Skip to main content

Full text of "The inns of Greece & Rome, and a history of hospitality from the dawn of time to middle ages"

See other formats


125449 


THE  INNS  OF 
GREECE  &  ROME 


SEEKING  A  TAVERN 


THE  INNS 


OF 


GREECE     ROME 


And  'a  History  of  Hospitality  Jrom  the 
Dawn  of  Time  to  the  Middle  Ages 


BY 


W.  C.FIREBAUGH 


With  an  Introduction 
by  WiaiACE  RICE 
and  Illustrations  by 
NORMAN  LINDSAV 


CHICAGO 
PASCAL  COVICI 

MCMXXVIII 


COPYRIGHT,    1923 

M. 


,   1998 

COVICI, 


129-  T^CX;  U^rixED  STATES  ay 


ILLUSTRATIONS 

PAGE 

Seeking  a  Tavern Frontispiece 

Vintage  Experts 6 

Bringing  in  a  Course SO 

At  the  Door  of  the  Tavern 59 

The  Vegetable  Cook 79 

A  Tavern  Bedroom 121 

A  Cabaret  Girl 142 

An  Innkeeper 194 

The  Hostess  of  Apuleius 215 

Returning  from  the  Tavern 226 


INTRODUCTION 

Surely  there  is  fitness  in  having  a  man  horn  and  reared 
in  the  best  hotels  of  his  time,  of  which  his  father  was  pro 
prietor,  write  a  brief  introduction  to  this  interesting 
account  of  the  best,  and  worst,  inns  of  antiquity.  For  to 
most  of  us  life  outside  the  home,  whether  stately  or 
humble,  is  an  abnormal  and  too  often  a  subnormal  state 
of  being,  fully  met  when  the  only  home  one  has  known  in 
early  life  is  itself  an  inn. 

Reading  of  the  hostelries  of  Greece  and  Rome  as  dis 
closed  in  the  classic  and  post-classic  writings  of  these 
lands,  where  the  good  old  tradition  of  hospitality  was 
often  so  grossly  abused,  one  is  left  to  wonder  if  it  was  not 
after  all  the  exception  that  secured  attention,  if  the  honest 
keeper  of  the  clean  tavern,  with  its  warmest  welcome  and 
savory  food,  was  not  in  all  ages  performing  his  pious  duty 
to  his  guests,  simply  and  unostentatiously  and  unmen- 
tioned,  while  his  ill  favored  competitor  with  his  tricks  of 
misrepresentation,  adulteration,  and  secret  theft  caught 
the  attention  of  poet  and  prose  writer,  who  justly  f  ound 
him  guilty  of  an  inhumanity  which  stands  forth  as  a 
sacrilege  to  the  race. 

For  giving  shelter  from  the  storm,  drink  to  the  thirsty, 
and  food  to  the  hungry  has  been  at  all  times  and  places  a 
fundamental  duty;  and  men,  however  unable  to  attain 
their  own  ideals  whether  simple  or  lofty,  have  always  been 
dutiful.  The  debt  owed  by  host  to  guest  was  sacred  and 
until  lately  has  so  remained  in  all  stages  of  society,  even 
those  of  savagery  in  which  the  stranger  is  perforce  an 
enemy.  Means  of  securing  not  mere  immunity  from 
plunder  and  attack  but  all  the  rites  of  hospitality  have 


been  noted  by  travellers  in  every  continent  where  taverns 
had  not  yet  been  demanded  by  the  numbers  of  sojourners. 
The  sacredness  of  the  wanderer's  goods  and  person  has 
been  willingly  conceded,  even  to  the  formation  of  a  per 
manent  bond  between  the  provider  of  bread  and  salt  and 
him  who  partakes  thereof.  May  we  not  rightly  assume, 
therefore,  that  even  when  the  inns  of  antiquity  are  shown 
at  their  worst  there  were  still  countless  hosts,  respecters 
of  the  gods  and  worshipful  of  the  rites  of  guestship,  who 
welcomed  the  coming,  rejoiced  the  staying,  and  sent  good 
luck  with  the  parting  guest? 

But  in  modern  days  a  more  subtle  danger  threatens 
the  ancient  spirit*  however  maintained  through  the  ages. 
The  devil  of  industrialism  has  invaded  the  hotel,  and  even 
the  revival  of  the  roadside  tavern  in  response  to  motor 
travel  has  been  contaminated  by  the  desire  to  make 
money  first  and  allow  the  guest's  comfort  and  pleasures  to 
become  a  mere  secondary  consideration. 

Here  I  recall  my  father's  sitting  in  the  corridor  down 
which  his  guests  must  depart,  his  spacious  pockets  filled 
with  little  flasks  of  choice  liquor,  with  his  own  hands 
bestowing  these  upon  the  men  who  slept  under  his  roof, 
not  as  an  advertisement,  not  to  secure  their  return  thereto, 
but  because  they  had  enabled  him  to  discharge  a  duty 
blest  by  the  gods,  for  which  he  was  duly  thankful. 

Happy  picture  of  a  bygone  age  in  these  United  States, 
and  happy  memory  of  a  good  man,  best  perhaps  because 
so  genial  a  host,  now  gone  to  his  reward  a  long  generation 
ago,  having  preserved  into  our  own  time  the  good  and 
ancient  tradition  so  vividly  set  forth  in  this  entertaining 
volume. 

WALLACE  RICE. 


been  noted  by  travellers  in  every  continent  where  taverns 
had  not  yet  been  demanded  by  the  numbers  of  sojourners. 
The  saqredness  of  the  wanderer's  goods  and  person  has 
been  willingly  conceded,  even  to  the  formation  of  a  per 
manent  bond  between  the  provider  of  bread  and  salt  and 
him  who  partakes  thereof.  May  we  not  rightly  assume, 
therefore,  that  even  when  the  inns  of  antiquity  are  shown 
at  their  worst  there  were  still  countless  hosts,  respecters 
of  the  gods  and  worshipful  of  the  rites  of  guestship,  who 
welcomed  the  coming,  rejoiced  the  staying,  and  sent  good 
luck  with  the  parting  guest? 

But  in  modern  days  a  more  subtle  danger  threatens 
the  ancient  spirit,  however  maintained  through  the  ages. 
The  devil  of  industrialism  has  invaded  the  hotel,  and  even 
the  revival  of  the  roadside  tavern  in  response  to  motor 
travel  has  been  contaminated  by  the  desire  to  make 
money  first  and  allow  the  guest's  comfort  and  pleasures  to 
become  a  mere  secondary  consideration. 

Here  I  recall  my  father's  sitting  in  the  corridor  down 
which  his  guests  must  depart,  his  spacious  pockets  filled 
with  little  flasks  of  choice  liquor,  with  his  own  hands 
bestowing  these  upon  the  men  who  slept  under  his  roof, 
not  as  an  advertisement,  not  to  secure  their  return  thereto, 
but  because  they  had  enabled  him  to  discharge  a  duty 
blest  by  the  gods,  for  which  he  was  duly  thankful. 

Happy  picture  of  a  bygone  age  in  these  United  States, 
and  happy  memory  of  a  good  man,  best  perhaps  because 
so  genial  a  host,  now  gone  to  his  reward  a  long  generation 
ago,  having  preserved  into  our  own  time  the  good  and 
ancient  tradition  so  vividly  set  forth  in  this  entertaining 
volume. 

WALLACE  RICE. 


THE  INNS  OF  GREECE  &  ROME 


CHAPTER  I. 

Inns  and  Taverns  of  Antiquity — A  Nation's  Inns  an  index  to  its 
roads  and  methods  of  transportation — Inns  of  the  great  routes  of  Egypt 
— Beer  a  National  beverage — Vintage  Wines  in  the  time  of  Rameses — 
Tavern  Songs — Drinking  and  conviviality  among  students — Method  of 
making  wine — Cabarets  of  Alexandria — Athenaeus  the  glutton — 
Drunkenness  among  women — Juvenal's  accounts  of  the  debaucheries  of 
the  Egyptians. 

One  whose  habits  of  mind  prompt  him  to  seek  diver 
sion  amongst  company  more  select  than  that  brought 
together  by  chance  in  some  inn  or  tavern  may  deem  such 
a  subject  unworthy  of  consideration  and  may  even  find 
fault  with  the  writer  for  presuming  to  invite  him  upon 
such  a  ramble,  for  it  will  be  a  ramble,  and  along  the  little 
known  byways  of  culture.  In  fact,  a  history  of  hospitality 
can  not  be  less  than  a  contribution  to  the  most  interesting 
chapter  in  anthropology:  the  chapter  which  deals  with 
Survivals  in  Culture.  Let  us  then  remind  him  of  the 
cellar  of  the  Auerbachs,  and  the  legends  which  have  grown 
up  around  it:  the  ventas  and  posadas  of  the  Spain  of 
Cervantes,  of  many  an  enchanting  passage  in  the  Letters 
of  James  Howell,  of  the  Wild  Boar's  Head  kept  by  Mrs. 
Hurtig,  in  Eastcheap,  of  the  Tabard  Inne  of  Chaucer,  and 
last,  but  not  least,  of  the  Mermaid  Tavern,  where  Ben 
Jonson  gained  inspiration  for  much  of  his  finest  work! 

The  inns  and  taverns  of  antiquity  were  not  lacking  in 
scenes  which  deserve  to  be  reanimated  and  preserved.  It 
is  true  that  such  establishments  occupied  a  lowly  station 

i 


THE     INNS     OF 

—~  i  ••••••»••    MI     ii    u*~m-*—mm~m* 

and  that  the  calling  of  the  innkeeper  was  looked  down 
upon,  and  even  despised,  but  fortunately,  the  subject  has 
an  interest  aside  from  the  poetic,  an  interest  which  justifies 
the  most  minute  treatment  in  detail.  The  nature  of  this 
interest  will  begin  to  make  itself  felt  when  we  give  thought 
to  our  inns  and  palatial  hotels  and  the  conditions  which 
brought  about  such  development.  The  institutions  of  our 
day  fill  a  double  purpose;  they  minister  to  the  comforts 
and  needs  of  their  patrons,  and  they  cater  to  the  amuse 
ment  and  social  needs  of  the  public.  That  interchange  of 
ideas  which,  more  than  any  other  factor,  has  refined  and 
broadened  civilization,  and  contributed  to  refinement  in 
taste  and  standards  of  comfort,  has  its  origin  in  three 
primary  causes:  wars  of  conquest,  travel,  and  commerce, 
and  the  last  named  has  contributed  more  than  the  other 
two.  The  greatest  progress  in  the  modern  world  has  been 
made  in  the  direction  of  overcoming  space,  whether  by 
telephone,  airplane,  ocean  greyhound,  or  luxurious  trans 
continental  trains,  and  the  impetus  behind  all  these  is 
commerce. 

If,  then,  we  examine  the  public  houses  of  the  ancients 
with  closer  attention,  is  it  not  in  fact  the  same  as  though 
we  were  to  dissect  their  civilization  for  purposes  of  con 
trast  with  our  own? 

Are  not  a  nation's  inns  an  index  to  its  roads  and 
methods  of  transportation,  as  well  as  a  true  reflection  of 
the  national  character? 

With  this  in  mind  we  shall  collect  the  scattered  notices 
upon  the  subject  and  attempt  to  bring  it  together  into  a 
connected  whole.  For  the  present,  we  shall  devote  our 
principal  efforts  to  the  inns  and  taverns  of  Egypt,  the 
Levant,  Greece,  and  Rome;  though  in  the  future  we  hope 
to  pursue  the  subject  through  the  Dark  Ages,  and  deal 
with  the  refectories  and  monastic  orders  which  took  upon 
themselves  the  burden  which  a  dying  commerce  could  no 


GREECE      &      ROME S 

longer  support.  The  growth  of  gilds  in  France,  Italy,  the 
Low  Countries,  and  England  slowly  rehabilitated  com 
merce  and  the  monastic  orders  were  gradually  relieved  of 
their  burden  as  we  reach  the  age  of  Chaucer. 

With  the  most  primitive  ages  we  have  no  concern,  for 
where  traffic  and  commerce  do  not  exist,  where  individuals 
do  not  travel,  and  the  wild  hordes  wandering  in  search  of 
spoil  and  pasturage  are  the  only  wayfarers,  there  is  no 
necessity  for  an  inn. 

The  Heroic  Age,  however,  furnishes  us  with  an 
entirely  different  picture  and  one  infinitely  more  beautiful 
and  agreeable.  Following  an  age  of  chaotic  social  rela 
tions  we  are  confronted  with  a  rude  culture  which  finds  its 
closest  parallel  in  the  writings  of  the  Old  Testament.  It 
has  been  well  said  that  the  two  great  literary  works  which 
bear  the  closest  resemblance  to  one  another  are  the  works 
of  Homer  and  the  Old  Testament.  This,  on  its  face,  is  a 
startling  assertion,  but  a  little  reflection  will  make  the 
conviction  stronger.  These  two  collections  of  writings  are 
emphatically  the  productions  of  two  opposed  civilizations 
which  had  progressed  to  about  the  same  stage  of  develop 
ment.  In  both  we  have  wars  and  rapine;  both  are  largely 
poetic  and  poetry  is  older  than  prose  as  a  literary  medium. 
In  both  we  find  a  realistic  description  of  practically  the 
entire  circle  of  life  down  to  its  smallest  details:  might 
begins  to  yield  the  palm  to  wisdom  and  guile,  but  hos 
pitality  is  still  a  duty  and  an  obligation.  Even  in  that  age 
individual  traveling  was  by  no  means  common.  Save  in 
the  instances  of  Egypt,  Tyre,  and  Sidon,  and  probably 
Cnossos,  commercial  intercourse  was  of  little  importance: 
it  was  carried  on  almost  exclusively  upon  the  water  and  at 
its  best  was  but  little  removed  from  piracy.  The  urge  to 
go  out  into  the  world  to  gain  knowledge,  that  divine 
dissatisfaction  from  which  all  progress  comes  and  which, 
in  the  ages  to  follow,  was  to  inspire  the  works  of  Herodotus 


4 THE      INNS      OF 

and  Rutilius,  had  not  yet  awakened.  A  few,  perhaps, 
visited  relatives  or  friends  living  near  at  hand,  or  some 
vagrant  may  have  fled  from  the  scene  of  his  crime  of 
passion.  Yet  even  in  that  age,  and  before  it,  we  know  of 
the  sack  of  Cnossos,  and  read  of  the  wanderings  of 
Ulysses.  He,  however,  was  an  unwilling  traveler  and  was 
driven  by  powers  beyond  his  control. 

In  the  early  heroic  age  there  were  no  special  establish 
ments  designed  to  profit  from  the  necessities  of  strangers. 
An  arrangement  nobler  and  more  beautiful  served  as  a 
substitute,  and  a  general  hospitality,  founded  upon 
religion,  custom,  and  obligation,  was  practised. 

Taking  our  subject  in  order,  we  will  begin  with  Egypt, 
whose  monuments  have  preserved  more  than  one  scene  in 
wineshop  and  tavern,  and  whose  festivals  are  the  very 
stuff  of  which  the  purest  hospitality  (purissimae  impur- 
itatis)  was  made. 

"No  people/*  says  Brugsch,  in  his  Historie  d'  Egypt, 
"  could  be  gayer,  more  lively,  or  of  more  childish  sim 
plicity,  than  those  old  Egyptians  who  loved  life  with  all 
their  hearts  and  found  the  deepest  joy  in  their  very 
existence*  Everybody  was  fond  of  enjoyment,  sang, 
drank,  danced,  and  made  excursions  into  the  country." 

"They  loved  the  flowing  cup  when  work  was  done," 
remarks  Arnold,  in  his  History  of  Beer  and  Brewing,  "and 
perhaps,  sometimes,  when  work  was  not  yet  done.  Thus 
the  hieroglyphics  tell  us,  and  thus,  too,  do  their  ancient 
literature,  their  imperishable  monuments,  their  inscrip 
tions,  their  papyri,  nay,  even  their  temples  and  their 
tombs.3* 

"Beer  was  the  national  beverage  of  the  Egyptians,  and 
it  was  perhaps  with  them  first  of  all,  prior  to  the  Baby 
lonians  and  Assyrians,  that  barley  was  grown  and  beer 
made.  Beer  was  as  intimately  interwoven  with  Egyptian 
life  as  it  is  with  that  of  any  modern  European  country 


GREECE      &      ROME 


where  the  vine  is  not  grown  in  abundance.  Four  thousand 
years  ago  the  Egyptian  peasant  and  landowner  drank  it, 
as  did  the  craftsman,  the  soldier,  the  merchant,  the  priest, 
and  the  king.  They  brewed  beer  and  they  drank  beer 
down  to  the  very  last  of  the  Pharaohs,  under  the 
Ptolemies,  as  under  the  Roman  rule.  Even  today,  the 
poverty-stricken  fellah  drinks  his  old  fashioned  Egyptian 
beer,  just  as  his  ancestors  did  under  Senefru  or  Thothmes, 
or  Rameses,  and  he  is  still  bearing  the  same  yoke  they  did, 
thousands  of  years  ago,  and  as  much  imposed  upon  and  as 
much  tyrannized  over  as  they  were.  But  he  does  not 
alone  DRINK  his  beer  in  the  same  fashion,  HE  ALSO  MAKES 

IT  IN  THE  SAME  WAT*" 

Maspero,  in  his  "Sketch  from  Life  in  an  Ancient 
Egyptian  City/5  has  combined  and  condensed  an  immense 
amount  of  material  from  original  sources  into  a  connected 
and, lucid  description  which  we  hasten  to  quote: 

The  scene  is  probably  laid  in  some  Egyptian  city  of 
the  New  Empire,  circa  1300  B.  C.,  in  the  time  of  Rameses 
IL  In  our  wanderings  through  the  streets  of  this  city  we 
come  at  length  to  a  beer-house  or  tavern.  ,  <^*~  -  . 

"The  reception-room  has  been  freshly  lime  washed," 
says  Maspero.  "It  is  furnished  with  mats,  stools,  and 
armchairs,  upon  which  the  habitual  customers  sit  side  by 
side,  fraternally  drinking  beer,  wine,  palm  brandy  (shodu), 
cooked  and  perfumed  liquors,  which  would  probably  seem 
detestable  to  us,  but  for  which  the  Egyptians  display  a 
strong  taste.  The  wine  is  preserved  in  large  amphorae, 
pitched  outside,  and  closed  with  a  wooden  or  clay  stopper, 
over  which  some  mud  is  laid,  painted  blue  and  then 
stamped  with  the  name  of  the  owner  or  the  reigning 
Pharaoh.  An  inscription  in  ink,  traced  upon  the  jar, 
indicates  the  origin  and  the  exact  date  of  the  wine:  THE 

YEAE  XXIII,   IMPORTED  WINE;    THE  YEAR  XIX,  WINE  OF 

BOUTO,  and  so  on. 


6 THE      INNS     OF 

"There  is  wine  of  every  variety,  white  and  red;  wine 
from  Mareotis,  wine  from  Pelusium,  wine  of  the  Star  of 
Horus,  Master  of  Heaven,  native  growths  from  the  oases, 
wines  of  Syene,  without  counting  the  wines  of  Ethiopia, 
nor  the  golden  wines  which  the  Phoenician  galleys  bring 
from  Syria. 

"Beer  has  always  been  the  favorite  beverage  of  Ihe 
people.  It  is  made  in  a  mash-tub  of  barley  steeped  in 
water,  and  raised  by  fermented  crumbs  of  bread.  When 
freshly  made  it  is  soft  and  pleasant  to  the  taste,  but  it  is 
easily  disturbed  and  soon  turns  sour.  Most  of  the 
vinegar  used  in  Egypt  is  made  from  beer.  This  defect  is 
obviated  by  adding  an  infusion  of  lupine  (?)  to  the  beer, 
which  gives  it  a  certain  bitterness  and  preserves  it. 

"Sweet  beer,  iron  beer,  sparkling  beer,  spiced  beer,  per 
fumed  beer  .  .  .  cold  or  hot,  beer  of  thick  sticky  millet 
like  that  prepared  in  Nubia  and  amongst  the  negroes  of 
the  Upper  Nile.  The  beer-houses  contain  stores  of  as 
many  varieties  of  beer  as  of  different  qualities  of  wine. 

"If  you  enter,  you  are  scarcely  seated  before  a  slave  or 
a  maid-servant  hastens  forward  and  accosts  you:  *  Drink 
unto  rapture,  let  it  be  a  good  day,  listen  to  the  conversa 
tion  of  thy  companions  and  enjoy  thyself/  Every 
moment  the  invitation  is  renewed:  " Drink,  do  not  turn 
away,  for  I  will  not  leave  thee  until  thou  hast  drunk/ 
The  formula  changes,  but  the  refrain  is  always  the  same 
.  .  „  drink,  drink,  and  again,  drink.  The  regular  cus 
tomers  do  not  hesitate  to  reply  to  these  invitations  by 
jokes,  usually  of  the  most  innocent  kind:  'Come  now, 
bring  me  eighteen  cups  of  wine  with  thine  own  hand.  I 
will  drink  till  I  am  happy,  and  the  mat  under  me  is  a  good 
straw  bed  upon  which  I  can  sleep  myself  sober.'*  (The 
remarks  of  the  drinkers  are  taken  from  a  scene  of  a  funeral 
meal  in  the  tomb  of  Ranni,  at  El-Keb.  I  have  para 
phrased  them  to  make  them  intelligible  to  modern  readers.) 


VINTAGE  EXPERTS 


GREECE      &      ROME 


They  discuss  together  the  different  effects  produced  by 
wine  and  beer.  The  wine  enlivens  and  produces  benevol 
ence  and  tenderness;  beer  makes  men  dull,  stupefies  them, 
and  renders  them  liable  to  fall  into  brutal  rages.  A  man 
tipsy  from  wine  falls  on  his  face,  but  anyone  intoxicated 
by  beer  falls  and  lies  on  his  back.  The  moralists  reprove 
the  excesses,  and  cannot  find  words  strong  enough  to  ex 
press  the  danger  of  them.  "Wine  first  loosens  the  tongue 
of  man,  even  wresting  from  him  dangerous  words,  and 
afterwards  it  prostrates  him,  so  that  he  is  no  longer 
capable  of  defending  his  own  interests.  Do  not,  there 
fore,  forget  thyself  in  breweries;  be  afraid  that  words  may 
come  back  to  thee  that  thou  hast  uttered  without  knowing 
that  thou  hast  spoken.  When  at  last  thou  fallest,  thy 
limbs  failing  thee,  no  one  will  help  thee,  thy  boon  com 
panions  will  leave  thee,  saying:  *  beware  of  him,  he  is  a 
drunkard!'  Then,  when  thou  art  wanted  for  business, 
thou  art  found  prone  upon  the  earth,  like  a  little  child. 
Young  men  especially  should  avoid  this  shameful  vice, 
for  beer  destroys  their  souls.  He  that  abandons  himself 
to  drink  is  like  an  oar  broken  from  its  fastening,  which  no 
longer  obeys  on  either  side;  he  is  like  a  chapel  without  its 
god,  like  a  house  without  bread,  in  which  the  wall  is 
wavering  and  the  beam  shaking.  The  people  that  he 
meets  in  the  street  turn  away  from  him,  for  he  throws 
mud  and  hoots  after  them  until  the  police  interfere  and 
carry  him  away  to  regain  his  senses  in  prison." 

Thus  has  Maspero  given  us  an  intimate  picture  of 
Egyptian  life  under  Rameses  IE,  enabling  us  to  glance 
back  over  the  centuries. 

We  shall  probably  be  greeted  with  song  and  laughter 
in  the  next  tavern  we  enter.  The  company  will  be  jolly 
and  bent  on  festivities  and  both  string  and  wind  instru 
ments  will  contribute  to  the  occasion.  While  we  are 
catching  up  with  the  rest  of  the  party  and  sampling  the 


8 THE      INNS      OF 

stock  in  trade,  singers  will  entertain  us  with  something 
like  the  following: 

Let  sweet  odors  and  oils  be  placed  for  thy  nostrils, 

Wreaths  of  lotos  flowers  for  thy  limbs 

And  for  the  bosom  of  thy  sister  (mistress),  dwelling  in  thy  heart, 

Sitting  beside  thee. 

Let  song  and  music  be  made  before  thee. 

Cast  behind  thee  all  cares  and  mind  thee  of  pleasure, 

Till  cometh  the  day  when  we  draw  towards  the  land 

That  loveth  silence.* 

The  Horatian  philosophy  of  Carpe  Diem  was  thus  not 
original  with  the  Augustan,  Why  should  they  not  make 
merry: 

"Whether  your  term  of  life  drags  on  in  sorrow, 
Or  in  some  grassy  nook  you  forget  tomorrow, 
Dallying  and  idling  at  your  leisure 
Wooing  with  Palernian  your  pleasure, 
While  Youth  and  Fortune  grant  you  power, 
While  yet  the  Sisters'  threads  endure.  .  .  . 

and  the  Egyptian,  fatalist  and  almost  Epicurean,  withal, 
goes  on  to  say: 

For  no  one  can  take  away  his  goods  with  him, 
Yea,  no  one  returns  again  who  has  gone  hence,  f 

Every  now  and  then  there  is  mention  of  students' 
private  drinking  bouts  with  doubtless  all  the  con 
comitants  of  a  successful  party,  for  it  was  not  the 
Egyptian  custom  to  deprive  the  women  of  the  social 
indulgences  in  which  the  men  took  such  delight.  Abste 
miousness  was  no  part  of  the  creed  of  Egyptian  woman 
hood,  as  is  easily  seen  from  tomb  decorations,  frescoes,  con 
temporary  literature,  and  the  like,  and  the  gilded  youth 
of  the  day  took  its  pleasures  where  it  found  them  even  as 

*Duemichen,  Hist.  lose.  II,  40. 

fHatris  500  Pap.  Maspero  EtuA  Egypt    L 


GRE  E  C  E      &     ROME  9 


our  own  today.  In  proof  of  this  statement  we  have  the 
evidence  of  a  letter  written  by  some  teacher  or  tutor  to 
his  pupil  who  "did  forsake  his  books/5  and  "did  wander 
from  street  to  street." 

Thou  art  caught  as  thou  dost  climb  upon  walls, 

And  dost  break  the  plank, 

The  people  flee  from  thee, 

And  thou  dost  strike  and  wound  them.*** 

Yes,  even  in  that  dark  age  the  college  boys  were 
enlightened  enough  to  have  acquired  a  taste  for  beer, 
wine,  palm  brandy,  or  other  ardent  spirits : "  every  evening, 
the  smell  of  beer,  the  smell  of  beer  (that)  drives  men 
away/*  Our  rah-rah  boy  of  long  ago  was  also  "  instructed 
how  to  sing  to  the  flute,  to  give  a  monologue  to  the 
accompaniment  of  the  pipe,  to  intone  the  lyre,  to  sing  to 
the  harp." 

Another  budding  genius,  who  probably  found  the  cost 
of  high  living  totally  out  of  all  proportion  to  the  allowance 
granted  him  by  his  father,  is  advised  by  that  worthy  man 
"  to  content  himself  with  two  jugs  of  beer  and  three  loaves 

of  bread."! 

Nor  are  drinking  and  conviviality  the  only  subjects 
allied  to  hospitality  upon  which  antiquity  has  com 
mented*  As  there  was  a  cause,  so  also  was  there  an  effect 
and  we  learn  quite  a  little  about  that  famous  "pulling  of 
the  hair/*  that  morning-after-the-night-before  feeling. 
The  Egyptians  used  a  very  simple  and  popular  remedy  to 
cure  it;  a  remedy  which,  since  the  discovery  of  the 
bromide  pick-me-up,  has  become  obsolete  in  the  so-called 
western  civilizations,  but  one  which  the  writer  has  often 
seen  used  when  the  guests  of  some  Chinese  mandarin  were 
a  trifle  heavy  and  lumpy  in  spots  after  undergoing  a 

*Pap.  Anastasi,  in  Sd.  Papyri 
f  Sallier  Papyri. 


10 THE      INNS      OF 

course  of  sprouts  at  the  august  table.  Athenaeus  also 
mentions  the  same  specific,  and  the  English  translator  of 
his  work  has  put  the  verses  into  English  rhyme: 

Last  evening  you  were  drinking  deep, 
So  now  your  head  aches,  go  to  sleep; 
Take  some  boiled  cabbage,  when  you  wake 
And  there's  an  end  of  your  headache. 

And,  fortifying  his  position  still  further,  he  runs  on, 
"and  Eubulus  says,  somewhere  or  other," 

Quick,  wife!    Some  cabbage  boil  of  virtues  healing, 
That  I  may  rid  me  of  this  seedy  feeling. 

Some  idea  of  the  amount  of  wine  and  beer  available  in 
Egypt  (its  population  probably  did  not  exceed  some  seven 
and  one-half  millions)  may  be  gained  from  the  Great 
Harris  Papyrus,  a  document  one  hundred  and  thirty- 
three  feet  in  length,  in  which  are  recorded  the  endowments 
of  Rameses  III,  during  a  reign  of  about  thirty-one  years. 
The  amounts  of  wine  and  beer  granted  by  him  to  the 
temples  were: 

Jars  of  Wine 256,460 

Jugs  of  Beer 466,303 

The  capacity  of  the  beer  jugs  is  not  known  to  us,  but, 
judging  by  their  bulk  in  proportion  to  the  human  figures 
in  the  frescoes,  they  must  have  held  more  than  one 
gallon,  and  we  thus  arrive  at  the  conclusion  that  the 
average  annual  contribution  of  beer  for  sacrificial  pur 
poses  was  about  fifteen  thousand  gallons,  and,  of  wine, 
probably  about  nine  thousand  five  hundred  gallons.  Nor 
should  we  assume  that  these  beer  and  wine  endowments 
were  in  the  form  of  a  levy  upon  the  people.  They  prob 
ably  came  direct  from  the  royal  treasury  and  are  set  down 
as  regular  expenses  for  the  sacrificial  fund.  "There  can 
be  no  doubt  that  the  department  for  the  management  of 


GREECE      &      ROME 11 

the  royal  domains,  that  is,  in  this  case,  the  royal  brewery, 
made  the  beer/'* 

From  what  has  gone  before  we  can  infer  that  the 
taverns  of  old  Egypt  were  no  less  popular  there  than  else 
where,  and  we  have  the  testimony  of  Strabo,  the  geo 
grapher,  to  the  conditions  which  in  his  day  prevailed  at 
Canopus. 

"They  sail  by  this  canal  to  Schedia,"  says  mine  author, 
"to  the  great  river,  and  to  Canopus,  but  the  first  place  at 
which  they  arrive  is  Eleusis.  This  is  a  settlement  near 
Alexandreia  and  Nicopolis,  and  situated  on  the  Canopic 
Canal.  It  has  houses  of  entertainment  which  command 
beautiful  views,  and  hither  resort  men  and  women  who 
are  inclined  to  indulge  in  noisy  revelry,  a  prelude  to 
Canopic  life,  and  the  dissolute  manners  of  the  people  of 

Canopus."f 

Nor  is  this  the  only  passage  in  which  Strabo  makes 
mention  of  the  taverns  and  cabarets  of  that  joyous  clime: 

"But  remarkable  above  everything  else  is  the  multi 
tude  of  persons  who  resort  to  the  public  festivals,  and 
come  from  Alexandreia  by  the  Canal.  For  day  and  night 
there  are  crowds  of  men  and  women  in  boats,  singing  and 
dancing  without  restraint,  and  with  utmost  licentiousness. 
Others,  at  Canopus  itself,  keep  hostelries,  situated  on  the 
banks  of  the  Canal,  which  are  well  adapted  for  such  kinds 
of  diversions  and  revelry."  J 

The  theory  of  decantation  as  a  preservative  and 
ripener  was  well  known  to  the  Egyptians,  who  taught  it 
to  the  Hebrews.  According  to  Strabo  the  Mareotic 
vintage  was  very  highly  esteemed  after  having  ripened 
and  aged,  the  process  being  aided  by  decantation.  The 
Egyptians  had  several  methods  of  pressing  the  grapes. 

*Arnold,  supra  cit.  p.  77. 
fLib.  XVH,  Chap.  I,  No.  16. 
{Lib.  XVII,  Chap.  I,  No.  17. 


12    THE      INNS      OF 

Sometimes  they  trod  them  under  foot  in  stone  troughs  but 
their  more  general  practice  seems  to  have  been  as  follows: 
they  would  weave  an  osier  weir,  enclose  the  grapes  therein, 
as  though  in  a  hammock  of  fine  meshed  net,  and  then  have 
recourse  to  torsion  by  means  of  bars  to  press  the  juice  and 
permit  it  to  flow  into  a  vessel  placed  to  receive  it. 
Wilkerson  has  produced  a  bas-relief  in  which  this  process 
is  illustrated. 

In  the  age  of  the  Ptolemies,  wine  had  come  to  be 
regarded  as  one  of  the  sources  of  wealth  and  one  of  the 
glories  of  that  sensual  land.  Athenaeus  has  transmitted 
much  information  concerning  the  vintages,  indicating 
their  respective  claims  to  excellence,  as,  for  example,  their 
color,  their  headiness,  their  excellence,  their  bouquet,  taste, 
and  so  on.  That  of  Coptos  is  light  and  an  aid  to  diges 
tion,  and  was  prescribed  to  patients  with  fevers.  The 
Mareotic  was  an  excellent  white  wine,  with  an  exquisite 
bouquet,  diuretic,  and  as  it  destroyed  neither  co-ordina 
tion  nor  lucidity,  it  was  little  likely  to  give  one  that 
morning-after-the-night-before  feeling.  Another  there  is 
called  by  some  Alexandrine  the  best,  but  the  finest  of 
all  was  the  wine  which  was  produced  on  that  tongue  of 
land  between  the  sea  and  the  lake,  which  was  called  the 
Taeniotic,  the  ne  plus  ultra  of  the  Egyptian  wines,  and 
it  was  of  a  dark  yellow  color. 

Athenaeus,  always  the  glutton  whom  he  professes  to 
be,  omits,  nevertheless,  a  number  of  vintages  which  ought 
to  be  included.  Far  be  it  from  us  to  reproach  him  for 
having  omitted  to  mention  the  wine  of  Libya,  a  detestable 
beverage  which  the  proletariat  at  Alexandria  drank  and 
guzzled  whenever  anything  but  water  or  beer  came  its 
way.  "  It  is  bad,"  says  Strabo.  "  One  is  likely  to  discover 
more  sea  water  than  wine  in  one  of  those  casks,  which, 
along  with  their  beer,  is  the  drink  of  the  commoners  at 
Alexandria.  One  is  reminded  of  the  smuggling  conven- 


GREECE      &      ROME 13 

tions  on  the  Cliina  coast,  when,  if  one  were  to  substitute 
counterfeit  coin  on  the  Chinese  bootlegger  who  was  good 
enough  to  supply  the  needs  of  the  enlisted  personnel  of  the 
Navy,  his  successor  was  certain  to  have  as  many  bottles 
of  sea  water  as  there  were  counterfeit  coins  in  the  original 
order.  And  this,  at  five  Mexican  dollars  per  head,  not 
withstanding  the  peril  of  hauling  such  contraband  cargo 
up  the  side  of  a  white  ship  with  a  white  pack  thread, 
there  was  always  the  danger  that  some  officious  officer 
might  look  overside  and  beat  the  bottle  to  its  destination 
before  the  prospective  owner  could  cache  it  and  himself. 
But  the  elegant  gastronomer  and  refined  host  and  enter 
tainer  should  not  have  failed  to  mention  the  Sebennytici 
vini  which  were  derived  from  the  mixture  and  blending  of 
the  juices  of  three  different  grapes,  whose  slips  came  from 
three  different  parts  of  Greece,  and  which  the  gluttons  at 
Rome  set  such  store  by. 

"The  Sebennytici,"  says  Pliny,  "come  from  three 
varieties  of  grapes  called  Thasian,  Oethalus,  and  Peuce." 
It  would  only  be  just,  then,  should  Athenaeus,  in  speaking 
of  the  wine  that  abounded  under  the  name  of  Arsinoite, 
and  which  came  from  the  oasis  of  that  name,  to  pay 
tribute  to  it.  Lastly,  Athenaeus,  in  editing  his  list  of  the 
wines  of  Egypt,  should  not  have  passed  over  in  silence  the 
wine  of  Meroe,  which  is  often  confounded  with  Mareotic, 
its  pale  rival,  more  especially  as  Lucan,  in  a  passage  no 
less  bombastic  than  eloquent,  has  taken  the  trouble  to 
distinguish  between  these  two  exquisite  vintages.  The 
passage  occurs  in  his  description  of  the  banquet  of  Caesar 
and  Cleopatra,  and  is  one  of  the  finer  points  in  Egyptian 
wine  making: 

"Many  birds  and  wild  beasts  did  they  set  before  them, 
the  Gods  of  Egypt;  and  crystal  supplied  the  water  of  the 
Nile  for  their  hands,  and  capacious  bowls  studded  with 
gems  received  the  wine,  but  not  of  the  grape  of  Mareotis, 


14 THE      INNS      OF 

but  noble  Falernian,  to  which,  in  a  few  years,  Meroe  had 
imparted  maturity,  compelling  it,  otherwise  full  of 
maturity,  to  ferment."* 

The  immoderate  thirst  of  the  drunkards  of  Egypt 
could  not  have  been  assuaged  by  anything  short  of  that 
abundance  of  liquors  of  exquisite  savor,  nor  could  the 
unbridled  passion  for  drunkenness  which  the  women 
manifested  have  been  sated  otherwise.  The  bas-reliefs  and 
tombs  furnish  peremptory  evidence  of  this  devouring 
passion,  and,  among  a  host,  one  illustration  is  often  cited, 
in  which  two  women  are  represented,  one  of  them  paying 
her  dues  to  nature,  being  full  of  drink,  while  the  other 
holds  her  head  and  renders  her  kind  service.    The  orgies 
of  Memphis  and  Alexandreia  have  been  perpetuated  by 
pictorial  art  as  well  as  by  literature,  and  the  scenes  in 
Pierre  Louys*  Aphrodite  are  by  no  means  an  exaggeration. 
On  the  contrary,  they  are  well  within  the  limits  of  art  and 
are,  if  anything,  less  than  realistic.    A  slave,  holding  a 
basin  whilst  her  mistress  discharges  the  bile  from  a 
stomach  which  can  endure  no  more,  is  also  an  illustration 
well  known  to  the  Egyptologist,  and  in  still  another  bas- 
relief  we  see  two  slaves  supporting  their  master,  who  is 
dead  drunk,  on  his  precarious  voyage  home  from  the  com- 
messatio.    Joseph,  therefore,  had  reason  on  his  side  when 
he  remarked  that  of  all  people  in  the  world,  the  Egyptians 
were  the  most  debauched,  and  there  is  little  of  hyperbole 
in  the  statements  of  Strabo,  quoted  above,  or  in  the 
terrible  passage  from  Juvenal  which  follows.    A  passage 
that  seethes  with  energy  and  contempt,  with  sarcasm  and 
satire,  a  banquet  at  Tentyra  or  Canopus  or  Ombi,  the 
brawling  and  fighting  which  are  the  inevitable  sequelae, 
more  especially  when  the  same  city  limits  contained  the 
revelers  and  their  enemies.    The  passage  occurs  in  Satire 
XV,  lines  33  to  83. 

*Pharsalia,  Lib.  X, 


GREECE      &      ROME 15 

"Between  the  neighboring  towns  of  Ombi  and  Tentyra 
there  burns  an  ancient  and  long  cherished  feud  and 
undying  hatred,  whose  wounds  are  not  to  be  healed. 
Each  people  is  filled  with  fury  against  the  other  because 
each  hates  his  neighbors'  gods,  deeming  that  none  can  be 
held  as  deities  save  its  own.  So  when  one  of  these  peoples 
held  a  feast,  the  chiefs  and  leaders  of  their  enemies 
thought  good  to  seize  the  occasion,  so  that  their  foe  might 
not  enjoy  a  glad  and  merry  day,  with  the  delight  of  grand 
banquets,  with  tables  set  out  at  every  temple  and  every 
crossroad,  and  with  night-long  feasts,  and  with  couches 
spread  all  day  and  all  night,  and  sometimes  discovered  by 
the  sun  on  the  seventh  morn"  Egypt  doubtless  is  a  rude 
country,  but  in  indulgence,  so  far  as  I  myself  have  noted, 
its  barbarous  rabble  yields  not  to  the  ill-famed  Canopus. 
Victory,  too,  would  be  easy,  it  was  thought,  over  men 
steeped  in  wine,  stuttering  and  stumbling  in  their  cups. 
On  the  one  side  were  men  dancing  to  a  swarthy  piper, 
with  unguents,  such  as  they  were,  and  flowers  and  chaplets 
on  their  heads;  on  the  other  side  a  ravenous  hate.  First 
come  loud  words  as  preludes  to  the  fray;  these  serve  as  a 
trumpet  to  arouse  their  hot  passions;  then,  shout  answer 
ing  shout,  they  charge.  Bare  hands  do  the  fell  work  of 
war.  Scarce  a  cheek  is  left  without  a  gash;  scarce  one 
nose,  if  any,  comes  out  of  the  battle  unbroken.  Through 
all  the  ranks  might  be  seen  battered  faces,  and  features 
other  than  they  were;  bones  gaping  through  torn  cheeks, 
and  fists  dripping  with  blood  from  eyes.  Yet  the  com 
batants  deem  themselves  at  play  and  waging  a  boyish 
warfare  because  there  are  no  corpses  to  trample.  What 
avails  a  mob  of  so  many  thousand  warriors  if  no  lives  be 
lost?  So,  fiercer  and  fiercer  grows  the  fight;  now  they 
search  the  ground  for  stones,  the  natural  weapons  of  civic 
strife,  and  hurl  them  with  bended  arms  against  the  foe; 
not  such  stones  as  Turnus  or  Ajax  flung,  or  like  that  with 


16 THE     INNS      OF 

which  the  son  of  Tydeus  struck  Aeneas  on  the  hip,  but 
such  as  may  be  cast  by  hands  unlike  to  theirs,  and  born  in 
these  days  of  ours.  For  even  in  Homer's  day  the  race  of 
man  was  on  the  wane;  earth  now  produces  nothing  but 
weak  and  wicked  men  that  provoke  such  gods  as  see  them 
to  laughter  and  loathing. 

"To  come  back  from  our  digression,  the  one  side,  rein 
forced,  boldly  draws  the  sword,  and  attacks  with  a 
shower  of  arrows;  the  dwellers  in  the  shady  palm  groves 
of  the  neighboring  Tentyra  turn  their  backs  in  headlong 
flight  before  the  Ombite  charge.  Hereupon,  one  of  them, 
overafraid  and  hurrying,  tripped  and  was  caught;  the 
conquering  host  cut  up  his  body  into  scraps  and  morsels, 
that  one  dead  man  might  suffice  for  everyone,  and 
devoured  it,  bones  and  all.  There  was  no  stewing  of  it  in 
boiling  pots,  no  roasting  upon  spits — so  slow  and  tedious 
they  thought  it  to  wait  for  a  fire  that  they  contented 
themselves  with  the  corpse  uncooked.5* 

Wine,  however,  not  only  intervened  in  the  affairs  of 
the  Egyptians  and  Hebrews,  Phoenicians  and  Assyrians, 
to  arouse  them  to  violence  and  cause  such  bloody  affairs 
as  that  described  above,  it  also  played  an  important  part 
in  the  settlement  of  disputes  and  business  difficulties 
everywhere.  It  was  one  of  the  principal  sinews  of  com 
merce  and  credit  through  all  antiquity,  and,  incidentally, 
the  one  means  by  which  a  contract  was  sometimes 
concluded.  Among  the  Romans,  and  among  our  own 
forefathers  of  the  Middle  Ages,  no  affair  of  importance 
was  disposed  of  without  taking  a  drink  upon  it,  and  it  i 
so  today,  in  the  countries  still  fortunate  enough  to  be  free 
from  the^  propaganda  of  zealots  and  bigoted  reformers, 
whether  it  be  the  little  intrigue  of  some  artizan  or  the 
vital  concern  of  some  cabinet  minister,  whether  the  pledge 
be  red  zinfandel  or  some  rare  brandy,  the  ratification 
(rata  fiat)  is  never  complete  without  this  last  formality. 


GREECE      &      ROME 17 

And  it  was  the  same  amongst  the  Phoenicians,  and  after 
them  with  the  Hebrews,  for  they  derived  many  of  their 
business  usages  from  the  merchant  princes  of  Tyre  and 
Sidon.  When  a  bargain  had  been  struck,  and  a  satis 
factory  understanding  reached  they  shook  hands,  and 
ordered  a  drink  called  "Chopen,"  that  is  to  say,  meta 
phorically,  the  wine  of  the  land,  to  drink  to  celebrate  the 
treaty.  The  French  word  chopine  is  said  to  have  come 
from  this  custom.  It  is  not  impossible,  but  it  is  certainly 
very  ingenious,  if  true,  or,  in  our  newspaper  parlance, 
interesting  if  true. 

We  have  said  above  that  beer  was  the  drink  most  in 
demand  in  Egypt,  and  Diodorus  Siculus  has  credited 
Osiris  with  the  invention  of  it.  c<  Wherever  a  country  did 
not  permit  the  culture  of  the  vine,  there  he  (Osiris) 
taught  the  people  how  to  brew  the  beverage  which  is 
made  of  barley,  and  which  is  not  greatly  inferior  to  wine 
in  odor  and  potency.55* 


18  THEINNSOF 


CHAPTER  EL 

Assyrian  and  Babylonian  inns  conducted  by  women — Laws  reg 
ulating  inns — Drinking  led  to  most  unbridled  extremities — Entire  tity 
of  Nineveh  in  different  degrees  of  intoxication — Aromatic  wines — 
Hebrew  conception  of  hospitality — The  inn  at  Bethlehem  where  Joseph 
and  Mary  were  forced  to  take  skelter  in  the  stable  in  which  Jesus  was 
lorn — 0  Donovan's  description  of  the  caravanseraei  at  Kuchan. 

In  closing  our  account  of  the  professional  hospitality 
amongst  the  Egyptians  we  should  bear  in  mind  that  they 
regarded  the  affairs  of  everyday  life,  whatever  their  tenor, 
as  of  little  importance;  on  the  other  hand,  they  lavished 
untold  wealth  and  meticulous  care  upon  their  tombs  as 
the  places  of  eternal  silence  and  the  sanctuaries  to  which 
they  withdrew  themselves  to  sleep  out  time.  In  these 
tombs  the  character  of  the  Egyptian,  king  or  noble,  was 
accurately  mirrored,  and  a  sense  of  dignity,  aloof  and 
impersonal,  was  probably  as  deeply  imbedded  in  his 
character  as  the  desire  for  life  itself. 

Our  information  as  to  Assyrian  and  Babylonian  inns 
and  taverns  is  necessarily  limited  because  of  the  fact  that 
their  ruins  were  buried  deep  below  the  surface  of  the  coun 
try  as  it  is  today.  Until  a  relatively  recent  period  we 
knew  little  of  their  records  and  experienced  the  greatest 
difficulty  in  deciphering  such  of  their  inscriptions  as  had 
come  to  light.  Now,  however,  clay  tablets,  sherds,  and 
tiles  have  begun  to  give  up  their  information  and  the  pic 
ture  is  becoming  more  and  more  distinct,  though  they  are 
still  far  from  complete*  In  the  code  of  Hammurabi  (B,  C. 
circa  2225)  we  have  a  few  facts  from  which  we  may  infer 
with  reasonable  certainty  that  wine  and  beer  were  vended 
and  drunk  upon  the  premises.  The  ownership  of  such 
beer-houses,  wine-shops,  or  taverns,  as  were  conducted  in 


GREECE      &      ROME 19 

Nineveh  and  Babylon  seems  to  have  been  vested  in  the 
hands  of  big  merchant  princes  who  installed  women  as 
managers,  and  these  women  actually  conducted  the 
resorts.  Payment  seems  to  have  been  made  in  grain,  the 
price  of  which  was  fixed  by  statute.  Patrons  were  given 
credit  and  the  score  was  paid  after  the  harvest.  Women 
conducting  such  places  were  forbidden  by  law  to  demand 
money,  as  this  might  have  caused  the  customer  em 
barrassment  or  inconvenience,  and  the  establishment 
would  also  have  profited  if,  after  the  harvest,  there  had 
been  a  fall  in  the  price  of  grain.  Each  evasion  or  con 
travention  of  this  law  was  punishable  with  death.  The 
paragraphs  vital  to  our  subject  follow: 

No.  108.  If  any  of  the  wine-selling  women  have  not 
accepted  grain  in  lieu  of  money,  but  have 
insisted  upon  money  in  ordinary  coin,  and 
thus  have  assisted  in  lowering  the  price  of 
drink  and  grain,  she  shall  be  summoned 
and  thrown  into  the  water. 

No.  109.  If  rebels  have  assembled  in  the  house  of  a 
wine-selling  woman,  and  she  has  not  seized 
upon  them  and  led  them  to  the  fortress, 
she  has  forfeited  her  life. 

No.  110.  If  a  priestess  who  does  not  reside  in  the 
convent  have  opened  a  dram  shop,  or  if  she 
have  entered  there  with  the  purpose  of 
drinking,  she  shall  be  burned. 

It  is  of  interest  to  note  that  the  huge  block  upon 
which  the  laws  were  inscribed  had  been  erected  in  the 
temple  at  Esagil,  which  was  the  temple  of  Bel  Merodach, 
in  Babylon.  It  was  discovered  in  1901-2  by  De  Morgan, 
French  archaeologist,  and  a  Dominican  monk  named 
Scheil,  in  the  acropolis  at  Susa.  Evidently  it  had  been  re 
moved  from  Babylon  by  the  Elamites.  Its  contents 
prove  an  astonishing  degree  of  civilization  in  early  Baby- 


20 THE      INNS      OF 

Ion  and  only  recently  it  was  invoked  as  a  precedent  by  a 
jurist  in  St.  Louis,  Missouri. 

In  addition  to  the  native  products,  such,  for  example, 
as  the  wines  made  from  palms  and  dates,  caravans  also 
transported  the  choice  vintages  of  neighboring  countries. 
Drinking  was  almost  universal.  Royal  banquets  were 
always  heavily  provided  with  wine,  as  both  Daniel  and 
Curtius  Rufus  testify,  and  the  daily  fare  of  the  upper 
classes  would  have  been  ill  esteemed  without  the  benign 
and  cheering  influence  of  the  spirit  of  the  grape.  In  the 
houses  of  the  wealthy,  fruit  juices  were  fermented  and 
mead  and  cordials  were  common.  Curtius  Rufus,  in  his 
history  of  Alexander  the  Great,  states  that  in  Babylon 
drinking  was  an  out  and  out  vice,  and  that  in  many 
instances  it  was  carried  to  the  most  unbridled  extremes 
and  led  to  excesses  such  as  even  the  court  of  Rome  knew 
but  infrequently. 

As  to  Assyria,  Maspero  has  drawn  the  following 
picture  from  original  sources: 

"The  Assyrian  is  sober  in  ordinary  life,  but  he  does 
not  know  how  to  stop  if  he  once  allows  himself  any 
excess.  Wines  of  Assyria  and  Chaldaea,  wines  from  Elam, 
wine  from  Syria  and  Phoenicia,  wines  from  Egypt, 
amphorae  and  skins  are  emptied  as  soon  as  opened,  with 
out  visibly  quenching  the  universal  thirst.  After  one  or 
two  days  no  brain  is  strong  enough  to  resist  it,  and 
Nineveh  presents  the  extraordinary  spectacle  of  an  entire 
city  in  different  degrees  of  intoxication.  When  the 
festival  is  over  several  days  are  required  before  it  resumes 
its  usual  aspect*  Whilst  the  people  are  becoming  tipsy 
outside,  Assurbanipal  feasts  the  leading  chiefs  and  the 
ministers  of  state  within  the  palace.  They  are  seated  on 
double  chairs,  two  on  each  side  of  a  small  table,  face  to 
face.  The  chairs  are  high,  without  any  backs  or  footstool 
upon  which  the  guests  can  rest  either  elbows  or  feet;  the 


GREECE      &      ROME 21 

honor  of  dining  with,  the  king  must  always  be  paid  for 
with  some  fatigue. 

"The  tables  are  covered  with  fringed  cloths,  upon 
which  the  dishes  are  placed  by  the  slaves.  Unlike  the 
common  people,  the  nobles  eat  little,  so  that  few  dishes  of 
meats  are  placed  before  them,  but  cakes  and  fruits  of 
different  kinds;  grapes,  dates,  apples,  pears,  and  figs  are 
brought  in  continued  relays  by  long  lines  of  slaves. 

"On  the  other  hand,  they  drank  a  great  deal — with 
more  refinement,  perhaps,  than  the  common  people,  but 
with  greater  avidity.  Upon  this  occasion,  the  king  has 
distributed  the  most  precious  vases  in  his  treasury,  cups 
of  gold  and  silver,  the  majority  of  them  moulded  or 
chased  in  the  form  of  a  lion's  head.  Many  of  them  were 
formerly  sacred  vessels  which  the  priests  of  vanquished 
nations  used  in  their  sacrifices;  some  are  from  Babylon 
or  Carchemish,  some  were  taken  from  Tyre  or  Memphis, 
whilst  others  belonged  to  the  temples  at  Samaria  and 
Jerusalem.  By  using  them  for  a  profane  occasion, 
the  Assyrians  insult  the  gods  to  whose  service  they  be 
long,  so  that  to  the  pleasure  of  drinking  is  added  that 
of  humiliating  the  foreign  deities  in  the  sight  of  Assur 
whom  they  resisted. 

"The  wines,  even  the  most  delicate,  are  not  drunk  in 
their  natural  state;  they  are  mixed  with  aromatics  and 
various  drugs,  which  give  them  a  delicious  flavor  and  add 
tenfold  to  their  strength.  This  operation  is  performed  in 
the  hall,  under  the  eyes  of  the  revelers.  An  eunuch, 
standing  before  the  table,  pounds  in  a  stone  mortar  the 
intoxicating  essences,  which  he  moistens  from  time  to 
time  with  some  substgoice.  His  comrades  have  poured 
the  contents  of  the  amphorae  into  immense  bowls  of 
chased  silver,  which  reach  to  their  chests.  As  soon  as  the 
perfumed  paste  is  ready  they  put  some  of  it  into  each  bowl 
and  carefully  dissolve  it.  The  cup-bearers  bring  the  cups, 


22  THE      INNS      OF 

draw  out  the  wine,  and  serve  the  guests.  Even  the 
sentinels  at  the  doors  receive  their  share,  and,  standing 
spear  or  club  in  hand,  pledge  each  other  as  they  mount 
guard.  The  only  persons  who  do  not  drink,  or  who  drink 
very  little,  through  the  necessity  of  retaining  their 
sobriety,  are  the  eunuchs — who  stand  behind  the  guests 
to  fan  them — the  servants,  and  the  musicians/* 

The  ancient  Hebrew  conception  of  hospitality  was 
based  upon  tenets  as  pure  as  those  of  Menelaus,  though  in 
later  times  the  right  was  not  binding  upon  them  unless 
the  wayfarer  was  of  their  own  people. 

The  place  where  Zipporah  and  her  son  stopped  when 
Moses  returned  to  Egypt  may  well  have  been  one  of  the 
inns  along  the  road  between  Egypt  and  the  northeastern 
countries.  Owing  to  the  fact  that  the  Hebrews  made  no 
distinction  between  a  harlot  and  an  hostess,  we  cannot  be 
certain  that  Bahab  did  not  conduct  an  inn  rather  than  a 
house  of  ill  fame.  In  any  case,  the  spies  of  Joshua  found 
shelter  under  her  roof  and  she  received  her  reward.  The 
same  may  be  said  of  the  harlot  at  Gaza  whose  hospitality 
Samson  shared;  but  one  episode  there  is  which  admits  of 
no  double  meaning;  I  refer  to  the  return  of  the  sons  of 
Jacob  from  Egypt.  They  stopped  at  an  inn  and  opened 
their  sacks  to  give  fodder  to  their  sumpter  mules.  One  is 
also  impressed  with  the  fact  that  they  carried  supplies  for 
the  return  journey.  Such  places  differed  little  from  the 
khans  of  present  day  Asia;  establishments  where  there 
was  shelter  for  man  and  beast  but  where  it  was  necessary 
to  provide  supplies.  On  the  second  journey  the  brothers 
received  from  the  ruler  of  Egypt  an  abundance  of  supplies 
and  a  train  of  mules  and  wagons  as  well.  One  well 
furnished  with  necessities  and  perhaps  a  few  comforts  was 
confronted,  in  these  towns  of  Judaea,  with  some  difficulty 
if  he  had  no  friends  or  acquaintances,  and  often  was  com 
pelled  to  go  into  camp  in  the  public  place,  like  a  modern 


GREECE      &      ROME 23 

Bedouin;  proof  positive  that  in  the  Hebrew  villages  there 
was  often  no  shelter  except  that  of  the  shrine  of  the  oldest 
of  professions. 

When  the  angels  arrived  at  Sodom  they  would  have 
remained  in  the  streets  had  not  Lot  pressed  his  kindly 
hospitality  upon  them,  which  probably  meant  that  there 
was  no  inn  to  which  they  could  apply. 

The  Levite  of  Ephraim,  a  stranger  at  Gaba,  had  gone 
into  camp  in  the  public  place  with  his  women,  his  servant, 
and  his  beasts  of  burden;  the  latter  had  received  their 
fodder  and  he  was  even  then  getting  ready  to  serve 
supper,  when  an  old  man,  a  fellow  countryman,  came  to 
offer,  in  his  own  house,  a  hospitality  which  was  accepted 
because  of  the  common  tie  between  them. 

One  can  still  see  in  the  Jewish  villages  the  open  places 
where  travelers  pitch  their  tents,  those  spaces  in  the  khans 
where  the  caravans  still  find  shelter,  and  conditions  today 
differ  little  from  those  of  the  days  of  Joseph.  The  khans 
are,  generally  speaking,  built  within  the  villages,  whereas 
the  enormous  caravanserais  are  constructed  along  the 
roads  and  at  distances  of  about  eight  miles  from  each 
other.  Some  described  by  O'Donovan  are  enormous  and 
the  discomfort  which  they  offer  is  only  exceeded  by  their 
size. 

It  is  in  the  khans,  however,  that  we  find  the  nearest 
approach  to  the  shelters  which,  in  the  times  of  Jacob, 
were  to  be  found  along  the  roads  leading  from  Egypt; 
shelters  which  the  Latin  translators  of  the  Holy  Writ  have 
probably  rendered  erroneously  by  the  term  deversorium, 
and  the  bleak  desolation  and  utter  lack  of  commissary  are 
eloquent  commentary  upon  the  wisdom  which  prompted 
the  sons  of  Jacob  to  prevent  themselves  from  being  placed 
at  the  mercy  of  those  conducting  such  places,  more 
especially  where  they  were  otherwise  unknown  and 
friendless. 


24 THE      INNS      OF 

The  inn  at  Bethlehem  where  Joseph  and  Mary  were 
forced  to  take  such  shelter  as  they  could  find  in  the  face 
of  the  emergency  which  confronted  the  expectant  mother 
was  one  of  the  khans  such  as  are  still  the  rule  in  those 
regions.  The  crowd  of  travelers,  caravan  hucksters, 
which  had  already  arrived,  left  not  even  a  corner  for  the 
weary  pair,  and  they  were  forced  to  find  such  comfort  as 
they  could  in  the  stable.  There  the  mother  gave  birth  to 
Him  who  was  thereafter  to  be  the  Saviour  of  all  humanity; 
she  wrapped  Him  in  swaddling  clothes  and  laid  Him  in 
the  manger  because  there  was  no  room  in  the  inn. 

If  the  inns  were  by  no  means  numerous  in  the  Hebrew 
countries,  the  taverns  were  not  more  so,  and  an  exhaustive 
analysis  of  the  Holy  Writ  will  produce  no  allusion  to  a 
cabaret,  and  this,  notwithstanding  the  fact  that  much 
wine  was  consumed  and  that  the  Hebrews  also  knew  how 
to  brew  beer.  In  addition  to  the  native  vintages,  and 
some  of  them  were  of  the  finest,  wine  was  imported  from 
Phoenicia  and  from  Egypt,  and,  later  on,  from  the  Greek 
Archipelago  and  Ionia. 

The  promised  land  which  lay  at  the  end  of  the  long 
exodus  from  Egypt  was  a  land  of  ™i1V  and  of  honey,  a 
land  of  wine  and  of  plenty.  The  grape  and  the  pome 
granate  flourished,  and  the  wines  of  Engeddi,  Carmel, 
and  Gelboa  were  famous,  although  not  produced  in  suffi 
cient  quantities  to  meet  the  demand,  and  pomegranate 
wine  and  various  artificial  products  were  made. 

Before  quitting  the  subject  of  Levantine  hospitality, 
we  wish  to  introduce  the  readers  to  two  pictures  which,  it 
is  hoped,  will  enable  the  mind  to  visualize  both  sides  of 
the  subject,  the  sordid  and  the  beautiful.  For  this 
purpose  we  quote  O'Donovan's  description  of  the  caravan 
serai  at  Kuchan,  as  he  found  it  in  the  latter  part  of  the 
nineteenth  century.  The  quotation  is  apt  because  the 
conditions  he  describes  are  in  no  way  different  from  those 


GREECE      &      ROME 25 

which  beset  travelers  in  pre-classical  ages,  in  the  Levant, 
and  could  with  equal  propriety  be  attributed  either  to 
Persia  or  Palestine. 

"After  some  experience  of  Kuchan,  and  especially  of 
its  caravanserai,  I  felt  the  strongest  desire  to  get  away 
from  it.  Of  all  the  wretched  localities  of  this  wretched 
East,  it  is  one  of  the  worst  I  have  been  in.  To  people  at 
a  distance,  the  petty  miseries  one  undergoes  in  such  a 
place  may  seem  more  laughable  than  otherwise;  there 
they  do  not  at  all  tend  to  excite  hilarity  in  the  sufferer. 
For  four  days  and  nights  at  a  stretch  I  did  not  enjoy  ten 
minutes*  unbroken  rest.  All  day  long  one's  hands  were 
in  perpetual  motion,  trying  to  defend  one's  face  and  neck 
against  the  pertinacious  attacks  of  filthy  blue-bottles,  or 
brushing  ants  or  various  other  insects  off  one's  hands  and 
paper.  With  all  this  extra  movement,  each  word  I  wrote 
occupied  me  nearly  a  minute.  Dinner  involved  a  per 
petual  battle  with  creeping  things,  and  was  a  misery  that 
seldom  tempted  one's  appetite.  As  for  the  time  spent 
on  the  top  of  the  house,  lying  on  a  mat,  and  which  it 
would  be  a  mockery  to  call  bed-time,  it  would  be  difficult 
to  say  whether  it  or  the  daylight  hours  were  the  more 
fraught  with  torment.  Every  ten  minutes  it  was  neces 
sary  to  follow  the  example  of  the  people  lying  around, 
and  to  rise  and  shake  the  mat  furiously,  in  order  to  get 
rid,  for  a  brief  space,  of  the  crowds  of  gigantic  black  fleas 
which  I  could  hear  dancing  around,  and  still  more  dis 
tinctly  feel.  The  impossibilities  of  repose,  and  the  con 
tinual  irritation  produced  by  insects,  brought  on  a  kind 
of  hectic  fever  which  deprived  me  of  all  desire  to  eat. 
All  night  long  three  or  four  scores  of  donkeys  brayed  in 
chorus;  vicious  horses  screamed  and  quarrelled,  and 
hundreds  of  jackals  and  dogs  rivalled  each  other  in  mak 
ing  night  hideous.  After  sunset  the  human  inhabitants 
of  the  caravanserai  mounted  to  the  roof,  and  sat  there  in 


THE      INNS      OF 

••••^ ••^•••••M ^ •• BMB^B BMHM 

scanty  garments,  smoking  their  kaliouns,  and  talking  or 
singing  until  long  after  midnight." 

In  contrast  to  this  dreary  picture  we  have  O'Dono- 
van's  tribute  to  a  comfortable  hotel  in  Teheran.  It  is 
worthy  of  notice  that  there  were  and  are  certain  estab 
lishments  in  Ispahan  and  other  centers  which  have  a 
charm  scarcely  to  be  found  elsewhere  except  in  some 
secluded  garden  in  Seville  or  in  the  private  grounds  of  one 
of  the  smaller  potentates  of  the  Asiatic  tropics.  The 
Caf6  de  Roses,  the  Caf 6  du  Fleuve,  the  caf 6  de  la  Porte- 
du-Salut,  with  its  sycamores,  happy  patrons  and  servants, 
lovely  gardens  and  artificial  waterfalls,  has  all  the  en 
chanting  and  haunting  charm  of  a  half  remembered 
dream  in  which  complete  rest  and  relaxation  fade  slowly 
into  oblivion  only  to  awaken  to  a  reality  that  becomes 
more  haunting  as  it  is  better  understood.  Well  did  the 
philosopher  remark  that  East  is  East  and  West  is  West 
and  never  the  twain  shall  meet. 


GREECE      &      ROME  27 


CHAPTER  m. 

The  Lydians  established  the  first  inns  and  taverns  (?}—The  Greeks 
of  the  Heroic  Age  knew  not  taverns  nor  inns,  but  practised  the  highest 
standards  of  hospitality— Lesches,  places  of  gossip,  preceding  inns — 
Pausanias's  description  of  two  casinos  in  Athens  and  Sparta. 

Herodotus,  who,  as  he  is  better  understood,  will  be 
better  appreciated,  and  who  generally  attempts  to  get  to 
the  root  of  a  matter,  would  place  the  origin  of  inns  among 
a  people  among  whom  he  saw  them  and  had  experience 
with  them  for  the  first  time,  and  he  therefore  attributes  to 
the  Lydians  the  establishment  of  the  first  inns  and 
taverns.  In  those  primitive  times,  however,  the  truth 
would  be  difficult  to  arrive  at,  if  not  utterly  impossible, 
and  we  shall  not  contradict  his  statement;  nevertheless, 
we  doubt  it,  and  we  have  many  times  asked  ourselves  why 
the  Lydians  and  no  other  people  should  have  conceived 
such  an  idea.  It  is  true  that  they  were  jolly,  light  hearted, 
and  passionately  fond  of  amusement.  Had  that  not  been 
the  case  they  would  never  have  fallen  so  rapidly  into  a 
state  of  decadence  after  the  conquest  of  Sardi  by  Cyrus, 
nor  could  they  have  taken  so  light  a  view  of  the  captivity 
and  humiliation  of  Croesus.  And  Polydore  Virgil  has 
defended  his  statement  with  a  singular  pleasantry  and 
brilliance,  on  the  ground  that  the  thing  is  very  natural. 
The  Lydians,  says  he,  invented  games  and  they  ought 
therefore  to  have  been  the  first  to  conceive  the  idea  of  a 
tavern,  and  to  open  establishments,  places,  as  he  remarks, 
where  games  and  gambling  would  always  be  held  in  great 
favor:  ."quippe  tale  opus  in  cauponis  maxime  semper 
fervet."  Larcher,  the  great  French  translator  of  Herod 
otus,  is  by  no  means  agreeable  to  this.  He  does  not  accept 


28     THE      INNS      OF 

in  that  sense  the  word  kapelos,  employed  by  Herodotus, 
and  he  is  caustically  critical  of  the  translators  of  Herod 
otus  who  have  rendered  that  expression  by  the  Latin  term 
caupona.  According  to  him,  the  term  of  Herodotus 
should  be  taken  in  the  sense  of  retailer,  retail  tradesman, 
and  thus  does  he  everywhere  render  it.  He  cites  a  great 
number  of  passages  where  kapelos,  in  effect,  is  used  in  the 
sense  in  which  he  maintains  it  should  be  taken,  notably  a 
phrase  in  Plato  where  it  is  said  that  "all  commerce 
between  towns  other  than  bartering  is  called  kapelican" 
but  with  all  the  evidence  he  has  cited,  there  is  still  room 
for  disagreement  and  an  opinion  to  the  contrary  may  be 
maintained  without  any  great  difficulty.  Scholarly 
candor,  however,  compels  us  to  admit  that,  notwithstand 
ing  the  various  Latin  versions  of  Herodotus,  and  even  the 
evidence  of  Polydore  Virgil,  the  word  kapelos  can  be 
taken  in  a  double  sense,  i.e*,  cabaret  keeper  and  merchant. 
And  this  legend  upon  a  sign  could  only  have  been  embar 
rassing  to  a  stranger  in  a  Greek  town,  if  he  was  searching 
for  an  inn  and  not  for  a  retailing  establishment.  The 
habit  of  cheating,  which  from  the  earliest  times  has  been 
inherent  in  the  two  callings,  would  be  a  complicating 
factor  in  the  affair,  and  to  do  justice  to  such  a  situation 
one  should  give  still  a  third  meaning  to  the  term  kapelos" 
-i.e.,  that  of  pilfering  or  obtaining  under  false  pretensions: 
and  the  verb  kapeleuein  is  no  less  elastic  in  the  meanings 
which  it  may  convey,  yet  notwithstanding  the  various 
innuendoes  which  it  conveys,  in  spite  of  the  various  shades 
of  meaning  which  it  takes  on  in  different  constructions, 
one  well  acquainted  with  the  genius  of  the  Greek  tongue 
will  unerringly  arrive  at  the  proper  sense,  and  should  the 
stranger  seek  a  wme-shop  he  had  but  to  ask  where  he 
could  find  an  oinopoles;  were  he  in  search  of  lodgings,  he 
asked  the  location  of  a  panddokos  or  a  katagogos,  but  not 
withstanding  all  his  care  and  precaution,  he  would  find 


GREECE      &      ROME 29 

himself  in  the  presence  of  the  kapelos  whether  he  patron 
ized  the  one  or  the  other;  and,  in  addition,  he  did  well  to 
be  on  his  guard  against  deception  which  often  presented 
itself  in  a  guise  as  lovely  as  it  was  sweetly  predacious. 
The  Greeks  of  the  Heroic  age  were  unacquainted  with  the 
plagues  which  beset  the  ages  in  which  inns  and  taverns 
flourished.  At  that  time  there  was  literally  no  such  thing 
among  them  as  professional  hospitality,  maintained  for 
profit.  Each  and  every  stranger  had  the  right  of  sanctu 
ary  and  asylum;  every  wayfarer,  as  though  under  the 
protection  of  Zeus  Xenios  himself,  was  sure  to  find  a  host. 
After  the  feast,  a  libation  in  honor  of  the  god  of  hospitality 
was  poured  upon  the  hospitable  table,  the  protector  of 
strangers  was  honored,  and  the  guest  was  then  on  even 
terms  with  the  host  who  entertained  him.  Pomp  and 
pageantry  made  not  the  slightest  difference  in  the  quality 
of  the  welcome;  a  guest  might  arrive  with  a  baggage  train 
of  mules  and  slaves,  or  he  might  come  as  unostentatiously 
as  Orestes,  in  the  Coephores,  with  a  lean  scrip,  and  leaning 
upon  a  staff;  he  was  a  stranger,  and  sanctuary  was  his  by 
right.  "At  the  voice  of  the  stranger/5  eloquently  remarks 
Barthelemy,  "all  gates  were  opened,  all  his  needs  were 
met,  and,  as  a  still  more  beautiful  tribute  to  the  homage 
thus  rendered  to  humanity,  the  host  was  not  informed  of 
the  state  and  birth  of  a  guest  until  after  the  latter  had 
satisfied  his  necessities." 

One  phase  of  hospitality  there  was,  in  the  Heroic  Age, 
which  placed  it  far  above  the  standards  practiced  by  the 
Hebrews,  at  least  in  the  later  ages  of  their  history,  and  the 
only  examples  which  can  be  cited  to  compare  with  this 
Greek  standard  are  those  of  Abraham  and  Lot.  To  the 
Greek,  it  made  not  the  slightest  difference  whether  his 
guest  was  a  Dorian  or  an  Ionian,  a  Locrian,  a  Corcyrian, 
or  an  Attican,  it  made  no  difference  whether  he  was  even 
of  Greek  stock,  he  was  entitled  to  food  and  shelter,  and 


30  THE      INNS      OF 

also  to  protection  while  under  his  host's  roof*  The 
Hebrew,  in  the  later  periods  of  his  history,  while  always 
hospitable,  confined  his  charity  and  entertainment  to 
members  of  his  own  race,  or  to  those  closely  allied  to  it. 
The  unlimited  scope  of  Hellene  hospitality  will  be  better 
understood  after  a  thorough  perusal  of  Homer.  Let  us 
then  attempt  a  description  of  the  age  in  which  he  is  said 
to  have  lived,  and  perhaps  we  shall  better  understand  the 
entertainment  of  Telemachus  by  Menelaus,  which  is  the 
earliest  and  one  of  the  finest  examples  of  the  hospitality 
with  which  we  are  concerned.  We  need  but  cast  a  glance 
at  this  cheerful,  well  contented,  happy  Homeric  world  to 
be  convinced  that  there  was  anything  but  a  lack  of  social 
amusement.  At  that  time  the  cultus  itself  was  a  series  of 
light  hearted  entertainments,  beautified  by  dances,  sing 
ing,  and  joyous  barbecues  and  banquets.  In  addition  to 
this,  the  council  of  the  nobles,  the  court  of  the  monarch, 
and  the  assembly  of  the  people,  were,  to  all  practical  pur 
poses,  as  much  social  as  political  or  commercial,  and  their 
debates,  often  acrimonious  and  generally  entertaining, 
with  their  cutting  and  thrusting,  were  entertaining  to  the 
highest  degree,  and  the  innumerable  special  celebrations 
and  religious  fetes  in  the  houses  of  the  king  and  the  nobles 
added  still  more  to  the  variety  and  richness  of  contem 
porary  life.  After  the  banquet,  virile  youth  hastened  to 
-the  palaestra  to  engage  in  athletic  sports  and  match  their 
strength  and  skill  against  one  another  in  a  physical  com 
petition  beneficial  to  both  body  and  character  alike. 
From  this  custom  the  finest  artistic  sense  of  all  time  was 
evolved.  The  elders  looked  on  and  decided  the  issues  in 
accordance  with  the  merits  of  the  contestants,  and  the 
Homeric  age  produced  few  weaklings,  or,  rather,  few 
survived,  which  is  not  a  left-handed  compliment  to  later 
and  supposedly  better  times.  Then  followed  a  wonderful 
old  folk  dance  of  lovely  damsels  and  armed  epheboi,  such 


BRINGING  IN  A  COURSE 


GREECE      &     ROME 31 

as  are  sometimes  seen  on  the  finer  pottery  of  the  time,  a 
dance  which  was  symbolical  of  life  itself,  and  Dryden,  in 
one  little  line,  has  caught  the  very  spirit  of  that  dance: 
"None  but  the  brave  deserve  the  fair!" 

Happy  times,  in  that  fairy-tale  age  of  pure  gold,  when 
man  at  his  best  was  "knee  deep  in  June,55  when  he  led  a 
healthy,  vigorous  life,  uncontaminated  at  its  source  by  a 
seething  commercialism  destined  to  devour  itself  and 
everything  it  touched;  when  Advertising,  its  crafty  and 
specious  spokesman,  had  not  educated  Appetite  or  tutored 
Desire.  What  Horace  wrote  as  his  conception  of  the  ideal 
condition  for  man  might  be  applied  with  equal  propriety 
to  that  age: 

Who  covets  much  will  ever  want, 

But  happy  he  on  whom  the  gods  bestow 

With  sparing  hand,  enough,  and  grant 
Him  health,  and  industry  to  keep  him  so. 

How  do  the  majority  of  our  social  pleasures  compare 
with  these  simple  and  healthy  amusements?  Are  they  as 
good,  as  constructive?  Are  they  not  too  refined?  Will 
not  such  a  trend  produce  eventually  a  race  of  mollycoddles 
and  cuddling  moths  if  carried  to  its  end  ?  Let  us  note  that 
in  building  the  stadia  at  the  various  universities  we  are 
getting  in  tune  with  the  ancient  Greek  ideal  of  robust 
health  and  the  physical  beauty  which  crowns  it.  And  we 
shall  have  less  of  ennui,  and  of  political  indifference  with 
which  to  reproach  demagogues,  as  a  result. 

The  first  public  institutions  in  Greece  which  can  with 
any  justice  be  compared  with  our  inns  and  taverns,  the 
so-called  kschai,  are,  in  all  probability,  a  development 
arising  at  the  close  of  the  Heroic  age.  In  the  age  which 
followed  they  were  adapted  to  the  needs  of  the  Ionic 
cities,  and  larger  towns,  especially  Athens.  They  were 
also  known  to  Doric  Greece,  but  to  a  much  less  degree. 


32  THE      INNS      OF 

The  first  mention  of  these  leschai  is  found  in  Homer  in 
that  passage  of  the  Odyssey  in  which  an  empty-headed 
maidservant  attempts  to  scold  Odysseus,  disguised  in 
beggar's  rags,  out  of  his  own  house:* 

"Wretched  guest"  (Melantho,  Penelope's  adopted 
ward,  is  speaking),  "surely  thou  art  some  brain-struck  man, 
seeing  that  thou  dost  not  choose  to  go  and  sleep  at  a 
smithy,  or  at  some  PLACE  OF  COMMON  BESORT,  but  here 
thou  pratest  much  and  boldly  among  many  lords  and  hast 
no  fear  at  heart.  Verily,  wine  has  got  about  thy  wits,  or 
perchance  thou  art  always  of  this  mind,  and  so  thou  dost 
babble  idly.  Art  thou  beside  thyself  for  joy,  because  thou 
hast  beaten  the  beggar  Irus  ?  Take  heed  lest  a  better  man 
than  Irus  rise  up  presently  against  thee,  to  lay  his  mighty 
hands  about  thy  head  and  bedabble  thee  in  blood,  and 
send  thee  hence  from  the  house."* 

This  is  the  only  Homeric  poem  which  contains  such 
mention,  and  it  is  probably,  as  stated  above,  that  the 
institution  of  public  houses  did  not  belong  to  the  earlier 
Heroic  age  and  the  bard  very  likely  carried  an  institution 
of  his  own  time  back  into  an  earlier  age.  As  regards  the 
passage  cited,  Eustathius  the  scholiast  informs  us  that 
leeches  were  buildings  with  open  halls  where  people  con 
gregated  for  purposes  of  gossip  and  amusement.!  Hesiod 
also  admonishes  against  habits  of  idleness  which  these 
lesches  fostered. 

Gossip,  however,  was  not  the  only  conversation  heard 
in  these  places;  more  serious  subjects  were  also  discussed, 
and  as  the  gymnasiums  later  became  the  lecturing  places 
and  haunt  of  philosophers  and  their  neophytes,  so  also 
these  earlier  substitutes  served  a  like  purpose.  The 
passage  from  Homer  quoted  above  shows  also  that  these 
lesches,  in  addition  to  their  social  usage,  served  as  shelter 

*Book  18, 520  et  sequitur; 
fButcher  and  Lang. 


GREECE      &      ROME 33 

and  sanctuary  to  the  homeless  and  needy  vagrants.  As  it 
was  unusual  for  the  Greeks  to  foster  a  public  custom  or  an 
institution  of  a  public  nature  without  associating  the  same 
with  their  religion  and  folklore,  so  they  had  also  for  these 
institutions  a  patron :  this  was  Apollo,  who  in  this  capac 
ity  was  called  Apollo  Leschenarios.  On  this  account 
we  need  not  be  surprised  at  reading  of  these  lesches  as 
being  enumerated  among  the  public  buildings  belonging 
to  the  different  cities.  The  degree  to  which  these  gath 
ering  places  were  frequented,  depended  naturally  upon 
the  varying  social  character  of  the  native  customs  and 
still  more,  upon  their  mode  of  living.  Athens  and  Sparta 
will  serve  as  striking  examples  of  what  is  meant.  Accord 
ing  to  Pausanias,  there  were  two  such  casinos,  as  we  will 
call  them  for  want  of  a  better  word;  one  called  the  Krot- 
anon  or  Club-room  of  the  Crotonians,  the  other  the 
Painted  Club-room,  and  in  another  passage,  Book  10, 
chap.  25,  Frazer's  translation,  he  speaks  of  another  such 
building  at  Delphi  adorned  with  paintings  by  Polygnotus 
and  dedicated  by  the  Cnidians. 

Called  by  the  Delphians  the  Club-room  (lesche,  place 
of  talk),  because  here  they  used  of  old  to  meet  and  talk 
over  both  mythological  and  more  serious  subjects.  That 
there  were  many  such  places  all  over  Greece  is  shown  by 
Homer  in  the  passage  where  Melantho  rails  at  Ulysses: 

And  you  will  not  go  sleep  in  the  smithy, 
Nor  yet  in  the  club-room,  but  here  you  prate. 

Plutarch  has  laid  the  scene  of  one  of  his  dialogues  (De 
Defectu  Oraculorum)  in  this  building.  He  says  (chapter 
6) :  "Advancing  from  the  temple  we  reached  the  doors  of 
the  Cnidian  club-house.  So  we  entered  and  saw  the 
friends  of  whom  we  were  in  search  seated  and  awaiting 
us."  Pliny  mentions  the  paintings  of  Polygnotus  at 
Delphi,  but  seems  to  suppose  that  they  were  in  a  temple. 


34 THE      INNS      OF 

(Hist.  Nat.  XXXV,  59.)  Of  the  two  series  of  paintings 
in  the  club-house,  the  one  which  represented  Troy  after 
its  capture  seems  to  have  been  especially  famous;  it  is 
mentioned  by  Philostratus  (Vit.  Apollon.  VI,  11,  64)  and 
by  a  scholiast  on  Plato  (Gorgias,  p.  448  b.).  Lucian 
refers  to  the  graceful  eyebrows  and  rosy  cheeks  of  Cas 
sandra  in  this  picture  (Imagines,  7).  In  the  time  of 
Pausanias  the  pictures  were  already  between  four  and  five 
hundred  years  old,  and  they  seem  to  have  survived  for  at 
least  two  centuries  more,  for  they  are  mentioned  with 
admiration  by  the  rhetorician  Themisteus,  who  lived  in 
the  fourth  century  of  our  era  (Or.  XXXIV,  11). 

The  scanty  remains  of  the  club-house  which  contained 
these  famous  paintings  were  excavated  by  the  French  in 
recent  years.  The  club-house  is  situated,  in  accordance 
with  the  description  of  Pausanias,  higher  up  the  hill  than 
the  spring  Cassotis,  a  few  steps  to  the  east  of  the  theatre. 
It  was  built  on  a  terrace,  which  is  supported  on  the  south 
by  a  high  retaining  wall.  A  marble  slab  in  this  wall  bears 
this  inscription: 

KNIDIONODAMOS 

TOANALAMMA 

APOLLONI 
"THE  CNIDIAN  PEOPLE  (dedicated)  THE  STJPPORTING 

WALL  TO  APOLLO" 
tt 
Let  it  not  be  inferred  that  the  other  club-houses  in 

Greece  were  constructed  and  adorned  upon  standards  so 
beautiful  as  this,  the  most  celebrated  of  them  all,  or  that 
the  forerunners  of  Gil  Bias  and  Casanova,  when  down  on 
their  luck,  lodged  habitually  in  sumptuous  quarters  such 
as  these*  The  name  Leschai  must  have  undergone  some 
changes  in  meaning  between  the  Homeric  age  and  that  in 
which  Pausanias  wrote.  The  term  was  applied  to  any 
place  in  which  people  gathered  to  gossip  or  to  talk  serious 
ly.  The  agora  and  its  colonnades,  the  gymnasia,  the 


GREECE      &     HOME 35 

shops  of  the  various  artisans  and  tradesmen*  especially 
the  smiths  whose  shops  were  frequented  in  winter  because 
they  were  warm,  all  came  under  this  heading.  In  Sparta 
these  club-rooms  were  the  scene  of  the  deliberations  of  the 
elders  on  the  welfare  of  the  state  and  it  was  to  them  that 
new-born  children  were  brought,  there  to  pass  physical 
examination  for  the  purpose  of  determining  whether  the 
child  should  be  reared  or  exposed  to  die,  vide,  Plutarch, 
Lycurgus,  16,  25. 

In  Athens,  on  the  contrary,  there  were  no  less  than 
three  hundred  and  sixty  such  club-rooms.  This  differ 
ence  had  its  cause  in  the  inherent  and  national  character 
of  the  Spartans,  which  was  not  so  volatile,  not  so  sprightly 
and  talkative  as  that  of  the  Athenians  and  Corinthians* 
Nor  must  one  also  overlook  the  other  features  of  their 
public  and  private  life — features  of  such  a  nature  as  to 
make  such  institutions  almost  superfluous.  As  is  well 
known,  the  Spartans  lived  their  life  entirely  in  common. 
With  them  individual  initiative,  except  in  the  field,  was 
discouraged,  and  in  some  cases  punished;  such  ambitions 
were  always  looked  upon  with  suspicion.  From  boyhood 
to  old  age,  the  Spartan  underwent  the  discipline  of  mass 
action.  He  was  a  cog  in  the  wheel  of  a  well  oiled  machine. 
He  played,  ate,  fought,  and  slept  in  a  common  brotherly 
companionship.  As  a  natural  consequence,  all  classes, 
whatever  their  condition  in  life,  and  they  were  all  rel 
atively  poor,  felt  no  social  urge  for  changed  conditions  and 
even  discouraged  the  visits  of  Greeks  from  other  parts  of 
the  country.  The  almost  patriarchal  state  of  society, 
with  its  military  glamour,  filled  every  need,  social  or 
physical.  Sparta  was  never  a  commercial  community  nor 
was  it  adorned  with  magnificent  edifices  and  temples. 
Nor  were  there  any  wonderful  collections  of  art  to 
attract  outsiders.  The  stay  of  strangers  in  their  city  was 
rendered  short  and  difficult  by  special  legislation,  and 


36 THE      INNS      OF 

the  comparatively  small  number  of  aliens  who  succeeded 
in  evading  their  immigration  laws  found  adequate  shelter 
and  care  in  the  homes  of  individual  families,  or,  if  they 
chanced  to  be  official  representatives  of  other  states,  they 
were  cared  for  by  royal  arrangement,  as  the  king  always 
placed  matters  of  this  sort  in  the  hands  of  designated 
individuals  who  were  responsible  to  him  and  to  the  state. 


GREECE      &      ROME  37 


CHAPTER  IV. 

Feast  tendered  Telemachus  by  Menelaus — Ardor  of  hospitality 
passes  mth  the  Trojan  War — Tokens  of  hospitality,  of  copper,  of  brass, 
of  ivory,  issued  in  the  Middle  Ages — The  origin  of  luggage  checks — 
Tokens  of  credit — Vitruviu&'s  description  of  apartments  for  guests  and 
entertainment  afforded — Origin  of  the  proxy — The  sumptuous  inns 
of  Persia. 

After  what  we  have  just  said  of  the  Spartans  we  are 
impelled  in  justice  to  them  to  introduce  Homer's  descrip 
tion  of  the  entertainment  and  hospitality  tendered  Tele 
machus  by  Menelaus.  We  shall  find  that  in  that  age, 
the  standards  were  the  same. 

"And  they  came  to  Lacedaemon  lying  low  among  the 
caverned  hills,  and  drave  to  the  dwelling  of  renowned 
Menelaus.  Him  they  found  giving  a  feast  in  his  house 
to  many  friends  of  his  kin,  a  feast  for  the  wedding  of  his 
noble  son  and  daughter  ...  So  they  were  feasting 
through  the  great  vaulted  hall,  the  neighbors  and  the 
kinsmen  of  renowned  Menelaus,  making  merry;  and 
among  them  a  divine  minstrel  was  singing  to  the  lyre, 
and  as  he  began  the  song  two  tumblers  in  the  company 
whirled  through  the  midst  of  them. 

"Meanwhile  those  twain,  the  hero  Telemachus  and  the 
splendid  son  of  Nestor,  made  halt  at  the  entry  of  the 
gate,  they  and  their  horses.  And  the  lord  Eteoneus  came 
forth  and  saw  them,  the  ready  squire  of  renowned  Mene 
laus;  and  he  went  through  the  palace  to  bear  the  tidings 
to  the  shepherd  of  the  people,  and  standing  near  spake 
to  him  winged  words: 

"  'Menelaus,  fosterling  of  Zeus,  there  are  two  strangers, 
whosoever  they  be,  two  men  like  to  the  lineage  of  great 
Zeus.  Say,  shall  we  loose  their  swift  horses  from  under 


38 THE      INNS      OF 

the  yoke,  or  send  them  onward  to  some  other  host  who 
shall  receive  them  kindly  ?' 

"Then  in  sore  displeasure  spake  to  him  Menelaus  of 
the  fair  hair:  'Eteoneus  son  of  Boethous,  truly  thou  wert 
not  a  fool  aforetime,  but  now  for  this  once,  like  a  child 
thou  talkest  folly.  Surely  ourselves  ate  much  hospitable 
cheer  of  other  men,  ere  we  twain  came  hither,  even  if  in 
time  to  come  Zeus  haply  gave  us  rest  from  affliction. 
Nay  go,  unyoke  the  horses  of  the  strangers,  and  as  for 
the  men,  lead  them  forward  to  the  house  to  feast  with 


us/ 


"So  they  loosed  the  sweating  horses  from  beneath  the 
yoke,  and  fastened  them  at  the  stalls  of  the  horses,  and 
threw  beside  them  spelt,  and  therewith  mixed  white  barley, 
and  tilted  the  chariot  against  the  shining  faces  of  the 
gateway,  and  led  the  men  into  the  hall  divine.  .  .  . 

"But  after  they  had  gazed  their  fill,  they  went  to  the 
polished  baths  and  bathed  them.  Now  when  the  maidens 
had  bathed  them  and  anointed  them  with  olive  oil,  and 
cast  about  them  thick  coats  and  doublets,  they  sat  on 
chairs  by  Menelaus,  son  of  Atreus.  And  a  handmaid 
bare  water  for  the  hands  in  a  goodly  golden  ewer,  and 
poured  it  forth  over  a  silver  basin  to  wash  withal;  and 
to  their  side  she  drew  a  polished  table,  and  a  grave  dame 
bare  food  and  set  it  by  them,  and  laid  upon  the 
board  many  dainties,  giving  freely  of  such  things  as  she 
had  by  her,  and  a  carver  lifted  and  placed  by  them 
platters  of  divers  kind  of  flesh,  and  nigh  them  he  set 
golden  bowls.  So  Menelaus  of  the  fair  hair  greeted  the 
twain  and  spoke: 

"  'Taste  ye  food  and  be  glad,  and  thereafter  when  ye 
have  supped,  we  shall  ask  what  men  ye  are;  for  the  blood 
of  your  parents  is  not  lost  in  you,  but  ye  are  of  the  line 
of  men  that  are  sceptered  kings  the  fosterlings  of  Zeus; 
for  no  churls  could  beget  sons  like  you/ 


GREECE      &      ROME 39 

"So  spake  he,  and  took  and  set  before  them  the  fat 
ox-chine  roasted,  which  they  had  given  him  as  his  own 
mess  by  way  of  honor/5 

And  in  the  first  canto  of  the  Odyssey  we  read  of  the 
welcome  extended  to  the  unknown  goddess  by  Tele- 
machus: 

"But  now  I  pray  thee,  abide  here,  though  eager  to 
be  gone,  to  the  end  that  after  thou  hast  bathed  and  had 
thy  heart's  desire,  thou  mayest  wend  to  the  ship  joyful 
in  spirit,  with  a  costly  gift  and  very  goodly,  to  be  an 
heirloom  of  my  giving,  such  as  dear  friends  give  to 
friends/* 

In  the  third  canto  of  the  same  poem,  when  Telemachus 
and  Pallas  were  entertained  by  Nestor,  we  find  no  in 
quiries  until  after  food  and  drink  have  assuaged  the 
weariness  and  hunger  and  thirst: 

"But  when  they  had  put  from  them  the  desire  of  meat 
and  drink,  Nestor  of  Gerenia,  lord  of  chariots,  first  spake 
among  them: 

"  'Now  is  the  better  time  to  inquire  and  ask  of  the 
strangers  who  they  are,  now  that  they  have  had  their 
delight  of  food.  Strangers,  who  are  ye?  Whence  sail 
ye  over  the  wet  ways?  On  some  trading  enterprise,  or 
at  adventure  do  ye  rove,  even  as  sea-robbers  over  the 
brine?5  55 

Athenaeus  comments  very  pleasantly  on  that  usage 
so  dignified  and  so  in  keeping  with  sturdy  ideals: 

"A  guest  was  received,55  says  he,  "he  was  invited  to 
drink,  and  lastly  he  was  interrogated,  and,  his  drunken 
ness  aiding  his  sincerity,  he  sometimes  told  more  than  he 
wished.55  Thus  speaks  the  spiritual  disciple  of  Epicurus; 
but  he  did  well;  that  liberal  confidence,  that  hospitality 
open  to  all,  the  house  of  the  father  of  the  family  was 
sanctuary  and  asylum,  a  shelter  where  the  wayfarer  knew 
a  welcome  awaited  him,  lodgings  for  parent  or  friend, 


40 THE      INNS      OF 

it  is  certainly  one  of  the  most  beautiful  aspects  of  the 
Greek  civilization  of  the  heroic  age  and  is  entitled  to  the 
most  sincere  reverence  which  after  ages  can  lavish  upon 
it,  if,  as  is  said,  imitation  is  the  most  sincere  form  of 
flattery. 

Some  men,  more  ardent  in  their  humanity,  sought  to 
outdo  even  that  pagan  age  with  an  61an  more  prompt  to 
bestow  the  benefits  of  an  evangelical  charity  and  even 
went  so  far  in  their  desire  to  confer  hospitality  upon  all 
as  to  erect  such  places  for  this  purpose.  Among  these 
was  Axilos,  son  of  Theutranus,  native  of  Arisbe  in  Troad, 
who  was  slain  by  Diomedes. 

"He  had  opened  on  the  public  road/*  says  Homer, 
"a  house  in  which  he  gave  asylum  to  all  who  passed." 

We  should  bear  in  mind  that  example  of  practical 
hospitality  and  its  benefits  as  shown  by  the  heroic  age, 
also,  as  it  has  a  vital  bearing  upon  our  subject  and,  as 
Pouqueville  has  very  justly  remarked,  "It  would  be 
necessary  to  cite  all  antiquity  to  make  known  the  im 
portance  .which  attached  to  hospitality  in  those  times/* 

Still  it  should  not  be  believed  that  this  great  ardor 
for  hospitality  was  always  general  throughout  and  that 
sometimes  it  did  not  cease  to  function,  for  cause.*  When 
we  reach  the  period  of  the  Trojan  War,  the  Golden 
Fleece,  and  the  age  of  Theseus,  that  is  to  say,  the  end 
of  the  heroic  age,  this  beautiful  devotion  begins  to 
break  down.  That  fraternal  bond  which  had  formerly 
seemed  to  unite  all  men  even  as  though  in  one  great 
family,  that  fraternal  chain,  let  us  call  it,  seemed  little 
by  little  to  break  under  the  strain.  All  arms  were  no 
longer  open  to  the  wayfarer.  We  enter  upon  an  epoch 
less  primitive  and  more  defiant  wherein  hospitality 
deserts  the  villages  and  seeks  its  shelter  in  the  country, 
where  Zeus  and  Hermes,  driven  away  by  an  entire  popu 
lation  hardened  and  haughty,  could  find  no  asylum  except 


GREECE      &      ROME 41 

in  such  a  cottage  as  that  of  Philemon  and  Baucis,  Tt 
is  nothing  if  not  a  complete  break  with  the  ancient  tradi 
tion  and  no  longer  would  it  be  as  under  the  ancient 
regime,  that  one  saw  the  face  of  his  host  for  the  first 
time  when  that  host  gave  the  wayfarer  food  and  shelter; 
hospitality  came  to  have  its  preferences  and  to  have  also 
its  exceptions  and  reserves.  In  the  cult  of  Zeus  Xenios 
one  might  place  his  faith,  but  he  would  be  better  served 
were  he  to  rely  upon  his  friends  and  their  near  relations 
and  retainers,  and  the  people  who  addressed  them.  There 
after,  hospitality  flourished  no  longer  as  a  general  axiom, 
nor  was  it  actually  accorded  as  a  right  except  to  such  as 
were  deemed  to  have  a  just  claim  upon  the  host.  It  is 
true  that  the  question  of  defilement  did  not  at  that  time 
enter  into  the  question  as  it  had  amongst  the  Egyptians 
and  Hebrews  (it  will  be  remembered  that  the  Egyptians 
could  not  eat  with  the  Hebrews  for  such  would  have  been 
an  abomination  to  the  Egyptians,  and  the  Jews  were  also 
constrained  by  the  same  fetish,  at  least  in  the  later  periods 
of  their  history.  Daniel,  for  example,  could  not  partake 
of  the  wine  and  viands  of  the  Babylonians  for  some  dietary 
reason,  and  many  of  the  most  savage  riots  between  the 
Roman  legionaries  and  the  Jews  were  probably  caused  by 
the  same  considerations. 

Thus,  in  course  of  time  certain  tokens  came  into  circu 
lation  (tesserae  hospitalitatis),  which  served  to  identify 
the  incoming  stranger  and  enabled  him  to  substantiate 
his  claim  to  the  best  the  house  afforded.  These  tokens 
were  issued  as  mandates  of  Zeus  Xenios,  although  the  gen 
eral  consideration  to  which  he  had  been  accustomed  in  an 
earlier  and  happier  age  had  long  been  atrophied.  The 
cabinets  of  Southern  Europe  have  preserved  several  speci 
mens  and  as  a  general  thing  they  were  of  gold  or  silver, 
broken  in  an  irregular  way,  each  family  keeping  a  part 
which  needed  the  other  to  complete  it.  Sometimes  they 


42 THE      INNS      OF 

were  of  copper  or  brass,  ivory  or  even  of  wood,  so  cut  that 
the  line  of  cleavage  by  which  they  were  joined  was  diffi 
cult  to  imitate  and  thus  prevented  fraud. 

These  tokens  of  hospitality,  of  which  Tomassin  has 
transmitted  to  us  certain  likenesses,  served  still  another 
purpose  during  the  Middle  Ages,  as  tokens  of  recognition 
for  political  purposes,  and  they  played  a  sinister  part  in 
the  affair  of  St.  Bartholomew,  and  earlier  still  in  the  Sicil 
ian  Vespers.  From  this  system  we  derive  hotel  bills  and 
probably  all  checking  systems,  such  as  baggage  checks, 
and  the  like.  When  a  guest  parted  from  his  host  the 
token  was  broken  and  each  retained  a  piece.  As  no  per 
fect  result  could  be  attained  in  matching  up  the  whole 
without  the  actual  parts,  the  identification  was  sufficient 
for  all  purposes.  Nor  did  their  usefulness  pale  with  the 
death  of  either  major  party  to  the  contract:  they  could 
be  bequeathed  to  heirs  on  either  side  and  were  honored 
as  long  as  there  was  anyone  left  to  honor  them.  In  the 
Poenulus  of  Plautus,  the  Young  Carthaginian  remarks  to 
Agoratocles,  "Thy  father  Antidamus  was  my  guest;  this 
token  of  hospitality  was  the  bond  between  us/5  and 
Agoratocles  immediately  made  answer,  "And  thou  shalt 
receive  hospitality  from  me." 

When  a  stranger  arrived,  bearing  the  token,  the  apart 
ments  reserved  solely  for  guests  were  prepared  as  expe- 
ditiously  as  possible,  even  as  the  inhabitants  of  the  French 
provinces  who  are  still  the  very  soul  of  hospitality,  to  this 
day  maintain  the  guest  chamber  (chambres  de  reserve) ; 
the  household  supplies  were  seen  to,  meals  planned,  and, 
in  a  word,  a  feast  was  prepared  which  taxed  the  resources 
of  the  house  to  the  uttermost. 

It  is  of  interest  to  note  in  connection  with  these  tokens 
of  hospitality,  that  there  was  an  ancient  Slavic  custom 
which  was  current  in  Russia,  Poland,  Servia,  Bulgaria, 
and  other  Slavic  countries,  down  to  a  period  of  about  a 


GREECE      &      ROME 43 

hundred  years  ago,  and  by  virtue  of  this  custom,  the 
peasants  drank  on  credit.  The  token  of  credit  was  a 
stick,  which  the  proprietor  of  the  public  house  notched 
with  as  many  notches  as  there  were  days  in  the  calendar 
until  their  harvest  of  hops,  barley,  or  wheat  should  be 
marketed.  When  the  account  was  liquidated,  the  stick 
was  broken  in  twain  and  debtor  and  creditor  retained  each 
his  piece.  Should  it  happen  that  the  account  was  not 
liquidated  as  per  contract,  and  there  was  no  good  reason 
for  the  failure  to  meet  the  obligation,  the  publican  would 
threaten  to  break  the  stick  and  retain  both  pieces.  This 
was  tantamount  to  the  ruin  of  the  credit  of  the  debtor 
throughout  all  the  district,  and  furthermore,  there  was  a 
quasi-religious  significance  to  the  ceremony  which  terrified 
the  illiterate  peasant  to  such  a  degree  that  he  would  even 
go  on  his  knees  to  prevent  such  an  untoward  happening. 
The  practice  came  to  an  end  due  to  improved  methods 
in  accounting. 

Vitruvius,  in  his  treatise  on  Architecture  has  spoken 
of  these  special  apartments,  such  as  the  owner  of  a  house 
of  the  better  class  always  kept  in  readiness  for  a  guest 
whom  Zeus  Xenios  might  send  him,  and,  curiously  enough, 
he  has  described  one  of  these  receptions  for  us: 

"The  peristylium,  and  this  part  of  the  house,  is  called 
Andronitis,  because  the  men  employ  themselves  therein 
without  interruption  from  the  women.  On  the  right  and 
left,  moreover,  are  small  sets  of  apartments,  each  having 
its  own  door,  triclinium,  and  bed-chamber,  so  that  on  the 
arrival  of  guests  they  need  not  enter  the  peristylium,  but 
are  received  in  rooms  (hospitalia)  appropriated  to  their 
occupation.  For  when  the  Greeks  were  more  refined, 
and  possessed  greater  wealth,  they  provided  a  separate 
table  and  triclinia  and  bed-chambers  for  their  guests. 
On  the  day  of  their  arrival  they  were  invited  to  dinner, 
and  were  afterwards  supplied  with  poultry,  eggs,  herbs, 


44 THE      INNS      OF 

fruits,  and  other  produce  of  the  country.     Hence  the 
painters  gave  the  name  of  Xenia  to  presents  given  to- 
guests.    Masters  of  families,  therefore,  living  in  these 
apartments,  were  quite,  as  it  were,  at  home,  being  at 
liberty  to  do  as  they  pleased  therein." 

It  is  readily  seen  that  a  host  might  have  a  certain 
amount  of  ostentatious  vanity  at  stake  in  thus  welcoming 
the  arrival  of  strangers  and  giving  them  the  run  of  his 
estates.  Trimalchio  had  it  in  abundance,  and  Nasidienus 
had  also  his  share.  On  this  account  Theophrastus  has 
introduced  a  host  entertaining  his  guests  at  open  table  to 
show  their  number  and  his  own  magnificence.  Thus  does 
the  Greek  caricature  Ostentation. 

"When  he  is  living  in  a  hired  house,  he  will  say  (to 
anyone  who  does  not  know  better)  that  it  is  the  family 
mansion;  but  that  he  means  to  sell  it,  as  he  finds  it  too 
small  for  his  entertainments." 

Yet  hospitable  as  the  Greeks  were,  both  in  honest  in 
tention  and  deed,  they  nevertheless  possessed  types  such 
as  even  a  Trimalchio  might  have  envied.  Theophrastus 
has  drawn  one  such  to  the  life: 

"Cool  cistern- water  has  he  at  his  house;  and  a  garden 
with  many  fine  vegetables,  and  a  cook  who  understands 
dressed  dishes.  His  house,  he  will  say,  is  a  perfect  inn; 
always  crammed;  and  his  friends  are  like  the  pierced 
cask — he  can  never  fill  them  with  his  benefits!" 

Thus  have  the  ancient  customs  atrophied  when  we 
reach  the  age  of  Theophrastus,  who  holds  such  preten 
tious  masquerading  up  to  the  ridicule  it  merits. 

Prudence  counseled  prospective  guests  to  see  that  the 
house  where  they  were  to  be  entertained  was  not  over 
crowded  lest  the  welcome  wear  thin,  and  what  MoliSre 
said  of  esteem  might  easily  have  been  thought  by  them: 
Esteem  is  founded  upon  preference. 

This  is  an  ancient  method  surviving  today. 


GREECE      &      ROME 45 

In  this  connection  let  us  listen  to  Aelian's  recital  of  a 
little  anecdote  in  which  Stratonice,  the  flute  girl,  played 
a  leading  role,  a  guest  disdainful  of  those  houses  too 
liberally  opened  to  hospitality: 

"Stratonice,  the  flute  girl,  having  been  accorded  a 
welcome  in  a  house  which  she  had  been  invited  to  enter, 
would  have  been  greatly  flattered  by  such  attention  which 
she  had  found  in  a  strange  land  in  which  she  had  no 
reason  to  expect  hospitality  and  no  ties  to  entitle  her  to 
that  consideration. 

"She  presented  her  most  graceful  thanks  to  the  host 
whose  kindness  had  prompted  such  attention  and  received 
her  with  such  good  grace;  but,  arriving  as  an  unexpected 
guest,  and  perceiving  that  the  house  was  open  to  any  and 
all  who  wished  to  stop  and  stay  over;  'Let  us  go,5  said  she 
to  her  slave,  *we  are  like  a  pigeon  that  has  taken  to  a 
tree,  what  you  mistook  for  a  house  of  hospitality  is  only 


an  inn/  " 


Again,  it  might  happen  that  strangers  would  be  ex 
cluded  from  hospitality  through  a  certain  disdain  of 
ancient  manners  and  customs,  or  because  of  certain  pref 
erences  of  citizens  who  refused  to  see  a  guest  in  a  man 
who  did  not  present  the  token  of  amity.  It  might  happen 
that  all  the  travellers  recently  arrived  at  some  Greek 
village  would  be  unable  to  evoke  any  tie  of  friendship, 
and  therefore  were  placed  under  the  necessity  of  finding 
a  lodging.  Nor  could  they,  as  in  the  Hebrew  villages, 
go  and  camp  in  the  public  place.  Some  countries  there 
were,  as  for  instance  the  island  of  Crete,  where  a  certain 
number  of  houses  were  perpetually  kept  in  readiness  for 
strangers,  and  where  tables  were  always  kept  set  and 
garnished. 

"There  were/5  says  Athenaeus,  "amongst  all  the 
habitations  of  the  island  of  Crete  two  houses  designated 
by  the  name  of  syssities;  one  was  called  the  andreion, 


46 THE      INNS      OF 

the  other  the  koimeterion,  and  these  were  the  places  in 
which  strangers  were  lodged.  In  the  house  set  aside  for 
the  common  repasts,  two  tables  were  set;  they  were  called 
hospitalieres,  and  the  strangers  were  given  the  first  place 
at  these  tables,  the  others  arranging  themselves  thereafter 
in  order/9 

In  other  parts  of  Greece  they  constructed  near  the 
temples  of  the  great  gods  vast  shelters,  veritable  free 
hostelries,  where  wayfarers  found  not  only  shelter  but 
also  beds  coiksecrated  to  the  god  adored  in  the  nearest 
temple.  The  hostelry  which  the  Lacedaemonians  erected 
in  the  precinct  of  Hera  on  the  ruins  of  Plataea  we  may 
suppose  to  have  been  an  institution  of  the  kind  just  spoken 
of.  The  passage  of  Thucydides  in  which  he  speaks  of  it 
is  very  curious  and  we  reproduce  it  here;  moreover,  it  is 
the  only  passage  in  the  works  of  the  historian  in  which 
he  speaks  of  the  inns  of  that  period,  giving  any  details 
as  to  their  furnishings,  style,  and  the  like: 

"They  (the  Lacedaemonians)  afterwards  razed  the 
whole  place  to  the  very  foundations,  and  built  near  the 
precinct  of  Hera  an  inn  forming  a  square  of  two  hundred 
feet;  it  had  two  stories,  and  chambers  all  around.  They 
used  the  roofs  and  the  doors  of  the  Plataeans;  and  of  the 
brass  and  iron  articles  of  furniture  found  within  the  walls 
they  made  couches,  which  they  dedicated  to  Hera/' 

The  religious  usage  which  constructed  for  wayfarers 
places  of  abode  in  the  vicinity  of  the  temples  may  prob 
ably  have  been  derived  from  the  devotional  custom  of 
religious  hospitality  native  to  the  Orient. 

Lucian,  in  his  Syrian  Goddess,  has  a  passage  which 
has  a  bearing  on  the  question.  He  is  speaking  of  the 
hospitality  which  was  the  due  of  those  coming  to  worship 
the  goddess,  if  they  be  strangers: 

"When  he  is  arrived  at  Hierapolis,  he  lodges  with  a 
host  whom  he  does  not  know,  as  though  he  were  lodged 


GREECE      &     ROME 47 

with  public  hosts  in  each  town,  and  he  is  received  accord 
ing  to  the  country  from  which  he  comes.  The  Assyrians 
are  called  tutors  as  they  are  the  ones  who  give  wayfarers 
the  necessary  instructions/3 

The  Athenian  proxenoi  of  whom  we  shall  presently 
speak  were  neither  more  nor  less  than  the  tutors  of  the 
Syrian  countries.  In  bringing  up  the  subject  of  the 
proxenos  it  may  be  well  to  discuss  him  and  his  function, 
as  his  descendant  in  our  times,  I  mean  the  proxy  of  our 
boards  of  directors,  scarcely  measures  up  to  the  standard 
set  by  the  archtype  of  the  species.  The  ancient  proxenos 
was  not  a  "yes"  man  for  any  individual  or  state. 

The  office  of  proxenos  grew  out  of  public  hospitality, 
that  hospitality  which  subsisted  between  two  cities  or 
states,  and  the  functions  of  the  official  closely  approxi 
mate  those  of  our  consuls  who  love  their  duty  and  do  it, 
in  spite  of  political  or  tropical  inertia.  In  the  primitive 
times  when  the  Greek  tribes  were  under  tyrants  a  quasi- 
public  hospitality  may  have  subsisted  between  the  reign 
ing  families  of  the  various  tribes  and  this  in  turn  may 
have  produced  similar  relations  between  their  subjects. 
With  the  abolition  of  the  tyrants,  the  tradition  was  prob 
ably  carried  on  as  a  heritage  of  the  past.  Then  again, 
some  prominent  citizen  of  one  state  may  have  had  great 
interests  and  influence  in  another  and  thus  have  been  able 
to  serve  the  interests  of  his  fellow  citizens  in  that  state 
as  well  as  their  interests  in  his  own.  This  he  would  do 
as  a  private  citizen  until  his  services  were  recognized  and 
rewarded  by  one  or  both  peoples.  When  public  hos 
pitality  was  established  between  two  states  and  no  private 
citizen  presented  himself  as  representative,  it  became 
necessary  that  persons  be  appointed  in  each  state  to  look 
after  the  welfare  of  visiting  citizens  of  the  other,  and  show 
them  hospitality,  and  the  officials  who  were  thus  ap 
pointed  were  known  as  proxenoi.  When  a  state  appointed 


48        THE      INNS      OF 

a  proxenos  it  could  send  one  of  its  own  citizens  acceptable 
to  the  authorities  in  the  other  or  it  could  appoint  a  citizen 
of  the  other  state  to  represent  its  interests  there*  The 
Spartans,  in  early  times,  held  to  the  former,  but  in  later 
times  the  custom  of  conferring  the  honor  of  proxenos 
upon  a  citizen  of  the  other  state  with  whom  hospitium 
publicum  had  been  concluded  seems  to  have  gained  in 
strength  and  usage.  With  the  exception  of  Sparta,  the 
common  method  of  appointing  a  proxenos  was  by  a  show 
of  hands.  In  Sparta,  the  king  had  the  right.  The  prin 
cipal  duties  of  the  proxenos  were  to  receive  citizens  com 
ing  from  the  state  he  represented,  especially  the  ambas 
sadors,  to  see  that  they  gained  admission  to  the  assembly, 
to  see  that  they  had  seats  in  the  theatre,  to  act  as  patron 
to  the  strangers  and  to  mediate  between  the  two  states 
if  any  misunderstanding  or  dispute  arose* 

Should  a  stranger  die  in  the  state  the  proxenos  of  his 
country  took  charge  of  his  effects  and  property. 

As  regards  the  honors  and  privileges  to  which  a  prox 
enos  was  entitled  from  the  state  which  he  served,  the 
different  Greek  states  followed  different  principles;  some 
honored  their  proxenos  with  the  full  civic  franchise,  and 
other  distinctions  besides.  The  right  of  acquiring  prop 
erty  in  the  state  of  which  he  thus  became  a  citizen  does 
not  seem  to  have  been  general  as  when  this  was  allowed 
it  was  as  the  result  of  special  legislation  or  authority.  A 
foreigner  appointed  in  his  own  country  as  proxenos  of 
Athens  enjoyed  in  his  own  person  the  right  of  hospitality 
at  Athens  whenever  he  visited  that  city,  in  addition  to 
all  the  other  privileges  that  a  foreigner  could  possess 
without  actually  becoming  a  citizen.  Among  these  privi 
leges,  though  they  were  not  necessarily  set  forth  in  the 
authority  conferred  upon  him,  were: 

1.  Epigamia  .  .  .  the  right  of  additional  marriage. 

2,  The  right  to  acquire  property  at  Athens. 


GREECE      &      ROME 49 

3.  Exemption  from  payment  of  taxes. 

4.  Inviolability  in  times  of  peace  and  war,  on  land  and 

sea. 

There  were  times  when  Athenian  commerce  was  so 
heavy  that  almost  every  citizen  might  have  been  called 
proxenos  (unofficially)  because  of  the  multitude  of  social 
and  commercial  ties  which  bound  them  to  other  cities. 
The  proxenos  9  however,  was  a  public  character  and  acted 
as  such  officially.  As  an  example,  when  the  representa 
tives  of  Megara  and  Corinth  arrived  the  proxenos  ap 
pointed  by  those  cities  lodged  them  in  his  own  house, 
served  them  as  guide,  lent  his  credit  to  their  negotiations, 
and  in  a  word,  as  has  been  well  remarked  by  Artaud  in 
a  note  on  the  Birds  of  Aristophanes,  "He  met  every 
demand  which  the  strangers  coming  from  allied  cities 
could  make  upon  him."  The  real  distinction  between 
our  own  consuls  and  the  ancient  proxenos  was  this:  the 
primary  and  imperious  duty  of  the  proxenos  was  hospi 
tality:  everything  else  came  in  due  order;  whereas  hos 
pitality  seems  to  be  the  last  duty  of  our  own  officials 
who  have  inherited  the  chiton  of  authority  under  a  foreign 


But  even  this  institution  which  embraced  so  many  of 
the  needs  of  travelling  inexperience  failed  to  meet  the 
requirements  of  that  fine  old  humanitarian  Xenophon, 
nor  did  it  measure  up  to  his  generous  ideal  of  what  true 
Athenian  hospitality  should  comprise.  It  was  his  desire 
that  every  foreign  sailor  who  disembarked  at  Athens 
should  find  free  and  clean  lodgings  and  that  every 
stranger,  from  whatever  country  whatsoever,  Greek  or 
barbarian,  would  always  be  sure  of  finding  shelter  in  a 
public  inn.  Therefore  in  his  Treatise  on  the  Causes  of 
Revenue  he  demands  the  levy  of  a  special  impost  with 
the  proceeds  of  which  he  would  construct  such  inns  near 
the  harbors  for  the  accommodation  of  pilots  and  other 


50 THE      INNS      OF 

watermen,  "in  addition  to  those  already  in  operation/5 
for  those  who  should  come  to  Athens. 

All  this  Xenophon  had  seen  in  his  residence  in  Persia, 
where  a  system  of  inns,  posts,  and  everything  necessary 
and  convenient  to  people  who  travel  was  well  organized. 
There  is  little  doubt  that  what  he  had  seen  in  that  coun 
try  had  armed  his  criticism  of  the  methods  and  crudities 
in  his  native  land,  and  as  for  the  Cyropaedia,  it  is  worthy 
of  credit.  It  was  written  at  the  request  of  a  prince,  but 
with  the  unmistakable  intention  of  amusing  and  instruct 
ing  the  youth  of  Athens;  it  is  not  so  much  his  desire  to 
describe  Asia  and  Asiatic  culture,  as  it  is  to  inform  his 
countrymen  of  their  own  shortcomings  and  state  of  un- 
preparedness,  that  they  may  remedy  them.  His  life 
among  the  Persians  was  an  active  one,  and  an  observant; 
what  he  has  written  of,  he  has  seen.  Before  the  days  of 
Xenophon's  maturity,  Herodotus  had  seen  the  Persian 
system,  in  operation  and  had  marveled  at  it. 

"The  first  courier/'  says  he,  te turned  his  dispatches 
over  to  a  second,  the  second  to  a  third,  and  they  passed 
them  along  from  one  to  another  just  as  among  the  Greeks 
the  torch  passes  from  hand  to  hand  in  the  rites  of  Heph- 
aestos.  The  distance  traveled  by  a  horse  is  called,  in  the 
Persian  language,  'Angareion/  "  There  are  several  other 
passages  in  the  writings  of  Herodotus  in  which  he  makes 
mention  of  the  Persian  posting  system,  and  hie  demotes 
some  space  to  one  detail  which  Xenophon  scarcely  notices; 
the  hostelry  which  the  Great  King  maintained  at  each 
station.  He  rarely  mentions  one  without  touching  upon 
the  other. 

Henricus  Stephanus,  in  commenting  upon  this  passage 
of  Herodotus,  emphasizes  the  immense  distances  in  the 
empire  of  the  Persians  by  saying  that  between  the  sea 
and  Susa,  the  capital  of  the  Great  King,  there  were  one 
hundred  and  eleven  stations  and  caravanserai.  The  inns 


GREECE      &     ROME 51 

must  have  been  exceedingly  sumptuous,  for  we  must  re 
member  that  the  king  went  so  far  in  his  luxurious  and 
sanitary  measures  that  he  carried  boiled  drinking  water 
with  him  in  silver  tanks,  in  an  age  that  knew  not  Lister. 
Hence  it  must  follow  that  when  he  stopped  at  an  inn  it 
must  have  been  all  that  comfort  could  require  and  money 
could  buy.  Aelian  also  mentions  these  magnificent 
caravanserai  that  were  in  operation  throughout  the 
empire,  from  Asia  Minor  to  Medea.  Alexander  stopped 
at  one  of  these  places  when  beginning  his  march  against 
Darius:  it  was  one  of  the  stathmoi  basilikai  on  the  fron 
tiers  of  Phiygia,  and  Mithridates  also  stopped  at  the 
same  caravanserai,  deeming  it  a  favorable  omen  as  he 
was  thus  destined,  as  he  believed,  to  follow  in  the  foot 
steps  of  Alexander  and  overrun  all  Asia. 

The  Greeks,  however,  failed  utterly  to  profit  from  the 
information  conveyed  by  Herodotus  and  Xenophon. 
They  detested  the  Persians  so  thoroughly  that  they 
scorned  to  learn  from  them  and  the  rapid  posts  and 
luxurious  inns  of  the  Asiatic  empire  were  never  objects 
familiar  to  the  sight  and  experience  of  the  dwellers  in  the 
little  peninsula.  In  many  ways  they  were  right,  as  the 
extent  of  their  country  was  infinitely  small  compared  to 
Persia,  and  their  states  were  independent,  whereas  in  the 
empire  there  was  a  powerful  central  authority. 

In  place  of  imitating  the  Persian  system  and  deriving 
from  it  the  things  which  might  have  aided  their  develop 
ment,  they  gave  a  malignant  turn  to  a  term  used  by  their 
former  enemies  in  their  posting  service.  We  have  spoken 
of  the  term  angareion,  as  the  distance  a  horse  traversed; 
the  Greeks  adopted  the  word,  made  it  into  a  verb  and 
defined  it  as  the  sum  of  all  tyrannical  force  well  worthy 
of  the  King  of  Kings,  who  forced  citizens  to  run  with 
news  at  the  peril  of  their  lives.  Strange  destiny;  that 
the  labors  of  the  father  of  history  and  the  disciple  of 


52 THE      INNS      OF 

Plato  should  avail  their  countrymen  only  in  adding  to 
the  scope  of  the  dictionary,  but  should,  in  years  to  come, 
aid  the  most  powerful  and  deadliest  enemy  of  Hellas  in 
keeping  the  country  in  subjection,  and  should  finally 
contribute  the  most  to  the  overrunning  of  occidental 
civilization  with  the  hordes  of  Tourania!  Alexander's 
messages  were  carried  as  were  those  of  his  ancestors  in 
the  days  of  Agamemnon,  and  the  institution  of  the 
hemeradromoi  lasted  until  the  Roman  Empire  instituted 
a  post  road  system  modeled  upon  that  of  Persia;  a  sys 
tem  from  which  all  that  have  come  later  were  derived. 
In  the  days  of  the  lower  empire  the  post  system  reached 
its  greatest  excellence  in  Greece.  The  course  of  empire 
had  shifted  from  Rome  to  the  city  of  Constantine  and  the 
centralized  authority  was  closer  to  the  Balkan  and  Asiatic 
provinces,  a  fact  which  sufficiently  explains  the  improve 
ment.  Thus  we  shall  arrive  at  the  period  when  through 
out  all  Greece  as  in  the  other  provinces  of  the  empire  we 
shall  see  magnificent  military  roads  with  relays  of  ani 
mals,  and  at  every  station  a  hostelry,  where  travelers 
may  lodge  and  where  copiers  may  procure  fresh  horses. 
The  entire  establishment  shall  be  meant  by  the  term 
allage,  which  Eustathius  has  specifically  informed  us  is 
synonymous  with  stathmos,  "by  which,55  writes  he,  in 
formally,  "we  mean  not  only  an  inn  and  a  stable  but 
also  the  places  proper  to  make  a  halt,  the  stations  where 
travelers  stay  over  to  rest  and  recruit  themselves/5  Thus 
we  have  again  the  posting  system  of  Persia,  and  rest 
assured,  that  unless  we  have  been  deceived,  the  master 
of  posts  will  soon  put  in  an  appearance. 

And  as  far  as  the  term  angareion  is  concerned,  it  has 
not  been  lost;  we  still  have  it  in  the  Latin  angariare  and 
through  low  Latin  in  the  French  hangar,  which  conveys 
accurately  enough  the  impression  of  such  shelters  as  the 
stathmoi  of  Persia  or  the  tillage  of  the  lower  empire. 


GREECE      &      ROME  53 


CHAPTER  V. 

Grecian  inns  of  the  fifth  century  before  Christ — The  inn*  of  the 
pleasure-loving  Athenians — The  public  houses,  low  dives,  and  public 
stews — Wine  booths  and  dancing  girls — The  giving  of  names  and  signs 
to  taverns  the  beginning  of  advertising — Keepers  of  taverns  and  cabarets 
held  detestable  and  infamous — Drunkenness  and  harlotry  prevail — 
Diogenes  a  frequenter. 

Inasmuch  as  we  have  only  found  inns  complete  in 
needful  details  under  the  emperors,  the  question  of 
whether  the  Greeks  of  former  times  actually  possessed 
establishments  where  one  could  lodge  and  where  his  ani 
mals  could  be  taken  care  of,  may  arise.  The  rapid 
decadence  of  hospitality,  once  it  had  set  in,  and  the  insti 
tution  of  the  proxenos  serve  but  to  cloud  the  issue,  and 
the  unwary  scholar  might  draw  an  erroneous  inference 
from  the  facts.  The  shelters  erected  for  pilgrims  to 
religious  festivals  would  also  tend  to  bear  out  such  an 
inference.  There  are  several  terms  in  the  Greek  language 
which  denote  inns,  and  many  of  these  terms  are  classical, 
some  few  being  even  ante-classical,  there  are  also  numer 
ous  passages  in  the  authors,  sometimes  obscure  and  am 
biguous,  but  which,  nevertheless,  offer  positive  evidence 
that  there  were  sumptuous  establishments  of  the  kind. 
A  verse  in  the  Inachus  of  Sophocles,  cited  and  commented 
upon  by  Pollux,  proves  that  as  early  as  the  fifth  century 
before  Christ,  hostelries  were  already  known  in  Greece. 
The  pandokos  xenostasis  was  an  inn  where  guests  only 
were  lodged;  but  the  phatne  as  well  as  the  stathmos  were 
used  to  denote  a  huge  establishment  where  men  and  beasts 
found  shelter.  Athenaeus  cites  a  passage  in  the  Peltate 
of  Ephippus  as  follows:  "The  place  was  furnished  with 


54 THE      INNS      OF 

stables  for  beasts  of  burden,  stalls  for  the  horses,  and 
dining-rooms  (gleumata).99 

It  was  in  places  such  as  these  that  great  and  powerful 
individuals  with  carriages  and  baggage  trains,  such,  for 
example,  as  envoys  on  their  way  to  their  posts  of  duty  in 
foreign  states,  lodged.  Such  diplomats  found  the  hos 
pitality  of  the  miserable  little  inns  of  Boeotia  or  Phocis 
little  to  their  tastes,  and  dearly  bought.  We  know  this, 
thanks  to  a  beautiful  passage  in  the  orations  of  Aeschines, 
in  which  the  Greek  orator  tells  us  that  the  Athenian 
ambassadors  lodged  one  of  their  companions,  whom  they 
suspected  of  treason,  in  an  inn,  and  among  other  indica 
tions  of  their  contempt,  they  refused  to  lodge  or  dine  in 
the  same  inn.  The  Jccdagogion  was  a  very  simple  and 
very  common  hostelry,  as  was  also  the  Jcatalusis.  Accord 
ing  to  Pollux  there  were  many  of  that  sort  at  Athens, 
and  also  throughout  the  whole  of  Greece,  as  is  proved  by 
many  references  in  the  Greek  writers.  It  was  in  such 
an  establishment  as  this  that  the  famous  case  of  murder 
and  telepathy  took  place  at  Megara,  as  Cicero  tells  us. 
Secaldus,  and  the  old  man  of  Oree,  found  themselves 
in  a  like  situation  in  Argolis  and  it  is  there  that  they  re 
cited  to  one  another  that  mutual  account  of  their  mis 
fortunes  which  Plutarch  has  transmitted  to  our  times. 
People  who  went  to  consult  the  oracle,  the  devotees  of 
Pythia  and  Apollo,  who  departed  for  Delphi  or  Tegyre, 
the  place  where  the  god  was  born,  lodged  there  of  their 
own  free  will  in  the  hostelries,  as  is  easily  inferred  from 
an  anecdote  related  by  Plutarch  in  his  treatise  On  the 
Oracles  Which  Are  No  More,  and  the  same  may  be  said 
of  certain  Delians  who  had  returned  to  Delphi.  Had 
they  not  overheard  the  words  of  a  certain  innkeeper,  they 
would  all  have  been  lost  and  would  never  have  been  able 
to  return  to  their  country.  "During  the  Peloponesian 
War,  the  Delians  having  been  driven  from  their  island, 


GREECE      &      ROME 55 

they  were  advised  by  an  oracle  of  Delphi  to  search  out 
and  possess  themselves  of  the  place  where  Apollo  had 
been  born,  and  there  to  make  sacrifices  of  a  certain 
nature:  they  marveled  about  this  and  demanded  whether 
Apollo  might  not  have  been  born  elsewhere  than  amongst 
them,  the  prophetess  I*ythia  advised  them  that  a  crow 
would  lead  them  aright.  The  representatives  of  the 
Delians,  on  their  return,  passed  by  chance  a  village  in 
Chaeronia,  and  they  saw  a  certain  hostelry  there  with 
some  strangers  frequented  from  the  oracle  of  Tegyre  to 
which  they  wished  to  go,  and  as  they  were  taking  their 
departure  they  heard  the  following  conversation :  *  Fare 
well,  madame  Crow/  and  taking  literally  the  response 
of  the  prophetess,  they  made  their  sacrifice  at  Tegyre, 
whereupon  they  were  restored  into  favor  and  returned  to 
their  country/5 

But  what  were  these  hostelries,  these  Greek  pan- 
dokeia,  such  as  were  to  be  found  in  these  villages,  scattered 
along  the  great  roads  for  those  travelling  through  the 
country?  How  were  they  distributed,  what  was  their 
extent,  what  were  the  conditions  in  them  and  what  were 
their  charges?  This  we  do  not  know.  The  fragments 
of  Menander  tell  us  that  wine  was  sold  for  a  few  obols 
the  pint  and  that  for  the  price  paid  daily  to  a  pandar  a 
whole  family  could  live  in  comfort  for  a  month.  The 
details  concerning  the  institution  at  Plataea  with  which 
Thucydides  has  furnished  us  are  happy  in  their  fullness, 
we  are  not  so  fortunate,  however,  in  material  of  the  same 
sort  which  will  serve  to  illustrate  the  pandok&ia,  nor  do 
the  writings  of  antiquity  help  us,  in  this  respect.  They 
may  have  been  simple  caravanserai  as  Pouquevifle  imag 
ines,  and  might  be  compared  with  the  klmns  of  modern 
Greece,  in  his  estimation;  those  vast  and  miserable  sheds 
where  beasts  of  burden  and  men  were  herded  indiscrim 
inately  into  a  hurly-burly,  and  of  which  Buchon  gives  so 


56  THE      INNS      OF 

piteous  a  description.  We  are  of  the  belief  that  a  passage 
of  Plutarch  will  prove  that  in  those  hostelries  of  Greece, 
even  as  in  the  khans  of  Modern  Greece,  the  life  of  the 
wayfarer  was  identical  in  every  respect,  and,  using  the 
expression  of  Buchon,  "everything  is  done  in  the  presence 
and  before  the  eyes  of  all/* 

But  in  Athens  these  conditions  were  entirely  different. 
Putting  aside  the  fact  that  from  their  very  character, 
pleasure-loving,  witty,  sprightly,  and  volatile,  they  would 
naturally  form  a  larger  number  and  a  greater  variety 
of  social  relations,  they  also  possessed  a  civic  life  infi 
nitely  more  cosmopolitan  and  sparkling.  They  harbored 
a  constant  influx  of  strangers  from  the  ends  of  the  earth, 
traders,  merchants,  brokers,  all  in  search  of  business  and 
profit;  travellers  and  art  lovers,  seeking  to  learn  and  to 
enjoy,  sages  come  to  pay  respect  to  the  shrine  of  phil 
osophy  and  literature.  It  was  only  natural  that  with 
them  the  need  for  hotels  and  inns  soon  brought  them  into 
being.  In  the  life  at  Athens  such  institutions  are  often 
mentioned,  and  the  difference  between  conditions  at 
Athens  and  Sparta  is  very  neatly  and  caustically  summed 
up  in  a  witticism  delivered  by  the  philosopher  Diogenes, 
which  Aristotle  has  preserved  for  us.  This  cynic  once 
said:  "The  public  houses  are  the  Phyditerien  (a  bagnio 
where  flute  girls  entertained  and  ministered  to  the  desires 
in  any  way  requested  [see  Aristophanes  for  extended 
note] )  of  the  Athenians."  If  from  this  witticism  one 
were  to  argue  a  greater  frequenting  of  the  public  houses 
this  must  be  understood  only  of  the  lower  and  lowest 
dregs  of  society,  and  therein  lies  the  basic  difference  be 
tween  the  public  house  of  the  ancient  Greco-Roman 
civilization  and  our  own.  There  were  exceptions,  how 
ever.  When  the  Athenian  ambassadors  were  sent  to 
negotiate  with  Philip  of  Macedon,  they  lodge  everywhere 
in  inns.  Dionysus  (Aristoph.  Ranae,  114),  makes  inquiry 


GREECE      &      ROME 57 

as  to  the  quality  of  the  inns  on  the  road  to  Hell,  and 
what  shall  we  say  of  those  special  provisions  made  by  the 
public  to  provide  shelter  for  wayfarers  coming  to  Athens 
and  Corinth  to  participate  in  the  great  religious  festivals 
and  games  ?  In  Athens,  however,  the  better  classes  of  the 
people  had  nobler  and  finer  occasions  for  social  entertain 
ment,  though  this  was  often  very  costly  at  Corinth. 
Horace  has  remarked  that  not  every  man  could  afford 
to  pleasure  there,  and  we  have  no  less  an  authority  than 
Demosthenes  to  bear  him  out.  The  public  houses  had 
little  influence  on  the  greater  number  of  the  upper  classes 
of  society  though  these  same  upper  classes  were  unani 
mous  in  holding  publicans  and  all  their  ways  in  contempt 
not  only  because  of  the  natural  contempt  of  the  aristo 
crat  for  the  underling,  but  also  because  these  rogues  and 
scoundrels,  fracturing  by  their  very  calling  one  of  those 
beautiful  and  sacred  tenets  of  a  semi-primitive  culture 
which  carried  out  the  rites  of  hospitality  even  to  remote 
generations  and  nourished  the  guest-friend  even  in  the 
face  of  war,  could  only  be  such  and  shelter  the  stranger 
within  their  gates  for  gain.  Then,  too,  the  adulteration 
of  wine  and  devious  methods  in  merchandising  were  only 
too  well  known  in  classical  times.  According  to  Pet- 
ronius,  Socrates  used  to  boast  that  he  never  had  looked 
into  a  tavern,  but  it  is  more  probable  that  what  he  meant 
to  say  was  that  he  never  looked  around  in  one.  But  the 
almost  universal  disrepute  in  which  the  aubergists  were 
held  may  be  inferred  from  a  multitude  of  passages  in 
classical  literature.  Among  the  most  striking  is  that 
passage  in  the  Characters  of  Theophrastus  in  which 
he  describes  an  individual  so  lost  to  shame  and  so  lacking 
in  intelligence  that  he  would  even  be  capable  of  con 
ducting  a  public  house.  Isaac  Casaubon,  in  commenting 
upon  the  passage  of  Theophrastus  cited  above,  hints  at 
the  facility  with  which  publicans  lent  their  services  in 


58  THE      INNS      OF 

the  matter  of  pimping;  and  decries  that  zeal  in  the  public 
service  which  would  procure  service  for  the  paying  guest 
who  wants  what  he  wants  when  he  wants  it.  In  fact, 
the  austere  post-renaissance  scholar  goes  so  far  as  to  sum 
up  the  attributes  of  hosts  who  did  better  than  serve  their 
patrons  with  a  savory  dish  or  a  rare  vintage,  calling  them 
pimps  and  their  establishments  public  stews.  The 
moralizing  Socrates  says  somewhere  that  not  even  a  slave 
with  a  shred  of  respectability  would  risk  eating  in  a  pub 
lic  house.  This  seems  somewhat  exaggerated,  however, 
for  from  various  passages  in  Aristophanes  one  learns 
that  the  more  common  class  of  citizens  and  their  wives 
as  well  did  not  hesitate  to  enjoy  themselves  in  such 
houses.  But  that  persons  of  position  and  dignity,  on 
the  contrary,  did  not  visit  such  places  and  that  they 
were  partly  constrained  by  law  from  visiting  them  can  be 
inferred  from  Hyperides  as  cited  by  Athenaeus,  who 
states  that  if  a  member  of  the  Areopagitus  had  ever 
entered  a  public  house,  even  on  a  single  occasion,  his 
colleagues  would  no  longer  have  tolerated  him  as  a 
member  of  that  assembly.  As  to  the  establishments 
themselves,  the  Greek  language  defines  them  and  places 
them  in  different  classes.  First  then  we  shall  mention  the 
wine  booths.  Here  wine  was  sold  only  on  the  street. 
Then  there  were  ale  or  beer  houses  or  taprooms,  at  least 
the  lexicographer  Suidas  expressly  differentiates  the  mere 
wine  seller  from  the  publican.  Such  were  the  places 
where  Demos  amused  himself  with  flutists  and  lyrists 
and  dancing  girls  who  were  agreeable  in  other  ways. 
Whether  all  these  wine  shops  also  sheltered  strangers,  or 
whether  the  rights  and  limitations  of  these  houses  were 
so  exactly  defined  and  established  and  regulated  by  the 
authorities  is  not  known.  This  definite  division  does  not 
seem  to  have  taken  place.  There  is  still  another  class  of 
public  houses  mentioned  which  seems  to  have  provided 


AT  THE  DOOE  OF  A  TAYEEN 


GREECE      &      ROME 59 

especially  for  the  shelter  of  strangers.  These  were  known 
by  a  characteristic  name,  pandokian,  All  Receiving,  open 
to  all.  Booths  also,  it  seems,  were  sometimes  connected 
with  these  inns.  Some  establishments  doubtless  stood 
somewhat  higher  in  the  scale  than  those  mentioned,  for 
even  if  a  large  part  or  even  if  the  greater  part  of  strangers 
stopping  in  Athens  found  shelter  with  hospitable  friends, 
there  must  have  been  a  considerable  number  who  had 
no  such  connections  and  were  therefore  compelled  by 
necessity  to  avail  themselves  of  a  public  house.  How 
ever,  it  is  not  at  all  to  be  expected  that  with  the  care 
lessness  and  indifference  which  even  yet  prevails  in  the 
Levant  and  Orient  and  even  in  the  Latin  countries,  the 
comfort  of  travelers  was  looked  after  to  the  same  degree 
as  in  our  inns  and  hotels  of  today,  especially  in  those  of 
the  larger  cities.  That  the  Greeks,  like  ourselves,  had 
painted  signs  on  such  establishments  may  be  ascertained 
from  a  passage  in  Aristotle.  Nevertheless,  the  fact  that 
in  Aristophanes  and  other  writers  no  further  trace  of  the 
use  of  such  signs  is  to  be  met  appears  to  weigh  against 
the  universality  of  the  custom,  and  as  this  usage  would 
have  furnished  many  an  opportunity  for  sarcastic  com 
ment,  its  absence  is  indicative  of  the  fact  that  the  custom 
was  not  widespread.  That  the  omission  is  accidental  is 
too  much  to  suppose.  The  custom  of  giving  names  and 
signs  to  inns  and  the  like  is  perhaps  the  very  beginning 
of  advertising  as  we  understand  it  today.  For  instance, 
we  have  the  familiar  sign  of  the  two  triangles  laid  one 
over  the  other,  and  also  the  bush  set  up  in  front,  both  of 
which  go  back  to  Graeco-Roman  times,  as  will  be  shown. 
The  Greek  innkeepers  had  a  special  patron  saint  just  as 
our  publicans  have  theirs,  in  Pandolphus  and  Julianus. 
They  placed  themselves  under  the  patronage  of  Mercury, 
who,  by  the  way,  was  also  the  very  prince  of  purloiners, 
of  whom  Horace  wrote: 


60 THE      INNS      OF 

Choused  of  lus  cattle,  ApoDo  in  a  rage 
Demanded  restitution,  with  a  frown; 
Threatening  thee  gamin,  impish  and  sage 
"Who  laughed,  and,  his  impotence  to  crown 
Didst  filch  his  quiver  with  thy  guile 
And  he  could  only  swear— and  smile. 

Such,  then,  was  the  manner  In  which  the  public  houses 
of  Athens  were  instituted  in  general,  and,  as  will  be  seen 
from  the  foregoing,  they  were  bound  to  differ  immeasur 
ably  from  ours  in  importance  and  in  the  esteem  in  which 
they  were  held.  Yet  the  writer  well  remembers  more 
than  one  wayside  forest  inn  along  the  former  bound 
aries  of  western  Russia  and  eastern  Germany  and  Aus 
tria  which  were  strongly  reminiscent  of  the  standards  to 
which  the  ancients  took  such  universal  exception  and  he 
is  here  tempted  to  enlarge  upon  the  statement  of  Sir 
Samuel  Dill,  in  his  Roman  Society  from  Nero  to  Aurelius : 
*'  The  Roman  inns,  from  the  time  of  Horace  to  Sidonius 
Apollinaris  were  in  bad  standing  and  even  dangerous." 
Had  Sir  Samuel  journeyed  through  the  forests  of  eastern 
Russia  he  would  have  commented  upon  these  inns  and 
harpies  at  some  length.  The  inns  of  Greece  and  Asia 
Minor  then  belonged  in  general  to  a  very  low  place  in 
the  social  order  and  the  need  they  filled  was  limited, 
while  our  public  houses,  in  their  large  number  and 
variety,  our  ale  and  beer  houses  (O  shades  of  Gambrinus 
and  the  golden  age),  inns,  wine  rooms,  coffee  houses, 
casinos,  clubs  and  restaurants,  are  patronized  in  the 
evening  by  the  greatest  number  of  all  those  who  have 
become  weary  during  the  day  by  application  to  business 
or  even  by  sheer  lack  of  all  employment.  The  reason 
for  this  contrast  is  not  difficult  to  adduce  or  to  under 
stand,  for  why  should  a  free  Athenian  have  wished  to 
seek  entertainment  and  social  intercourse  in  such  a  place? 
Was  not  all  life  a  series  of  gay  festivities  and  activities 


GREECE      &      ROME 61 

which  stimulated  his  mind?  There  were  the  numerous 
religious  fiestas,  venerable  and  national,  and,  almost 
coaeval  with  his  traditions,  built  on  the  very  foundation 
of  his  character  and  its  needs,  beautiful  in  their  simplicity 
and  symbolism;  and  in  addition  there  were  the  games, 
the  philosophical  schools,  folk  dances,  and  the  ever  pres 
ent  spectre  of  war  among  themselves  which  kept  alive  the 
glamour  of  military  tradition  and  service. 

In  the  theatre  he  saw  his  gods  on  the  stage,  in  the 
majesty  and  grandeur  of  Aeschylus  and  Sophocles  he 
heard  their  utterances,  and  the  memory  lingered  until 
the  next  occasion  and  lingers  still.  The  greater  part  of 
his  time,  however,  was  occupied  with  political  duties  and 
activities.  He  presided  in  the  popular  assembly  as  a 
magistrate  or  attended  as  a  citizen,  he  spoke,  or  listened 
to  the  speeches  of  others,  which  sometimes  tended  to 
benefit  him  but  often  injured  him,  and  which  always  en 
tertained  him.  He  elected  officers  and  he  was  elected  to 
office,  or  he  sat  in  open  court  as  judge  or  as  spectator. 
Everywhere  subjects  were  discussed  which  touched  his 
interests  closely,  and  the  debates  were  such  that  by  their 
wit  and  energy  of  expression,  their  brilliant  rhetoric  and 
the  exquisite  artistry  in  the  manner  of  their  presentation, 
they  were  then  supreme  and  have  never  been  surpassed 
or  even  equalled  to  the  present  time.  Aristophanes  has 
flayed  the  designing  Cleon,  and  he  was  not  alone  in 
demoralizing  Demos,  sycophants  and  subserviency  often 
had  such  plausibility  that  they  were  able  to  overthrow 
honor  and  lead  even  the  most  scrupulous  citizen  into  a 
dangerous  and  expensive  lawsuit,  but  when  that  age  came 
Greece  was  on  the  decline  even  as  has  always  been  the 
case  with  other  nations*  "Men,"  said  Aristophanes,  and 
after  bmi  Petronius,  "men  are  lions  at  home  and  foxes 
abroad." 

Only  the  results  of  all  this  were  tragic,  however;  in 


62 THE      INNS      OF 

the  daily  and  ordinary  activity  of  these  institutions  there 
unfolded  itself  on  the  other  hand,  a  certain  strength  of 
mind  and  activity  of  thought,  a  stimulating  of  the  facul 
ties  and  an  energy  of  action  compared  with  which  our 
public  life  forms  a  contrast  almost  as  marked  as  the  dif 
ference  between  life  and  death.  We  must  be  cautious  in 
condemning  lest  we  condemn  ourselves  and  our  own 
institutions. 

One  should  do  whatever  will  benefit  his  health,  sing, 
declaim,  or  if  he  so  desires,  walk  up  and  down  in  the  great 
room  of  a  hostelry,  whether  strangers  be  present  or  no, 
"it  makes  no  difference  whether  one  is  a  passenger  aboard 
ship  or  whether  he  is  lodged  in  an  inn  with  many  others, 
if  the  attendants  are  inclined  to  laugh  and  make  sport 
it  makes  no  difference,  it  is  no  less  dishonest  to  eat  than 
it  is  to  take  one's  exercise."  From  this  passage  it  would 
appear  that  no  separate  room  was  allotted  to  each  indi 
vidual  traveler,  and  the  pandokeion  was  a  common 
refectory  and  dormitory.  Would  it  then  follow  that  the 
same  disorder  of  men  and  beasts  would  have  been  found 
there  as  in  a  modern  Greek  kahn?  We  do  not  think 
otherwise. 

We  base  our  belief  on  the  passage  of  Epphippus  cited 
by  Athenaeus,  and  upon  another  not  less  curious  found 
in  Pollux.  In  his  precious  chapter  upon  the  settings  of 
a  play  and  the  decorations  of  Greek  theatres,  he  informs 
us  that  ordinarily  they  opened  through  the  proscenium, 
three  doors;  that  in  the  middle  might  open  upon  a  palace, 
a  cavern  or  grotto,  or  the  house  of  a  nobleman,  but  that 
the  second,  on  the  left,  invariably  opened  upon  an 
inn,  whilst  the  one  on  the  right  led  to  a  temple  in 
ruins  or  remained  vacant.  In  tragedies,  on  the  contrary, 
the  inn  or  "door  of  strangers/'  according  to  his  diction, 
was  on  the  right,  and  one  discovered  a  prison  on  the  left. 
These  details,  while  of  interest,  go  far  to  prove  that  inn 


GREECE      &      ROME 63 

life  was  well  known  and  was  a  familiar  part  of  daily  liv 
ing  in  ancient  Greece,  otherwise  they  would  never  have 
had  a  part  in  the  drama  of  the  times,  and  have  been 
always  introduced  in  the  scenic  scheme  of  the  theatre; 
but  let  us  give  the  passage  in  the  words  of  Pollux:  "In 
the  comedies,  an  awning  was  stretched  over  a  carpet,  it 
was  always  stretched  near  a  tavern  doubtless  so  that  those 
passing  might  cool  themselves  in  the  hot  hours  of  the 
day,  and  nearby  one  saw  the  stables  for  the  beasts  of 
burden,  and  the  great  gates  which  the  Greeks  called 
Jclisiades,  and  they  passed  through  these  to  enter  their 
carriages."  Here,  then  we  see  one  of  those  edifices  of  the 
Greeks,  great  halls  for  the  guests,  near  by  stables  for 
the  horses  and  sumpter  mules,  and  great  doors  for  the 
carriages.  But  at  that  point  our  information  comes  to 
an  abrupt  end. 

As  to  the  masters  of  these  establishments,  we  cannot 
think  ourselves  better  informed,  in  fact,  our  information 
is,  if  anything,  even  more  scanty  and  sketchy.  We  only 
know  that,  as  in  the  case  of  the  keeper  of  a  tavern  or 
cabaret,  the  calling  of  him  who  conducted  a  pandokeion 
was  held  detestable  and  infamous.  Pollux  has  trans 
mitted  to  our  admiring  curiosity  the  entire  index  expur- 
gatorius  of  infamous  callings  and  damaged  goods  and 
we  have  good  reason  to  suppose  that  the  legislator  was 
very  wisely  occupied  with  such  subjects  in  placing  the 
ban  of  a  public  scarcely  less  moral,  all  those  who  lodged 
for  the  night,  all  the  tavern  keepers  in  the  villages  and 
towns,  or  along  the  great  routes  of  Hellas. 

Their  women  were  for  the  most  part  strumpets  from 
the  lowest  stratum.  In  absolute  proof  of  this  we  need 
only  cite  a  very  curious  passage  from  the  Theodosian 
code,  as  later  on  we  shall,  that  such  women  were  absolved 
from  the  penalties  carried  by  the  law  against  adultery, 
so  true  was  it  thought  that  their  hideous  calling  was  but 


64 THE      INNS      OF 

one  facet  of  the  profession  still  older;  a  few  phrases  from 
Theophrastus's  chapter  on  Slander  shall  suffice  for  the 
present.  He  tells  us  that  the  daughters  of  Thrace,  so 
numerous  at  Athens,  many  being  of  the  nobility  of  their 
own  country,  but  for  the  most  part  slaves,  sellers  of  rib 
bons,  tavern  girls,  all  combining  the  calling  of  sweet 
predaciousness  with  their  other  metier;  our  evil  speaker 
launches  an  epigram  at  the  sons  of  such  abandoned 
women,  imputing  the  same  qualities  to  her  son — like 
mother  like  son,  as  it  were:  "His  mother,  I  may  add,  is 
a  noble  damsel  of  Thrace,  at  least,  in  the  language  of 
Corinth  she  is  called  'my  life,  my  soul,*  and  such  ladies 
are  esteemed  noble  in  their  own  country,  they  say.  Our 
friend  himself,  as  might  be  expected  from  his  parentage, 
is  a  rascally  scoundrel.  Such  women  snatch  the  passers- 
by  out  of  the  very  street.  That  house  has  not  the  best 
of  characters.  Really  there  is  something  in  that  proverb 
about  the  women.  In  short,  they  have  a  trick  of  gossip 
ing  with  men  .  .  .  and  they  answer  the  hall-door  them 
selves/*  In  other  words,  such  hostesses  conducted  hostel- 
ries  along  the  great  roads,  but  the  pleasure  of  their 
guests  was  the  most  serious  and  profitable  concern  of 
their  lives.  Nor  should  we  be  astonished  at  this  in 
formation  when  we  remember  the  nature  of  the  company 
thus  brought  together  in  the  stalls  called,  by  way  of 
compliment  among  the  Greeks,  inns,  and  we  find  the 
high  minded  Plutarch  greatly  insensed  and  defending 
well  born  men  from  tavern  friendships  and  familiarities. 
He  says  to  them:  "That  they  should  not  do  as  many  do 
and  imagine  they  have  the  substance  of  a  good  time 
when  they  have  but  the  shadow,  gaming  with  dice,  playing 
mora,  lodging  with  innkeepers  and  picking  up  gambling 
friendships  with  tavernkeepers  in  the  villages  to  the 
glittering  spell  of  games."  And  a  saying  of  Plato  in  his 
Laws  wherein  he  sets  forth  his  ideas  upon  a  Utopian 


GREECE      &      ROME 65 

government  is  as  much  to  the  point  in  some  favored 
countries  today  as  it  was  when  lie  enunciated  it.  I 
refer  to  the  passage  in  Lib.  XI,  sec.  918  of  the  Laws. 

There  is,  of  course,  little  doubt  that  the  unpopularity 
of  innkeepers  in  Greece  arose  in  part  from  the  feeling 
against  receiving  pelf  for  hospitality,  but  their  tendencies 
toward  adulteration  and  substitution,  extortion,  espion 
age,  and  the  like,  also  contributed  to  their  ill  repute. 

"On  this  account  (eagerness  for  gain)  all  the  lines 
of  life  connected  with  retail  trade,  commerce,  inn-keeping, 
have  fallen  under  suspicion  and  become  utterly  disrepu 
table.  For  if  what  I  trust  may  never  be  and  will  not 
be,  we  were  to  compel,  if  I  may  say  a  ridiculous  thing, 
the  best  men  everywhere  to  keep  taverns  for  a  time; 
or  carry  on  retail  trade,  or  do  anything  of  that  sort; 
or  if,  in  consequence  of  some  fate  or  necessity,  the  best 
women  were  compelled  to  follow  similar  callings,  then 
we  should  know  how  agreeable  and  pleasant  all  these 
things  are;  and  if  all  such  occupations  were  managed 
on  incorrupt  principles,  they  would  be  honored  as  we 
honor  a  mother  or  a  nurse.  For  the  sake  of  trade,  a 
man  opens  lodgings  in  a  lonely  place,  a  long  way  from 
anywhere.  He  receives  bewildered  travelers  in  barely 
tolerable  quarters,  or  affords  warmth,  quiet,  and  rest  in 
his  close  rooms  to  people  driven  in  by  angry  storms. 
And  then,  after  receiving  them  as  friends,  he  does  not 
provide  them  with  hospitable  entertainment  according 
to  that  reception  but  holds  them  to  ransom  like  captive 
enemies  whom  he  has  got  into  his  clutches,  on  the  most 
exorbitant,  unjust,  rascally  terms.  It  is  these  offenses 
and  others  like  them,  shamefully  common  in  all  such 
callings,  which  have  brought  discredit  upon  all  minis 
tration  to  men's  need." 

Is  it  any  wonder  that  Dionysus  in  the  Frogs  in 
quires  what  are  the  best  inns  on  the  road  to  Hell? 


THE      INNS      OP 


No,  Theophrastus,  you  were  wrong;  the  reckless  man 
would  not  become  a  tavern  keeper  with  such  profits  in 
sight. 

The  impudent  predaciousness  and  harlotry  of  the 
women  of  the  inns  and  taverns  were  able  foils  for  the 
unprincipled  thievery  and  general  rascality  practised 
habitually  by  the  men  of  the  house;  hungry  for  profits, 
they  cared  not  a  fig  what  the  source  might  be.  They  had 
taking  ways,  but  their  charity  was  hypo-microscopic  and 
could  only  be  awakened  by  some  wily  impostor  with  a 
supposititious  legacy  to  leave  or  some  other  motive  of 
paramount  interest;  arrogant  where  they  did  not  fear 
personal  chastisement,  they  bore  admirably  the  tradition 
of  Aristophanes,  that  "men  are  lions  at  home  and  foxes 
abroad." 

They  held  the  stranger  in  contempt  who  was  careful 
of  his  expenditures  and  did  not  hesitate  to  manifest  it 
when  they  dared.  All  these,  and  other  characteristics 
are  meant  by  the  term  Jcapelos. 

Any  man  possessing  a  tavern  where  entertainment 
was  to  be  had  passes,  if  that  were  possible,  for  even  a 
greater  knave  than  the  innkeeper.  It  was  always  a  dis 
grace  to  frequent  his  establishment,  and  any  man  making 
such  a  place  his  headquarters  would  have  been  held  to 
be  without  shame  and  utterly  lost  to  all  sense  of  honor, 
and  would  have  blushed  to  have  been  seen  sitting  at 
table  there.  A  certain  Demosthenes,  not  the  orator,  as 
he  was  a  drinker  of  water,  was  seen  one  day  by  Diogenes 
the  Cynic,  getting  drunk  in  a  tavern,  and  was  greatly 
put  out,  according  to  Plutarch,  and  wished  for  nothing 
so  much  as  to  get  away  from  the  place  undiscovered. 
"The  more  you  pull  back,3*  said  the  Cynic,  "the  further 
you  get  into  the  tavern,"  meaning  of  course  infamy. 
Although  Diogenes  spoke  to  that  purpose,  he  was  none 
the  less  a  frequenter  of  such  abandoned  places,  in  true 


GREECE      &      ROME 67 

cynic  form*  Before  lie  took  Ms  perpetual  headquarters 
in  the  patched  tub  in  which  he  crouched,  he  had  spent 
practically  his  whole  life  in  taverns.  He  took  his  meals 
in  them,  too.  Once  when  he  was  dining  amongst  a 
crowd  in  a  tavern  he  saw  through  the  open  door  Demos 
thenes  the  orator  passing  by  in  the  street.  He  called 
to  him,  and  as  the  other  heeded  not  the  invitation,  but 
continued  his  walk  and  turned  his  head,  "And  why/* 
yelled  the  Cynic  after  him,  "are  you  too  proud  to  ap 
proach  a  place  where  your  master  does  not  disdain  to  dine 
and  spend  his  time?"  "It  was  his  desire/*  remarks 
Aelian,  who  has  transmitted  the  anecdote  to  posterity, "  to 
speak  to  people  in  general,  and  to  citizens  in  particular, 
intimately,  individually;  such  he  deemed  the  office  of 
the  orator;  and  such  as  harangued  the  public  for  reasons 
of  state  are  but  the  slaves  of  the  multitude/* 


68  THE      INNS      OF 


CHAPTER  VI. 

Realistic  night  in  a  Greek  inn,  from  Marcel  Schwob — Adventure  of 
the  poet  and  the  slave — Beggars9  guild,  their  methods — Theophrastus 
on  ostentation — Night  life  in  Athens — Arts  of  Athenian  innkeepers- 
How  they  avenged  the  dupes — Their  jinesse  in  substitution — Plutarch 
on  capacity — Price  of  wines — Gentle  art  of  obtaining  something  for 
nothing — Wine  inspectors. 

Let  us  now  cite  a  pleasanter  picture,  conventional,  it 
is  true,  but  not  lacking  in  beauty.  The  gem  is  from  the 
works  of  Marcel  Schwob,  Mime  IV,  The  Hostelry.  (Edi 
tion  of  Mosher,  1901.): 

"Hostelry,  o'errun  with  vermin,  the  poet,  bitten  till 
deplete  of  blood,  salutes  thee.  Not  to  thank  thee  for 
having  sheltered  him  one  night  on  the  borders  of  a  dark 
highway;  the  route  is  miry  as  that  which  leads  to  Hades 
— but  thy  cots  are  broken  down,  the  lamps  smoky;  thine 
oil  is  rancid,  galettes  mouldy,  and,  since  last  autumn 
there  are  white  worms  in  thine  emptied  nut-shells. 

"But  the  poet  is  grateful  to  the  venders  of  swine  who 
came  from  Megara  to  Athenae  (thy  partitions  are  thin, 
O  hostelry),  and  renders  thanks  also  to  thy  vermin, 
which  kept  him  awake  by  preying  upon  his  whole  body, 
swarming  in  hurrying  masses  upon  the  beds. 

"For,  since  thus  he  might  not  sleep,  he  sought  to 
breathe  the  white  moonlight  through  an  opening  in  the 
wall;  and  from  thence  he  saw  a  vender  of  women  who 
came  knocking  at  the  door  very  late  at  night.  The 
merchant  called :  *  Child,  child ! ' — but  the  slave  was  snor 
ing,  face  downward,  and  with  upstretched  arms  muffled 
his  ears  with  the  coverings.  Then  the  poet  wrapped 
himself  in  a  yellow  robe,  of  the  same  shade  as  nuptial 
veils :  this  crocus  tinted  robe  had  been  left  in  his  possession 


GREECE      &      ROME 69 

one  morning  when  a  young  love-maiden  deserted  Mm 
clad  in  a  new  lover's  robe.  So  the  poet,  with  the  out 
ward  seeming  of  a  servant,  opened  the  door;  and  the 
vender  of  women  ushered  in  a  numerous  band.  The 
breasts  of  the  young  girl  who  entered  last  were  firm  as 
the  quince  fruit;  she  was  worth,  at  least,  twenty  minae. 

"  *  0  servant/  said  she,  *  I  am  weary;  where  is  my  bed?  * 

"  'O  my  dear  lady/  said  the  poet,  *thy  friends  already 
occupy  every  bed  in  the  inn;  only  the  servant's  cot  is 
left;  if  you  wish  to  lie  thereon  you  are  welcome/ 

"The  miserable  wretch  who  cared  for  all  these  fair 
young  girls  flared  the  light  of  the  great  charred  lamp- 
wick  in  the  face  of  the  poet;  perceiving  a  maid-servant, 
neither  too  beautiful  nor  well  arrayed,  he  uttered  no 
word  of  dissent. 

"Hostelry,  the  poet,  bitten  till  deplete  of  blood,  thanks 
thee.  The  woman  who  rested  with  the  maid-servant 
this  night  was  softer  than  eiderdown,  and  her  fragrant 
throat  was  like  to  a  perfected  fruit.  But  all  this  had 
remained  untold,  O  hostelry,  but  for  the  noisy  prating 
of  thy  cot.  The  poet  fears  that  the  little  pigs  of  Megara 
may  have  thus  learned  of  his  adventure.*  O  ye  who 
listen  to  these  words,  if  the  *coi,  coi5  of  these  little  pigs 
from  Agora  to  Athenae  falsely  relates  that  our  poet 
indulges  in  low  amours  come  to  the  hostelry  and  see  his 
little  friend  whose  love  he  knew — she  whose  breasts  are 
as  firm  as  the  quince  fruit, — this  poet  bitten  by  the 
blessed  vermin  on  a  moonlit  night/5 

The  principal  frequenters  of  the  taverns  of  Athens, 
then,  would  have  been  the  lower  classes,  the  sailors  and 
watermen  (pronneikvi)  of  the  Piraeus;  and  the  rascally 
scapegraces  which  Suidas  and  Harpocration  include 
under  the  name  peristatoi,  idlers  and  vagrants,  turbulent 
rioters  of  the  Agora;  their  especial  haunt  the  tavern 

*From  Aristophanes,  the  idea  at  least,  but  the  basket  is  missing. 


70 THE      INNS      OF 

which  harbored  abandoned  women;  obstreperous  hecklers 
of  the  demagogues  of  the  Pnyx,  where  Demosthenes  him 
self,  though  affecting  to  despise  their  good  or  evil  opinion, 
labored,  nevertheless,  for  their  favor,  never  ceased  in 
triguing  for  their  backing,  and  was  always  attempting 
to  win  their  applause  and  support. 

The  more  hardy  of  the  beggars*  gild  forgathered  in 
the  vicinity  of  the  cabarets,  the  mob  of  impudent  brag 
garts  such  as  the  one  of  whom  Theophrastus  speaks  in 
the  skit  called  Aponoia  (The  Reckless  Man) : 

"In  character  a  coarse  fellow,  defiant  of  decency, 
ready  to  do  anything;  just  the  person  to  dance  the 
cordax,  sober  and  without  a  mask,  in  a  comic  chorus. 
At  a  conjurer's  performance,  too,  he  will  collect  the 
pence,  going  along  from  man  to  man,  and  wrangling 
with  those  who  have  the  free-pass  and  claim  to  see  the 
show  for  nothing.  He  is  apt,  also,  to  become  an  inn 
keeper  or  a  tax-farmer.  .  .  .  And  he  would  seem,  too, 
to  be  one  of  these  persons  who  collect  and  call  crowds 
about  them,  ranting  in  a  loud  cracked  voice  and  ha 
ranguing  them." 

Beggars'  gilds  are  not  new  under  the  sun,  and  the 
leader  of  the  clan,  a  ruffian  hardier  and  more  brazen 
and  enduring  than  any  of  his  cohorts,  furnished,  through 
his  lieutenants,  the  pittances  of  silver  necessary  to 
effectuate  the  carrying  out  of  any  predatory  campaign 
contemplated  against  the  peace  and  pocketbooks  of 
the  community,  or  to  bait  the  traps  and  snares  set  for  the 
feet  or  appetites  of  Inexperience  or  Lusty  Age,  or  to 
buy  the  wine  for  some  poor  devil  who  had  been  picked 
to  the  bones  while  drunk  and  irresponsible.  And  from 
each  enterprise  he  took  the  lion's  share,  holding  his 
slaves  and  serfs  to  a  daily  accounting.  It  is  for  this 
reason  that  Theophrastus  has  depicted  the  hero  of  the 
episode  quoted  above  as:  "Great  in  lawsuits,  now  as 


GREECE      &      ROME 71 

def endant,  now  as  prosecutor,  sometimes  excusing  himself 
on  oath,  sometimes  attending  the  court  with  a  box  of 
papers  in  the  breast  of  his  cloak  and  satchels  of  note 
books  in  his  hands.  He  will  not  disdain  either  to  be  a 
captain  of  market-place  hucksters,  but  will  readily  lend 
them  money,  exacting,  as  interest  upon  a  dollar,  twenty- 
five  per  cent  per  diem;  and  will  make  the  round  of  the 
cook-shops,  the  fishmongers,  the  fish-picklers,  thrusting 
into  his  cheek  the  interest  which  he  levies  on  their  gains." 

But  night  was  the  greatest  friend  of  designing  idle 
ness.  The  cabarets  were  always  open,  and  the  pick 
pockets  dancing  attendance  upon  their  dupes  were  as 
alert  as  bird-catchers  watching  their  snares.  The  cour 
tesan  of  the  Ceramicus  glided  noiselessly  into  the  light 
from  the  somber  darkness  of  the  side-street,  a  wavering 
light  from  a  dim  lamp  that  lit  up  the  sign  over  the  door, 
she  took  her  place  in  this  Athenian  medley  along  with 
the  thieves  and  smugglers,  she  boldly  demands  drink 
in  her  hoarse  voice,  "Crasi,  crasi"  she  calls  to  the  host, 
she  drinks  deeply  in  a  manner  worthy  of  an  Athenian, 
and  although  her  head  may  be  hot,  her  reasoning  para 
sitism  is  cool  enough  to  take  instant  advantage  of  the 
slightest  opportunity  of  gain  and  to  make  the  best  of 
such  meager  advantages  as  nature  has  endowed  her 
with.  The  design  carried  out,  she  takes  her  share  and 
vanishes,  but  alas,  not  into  oblivion,  for  day  will  dawn 
and  with  it  will  come  the  overlord  who  must  be  paid 
and  whom  there  is  no  avoiding. 

The  poor  dupe  did  not  remain  to  seek  revenge;  the 
police  of  Athens  were  not  more  numerous  than  active, 
they  were  not  equipped  like  our  own  with  eyes  that 
outnumbered  those  of  Argus,  there  it  was  the  tavern- 
keeper  himself  who  avenged  the  wrong,  a  sort  of  lex 
talionis,  a  gentle  and  insinuating  blackmail  that  knew 
the  value  of  well  paid  silence  as  well  as  the  best  method 


72 THE      INNS      OF 

of  communicating  the  fact  that  he  possessed  knowledge 
and  probably  a  dangerous  gift  of  eloquence*  Little  by 
little  the  spoils  would  find  their  way  into  his  till  and 
all  was  well.  Mine  host  knew  so  well  the  whole  band  of 
robbers,  he  served  them  with  adulterated  vitriols  (kykeon) 
in  delightfully  small  cups,  veritable  nectar  as  he  would 
call  it,  and  the  cistern  water  with  which  he  tempered 
his  munificence  was  the  most  valuable  portion  of  the 
drink.  To  put  it  bluntly,  our  tavern-keeper  was  not  only 
a  blackmailer  and  a  thief,  but  he  was  also  a  poisoner, 
and  we  are  guilty  of  no  euphemism  when  we  charge  him 
with  having  undertaken  to  avenge  the  dupe,  and  settle 
his  losses  in  full. 

The  tavern-keeper  of  old  Greece  was  not  lacking  in 
expedients  for  doing  business  in  a  dishonest  way  with 
a  bold  front  and  behind  a  mask  of  injured  innocence.  If 
he  had  been  very  long  in  the  business  he  knew  every 
resource  of  his  calling;  he  was  a  good  mixer  and  an  adept 
adulterator.  He  knew  his  wines.  Unfortunately,  we 
know  nothing  definitely  of  the  methods  or  perfidious 
ingredients  which  took  the  place  of  the  grape,  and  which 
gave  the  synthetic  mixture  its  taste  and  color.  The 
Greek  vintner  may  have  made  it  as  a  substitute  for  the 
wine  of  Crete  or  Cyprus,  just  as  a  Parisian  vintner  of 
the  sixteenth  century  made  a  substitute  for  malvoisie, 
producing  a  wine  of  the  same  native  growth,  as  Beaujeu 
informs  us,  or  again,  as  the  merchants  of  the  eighteenth 
century  with  no  less  effrontery  made  an  imitation  of 
muscat.  At  any  rate,  according  to  a  recipe  left  by 
Olivier  de  Serres,  they  mixed  together  water,  honey, 
orval  juice,  and  the  dregs  of  beer,  to  attain  the  horrible 
mash.  But  supposition  has  no  place  here.  Thanks  to 
the  indiscretion  of  Plutarch,  there  is  one  manoeuvre  of 
the  Greek  tavern-keepers  that  has  not  escaped  us.  They 
would  serve  their  customers  with  potable  vintage  until 


GREECE      &      ROME     73 

the  wine  had  made  itself  felt  in  their  finger  tips  and  then 
substitute  a  vile  vintage  (oxos).  Our  host  also  had  the 
benefit  of  false  measures,  the  eternal  expedient  which 
those  who  sell  anything  seem  to  inherit  by  instinct.  "Is 
it  the  tavern-keeper  of  our  neighborhood,  who  is  always 
cheating  me  grossly  with  her  half  pints?"  asks  Blepsi- 
demus,  in  the  Plutus  of  Aristophanes.  In  the  Thesmo- 
phoriazusai,  we  have  another  passage:  "If  any  male 
or  female  publican  falsifies  the  legal  measure  of  the 
gallon  or  the  half  pint,  pray  that  he  may  perish  miser 
ably."  The  fraud  against  which  the  dramatist  is  con 
tending  is  the  alteration  more  or  less  bold  of  the  public 
measure  which  the  government  of  Athens  had  established 
by  law,  and  all  sellers  of  liquids  were  bound  by  it  not  to 
use  utensils  of  capacity  less  than  the  legal  standard. 
"It  is  true,"  says  Plutarch,  in  a  curious  passage  in  his 
Symposium,  where  he  attempts  to  prove  that  one  should 
drink  according  to  the  measure  of  his  own  stomach,  a 
standard  highly  specialized  and  never  the  same  in  two 
individuals,  sometimes  increasing  or  diminishing  even 
in  the  same  individual,  "it  is  true  that  we  go  to  the 
tavern  to  purchase  our  wine  according  to  the  same 
measure  and  uniform,  which  is  public,  but  at  our  tables, 
each  stomach  is  the  standard  by  which  one  is  governed, 
which  does  not  fill  itself  with  an  amount  uniform  and 
universal,  but  according  to  the  capacity  which  each  has 
at  the  time." 

With  the  measures  themselves,  we  are  little  concerned 
in  a  work  of  this  scope,  but  with  wine  as  cheap  as  it 
was  in  the  days  of  Menander,  and  later  of  Polybius,  it 
is  difficult  to  understand  how  false  measures  or  adulter 
ation  could  have  contributed  enough  in  profits  to  make 
it  worth  the  while.  With  the  rare  and  costly  vintages 
it  would  of  course  have  been  different,  but  these  were 
not  often  to  be  had  of  the  tavern-keeper*  Menander, 


74 THE      INNS      OF 

in  a  fragment  of  Ms  Treasure  cited  by  Stobaeus,  speaks 
of  an  Athenian  vintner  named  Kantharos  who  was  un 
usually  expert  in  adulterating  wines,  so  much  so  that  his 
skill  passed  into  a  proverb  "Cunning  as  Kantharos." 

Very  frequently,  thanks  to  the  quality  of  the  custom 
ers  who  came  in  along  with  the  frequenters  of  the 
drinking  place,  the  Athenian  tavern-keepers,  who  were 
generally  gifted  with  many  of  the  less  admirable  attributes 
of  the  fox,  found  much  to  engage  their  conversation. 
They  were  generally  abusive,  and  always  on  the  lookout 
to  cheat.  The  tavern-keeper  had  to  serve  his  product 
before  receiving  his  money,  and  often  the  guest  drank 
to  his  health  and  departed  hastily  without  having  paid 
for  his  wine. 

These  tricks  of  Greek  villainy  renewed  their  venom 
in  the  warm  baths  of  the  Cynosarges,  the  retreat  outside 
the  city  for  those  not  of  pure  Athenian  blood,  such  as 
vagrant  philosophers,  pretty  ladies,  parasites  who  were 
fasting  for  the  time  being;  places  which  were  warmed 
for  the  proletariat  in  the  winter.  In  Theophrastus  we 
read  of  an  episode  which  parallels  the  experience  of  the 
Athenian  tavern  keeper: 

"He  is  apt,  also,  to  go  up  to  the  coppers  in  the  baths, 
— to  plunge  the  ladle  in,  amid  the  cries  of  the  bath-man — 
and  to  souse  himself;  saying  that  he  has  had  his  bath, 
and  then,  as  he  departs, — no  thanks  to  you ! "  In  explana 
tion  of  the  above  passage  it  should  be  stated  that  a 
shower  bath  was  sometimes  taken  by  having  water 
dashed  over  the  head.  It  was  the  bath  attendant's  duty 
to  do  this  service  which  our  Pyrgopolynices  does  for 
himself,  saving  his  money,  and  depriving  the  attendant 
of  his  fee.  In  all  disputes  the  voice  of  the  tavern-keeper 
was  likely  to  be  heard  in  the  land,  first  of  all,  loudest  of 
all.  "Whom  do  you  take  me  to  be?"  asks  Poverty,  in 
the  Plutus  of  Aristophanes,  after  having  threatened  the 


GREECE      &      ROME 75 

admirable  Blepsidemus  and  Chremylus,  who  are  intent 
upon  expelling  her  from  the  hearths  of  all  the  just  people 
in  Hellas:  "Some  hostess  (bar  harlot),  or  pulse-porridge 
seller,"  responds  Chremylus  promptly,  "otherwise  you 
would  not  have  screeched  at  us,  having  wronged  you 
in  no  way."  It  was  held  shameful  to  enter  into  a  con 
troversy  with  a  courtesan,  a  bath  attendant,  a  tavern- 
keeper,  a  fish  monger,  or  an  itinerant  peddler  of  any  kind. 
Aristophanes  is  almost  positive  evidence  on  this  point, 
and  Theophrastus  is  almost  equally  outspoken. 

Furthermore,  as  we  have  said  above,  it  would  have 
dishonored  any  man  of  good  morals  to  even  have  been 
seen  in  a  tavern  no  matter  what  the  circumstances,  aside 
from  taking  part  in  the  revelries  and  brawls  which  so  de 
lighted  the  idle  Athenian  proletariat,  where  not  even  a 
respectable  servant  could  have  passed  his  spare  time  and 
saved  his  moiety  of  reputation. 

Athenaeus  quotes  Cynulcus  on  the  frequentation  of 
taverns  and  cook-shops  as  follows: 

66 And  do  you  dare  talk  in  this  way,  you  who  are  not 
'rosy  fingered/  as  Cratinus  says  .  .  .  and  do  you  bring 
up  again  the  recollection  of  that  poet  your  namesake, 
who  spends  all  his  time  in  cook-shops  and  inns?  Although 
Isocrates  the  orator  has  said,  in  his  Areopagitic  Oration, 
*But  not  one  of  your  servants  ever  would  have  ventured 
to  eat  or  drink  in  a  cook-shop;  for  they  studied  to  keep 
up  the  dignity  of  their  appearance,  and  not  to  behave 
like  buffoons/  And  Hyperides,  in  his  oration  against 
Patrocles  (if,  at  least,  the  speech  is  a  genuine  one),  says 
that  they  forbade  a  man  who  had  dined  in  a  cook-shop 
from  going  up  to  the  Areopagus.  But  you,  you  sophist, 
spend  your  time  in  cook-shops,  not  with  your  friends 
(hetairon),  but  with  pretty  ladies  (hetairon),  having  a 
lot  of  cadets,  male  and  female  about  you,  and  always 
carrying  about  these  books  of  Aristophanes,  and  Apollo- 


76 THE      INNS      OF 

dorus,  and  Ammonius,  and  Antiphanes,  and  also  of 
Georgias  the  Athenian,  who  have  all  written  about  the 
pretty  ladies  at  Athens.  O,  what  a  learned  man  you 
are!" 

Public  morality,  such  as  it  was,  decreed  that  the 
frequentation  of  these  places  was  infamous,  and  the  ban 
extended  even  to  the  man  who  went  there  but  once. 
The  public  of  Athens  seems  to  have  had  a  well  developed 
sense  of  the  proprieties,  and  reserved  for  gluttons,  mem 
bers  of  the  oldest  profession,  brawling  roisterers,  and  cynics, 
spoken  of  above  the  privilege  of  immune  frequentation. 
The  law  left  such  inhibitions  to  the  discretion  of  the 
populace,  and  the  opinion  of  disadvantage  which  was  the 
companion  of  such  infractions  of  the  moral  code  lay  also 
in  their  hands;  we  have  no  proof  that  the  law  ever  oc 
cupied  itself  seriously  with  the  taverns  and  their  keepers, 
save  only  in  cases  where  false  measures  had  been  used  or 
in  cases  of  murder  or  treason,  nor  have  we  been  able  to 
adduce  evidence  of  law  in  the  matter  of  taverns  and  inns 
except  such  as  is  conventional  or  hypothetical,  as  in 
Plato. 

There  was,  on  the  other  hand  a  peculiar  edict  of 
Xerxes  levelled  against  the  Babylonians  after  their  revolt 
and  appeal  to  arms.  He  promulgated  a  decree  which 
carried  with  it  the  severest  penalties;  a  ukase  which 
prescribed  that  the  Babylonians  from  then  on  were  to 
pass  their  lives  in  taverns  and  other  places  where  revelry 
ran  rife,  in  order  that  such  character  and  manly  vigor 
as  remained  to  them  should  be  disintegrated  and  leave 
them  a  supine  assemblage  of  slaves  ripe  for  tribute  and 
utterly  unfitted  for  self  government  or  the  effort  neces 
sary  to  secure  independence. 

One  institution,  however,  proves  that  the  police  of 
Athens  were  not  entirely  indifferent  to  the  orgies  of 
drunkenness  common  in  Athens,  and  the  brawls  and 


GREECE      &      ROME 77 

breaches  of  the  peace  which  followed  in  their  wake:  I 
mean  the  oenoptae,  or  inspectors  of  wine.  Athenaeus 
says  of  them:  "The  ancients  affected  so  much  of  luxury 
and  grandeur  that  they  had  cup-bearers  for  their  tables, 
and  in  addition,  inspectors  of  their  wines."  The  Athen 
ians  made  a  public  charge  of  that  inspection.  Eupolis 
speaks  of  the  same  institution:  "0  city  of  Athens,  you 
are  happier  than  wise.  You  who  are  commanded  by 
those  whom  you  have  condescended  to  name  inspectors 
of  your  wines." 

The  oenoptae,  however,  had  no  right  of  inspection 
over  the  taverns.  Like  the  gynoeconomos,  whose  care 
was  the  public  weal,  and  who  took  precautions  that  the 
number  of  guests  did  not  exceed  thirty,  and  that  no 
seditious  gatherings  should  take  place  under  pretext  of 
political  banquets  or  excursions  into  the  country,  the 
oenoptae  did  not  concern  themselves  with  particulars  of 
a  dinner,  they  merely  saw  to  it  that  such  as  drank  did 
so  according  to  law. 

"Now,"  remarks  Athenaeus,  "their  function  is  unim 
portant.  The  oenoptae  number  three,  and  they  furnish 
guests  with  necessary  information  during  a  dinner. 
Therefore  they  have  come  to  be  known  as  *eyes/ " 
There  might  have  been  an  official  over  the  inspectors, 
an  official  whose  powers  were  more  far  reaching;  he 
might,  for  instance  have  had  control  of  the  enforcement 
of  all  laws  concerning  drink,  the  imposts,  and  especially 
the  sale  to  the  public,  and  therefore  to  the  taverns.  A 
passage  from  Plato,  unfortunately  incomplete,  but  cited 
by  Pollux,  is  of  interest  in  this  connection.  It  seems  that 
Plato  desired  to  praise  a  man  named  Strabo  for  his 
excellent  management  of  the  duties  incumbent  upon  the 
administration  of  the  wine  trade,  and  for  that  reason 
calls  Tn'm  a  taverner.  A  most  peculiar  tribute,  and  one 
which  might  be  tortured  into  a  tolerable  epigram. 


78 THE      INNS      OF 

The  Athenian  innkeeper  had  not  only  to  contend 
with  the  officials  of  the  wine  business,  he  was  also  sub 
ject  to  the  visitations  of  the  opsonomos,  the  official  who 
had  authority  over  food  stuffs;  and  whose  chief  aim  in 
life  seems  to  have  been  the  prosecution  of  retailers  of 
commodities  who  had  recourse  to  misrepresentation  and 
lying  in  carrying  on  the  affairs  of  business  at  a  profit. 
The  Athenian  inns  dealt  in  food  and  drink,  and  were 
frequented  for  both  purposes  even  as  those  of  Europe 
today.  These  places  served  meals  in  proportion  to  the 
excellence  of  the  cook,  the  difficulty  experienced  in 
carrying  the  carved  pieces  of  the  sacrificial  victims  from 
the  altars,  and  the  complaisance  of  the  landlord,  and 
Hermes  regretted  bitterly  the  effect  Plutus  has  had  upon 
hospitality  in  the  Athenian  taverns: 

HERMES:  I  used  to  enjoy  all  the  good  things  in  the 
female  innkeepers'  shops  as  soon  as  it  was  morning, 
wine-cake,  honey,  dried  figs,  as  many  as  was  fitting  for 
Hermes  to  eat:  but  now  I  go  to  bed  hungry  and  sleep  in  a 
garret. 

CARIO:  Is  it  not  then  with  justice,  who  sometimes 
caused  their  loss,  although  you  enjoyed  such  good 
things? 

HERMES:  Ah  me,  for  the  cheese-cake  that  was  baked 
on  the  fourth  day! 

CARIO:    You  long  for  the  absent,  and  call  in  vain. 

HERMES:  Ah  me,  for  the  ham  which  I  used  to  de 
vour! 

CARIO:    Leap  upon  the  bottle,  there  in  the  open  air. 

HERMES:  And  for  the  warm  entrails  which  I  used  to 
devour! 

CARIO:  A  pain  about  your  entrails  seems  to  torture 
you. 

HERMES:  Ah  me,  for  the  cup  that  was  mixed  half 
and  half! 


THE  VEGETABLE  COOK 


GREECE      &      ROME 79 

CARIO:  You  ca.Tm.ot  be  too  quick  in  drinking  this 
besides  and  running  away. 

HEKMES:  Would  you  assist  your  own  friend  in  any 
way? 

CARIO:  Yes,  if  you  want  any  of  those  things  in 
which  I  am  able  to  assist  you. 

HEBMES:  If  you  were  to  procure  me  a  well  baked 
loaf  and  give  it  me  to  eat,  and  a  huge  piece  of  meat  from 
the  sacrifices  you  are  offering  within, 

CARIO:    But  there  is  no  carrying  out! 

The  Greek  restaurants  had  one  door  on  the  street, 
always  open,  and  the  most  delicious  aromas  and  odors 
streamed  out  to  assail  the  senses  and  stomachs  of  the 
passers-by,  where  custom  hesitated  and  was  lost.  Often 
these  odors  would  awaken  a  sluggard  who  would  send 
a  slave  out  to  find  the  morsel  so  much  to  his  taste;  this 
usually  completed  the  conquest  and  was  sound  adver 
tising.  Such  was  the  experience  of  Philoxenos,  glutton 
and  poet,  one  day.  He  was  always  keen  upon  the  de 
lights  of  the  table  as  soon  as  he  was  awake.  He  chanced 
to  pass  by  the  door  of  a  famous  innkeeper  and  his  nostrils 
were  assailed  by  the  delicious  emanations  from  a  goulash 
or  ragout  which  seems  just  to  have  attained  the  very 
acme  of  culinary  perfection.  "Run  out  and  get  that 
dish  for  me/5  he  commanded  in  a  voice  vibrant  with 
ravenous  desire. 

"But,"  replied  the  slave,  who  tested  prices  by  the 
poignancy  of  the  aroma,  "it  will  be  very  dear." 

"Very  well/*  replied  Philoxenos,  "so  much  the 
better!"  Surely  an  exclamation  worthy  of  Brillat- 
Savarin! 

All  inn-kitchens,  however,  were  not  equally  good,  and 
unless  the  fastidious  customer  paid  his  compliments  to 
the  best  known  establishments,  as  for  instance  one  whom 
Athenaeus  has  cited  under  the  head  of  cook  and  vintner, 


80         THE      INNS      OF 

he  was  likely  to  meet  with  a  rogue,  a  bad  dinner,  and  a 
malodorous  experience,  all  at  the  same  time,  and  might 
find  no  one  in  and  the  ovens  cold.  There  was  a  certain 
Lacedaemonian  wholly  uninformed  as  to  anything  which 
concerned  inns  and  taverns,  and,  being  a  Lacedaemonian, 
he  would  know  nothing  of  such  things,  and  he  addressed 
himself  to  one  of  those  kitchen  keepers  who  was  out  of 
everything.  The  former  happened  to  be  a  man  of  some 
rude  wit  and  spirit.  "The  Laconian,"  says  Plutarch,  from 
whom  we  have  taken  the  anecdote,  "gave  the  tradi 
tionally  soft  and  brief  answer;  having  purchased  a  fish 
in  a  tavern  he  delivered  it  to  the  taverner  whom  he  had 
accosted.  When  the  taverner  demanded  of  him  vinegar, 
cheese,  and  oil,  he  made  answer  as  follows:  "If  I  had  had 
what  you  demand  of  me,  I  would  not  have  bought 
the  fish." 

There  were  itinerant  retailers  of  foodstuffs  who  had 
portable  ovens  which  burned  charcoal.  They  were 
numerous  in  the  streets  of  Athens,  but  their  favorite 
haunt  seems  to  have  been  the  Agora  and  its  vicinity. 
They  sold  all  sorts  of  underdone  foods  from  their  little 
ovens,  and,  almost  without  exception,  they  had  the  mak 
ings  of  excellent  rascals  in  them.  They  were  more  guile 
ful  than  even  those  oakum  dealers  and  horse  traders  of 
whom  Aristophanes  speaks  so  pointedly  as  being  worthy 
to  succeed  Cleon  in  conducting  the  governmental  affairs 
of  the  city.  Nevertheless,  customers  often  were  able  to 
procure  from  these  peripatetic  retailers  such  delicacies  as 
were  not  served  in  the  kitchens  of  the  inns*  Hot  sausages 
highly  seasoned  with  pepper,  let  the  venders  of  hot  dogs 
take  notice,  hash,  omelettes  wrapped  in  fig  leaves  (prob 
ably  the  remote  ancestor  of  the  hot  tamale),  and  a  sort 
of  fruit  pudding  such  as  the  English  know  today  as  plum 
pudding:  the  Athenian  commoner  was  exceedingly  fond  of 
these  last  two  delicacies.  It  is  true  that  such  dishes  were 


GREECE      &      ROME 81 

grossly  prepared,  but  they  tickled  to  admiration  the 
tastes  of  the  sailors  and  other  plebeian  sojourners  in  the 
city.  They  also  dealt  in  sweets  such  as  honey  cakes  and 
preserved  fruits,  blanc-mange,  disposed  handily  in  rows 
in  their  shallow  baskets  woven  from  fragrant  rushes, 
very  convenient  and  appropriate  for  the  purpose.  Carry 
ing  their  stocks  in  trade  they  trotted  up  and  down  the 
streets  of  the  city  and  also  sold  their  wares  at  the  games 
and  other  spectacles.  Aristotle,  who  would  never  have 
been  suspected  of  having  been  interested  in  such  things, 
has  said  much  of  their  hawking  methods  and  their  cries 
as  they  glided  through  the  crowds  of  the  amphitheatre 
and  worked  their  way  by  degrees  to  the  topmost  benches, 
to  offer  some  customer  their  wares.  According  to  the 
grave  philosopher,  who  has  been  suspected  of  having 
a  sense  of  humor,  the  success  of  a  play,  whether  tragedy 
or  comedy,  was  always  in  inverse  ratio  to  that  of  the 
hawkers  with  their  merchandise.  If  the  play  was  unin 
teresting,  the  audience  appeased  its  appetite  with  cakes 
in  recompense  for  the  disappointment  to  its  curiosity,  but 
if  the  play  was  gripping,  as  for  instance,  the  Oedipus  of 
Sophocles,  or  if  the  sublimity  of  Aeschylus  had  found  an 
instrument  worthy  to  interpret  it,  the  hawkers  met  with 
the  short  shrift  which  should  overtake  all  vociferous 
votaries  of  Lucrum  when  they  punctuate  a  Chopin  noc 
turne  or  a  Beethoven  sonata  with  their  appeal  to  the 
flesh.  It  would  be  highly  interesting  as  well  as  entertain 
ing  to  try  some  such  comparison  in  our  own  theatres;  I 
mean  in  such  of  them  as  still  permit  an  ox-like  public 
to  be  annoyed  and  harassed  by  the  demands  of  such 
gentry.  The  article  vended  might,  for  convenience,  be 
packages  of  salted  peanuts,  or  other  tidbit  with  a  volatile 
base.  The  greater  the  sales,  the  more  the  audience 
would  enjoy  the  play. 

These  petty  peddlers  of  dainties  were  always  pros- 


82      THE      INNS      OF 

perous  and  numerous  at  Athens,  but  only  in  Athens. 
In  every  other  Greek  city,  even  in  those  in  which  it  might 
have  been  thought  that  conditions  were  favorable  for 
their  trade,  they  found  it  unprofitable  or  utterly  im 
possible.  We  do  not  include  Sparta  in  our  survey,  because 
gormandising  was  always  regarded  there  as  a  crime,  and 
cooks,  caterers,  and  the  like  were  classed  as  poisoners 
and  driven  from  the  country,  like  any  Sicilian  mal 
content*  Corinth,  the  luxurious  harbor  of  pleasure  and 
new  sensations,  is  the  city  we  have  in  mind;  Corinth, 
which  placed  such  extravagant  values  upon  hidden  assets 
and  virgin  territory.  "Not  everyone,"  laments  Horace, 
"can  go  to  Corinth/*  Yet  with  all  its  love  of  luxury, 
Corinth  was  far  behind  Athens  in  matters  of  eating  and 
taste  in  choosing,  and  one  of  the  characters  in  the  Mer 
chant  of  Diphilus  is  advised  to  hold  in  check  his  gas 
tronomic  preferences  and  comply  with  the  law.  "If," 
says  he  indignantly,  "one  sets  a  splendid  table,  the  magis 
trates  promptly  inquire  into  his  manner  of  living  and 
the  manner  in  which  he  employs  his  time;  they  ascertain 
whether  his  revenues  are  sufficient  to  meet  the  outlays 
demanded  by  such  luxury.  If  his  expenses  are  greater 
than  his  income  they  will  not  permit  it,  if  he  persists  in 
his  course,  he  must  make  amends.  Should  the  day  arrive 
when  he  has  no  more  property  and  he  still  persists  in  his 
manner  of  life  he  is  turned  over  to  the  executor  of  jus 
tice  who  inflicts  an  infamous  punishment  upon  him.55 
See  how  they  dealt  with  luxury  in  one  of  the  most  luxury 
loving  republics  of  Greece! 

Alciphron  speaks  in  the  same  manner  of  Corinth,  but 
what  Diphilus  imputes  to  the  severity  of  the  laws, 
Alciphron  lays  at  the  door  of  avarice.  "One  need  only 
approach  that  city  to  become  aware  of  the  miserly  selfish 
ness  of  the  rich  and  the  misery  of  the  poor.  It  is  noon, 
I  sally  out  to  the  bath,  I  see  a  great  many  young  people, 


GREECE      &     ROME 83 

handsome,  with  faces  gay  and  spirituel;  none  take  the 
road  leading  to  the  houses  of  the  wealthy,  all  direct  their 
steps  toward  the  Kranion,  where  the  wine  merchants 
and  fruit  sellers  have  their  booths.  I  see  that  they  keep 
their  eyes  bent  upon  the  ground;  some  rake  together  the 
pods  of  peas,  others  the  shells  of  nuts,  examining  the 
heaps  with  attention  to  see  whether  there  is  anything 
there  upon  which  to  grind  their  teeth.  They  scrape 
with  their  nails  the  peeling  of  the  pomegranate;  the 
tiniest  morsels  of  bread  which  have  been  trampled  under 
foot  do  not  escape  their  search  and  are  eaten." 

Taverns  and  inns  would  not  prosper  in  a  city  in  which 
the  wealthy  were  restrained  from  extravagance  by  rigid 
sumptuary  laws,  and  the  poor  were  forever  constrained 
by  their  melancholy  condition  to  a  diet  of  air  sparingly 
tempered  with  bread.  The  city  was  scarcely  visited  by 
lighters  except  for  the  purpose  of  supplying  their  daily 
allowance  of  wine,  so  that  a  single  tavern-keeper  could 
have  supplied  all  the  custom  to  be  found  there.  Plutarch 
relates  of  Dionysius  the  Tyrant,  that  when  he  was  living 
in  exile  at  Syracuse,  his  condition  was  no  better  than 
that  of  a  porter,  and  that  he  was  compelled  to  purchase 
his  wine  of  the  tavern-keeper,  and  that  this  was  only  the 
stronger  proof  of  the  ignominious  level  to  which  he  had 
fallen. 

But  how  different  were  things  in  happy  and  light 
hearted  Athens!  The  taverns  were  always  open  there, 
day  and  night;  you  could  always  get  a  joint  from  some 
succulent  sacrifice  in  the  inn  and  in  good  company; 
always,  somewhere  in  Athens  these  fraternities  which 
we  shall  later  see  again  in  Rome,  were  holding  a  banquet 
with  the  delicate  cuts  which  the  gods  with  as  much  wis 
dom  as  good  taste  refused.  At  Athens  it  was  not  re 
garded  as  shameful  to  go  daily  to  the  tavern  to  buy  wine, 
and  the  wealthy  did  not  blush  to  sell  the  same.  Accord- 


84     THE      INNS      OF 

ing  to  an  ancient  usage  in  France,  the  abbots  of  monas 
teries,  the  high  magistrates,  even  the  kings  sold  in  detail 
the  products  of  their  vineyards;  a  custom  common  also 
in  Italy,  and  especially  in  Florence  and  Naples.  The 
wealthy  Greek  vineyard  owners  left  such  wines  as  they 
wished  to  dispose  of  in  their  houses  in  the  city,  under 
charge  of  their  slaves.  The  disgrace  lay  not  in  selling 
the  wine  but  in  selling  what  purported  to  be  wine,  and 
adulteration  was  deemed  a  disgrace  which  only  a  vintner 
or  tavern-keeper  could  be  guilty  of. 

Yet  in  that  lovely  city  so  redolent  of  the  soul  of 
gayety  one  could  find  no  place  in  which  to  eat  and  drink 
in  good  company,  without  some  disagreeable  individuals 
to  spoil  the  evening.  The  taverns,  as  we  have  said,  were 
impossible;  therefore  the  wealthy  men-about-town,  who 
had  time  on  their  hands,  dropped  into  the  booths  of  the 
perfumers  and  the  barbershops  to  exchange  the  news 
and  discuss  matters  of  interest. 

The  women  were  forbidden  to  enter  places  where  they 
might  mix  with  men  or  find  themselves  in  male  com 
pany,  and  this  was  especially  true  of  the  taverns;  they 
therefore  betook  themselves  to  the  gristmills  to  gossip, 
just  as  the  rural  English  woman  frequents  the  ship 
chandlery.  Here  they  sang  their  songs  of  hero  and 
spindle,  and  love  and  life,  while  the  men  assembled  in 
these  shops  of  good  repute,  principally  those  of  the  bar 
bers,  predestined,  according  to  Theophrastus  and  Aris 
tophanes,  to  be  the  centers  of  all  the  chit-chat,  the  head 
quarters  of  writers  and  playwrights  who  decreed  peace 
and  war  and  made  or  unmade  the  destinies  of  the  State, 
according  to  the  visionary  plans  which  they  wrote  in 
charcoal  on  the  walls.  Aristophanes  would  have  us 
understand  that  all  Athens  was  agog  with  the  sudden 
good  which  had  befallen  some  dandy,  and  the  barbers 
were  entirely  responsible  for  the  spread  of  the  news*  In 


GREECE      &     ROME 85 

many  places  Aristophanes  mentions  a  certain  Cosmos, 
a  perfumer,  in  whose  shop  the  critics  of  Cleon  met  to 
discuss  him  and  his  policies,  and  of  the  crowd  of  dema 
gogues  who  raised  such  an  uproar  in  front  of  the  tribune 
of  the  leather  currier.  Nor  was  there  danger  in  thus 
taking  part  in  the  political  criticism  of  the  time  in  these 
shops,  the  haunt  of  the  well-to-do  idlers  and  literary 
ciitics,  the  radicals  of  the  times.  Radicalism  is  not  often 
in  conflict  with  the  police  unless  it  is  clad  in  rags.  It 
was  a  contention  of  Demosthenes  that  Aristogiton,  the 
better  to  convince  the  people  of  his  loving  devotion  to 
their  interests,  made  it  a  point  never  to  be  seen  in  the 
shop  of  perfumer  or  barber;  and  the  only  instance  I  have 
been  able  to  find  of  a  man  of  evil  reputation  slipping  in 
and  intruding  himself  into  such  company  is  the  arrogant 
upstart  whom  Theophrastus  satirizes  in  his  Characters. 

In  addition  to  the  taverns  where  wine  was  sold,  and 
the  shops  of  the  perfumers  and  barbers,  there  was  another 
institution  where  gossip  ran  rife,  I  refer  to  the  thenn- 
opolia.  These  establishments  were  very  popular  in 
Greece  and  especially  so  at  Athens,  and  we  shall  find 
them  well  established  at  Rome  in  due  course.  The 
thermopolia  were  places  where  hot  drinks  were  sold. 
The  word  is  of  purely  Greek  origin  as  is  seen  from  the 
roots,  and  in  addition  there  is  a  passage  in  Pollux  which 
confirms  the  statement. 

It  is  well  known  that  in  antiquity  hot  water  was 
esteemed  as  a  delectable  beverage  and,  in  addition,  it 
was  thought  to  possess  certain  hygienic  virtues.  Plutarch 
in  his  Treatise  on  the  Preservation  of  Health  remarks 
that  it  may  be  drunk  without  thirst,  that  it  relaxes  and 
refreshes  the  body,  and  that  it  fortifies  the  bodily  forces. 
The  eulogies  of  Dr.  Sangrado  must  be  taken  as  the  sum 
and  total  of  all  the  opinions  of  antiquity,  setting  aside, 
of  course,  that  of  Antonius  Musa: 


THE      INNS     Of 

"In  fact  the  wine  had  made  me  very  thirsty.  The 
suspicion  of  anyone  else  but  Sangrado  would  have  been 
awakened  by  the  thirst  that  consumed  me,  and  the  great 
draughts  of  water  I  tossed  off;  but  he,  fancying  seriously 
that  I  was  beginning  to  acquire  a  taste  for  watery  potions, 
said  to  me  with  a  smile:  *I  can  see,  Gil  Bias,  that  you 
no  longer  have  such  an  aversion  for  water.  Od's  life, 
you  drink  it  like  nectar.  That  does  not  astonish  me, 
my  friend;  I  knew  that  you  would  get  used  to  this  liquid/ 
'Sir/  I  replied,  'there  is  a  time  for  everything;  I  would 
give  just  now  a  hogshead  of  wine  for  a  pint  of  water/ 
This  answer  delighted  the  doctor,  who  did  not  lose  so 
good  an  opportunity  of  extolling  the  excellence  of  water* 
He  began  a  new  panegyric  upon  it,  not  as  a  calm  orator, 
but  as  an  enthusiast. 

"  *  A  thousand  times/  he  exclaimed,  'a  thousand  times 
more  estimable  and  more  innocent  than  the  taverns  of 
our  days,  were  those  water-establishments  of  former  ages, 
whither  men  did  not  go  shamefully  to  prostitute  their 
wealth  and  their  life  in  glutting  themselves  with  wine, 
but  where  they  met  to  amuse  themselves,  decently,  and 
without  risk,  by  drinking  warm  water!  We  cannot  too 
much  admire  the  wise  foresight  of  those  worthies  of  the 
State,  who  established  places  of  public  resort,  where 
water  was  given  to  all  comers,  and  who  confined  wine  to 
the  shops  of  the  apothecaries,  permitting  its  use  only  by 
prescriptions  of  the  physicians.  What  a  stroke  of  wis 
dom  !  Doubtless/  he  added,  *  it  is  by  some  happy  remains 
of  this  ancient  frugality,  worthy  of  the  golden  age,  that 
persons  are  found  to  this  day  who,  like  you  and  me, 
drink  nothing  but  water,  and  who  as  a  preventive  against, 
or  as  a  cure  for  all  ailments,  believe  in  drinking  warm 
water  that  has  never  boiled;  for  I  have  observed  that 
when  water  has  been  boiled  it  is  heavier  and  sets  less 
easily  on  the  stomach/ 


GREECE      &      BOME 87 

"Whilst  holding  forth  thus  eloquently,  I  more  than 
once  thought  I  should  burst  out  laughing.  Yet  I  main 
tained  my  gravity,  I  did  more;  I  entered  into  the  doc 
tor's  views.  I  blamed  the  use  of  wine,  and  pitied  man 
kind  for  having  acquired  a  taste  for  so  pernicious  a 
beverage.  Then,  as  my  thirst  was  not  yet  quenched,  I 
filled  a  large  goblet  with  water,  and  after  taking  a  deep 
draught,  said  to  my  master,  'Come,  sir,  let  us  quaff  this 
beneficent  liquor!  Let  us  revive  in  your  house  the 
ancient  water-taverns  which  you  regret  so  much!*  He 
applauded  these  words,  and  exhorted  me  for  a  whole 
hour  never  to  drink  anything  but  water.  I  promised 
him,  in  order  to  accustom  myself  to  this  beverage,  to 
imbibe  a  large  quantity  every  night;  and,  the  better  to 
keep  my  promise,  I  went  to  bed  resolved  to  go  to  the 
tavern  every  day/* 

Had  the  good  doctor  prescribed  his  aqueous  specific 
at  the  same  low  price  at  which  hot  water  was  served  in 
the  thermopolia  in  Greece,  and  had  he  used  as  an  excipient 
infusions  made  from  rare  plants,  charging,  for  example 
three  half  obols,  which  the  comic  poet  Philemon  has 
declared  was  the  price  of  a  cupful,  he  might  have  trans 
formed  that  sovereign  remedy  into  a  popular  beverage, 
and  have  gone  down  into  history  as  the  inventive  genius 
whose  ingenuity  produced  the  soda  fountain  and  all  its 
products. 

Success  was  in  his  grasp  had  he  but  taken  the  trouble 
to  follow  the  precepts  of  the  authors  from  whom  he  must 
have  amassed  his  information.  Had  he,  for  example, 
stimulated  the  tastes  and  appealed  at  the  same  time  to 
the  vanity  of  his  patients  by  following  the  classical  pro 
cedure,  and  mixing  equal  volumes  of  very  hot  water  and 
very  cold  excipients  in  the  form  of  decoctions,  his  prac 
tise  would  have  been  enormous,  and  had  his  excipient 
been  wine,  there  is  no  saying  where  it  would  have  ended. 


THE      INNS      OF 

•••^•••••••••••^•••••••••••••M  H 

And  it  is  true  that  this  method  had  much  to  recom 
mend  it.  Fluids  could  not  be  taken  boiling  hot,  and  it 
was  long  deemed  dangerous  to  drink  ice  cold  beverages 
in  a  hot  climate.  The  temperature  of  the  potion  after 
the  mixture  of  the  two  was  pleasant  and  salubrious,  and 
the  trouble  it  necessitated  made  it  only  the  more  to  be 
desired.  There  is  a  passage  in  the  letters  of  Aristaenetus 
which  bears  directly  upon  the  practice  of  mixing  cold 
water  and  hot  wine.  It  is  as  follows: 

"The  cup  bearer,  skilled  in  his  calling,  has  heated 
the  wine,  which  he  will  mix  with  cold  water,  in  just  such 
proportion  that  the  coldness  of  the  water  will  lower  the 
temperature  of  the  wine,  excessive  heat  being  moderated 
by  extreme  cold,  and  the  resulting  beverage  will  be  gra 
cious  to  the  palate  in  taste  and  in  temperature/' 

Patients  in  raging  fevers  were  not  so  scrupulous  and 
drank  their  wine  ice  cold.  A  courtesan  was  once  enter 
taining  the  comic  poet  Diphilus  at  supper  and  presented 
him  with  a  cupful  of  wine  cooled  with  snow:*" By  all  the 
gods,"  exclaimed  the  poet,  "you  have  an  ice-house  in 
your  well/5  "Yes,"  answered  the  Athenian  courtesan 
with  all  the  sprightly  spirit  of  her  class,  "I  throw  the 
prologues  of  your  comedies  into  it  when  necessary.  It 
need  not  astonish  you,  Diphilus." 

Finally,  let  us  say,  in  praise  of  the  uniform  sobriety 
of  Greece,  and  to  give  the  lie  to  the  slander  philosophical 
reprobates  later  made  current  in  Italy,  that  the  term 
pergraecari  (to  drink  like  a  Greek),  to  get  beastly  drunk, 
that  in  the  times  of  which  we  speak,  they  mixed  their 
wine  with  water  in  Hellas.  If  it  was  taken  pure,  it  was 
the  exception  and  not  the  rule. 

And  also,  in  the  Heroic  Age,  when  tradition  assumes 
that  the  whole  nation  was  plunged  into  drunkenness, 
which  was  continual  and  habitual,  and  was  said  to  be 
insatiable  for  the  finer  vintages  of  the  soil  in  the  Heroic 


GREECE      &      ROME 


Age,  let  us  repeat,  it  was  even  as  it  was  in  the  times  of 
which  we  treat,  with,  perhaps,  the  factor  of  moderation 
still  more  preponderant.  One  who  knew  the  secret  of 
procuring  the  most  subtle  mixture  of  wine  and  water 
was  deemed  worthy  of  a  statue;  a  lesson  which  seems  to 
have  been  lost  upon  a  later  but  more  inwardly  degen 
erate  age.  In  the  Homeric  age,  these  mixtures  of  wine 
and  water  were  mixed  before  anything  else  was  con 
sidered.  Large  amphorae  were  employed  for  the  pur 
pose,  and  the  cups  of  the  guests  were  filled  from  these, 
just  as  we  have  seen  that  at  Assyrian  and  Babylonian 
feasts,  the  cups  of  the  revellers  were  replenished  from 
the  huge  silver  urns  which  stood  almost  as  high  as  the 
eunuch  slave's  breast.  Drunkenness  at  these  entertain 
ments  in  pre-classical  Greece  was  not  the  rule;  on  the 
contrary,  the  aim  was  to  secure  the  maximum  of  effect 
with  the  minimum  of  evil  results,  and,  like  Friar  Tuck, 
they  loved  to  feel  the  grape  at  their  very  finger  tips 
without  invading  their  intelligence  or  cheapening  the 
reputation  for  good  repute  which  was  one  of  the  most 
precious  attributes  of  primitive  strength.  Because  of  that 
continual  sobriety,  that  detestation  of  pure  wine,  that 
continual  dilution  with  water,  which  must  have  been 
particularly  grateful  when  they  opened  the  acrid  pipes 
from  Arcady  or  Here,  which  rendered  those  who  drank 
them  dull  and  torpid,  and  the  ceramia  which  caused 
women  to  miscarry,  or  even  in  the  case  of  the  vintages 
of  Laconia  which  were  thick  and  heavy,  or  those  of 
Boeotia  and  Phocis,  which  were  a  mixture  of  grape  and 
pine  cone  extract,  water  made  them  all  more  pleasant  to 
the  taste  and  less  liable  to  overpower  the  head,  as  it 
helped  to  dilute  whatever  poison  they  contained.  The 
use  of  water,  however,  might  be  questioned  by  a  fine 
taste  where  the  rare  vintages  of  wines  of  Smyrna,  de 
canted  as  they  were  in  the  shadow  of  the  temple  of  the 


90          THE      INNS      OF 

mother  of  the  gods,  were  concerned,  or  the  white  polios 
wine  of  Syracuse,  the  wines  of  Lesbos  or  Thasos,  gleaming 
like  gold  in  the  pale  yellow  depths  of  their  shimmering 
volume,  so  exquisite  to  the  taste  with  their  sweet  and 
generous  flavor,  and  which  as  they  aged  more  and  more 
came  by  degrees  to  have  much  of  the  odor  of  the  finest 
apples.  And  one  might  well  demand  why  they  deemed 
it  necessary  to  debase  the  wonderful  vintage  of  Chios 
by  incorporating  it  into  any  mixture?  Or  why  adulterate 
the  delicate  wine  of  the  Aegean  Islands  with  impure 
water,  as  the  Latins  say?  a  wine  so  rare  and  costly  that 
when  it  was  used  even  at  Rome  it  was  at  only  the  most 
sumptuous  entertainments.  It  was  regarded  as  the  glory 
of  the  island  from  which  it  came,  and  the  Chian  vintage 
was  celebrated  with  medals  on  which  were  engraved  a 
sphinx  crowned  with  clusters  of  grapes  on  the  one  side 
and  on  the  other  an  amphora.  Rare  and  costly  indeed 
was  this  wine,  probably  the  rarest  of  all  antiquity,  and 
was  so  precious  that  those  who  sold  it  sometimes  drank 
it  from  the  amphora  as  such  an  ambrosia  could  give  them 
more  pleasure  than  the  profit  they  would  take  later  on 
from  its  sale.  Goguet  remarks  that  the  preference  of 
the  Greeks  for  mixtures  of  wine  and  water  were  founded 
upon  long  established  custom  and  on  the  headiness  and 
high  alcoholic  content  of  the  native  vintages.  "All 
Greek  wines  were  luscious/*  says  he,  "and  if  one  drank 
but  a  small  quantity  it  flew  to  the  head  and  rendered  one 
tipsy.  In  order  to  combat  these  tendencies  they  evolved 
the  method  of  exact  dilution  best  suited  to  each  vintage, 
and  when  this  was  once  worked  out,  they  followed  the 
rules.  Some  wines  were  diluted  more,  some  less,  each 
according  to  its  quality.  Homer  proves  this  in  many 
passages." 

One  should  not  suppose  that  the  professional  drunk 
ards  took  kindly  to  the  usage,  however,  as  there  were 


GREECE      &      ROME 91 

many  cynics  whose  dispositions  were  scarcely  less  acid 
than  their  countenances,  who  would  have  thought  their 
cups  and  their  persons  profaned  if  a  single  drop  of  water 
had  come  in  contact  with  either,  and  our  encomium  on 
the  general  sobriety  of  Greece  would  not  ring  true  were 
we  to  omit  stating  that  there  were  many  such  tipplers 
and  bottle-nosed  sages  in  Athens  and  Sparta,  in  Thebes 
and  in  the  Greek  settlements  of  Asia  Minor,  and,  in  fact, 
throughout  all  Greece. 

Aelian  has  preserved  a  list  of  the  more  celebrated 
devotees  of  the  flowing  bowl,  and  we  confess  to  some 
little  confusion  at  finding  it  so  long.  The  tyrants  of 
Hellas  were  all  given  to  alcoholic  excesses,  Dionysius 
(The  Younger),  of  Syracuse,  of  whose  exile  in  Corinth 
we  have  spoken  above,  Charidemus,  against  whom 
Demosthenes  exercised  his  talents  in  vain,  it  was  said 
of  him  that  wine  acted  as  a  spur  to  his  cruelty  but  it 
certainly  detracted  little  from  his  subtlety.  There  are 
many  others  in  Aelian's  list,  but  it  seems  unfair  to  chron 
icle  a  leader's  evil  deeds  without  saying  something  of  the 
good  he  did  as  well,  and  unless  the  evidence  is  well  authen 
ticated,  we  shall  not  record  such  matters* 

After  the  tyrants,  the  philosophers  are  given  a  place 
of  preference  on  Aelian's  list.  With  them  we  shall  not 
be  moved  to  leniency,  as  they  did  but  dampen  the  dry- 
ness  brought  on  by  their  arid  doctrines,  "Lacydes  and 
Timon,"  remarks  Aelian,  "were  not  so  well  known  as 
philosophers  as  they  were  as  drunkards." 

Anacharsis,  also,  who  was  not  enough  of  a  Scythian 
to  take  keenly  to  water,  has  a  place  in  the  middle  of  the 
list,  and  our  narrator  of  anecdotes  states  that  while  at 
the  court  of  Periander,  his  philosophical  escutcheon  was 
besmirched  by  his  drunken  pranks.  Diotomus  was  also 
a  great  tippler.  On  him  was  bestowed  the  surname 
"Funnel/*  because  he  took  the  largest  funnels  he  could 


92 THE      INNS      OF 

lay  hands  on,  put  the  end  in  his  mouth,  and  "swallowed 
all  the  wine  they  could  pour  into  it."  He  was  certainly 
a  high  priest  of  Dionysus,  and  the  only  guzzler  that  can 
even  be  compared  with  him  is  that  son  of  Syracuse  who, 
as  Aristotle  says,  placed  fresh  eggs  upon  a  carpet  and 
set  a  hen  upon  them,  meanwhile,  that  no  time  might  be 
lost,  retiring  to  a  tavern  to  drink  at  his  ease  and  wait 
for  them  to  hatch  out.  Cleomenes  of  Sparta  also  loved 
his  wine,  but  he  lived  amongst  a  populace  which  detested 
alcoholic  excesses,  and  would  not  tolerate  them  in  indi 
vidual  or  king,  and  Aelian's  malignity  can  bring  forward 
but  one  charge  against  his  sobriety:  "he  drank  his  wine 
pure,  in  the  Scythian  fashion." 

The  Scythes,  as  is  well  known,  were  greatly  given  to 
drunkenness,  and  among  them  a  warrior's  courage  and 
resource  were  reckoned  and  evaluated  according  to  his 
capacity  to  outlast  the  rest  of  the  company  in  a  drinking 
bout.  While  there  is  no  absolute  evidence  as  to  this, 
other  barbarians  who  had  come  from  Scythia  to  Athens 
had  been  known  to  drink  almost  to  frenzy  in  the  low 
dives  of  the  Piraeus  or  the  Agora,  on  the  days  of  solemn 
festivals,  and  then  stertorously  sleep  themselves  sober  on 
the  steps  of  the  Parthenon  or  on  the  massive  stairs  of  the 
deserted  Phyx.  This  seems  to  have  been  rather  common 
amongst  such  barbarians  as  were  in  the  guard  of  the 
archon,  or  the  porters  of  the  Areopagus  or  temples. 

The  Thracians,  who  were  especially  numerous  in 
Athens,  where  they  formed  almost  the  whole  of  the 
domestic  population,  were  by  nature  very  like  the 
Scythians,  and  as  drinkers  they  held  their  own  with  all 
comers*  Aelian  has  not  included  them  in  his  index,  but 
what  he  has  said  of  a  barbarian  race  to  the  north  may 
well  be  applied  to  the  Thracians.  "It  would  be  safe  to 
affirm  that  they  live  in  wine;  as  other  peoples  use  oil  to 
anoint  their  bodies,  so  do  the  Tapyrians  soak  themselves 


in  wine." 


GREECE      &      ROME 93 

Byzantium,  whose  sailors  went  in  great  numbers  to 
the  port  of  Athens,  its  metropolis,  was,  among  all  the 
cities  of  Thrace,  the  one  in  which  there  was  the  most 
debauchery  and  drunkenness.  Athenian  depravity,  re 
acting  upon  the  native  coarseness  and  addiction  to  such 
entertainment,  gave  such  impulses  free  swing.  Vice 
flourished  there,  vice  rude  and  robust,  always  brutal,  and 
insatiable.  "It  is  said/3  writes  Aelian,  "that  the  Byzan 
tines  loved  wine  so  passionately,  they  quitted  their  houses 
and  rented  them  to  the  strangers  who  came  to  live  in 
their  city,  in  order  that  they  might  establish  themselves 
in  taverns.  They  also  left  their  women  to  the  foreigners 
and  thus  committed  two  crimes  at  the  same  time, 
drunkenness  and  prostitution.  When  they  had  become 
inebriated,  they  took  the  greatest  pleasure  in  playing  the 
flute;  the  sound  of  that  instrument  being  in  closest  accord 
with  gayety:  they  were  not  titillated  by  the  thrill  of  a 
trumpet,  a  thing  which  will  enable  one  to  sum  up  their 
skill  in  arms  and  their  fitness  for  war.  .  .  .  During  the 
siege  of  Byzantium,  Leonidas,  their  general,  seeing  they 
had  abandoned  their  posts  on  the  walls,  which  were  then 
being  heavily  attacked  by  the  enemy,  and  that  they 
passed  their  entire  days  in  their  accustomed  haunts, 
ordered  taverns  to  be  established  upon  the  ramparts. 
That  ingenious  artifice  held  them,  although  a  little  late, 
and  they  did  not  again  abandon  their  posts.  There  was 
no  longer  a  reason  for  doing  so.M 

"Byzantium/*  writes  Menander,  in  a  fragment  of  an 
unidentified  play,  "Byzantium  makes  all  the  traders 
tipsy.  The  whole  night  through  for  your  sake  we  are 
drinking,  and,  methinks,  5twas  very  strong  wine  too.  At 
any  rate  I  get  up  with  a  head  on  for  four." 

Everything  in  Byzantium  announced  it  to  be  a  city 
in  which  brazen-faced  debauchery  and  drunkenness  were 
normal  and  universal.  Even  the  coin  of  the  realm  bore 
on  its  faces  the  mark  which  characterized  the  national 


94  THE      INNS      OF 

morality:  and,  circulating  throughout  the  ports  of  Hellas, 
confessed  through  the  Bacchic  emblems  stamped  on  their 
faces  the  genuineness  of  the  Byzantine  orgiastic  rites. 
The  images  thus  represented,  we  must  suppose  to  have 
been  copied  from  the  signs  of  certain  Greek  inns  and  tav 
erns,  though  it  would  startle  Reform  to  see  a  cabaret 
with  a  sign  flaunting  such  advertising  as  this.  These 
were  no  grapes  clustered  on  their  slender  stems,  nor 
were  they  pot-bellied  amphorae,  with  huge  handles,  nor, 
finally,  were  they  heads  of  Bacchus  crowned  with  ivy 
wreaths. 

The  detestable  addiction  of  the  Byzantines  for  drunk 
enness  was  later  on  to  be  the  cause  of  their  downfall  and 
end.  We  have  already  spoken  of  the  defense  of  the  city 
by  Leonidas,  and  the  ruse  by  which  he  prevented  them 
from  falling  victim  to  their  enemies.  Their  fate  was 
reserved  for  a  later  time,  and  it  was  the  destiny  of  the 
Spartan  Clearchus,  who  had  resolved  to  conquer  them, 
to  base  his  strategy  upon  their  dissolute  habits,  succeed 
in  his  military  ambition,  and  ensnare  the  Byzantines  by 
using  their  own  vices  against  them. 

Let  us  then  cite  Polyaenos,  who,  in  his  work  in  Strat 
egy,  has  furnished  us  with  a  full  account  of  this  curious 
affair,  probably  the  most  interesting  episode  in  the  entire 
history  of  Greek  inns  and  taverns. 

"When  the  Byzantines  revolted,  Clearchus  was  fined 
by  the  ephors,  and  fled  to  Lampsacus  with  four  ships. 
He  dwelt  there  in  such  a  manner  and  made  such  an  ap 
pearance  that  it  would  be  thought  that  he  drank  and 
lived  merrily  and  sumptuously.  Meanwhile,  Byzantium 
was  besieged  by  the  Thracians,  and  they  sent  the  com 
manders  of  their  forces  to  demand  assistance  of  Clearchus. 
He  affected  to  give  the  impression  that  he  was  steeped 
in  drunkenness,  and  it  was  not  until  the  third  day  that 
they  were  able  to  gain  an  audience  with  him.  Having 


GREECE      &      ROME 95 

heard  their  prayers,  he  told  them  he  pitied  them,  and 
promised  them  aid. 

"In  addition  to  his  four  vessels,  he  armed  two  others, 
and  made  sail  to  Byzantium;  there  he  convoked  the  as 
sembly,  and  advised  that  they  embark  on  his  ships  all 
the  troops,  foot  or  horse,  for  the  purpose  of  attacking  the 
Thracians  in  the  rear.  That  plan  was  executed,  and  the 
pilots  were  already  under  orders  from  him  to  proceed 
immediately  to  sea  and  lie  to  under  arms,  as  soon  as  they 
saw  the  signal  of  battle  raised  on  high. 

"When  this  had  been  carried  out,  Clearchus,  staying 
ashore  with  the  two  commanders,  said:  *I  am  thirsty/ 
And,  finding  himself  near  a  tavern,  he  entered  with  them, 
then,  with  the  guards  which  he  had  posted  in  this  am 
buscade,  he  murdered  the  two  leaders.  The  tavern  was 
closed  immediately  afterwards,  and  the  keeper  ordered 
to  hold  his  tongue;  thus,  having  removed  their  com 
manders,  and  having  succeeded  in  getting  their  forces  out 
of  the  city,  he  was  able  to  march  his  own  guards  in,  and 
remained  master  of  the  place/*  (Polyaenus,  Lib.  n, 

Let  us  then  bring  this  curious  history  of  Greek  inns  and 
taverns  to  a  close  with  this  no  less  curious  episode,  as 
when  a  tun  is  broached,  the  wise  do  not  remove  the  bung 
and  faucet,  after  having  drawn  off  a  huge  bumper,  and 
taken  a  long  pull  at  it.  But  having  thus  finished  with 
these  hostelries  of  ancient  Greece,  with  the  taverns  of 
Athens  and  Byzantium,  which  none  of  the  scholars,  not 
even  Barthelemy,  or  Scaliger  or  Casaubon  have  known, 
or  at  least,  have  not  discussed  at  any  length,  disdaining 
the  subject,  Athens  was  noted  for  many  things,  and  not 
the  least  lovely  among  them  were  the  violets  which 
crowned  the  city's  beauty;  Hymettus  was  famous  for  its 
honey,  and  the  murmurous  humming  of  the  myriads  of 
bees  which  gathered  it,  yet  the  penetrating  and  haunting 


96_ THE      INN-S      OF 

fragrance  of  the  wild  thyme  with  which  the  slopes  of  the 
eminence  abounded  and  with  which  they  still  abound  is 
a  memory  that  time  itself  cannot  destroy;  an  ethereal 
haze  of  perfume,  the  very  spirit  of  Hellas,  the  Hellas  of 
Theocritus,  and  Bion,  and  Moschus*  It  charms  even  the 
wild  and  picturesque  loveliness  of  a  scene  hallowed  by  the 
associations  of  centuries,  and  the  tributes  of  great  poets, 
and  seen,  alas,  through  the  mists  of  antiquity.  Still,  let 
me  hope  that  I  have  been  able  to  diffuse  a  little  of  the 
freshness  and  spirit  which  permeates  the  traditions  of 
Greece,  to  distill  for  moderns  a  little  of  the  perfume  which 
almost  intoxicated  me  when  writing  of  this  subject,  and 
finally,  without  infraction  of  the  law,  to  perfume,  alas, 
but  faintly,  our  own  dry  atmosphere  with  the  fragrance 
of  those  fine  old  tuns  from  Biblos  in  Phoenicia,  or  with 
the  exquisite  bouquet  of  the  vintages  of  Lesbos,  Rhodes, 
or  Herachia. 

The  need  to  be  complete  and  exact  has,  perhaps, 
forced  me  to  introduce  many  dry  details,  some  disserta 
tions  of  critical  dullness,  some  philological  curiosities, 
but  I  have  striven  to  blend  them  with  other  details  more 
absorbing  and  so  retain  the  interest  of  my  readers.  Let 
him  accept  this  work  as  the  Greeks  did  their  wines:  the 
acrid  pitch  was  necessary,  and  when  a  tun  was  found  full 
of  sea  water,  they  merely  tossed  it  back  into  its  natural 
element. 


GREECE      &      ROME  97 


CHAPTER  VH. 

Rome — Wealth  brings  its  attendant  ills — Tavern  keepers  still  held 
in  contempt — Not  admitted  to  military  service — Hospitality  tokens  held 
in  high  respect — Amusements  and  festivals  wild  and  brutal — The  circus 
and  its  bloody  games — Helwgabalus — Nero — Claudius,  Vitellius  and 
Otho,  frequenters  of  vile  inns — Nero  the  author  of  the  worst  enormities. 

We  come  at  last  to  Italy,  and  the  western  civilization, 
for  by  that,  and  all  it  implies,  we  mean  Rome.  In  Italy, 
we  shall  find  that  publicans  and  their  establishments  were 
held  in  as  great  and  abiding  contempt  as  in  Greece.  If 
anything,  the  Italians  detested  such  innovations  even 
worse,  and  the  reasons  are  not  hard  to  discover.  First  of 
all,  as  among  the  Greeks,  was  pride  of  race,  the  outstand 
ing  characteristic  of  the  Roman  from  the  days  of  Romulus 
to  those  of  Ammianus  Marcellinus.  One  may,  without 
difficulty,  imagine  the  attitude  of  Appius  Claudius  toward 
hospitality  which  was  bought  and  paid  for;  and  the  rude 
and  virile  enemies  of  Pyrrhus,  who  scorned  to  remove  a 
foe  that  had  proved  his  superiority  to  valor  of  the  highest 
type,  would  have  also  scorned  anything  savoring  of 
commercialism  in  the  matter  of  a  tired  traveller's  neces 
sities.  In  a  short  time,  however,  we  find  an  increasing 
internal  trade  making  demands  upon  conditions  unfavor 
able  to  increasing  travel,  and  when  we  reach  the  age  of 
the  most  polished  of  the  Latin  dramatists,  we  find  Ter 
ence,  at  twenty-seven,  unknown,  poorly  clad,  a  manu 
mitted  slave,  in  the  house  of  Caecilius,  at  that  time  the 
popular  dramatist  of  Rome,  whither  he  had  been  sent  by 
the  Curile  Aedile,  that  the  author  of  reputation  might 
pass  upon  the  Andrian.  So  excellent  was  the  work  that 
the  poor  foreigner  was  invited  at  once  to  share  the  dinner 
of  his  host  and  to  lodge  in  his  house.  In  the  interval 


98 THE      INNS      OF 

between  Plautus  and  Terence  the  great  Roman  houses  had 
by  degrees  assumed  more  and  more  of  the  tone  of  princely 
character.  The  conquests  had  begun,  and  the  inhabi 
tants  of  the  peninsula  were  brought  more  and  more  into 
contact  with  the  outside  world  and  with  manners  and 
usages  foreign  to  their  culture  and  their  way  of  thinking. 
Wealth  flowed  in  incalculable  profusion,  and  it  brought 
all  the  attendant  ills  in  its  train,  Syrian  and  Greek, 
Egyptian,  Jew  and  barbarian  migrated  to  the  center  of 
things  and  each  found  a  fertile  field  for  the  exercise  of  his 
own  particular  calling.  Although  the  ancient  rigid 
standards  had  weakened  materially  at  the  beginning  of 
the  first  century  before  our  era,  the  tavern  keeper  and 
the  petty  tradesman  were  held  in  no  less  contempt  than 
had  been  the  case  in  earlier  times,  and  we  shall  find  this 
true  almost  without  exception  for  a  period  of  over  a 
thousand  years  in  the  history  of  the  greatest  of  the  ancient 
seats  of  culture  and  power.  Numerous  forceful  passages 
from  the  works  of  Roman  writers  could  be  cited  in  proof, 
but  it  will  suffice  to  show  the  position  held  by  such  trades 
in  the  eyes  of  the  law,  and  from  that  evaluation,  we  can 
easily  estimate  their  position  in  the  social  life  of  the  time. 
In  the  eyes  of  the  law,  the  innkeeper,  the  pander,  and 
others  of  like  standing  were  on  the  same  footing,  and  the 
wife  or  concubine  of  a  tavern  keeper  was  so  lightly 
esteemed  that  she  was  exempt  from  the  provisions  of 
legislation  against  adultery  and  other  problems  of  do 
mestic  triangulation:  her  position  was  so  lowly  that  the 
law  might  have  been  offended  if  she  failed  to  break  it, 
or  even  if  she  heeded  it  at  all.  Innkeepers  were  not 
admitted  to  military  service,  nor  so  far  as  I  have  been  able 
to  ascertain,  did  they  form  a  gild,  as  did  other  tradesmen. 
This  may  have  been  accidental,  but  I  am  inclined  to 
doubt  it  from  one  or  two  fugitive  passages  in  Petronius 
and  the  Theodosian  code.  It  need  not  seem  strange  to 


GREECE      &     ROME 


us  when  we  find  the  consensus  of  classical  opinion  almost 
unanimous  upon  the  evil  repute  and  the  dastardly  char 
acter  of  the  publicans  generally.  Furthermore,  most  of 
them  were  probably  of  foreign  extraction;  the  kind  we 
in  the  Pacific  littoral  designate  as  the  "kind  that  can't 
go  back";  and  down  until  the  very  end  of  the  Republic 
no  man  having  due  regard  for  decency  and  honor  would 
frequent  such  a  place  or  even  enter  it.  On  the  other 
hand,  under  the  empire,  the  finest  gentlemen  could  enter 
with  impunity  the  various  schools  maintained  for  the 
purpose  of  instructing  budding  genius  gladiatorial,  and 
accumulating  a  competence  sufficient  to  purchase  a  cosy 
little  tavern  not  too  far  from  the  arena,  even  as  the 
sailor's  fondest  hope  lies  in  getting  a  pay-day  large  enough 
to  enable  him  to  purchase  a  public  house  in  Wapping,  or 
Limehouse,  Paradise  Street,  or  George  Street,  and  live 
at  his  ease  the  rest  of  his  days.  As  among  the  Greeks, 
shelter  and  nourishment  were  provided  for  among  the 
Romans  as  a  right  rather  than  a  necessity  from  which 
to  wring  a  profit,  and  as  a  general  thing  a  stranger  or 
traveller  of  importance  had  hospitable  or  friendly  con 
nections  in  the  city  which  made  him  independent  of  inns 
and  lodging  houses.  There  were  also  current  among 
the  Romans  those  tokens  of  hospitality  such  as  we  have 
seen  amongst  the  Greeks,  and  they  were  as  scrupulously 
honored  until  the  time  of  Marcellinus.  Nor  did  their 
virtue  expire  with  the  death  of  the  original  holders  of  the 
parts;  they  could  be  bequeathed  as  a  valued  inheritance 
from  generation  to  generation.  The  circulation  of  such 
tokens  was  of  course  greatly  increased  after  Rome  had 
begun  her  march  of  conquest;  the  conditions  governing 
hospitality  were  then  transferred  more  and  more  to 
foreigners;  and  sometimes  to  entire  cities  and  even  states, 
and  almost  without  exception,  the  powerful  patrician 
families  at  Rome  belonged  to  the  municipal  council  or 


100 THE      INNS      OF 

S 

was  in  some  manner  associated  with  governmental  affairs, 
and  had  in  their  clientele  whole  provinces  which  had  the 
right  to  look  to  them  for  necessities.  Naturally,  when 
such  individuals  came  to  Rome  they  were  never  thrown 
upon  the  tender  mercies  of  an  innkeeper,  and  it  is  probable 
that  such  travellers  formed  a  large  percentage  of  the 
number  of  transients  visiting  the  city.  Foreign  ambas 
sadors,  unless  the  intention  was  to  neglect  them,  were 
never  dependent  upon  inns  and  taverns;  it  was  customary 
to  welcome  and  entertain  them  either  in  the  house  of 
some  prominent  Roman,  or  to  lodge  them  in  some  mansion 
which  was  the  property  of  the  state  itself.  The  reception 
and  entertainment  of  the  Rhodian  ambassadors  were 
examples  of  the  former,  that  accorded  the  Carthaginian 
envoys,  of  the  latter.  We  shall  have  occasion  to  speak 
of  both  a  little  later. 

The  free  Roman  citizen  was  under  no  such  necessity 
to  go  to  a  tavern  for  recreation,  festive  enjoyment  or  even 
variety,  as  was,  until  a  short  time  ago,  the  case  with  us. 
His  everyday  life  was  not  so  largely  occupied  as  ours  with 
the  struggle  for  a  living,  and  he  consequently  had  more 
leisure  on  his  hands.  The  authorities  met  such  a  dan 
gerous  condition  as  this  in  the  same  manner  that  their 
preceptors  the  Greeks  did:  by  festivities,  entertainments, 
and  military  service.  The  more  prominent  among  the 
Roman  citizenry,  if  they  were  not  in  camp,  and  as  a  rule 
practically  everyone  spent  many  of  his  younger  years 
there,  were  continually  active  in  their  political  interests, 
as  magistrates,  senators,  consuls,  aediles,  and  the  like. 
The  demands  made  upon  such  officials  were  frequently 
crucial,  but,  unlike  the  exactions  of  modern  business, 
wearied  but  at  the  same  time  stimulated;  it  rarely  caused 
the  individual  to  "break,"  as  we  today  understand  the 
term.  Neurasthenia  was  not  common  at  Rome.  The 
sum  and  total  of  the  philosophy  of  political  activity  was 


GREECE      &      ROME 101 

the  oral  treatment  of  problems,  public  participation  and 
discussion;  and  a  play  of  the  emotions,  perhaps  sometimes 
too  free,  but  more  frequently  restrained  and  constructive, 
and,  by  their  very  nature,  they  did  not  dull  the  mind 
because  they  compelled  the  individual  to  exert  all  his 
faculties,  while  the  demands  of  the  military  service  com 
pelled  him  to  keep  in  excellent  physical  trim.  Whenever 
a  Roman  of  the  class  described  above  had  time  to  get 
away  from  his  political  fence  building,  he  generally 
lavished  it  upon  agriculture,  at  least  during  the  republican 
period  and  the  early  empire,  but  as  culture  became  more 
general,  he  divided  his  spare  time  between  agriculture 
and  literature.  Such  was  the  noble  otium  of  the  Roman 
statesman.  I  regret  that  I  know  of  no  word  in  our  lan 
guage  which  can  define  the  term  I  have  been  compelled 
to  use,  but  John  Morley's  life  is  the  best  example  among 
the  moderns. 

Great  patricians  and  men  of  wealth  who  had  more 
predilection  to  sensuality  than  to  agriculture  or  literature 
had  in  their  villas  and  country  places  every  means  for 
the  gratification  of  their  inclinations  whatever  they  might 
be  and,  until  a  very  late  age,  there  is  little  to  be  said  in 
such  circles  of  inns  and  taverns. 

The  public  life  and  civic  interests  of  the  masses  were 
in  their  way  almost  as  rich  as  that  which  fell  to  the  lot  of 
the  patricians,  and  the  amusements  and  pleasures  lavished 
upon  them  were  on  a  scale  not  to  be  found  in  any  capital 
in  the  modern  world,  with  the  possible  exception  of  Spain. 
The  Roman  commoner  annually  elected  his  magistrate, 
often  amid  scenes  of  factional  warfare;  he  could  listen  to 
the  pleaders  such  as  Hortensius  or  Cicero  or  Papinian; 
his  tribunes,  who  were  well  versed  in  mob  psychology, 
played  upon  the  emotions  and  passions  of  the  proletariat, 
by  biting  sarcasms  and  stinging  repartee.  He  was  an 
interested  witness  to  all  that  passed  before  his  eyes,  and 


102 THE      INN  S      OF 

Rome  was  the  maelstrom  of  the  civilized  world;  infinite 
variety;  an  ever  changing  panorama  for  its  citizens  to 
examine,  criticize  or  praise:  he  was  nothing  if  not  hyper 
critical,  cynically  so,  and  captious.  This  magnificent 
city  that  ruled  tie  world  held  many  beautiful  things  in 
its  powerful  grasp;  the  varied  throngs  from  every  prov 
ince,  barbarian  or  semi-barbarous,  furnished  an  unending 
pageant  of  living  and  gorgeous  color  as  inexhaustible  as 
the  combinations  of  a  kaleidoscope;  and  no  matter  where 
her  nationals  might  be,  it  was  sufficient  for  them  to  pro 
claim  their  nationality  and  fealty;  these  were  their  pro 
tection  and  their  refuge.  "I  am  a  Roman  citizen,"  said 
Paul,  in  the  hands  of  his  enemies;  "I  appeal  unto  Caesar/* 
Many  of  the  spectacles  were  at  times  too  wild  and  brutal 
for  modern  standards,  but  they  were  probably  never  dull, 
and  they  were  always  full  of  life  and  movement. 

An  elastic  religion,  a  cycle  of  festivities  and  holidays 
that  extended  through  the  entire  year,  processions  and 
festivals  of  every  sort,  some  for  all  the  populace,  some  for 
special  sects  and  cults  organized  for  liturgical  purposes — 
there  were  many  of  these  latter  in  ancient  Rome.  The 
circus  offered  its  pageants  and  games  for  their  amuse 
ment;  the  chariot  races,  so  much  a  part  of  the  national 
character  that  the  various  political  factions  came  to  take 
their  names  from  the  colors  of  the  drivers:  riots  and  street 
battles  often  had  their  origin  in  the  differences  in  course 
of  settlement  between  the  various  factions  and  their  ad 
herents:  well  might  the  Roman  commoner  cry  "Bread  and 
Games*'  as  the  sum  of  the  blessings  to  be  extracted  from 
life  itself.  In  the  theatre  he  could  enjoy  the  attempts  of  his 
dramatists  and  poets  to  confine  the  fluid  ease  and  airy 
elegance  of  Greek  fantasy  in  a  Roman  setting;  an  attempt 
doomed  at  the  very  beginning  to  failure;  even  as  French 
and  Italian  opera  will  always  fail  in  English  because  of 
the  impossibility  of  reproducing  the  psychology  of  the 


GREECE      &     ROME 103 

Italian  and  the  Gaul  along  with  their  meaning.  Among 
the  Romans,  however,  the  theatre  was  never  so  highly 
esteemed  as  was  the  circus  and  its  bloody  games.  Huge 
carnivora  fighting  to  the  death,  the  net  thrower  pitted 
against  the  heavily  armed  gladiator,  duels  &  outrance 
between  heavily  armed  antagonists  of  equal  skill;  such 
spectacles  served  to  amuse  the  leisure  and  cultivate  the 
lusts  of  a  populace  cruel  by  nature;  a  populace  that  in 
later  ages  was  better  qualified  to  view  such  spectacles 
than  to  take  an  active  part  in  them;  a  truism  graphically 
illustrated  in  the  bull  fights  of  Spanish  splicing  coun 
tries,  and  among  our  own  captious  baseball  writers  and 
fans,  who  boo  at  the  so-called  age  for  hitting  a  homer, 
but  who,  alas  do  not  write  like  one. 

The  games  of  the  circus  were  of  frequent  occurrence 
but  they  were  not  held  daily,  and  the  Roman  sought  the 
Campus  Martius  to  while  away  a  little  of  each  day's 
leisure.  On  this  wide  plain  on  the  bank  of  the  Tiber 
the  young  engaged  in  athletic  games  while  the  elders 
talked  of  affairs  which  ruled  the  destinies  of  all  the  world 
between  Britain  and  Parthia.  As  with  the  Greeks,  so 
also  were  the  Romans  favored  in  the  matter  of  public 
baths,  which  served  the  people  as  places  of  assembly  and 
amusement. 

Some  of  these  institutions,  called  thermae,  were  splen 
did  establishments,  erected  by  the  wealthy  to  prevent  the 
consequences  of  serious  thought  and  concerted  action  on 
the  part  of  a  populace  no  longer  capable  of  either.  Booths, 
shaded  arcades,  promenades,  even  libraries  were  found 
here;  and  the  miserable  ministers  to  appetite  were 
specialists  in  their  callings.  They  had  need  to  be;  then 
as  now  it  was  survival  of  the  fittest,  and  a  Commodus 
would  not  have  hesitated  for  an  instant  to  order  a  bath 
attendant  to  be  thrown  into  the  furnace  if  the  water  was 
not  hot  enough,  nor  would  a  Heliogabalus  have  refrained 


104         THE      INNS      OF 

from  ordering  an  unfortunate  caterer,  whose  new  fangled 
sauce  was  not  piquant  enough  to  titillate  the  jaded  taste 
buds  of  the  parvenu,  to  eat  nothing  but  that  sauce  until 
he  had  compounded  another  which  met  the  requirements 
of  the  imperial  taste.  Under  conditions  such  as  these 
one  may  assume  that  the  standards  were  at  least  as  lofty 
as  the  capacity  for  enjoyment.  Why,  then,  should  the 
Roman  have  desired  to  confine  himself  within  the  four 
walls  of  a  pot-house  or  a  cabaret? 

The  everyday  life  of  Republican  Rome  was  charac 
terized,  until  the  last  century  of  its  existence,  by  an  aus 
tere  and  provident  simplicity  which  regarded  extreme 
wealth  with  contempt  and  suspicion,  and  which  relieved 
poverty  in  just  moderation.  There  are  many  inns  and 
taverns  mentioned  in  Plautus  and  there  were  probably 
many  such  places  in  Rome  and  Magna  Graeca,  but  after 
all,  Plautus  was  writing  from  Greek  originals  and  may 
have  overstated  the  facts  slightly. 

It  is  worthy  of  note  that  in  the  reigns  of  the  succeed 
ing  emperors  public  activities  gradually  ceased,  and  the 
populace,  having  no  longer  important  and  more  worthy 
occupations  to  fill  their  days,  began  to  frequent  inns  and 
taverns;  and,  as  the  city  declines  and  public  character 
decays,  we  shall  find  that  these  places  will  become  more 
and  more  the  haunts  of  the  quasi-respectable,  and  even 
of  the  patricians,  and  no  longer,  as  was  formerly  the  case, 
be  patronized  largely  by  the  slaves  and  vagabonds.  Not 
withstanding  the  degradation  of  national  character,  the 
standing  of  the  publicans  was  not  improved;  on  the  con 
trary,  it  was  even  rendered  more  contemptible  by  direct 
legislation  and  by  action  of  the  courts.  Claudius  and 
Nero  were  frequent  visitors  in  the  taverns,  Vitellius  and 
Otho  were  also  guilty  of  the  same  indiscretions.  Let  us 
cite  for  our  purposes  the  favorite  author  of  Mark  Twain; 
I  mean  Suetonius:  "Often/*  says  mine  author,  in  speak 
ing  of  Claudius,  *c  of  ten  he  showed  such  heedlessness  in 


GREECE      &      ROME 105 

word  and  deed  that  one  would  suppose  that  he  did  not 
know  or  care  to  whom,  with  whom,  or  when  or  where  he 
was  speaking.  When  a  debate  was  going  on  about  the 
butchers  and  vintners,  he  cried  out  in  the  House:  *who 
can  live  without  a  snack,  I  ask  you/  and  then  went  on 
to  describe  the  abundance  of  the  old  taverns  to  which  he 
used  to  go  for  wine  in  earlier  days/*  (Chap.  XL.) 

Both  Claudius  and  Nero  were  wild,  and  Nero  was 
more  dissolute  and  abandoned  than  his  father-in-law,  but 
as  both  were  base  at  heart,  Nero,  being  the  younger,  had 
better  opportunities.  Claudius  was  a  dullard  and  his 
welcome  would  be  in  proportion  to  his  ability  to  spend, 
and  in  direct  ratio  to  the  terror  with  which  his  name  in 
spired  those  in  the  tavern.  Nero  had  a  personality  which 
could  be  very  pleasing,  and  his  character  has  been  some 
thing  of  an  enigma  to  writers  of  history.  In  him  was 
combined  an  artistic  sense  of  some  discrimination,  an 
ability  to  appreciate  good  literature,  and  latent  tendencies 
toward  ferocity  that  had,  in  some  cases,  the  added  stigma 
of  refinement.  A  character  which  had  been  restrained 
and  guided  by  Seneca  and  Burrhus,  suddenly  threw  off 
all  restraint  and  went  the  limit  in  gratifying  the  ferocious 
appetities  that  drove  it  on  until,  as  was  the  case  with 
other  and  better  tyrants  such  as  Aurelian,  and  still  more 
dissolute  despots,  such  as  Commodus  and  Phocas,  the 
unknown  designs  of  the  emperor  became  a  menace  to  his 
familiars,  and  led  them  to  take  such  measures  as  should 
prevent  the  consequences  of  satiety,  or  of  that  morning 
after  feeling  which  has  so  often  led  to  the  downfall  of  the 
most  trusted  ministers  and  officers.  Tacitus  has  left  us 
an  admirable  sketch  of  the  times  of  that  odious  tyrant 
Nero: 

"The  consulship  of  Quintus  Volusius  and  Publius 
Scipio  was  remarkable  for  the  tranquillity  that  prevailed 
in  all  parts  of  the  empire,  and  the  corruption  of  manners 
that  disgraced  the  city  of  Rome.  Nero  was  the  author 


106 THE      INNS      OF 

of  all  the  worst  enormities.  In  the  garb  of  a  slave,  he 
roved  through  the  streets,  visited  the  brothels,  and 
rambled  through  all  by-places,  attended  by  a  band  of 
rioters,  who  seized  the  wares  and  merchandise  exposed 
to  sale,  and  offered  violence  to  all  that  fell  in  their  way. 
In  these  frolics,  Nero  was  so  little  suspected  to  be  a 
party,  that  he  was  roughly  handled  in  several  frays.  He 
received  wounds  on  some  occasions,  and  his  face  was  dis 
figured  with  a  scar.  It  was  not  long,  however,  before 
it  transpired  that  the  emperor  was  become  a  night- 
brawler.'* 

Yet,  dissolute  as  Nero  was,  such  as  he  would  scarcely 
have  frequented  such  places  in  earlier  times,  and  we  base 
this  contention  upon  a  passage  in  Cicero  in  which  he  de 
nounces  another  Roman  no  less  dissolute  than  Nero,  but 
much  more  courageous,  and  abler.  I  refer  to  Marcus 
Antonius. 

" Judge  then  of  the  nature  of  this  fellow/*  says  the 
orator,  in  speaking  of  Antony's  arrival  in  Italy.  "When 
he  arrived  at  Bed  Rocks  at  about  the  tenth  hour  of  the 
day,  he  skulked  into  a  petty  little  wine-shop,  hid  there, 
and  kept  on  drinking  until  evening.  From  thence,  get 
ting  into  a  gig,  he  was  driven  rapidly  into  the  city  and 
came  to  his  own  house  with  his  head  veiled." 

In  another  passage  the  great  orator  speaks  of  the 
humiliation  which  he  suffered  at  the  hands  of  Piso,  and 
excoriates  the  latter  for  his  love  for  such  places. 

"Infamous  fellow/5  says  the  sage  of  Arpinum,  "do 
you  remember  that  when  I  came  to  you  with  Caius 
Piso,  about  the  fifth  hour  of  the  day,  you  came  out  of 
some  hovel  or  other  with  your  head  wrapped  up?  And 
you  were  wearing  slippers,  too,  were  you  not?  and  when 
you  had  suffocated  us  with  the  vile  stench  of  that  cook- 
shop,  with  which  your  foetid  breath  was  loaded,  you 
made  the  excuse  of  your  health  because  you  said  that 


GREECE      &      ROME 107 

you  were  compelled  to  have  recourse  to  some  vinous 
remedies?  and  when  we  had  admitted  the  pretense,  (for 
what  else  could  we  do?),  we  stood  a  little  while  amid  the 
fumes  and  stench  of  your  gluttony  till  you  drove  us 
away  by  filthy  language  and  still  more  filthy  behaviour?3* 

In  concluding  this  introduction  to  everyday  life  in 
Rome  I  wish  to  state  that  it  was  disgraceful  for  a  family 
of  even  moderate  means  to  be  without  its  own  cellar, 
bakery,  and  elaborate  cuisine.  In  support  of  this  I  quote 
again  from  Cicero's  speech  against  Piso: 

"In  his  house  there  were  no  dishes  of  silver,  only 
very  large  cups,  and  these  are  in  fact  all  from  Placentia, 
due  to  his  desire  to  avoid  the  appearance  of  scorning 
his  countrymen.  On  his  table  one  sees  no  oysters,  no 
fish,  only  large  chunks  of  meat  which  is  almost  tainted. 
Dirty  slaves  wait  on  the  table,  and  among  them  even 
old  men.  With  him  the  cook  and  serving  man  are  com 
bined  into  one  person;  he  has  not  his  own  baker,  and  no 
cellar.  Bread  and  wine  he  buys  from  the  dealer  and 
from  the  inn/* 

Thus  we  see  the  attitude  of  the  upper  class  citizen 
toward  petty  dealers  and  especially  towards  inns  and 
taverns.  And  there  is  also  a  lesson  to  be  learned;  not 
that  we  have  ever  shown  much  ability  to  learn  from  the 
past  and  thus  forecast  the  future;  the  lesson  is  this:  in 
ancient  times  it  was  not  necessary  for  the  citizenry  of 
character  and  ability  to  frequent  roof -gardens  or  taverns 
in  order  to  exchange  social  obligations  and  discuss  ques 
tions  of  the  day.  On  this  account,  the  Greeks  and 
Romans  could  leave  such  dens  to  their  proper  denizens, 
the  slaves,  the  rabble,  and  that  general  class  which 
neither  toils  nor  spins  but  which,  like  the  lily  and  the 
green  bay-tree,  flourished  then,  but  fared  never  so 
sumptuously  as  now. 


108  THEINNSOF 


CHAPTER  VUL 

The  era  of  the  Roman  emperors — The  great  highways — The  growth 
of  the  Persian  Post  Service — The  menace  of  the  imperial  public  houses — 
The  Roman  Diploma  (diplomata  tractarium)  necessary  for  travellers — 
Landlords  in  Italy  in  the  times  of  Polybius — Petronius  and  Trimalchio 
— Cicero  and  Macula,  the  inn-keeper — Horace  and,  taverns — Inns  dan 
gerous  places  of  refuge. 

Let  us,  then,  reverse  the  hour-glass  of  eternity,  that 
the  sands  of  time  may  filter  backward  until  we  have 
reached  the  era  of  the  emperors  of  Rome:  Augustus,  or 
the  timid  and  inhuman  Domitian,  Marcus  Aurelius,  or 
that  stern  disciplinarian  Aurelian,  who  lived  two  cen 
turies  too  late.  Rome  was  then  the  sovereign  city  of 
the  known  world,  bound  to  every  province  by  those 
wide  and  solid  roads,  the  number  and  ruins  of  which 
astonish  us  to  the  present  day,  and  which,  after  the 
ascendency  of  barbarism,  were  still  the  arteries  of  such 
transportation  as  existed  through  the  dark  ages.  It  made 
no  difference  in  what  country  the  traveller  found  him 
self,  if  he  was  bent  upon  leaving  Gaul,  or  Germany,  or 
Greece,  or  Iberia,  the  highway  he  followed  led  him  to 
wards  the  Eternal  City,  and  aU  roads  lead  to  Rome. 

The  stages  of  travel  were  so  admirably  calculated 
that  the  end  of  each  day's  journey  found  the  traveller 
at  a  station  where  fresh  horses  and  pack  animals  could 
be  obtained,  and  where  food  and  lodging  were  procurable. 
The  post-houses  were,  in  reality,  great  imperial  inns 
which  served  as  ration  depots  and  halting  places  for 
military  details,  as  well  as  the  putting  up  of  travellers, 
when  otherwise  unoccupied  by  imperial  missions  or 
other  official  guests.  The  entire  system  was  an  out 
growth  of  the  Persian  Post  Service,  but  in  many  ways 
the  Roman  aggressiveness  improved  upon  the  model. 


GREECE      &      ROME 109 

Officials,  known  under  the  collective  term  frumentarii, 
were  assigned  to  the  administration  and  inspection  of 
these  great  public  houses:  in  addition  to  which  they 
also  maintained  a  system  of  espionage  which  was  useful 
in  keeping  the  authorities  informed  as  to  everything 
going  on  in  the  neighborhood.  Some  of  these  official 
delators  were  by  nature  so  meddlesome  that  they  placed 
this  duty  even  above  their  actual  official  calling,  using 
every  means  in  their  power  to  overhear  the  conversation 
and  plans  of  those  lodging  with  them.  If  these  plans 
appeared  to  them  treasonable,  no  time  was  lost  in 
denouncing  the  culprits  to  the  emperor  or  to  the  prae 
torian  prefect.  It  is  to  be  regretted  that  mere  suspicion 
was  too  often  equivalent  to  condemnation,  and  Gibbon's 
strictures  were  justified.  Taking  this  interpretation, 
these  great  inns  were  not  so  much  a  place  of  sanctuary, 
a  shelter  from  the  storms  of  winter  in  dreary  climes; 
they  were  the  lairs  of  espionage;  in  place  of  pleasant 
lodgings  offered  free  of  charge,  they  were  rather  snares 
perfidiously  set  and  cunningly  baited. 

By  virtue  of  such  a  system,  the  police,  operating  as 
a  huge  organization  could  arrest  and  detain  a  far  greater 
number  of  criminals  and  malcontents  than  would  have 
been  the  case  had  these  great  hostelries  been  maintained 
for  official  use  alone.  Gibbon  has  pointed  out  the  utter 
impossibility  of  escape  under  the  emperors  and  has 
cited  one  attempt  under  Tiberius,  in  which  the  fugitive 
was  apprehended  and  brought  back.  So  perfect  was  the 
organization,  however,  that  even  Tiberius  saw  nothing 
to  fear  from  the  example  and  the  matter  was  dropped. 
In  later  times,  however,  this  was  not  the  case,  as  Aetius 
probably  owed  his  life  to  his  escape  from  inimical  author 
ity,  and  Attila  would  probably  have  won  the  battle  of 
Chalons  had  Aetius  been  apprehended  before  he  could 
sue  for  pardon  at  the  head  of  sixty  thousand  veterans 
devoted  to  his  interests. 


110 THE      INNS      OF 

As  tlie  institutions  of  which  we  are  speaking  were 
imperial,  it  need  not  astonish  us  to  learn  that  some 
credentials  were  necessary  in  order  to  gain  admittance 
and  procure  the  services  of  the  master  of  posts  and  his 
organization.  The  document  in  question  was  called  the 
diploma  tradatorium  under  the  earlier  empire,  but  under 
Constantine  it  came  to  be  known  as  epistola  evictionis, 
a  more  specific  term  according  to  Bergier.  The  writ, 
for  such  it  was,  consisted  of  two  leaves,  hence  its  name; 
and  the  imperial  couriers,  who  corresponded  to  what 
the  British  call  king's  messengers,  were  of  course  always 
provided  with  the  diploma.  Travelling  emperors  lodged 
at  these  mansiones  and  held  there  a  sort  of  local  court 
to  receive  the  homage  of  local  authorities  and  their 
suites,  and  from  this  we  may  suppose  that  at  times 
these  ions  were  accessible  to  all  the  world;  they  wit 
nessed  a  ceaseless  coming  and  going  of  nobles  and  high 
officials,  tourists  of  position,  and  even  mere  tradesmen. 
On  this  account  an  official  lodged  there  was  always 
exposed  to  danger  no  matter  how  carefully  precautions 
for  his  protection  had  been  taken,  and  the  emperors 
therefore  reserved  for  themselves  the  entire  establish 
ment  when  putting  up  there.  The  epistola  evictionis  was 
the  instrument  used  to  clear  the  way  for  them  and  their 
suites.  All  such  documents  bore  the  imperial  seal  and 
were  either  issued  by  imperial  authority  direct,  or  by 
some  high  official  to  whom  that  power  had  been  dele 
gated* 

In  spite  of  all  the  care  taken  to  shield  him,  Titus  fell 
a  victim  to  the  dangerous  and  criminal  enterprise  of  his 
brother  Domitian,  in  a  mansio  (post-house)  in  the  Sabine 
country,  almost  at  the  very  gates  of  Rome.  He  was 
taken  with  that  raging  fever  which  caused  his  death,  and 
tradition  has  it  that  the  fever  was  the  result  of  a  poison 
which  set  his  blood  on  fire.  The  assassination  of  Aurelian 
by  his  trusted  general  Mucapor  in  the  post-house  at 


GREECE      &      ROME 111 

Coenophrurium,  between  Heracleia  and  Byzantium, 
proved  yet  again  that  notwithstanding  the  most  pains 
taking  precautions,  the  gravest  danger  could  still  attend 
and  menace  even  princes  in  these  imperial  public  houses* 
Therefore  we  stress  the  fact  that  the  diploma  tradatorium 
was  a  most  difficult  document  to  procure,  and  the  reasons 
for  requesting  it  must  have  been  vital  and  unavoidable. 
Pliny  the  Younger,  a  powerf id  minister  high  in  the  favor 
of  Trajan,  begged  the  emperor's  indulgence  for  having 
granted  Calphurnia  post-horses  without  first  having  ob 
tained  imperial  authorization,  and  this,  notwithstanding 
the  fact  that  her  business  was  so  pressing  as  to  admit 
of  no  delay.  The  bearer  of  an  imperial  diploma  was 
literally  able  to  command  such  service  and  attention 
as  not  even  Lady  de  Winter,  in  Dumas's  Three  Mus 
keteers  could  have  procured  with  Richelieu's  famous 
letter  of  absolution:  "It  is  by  my  order  and  for  the  good 
of  the  state  that  the  bearer  of  this  has  done  what  has 
been  done.*5  On  the  other  hand,  should  an  individual 
or  official  present  himself  at  a  mansio  and  either  seek 
or  force  service  from  the  imperial  establishment,  he  was 
liable  to  the  most  drastic  punishment,  no  matter  what 
his  station  or  influence.  An  episode  in  the  life  of  Helvius 
Pertinax,  who  later  became  emperor,  will  serve  to  illus 
trate  the  severity  of  the  regulations  governing  the  post- 
houses  and  service.  Julius  Capitolinus  relates  that  when 
Pertinax  was  praefectus  cohortis,  serving  in  Syria,  he  was 
punished  by  the  governor  of  that  province  for  having 
levied  post-horses  without  the  diploma,  being  ordered  as 
a  consequence  to  proceed  on  foot  from  Antioch  to  the 
place  to  which  he  had  been  ordered  as  legate.  Under 
the  later  empire  it  became  very  fashionable  to  apply  for 
this  all  powerful  diploma,  which  was  good  for  a  certain 
time  and  which  became  void  automatically  upon  the 
death  or  removal  from  office  of  the  emperor  or  official 
granting  it.  When  such  a  request  was  honored,  the 


118  THE      INNS      OF 

lucky  recipient  had  great  cause  to  congratulate  himself 
because  of  the  prestige  which  the  possession  of  such  a 
document  conferred  upon  the  bearer,  whose  importance 
was  at  once  augmented.  He  was  empowered  to  take 
any  route  that  might  suit  his  fancy.  In  special  cases  the 
emperor  granted  a  sort  of  perpetual  diploma  which  was 
good  during  the  life  of  the  possessor  or  during  that  of 
the  emperor  whose  seal  it  bore.  In  fact,  due  allowance 
being  made  for  the  times,  a  diploma  tractatorium  was 
equivalent  to  a  pass  good  on  any  railroad  or  steamship 
line,  and  in  addition  it  granted  the  bearer  carte  blanche 
in  the  diner  and  buffet  car,  as  well  as  in  the  Pullman 
stateroom,  or  for  that  matter,  a  special  train,  unlimited 
service,  and  prompt  and  respectful  obedience.  The  near 
est  approach  which  we  know  of  is  the  katicherif,  until 
recently  furnished  to  Turkish  officials;  a  document  which 
carried  with  it  most  of  the  powers  conferred  by  the  old 
Roman  diploma,  both  as  to  hospitality  and  to  horses, 
supplies,  and  so  on.  King's  messengers  are  also  believed 
to  possess  credentials  almost  as  powerful.  Upon  the  mere 
presentation  of  the  diploma,  the  bearer  thereof  did  the 
post-master  the  honor  of  receiving  from  him  horses, 
beasts  of  burden,  and  all  the  food  and  supplies  of  which 
he  and  his  suite  might  have  need.  Should  the  station 
be  short  of  supplies,  a  condition  which  did  not  often 
occur,  the  stables  empty  of  fresh  beasts,  the  cellars  dry, 
the  mansionarvus  or  stationarius  would  levy  upon  the 
local  inhabitants  to  supply  his  needs,  and  a  requisition 
such  as  this  had  all  the  weight  of  imperial  sanction. 
The  rustics  were  ordered  to  furnish  such  animals  and 
stores  as  were  enumerated  in  the  diploma,  and  in  num 
bers,  quantities,  and  quality,  as  specified  therein.  The 
term  used  to  denote  such  requisitioning  was  angariare,  in 
allusion  to  a  usage  prevalent  amongst  the  Persians  and  a 
saying  current  among  the  Greeks,  of  which  we  have 


GREECE      &      ROME 113 

spoken  before.  Marculphus,  a  Gallic  monk,  wrote  a  work 
entitled  Formulae,  in  which  he  compiled  and  preserved 
the  actual  texts  of  many  legal  forms.  To  his  industry 
we  are  indebted  for  the  text  of  one  of  these  diplomata 
tractatorium,  or,  as  they  were  known  in  his  time,  circa 
660  A.  D.,  epistolae  evictionis.  The  reader  need  not  be 
surprised  at  the  munificence  of  the  emperor  in  thus  pro 
viding  for  the  needs  of  his  legates,  as  they  sometimes 
travelled  with  an  innumerable  train  of  officials,  secre 
taries,  slaves,  and  the  like;  and  in  some  regions  supplies 
were  scarce  and  had  to  be  transported  with  the  traveller. 
(Name  of  Emperor),  Emperor: — 

TO  ALL  OUR  OFFICIALS  AT  THEIR  POSTS  OF  DUTY. 

Greeting: — 

Know  ye  that  we  have  delegated , 

an  illustrious  gentleman,  to  be  our  legate  or  ambassador  to 

We  therefore  command  you  by 

these  presents  to  aid  his  excellency,  to  provide  and  furnish 

his  excellency  with horses,  to  collect  such  quantity  of 

supplies  as  to  him  shall  seem  good  and  reasonable,  in  places 

proper   and   convenient;  furnish ordinary   sumpter 

horses  and  in  addition; bread; hogs- 

heads  of  wine; barrels  of  beer; sides  of  bacon; 

cattle;    hogs;    suckling  pigs;    

sheep; lambs; geese; pheasants; 

chickens;  pounds  of  oil;  pounds  of  pickle; 

pounds  of  honey; of  vinegar; of  cummin; 

of  pepper; of  coste; of  cloves; of 

aspic; of  cinnamon; grains  of  mastic; 

dates;   .."...  .pistache-   almonds;   pounds  of 

wax;   of  salt;   of  oils;   ricks  of  hay; 

of  oats;  and of  straw. 

Look  ye  that  all  these  things  are  furnished  him  in  full 
and  entirely <9  in  a  place  convenient,  and  let  everything  be 
accomplished  without  delay. 


114 THE      INNS      OF 

From  the  foregoing,  it  is  easily  evident  that  life 
under  the  emperors  was  full  and  abundant  in  all  that 
concerned  their  agents  and  legates,  and  we  have  reason 
to  believe  that  they  acted  with  equal  liberality  toward 
foreign  ambassadors  and  august  prisoners  of  war.  Wit 
ness  the  treatment  of  Zenobia  by  Aurelian  and  that  of 
Gelimer  by  Justinian,  and  neither  of  these  princes  was 
noted  for  his  liberality.  Such  profusion  did  not  greatly 
antedate  the  empire,  however,  and  the  complaints  voiced 
by  the  deputies  from  Rhodes,  and  of  those  from  Mace 
donia,  inform  the  reader  that  Rome,  during  the  period 
of  the  Punic  Wars,  sumptuously  entertained  foreign  am 
bassadors  of  friendly  states  and  lodged  them  in  a  house 
owned  by  the  government;  but  that  representatives 
whose  home  governments  were  of  doubtful  allegiance, 
might  possibly  be  subjected  to  some  indignity.  Legates 
of  the  enemy  were  adequately  cared  for. 

"Quintus  Fulvius  Gillo,  a  lieutenant-general  of  Scipio, 
conducted  the  Carthaginians  to  Rome;  and  as  they  were 
forbidden  to  enter  the  city,  they  were  lodged  in  a  country 
house  belonging  to  the  state,  and  admitted  to  an  audience 
of  the  senate  at  the  temple  of  Bellona."  (Livy,  XXX,  21 .) 

In  the  case  of  the  envoys  from  Rhodes,  we  find  these 
ambassadors  expressing  their  displeasure  at  what  they 
considered  a  breach  of  diplomatic  usage,  as  follows: 

"In  former  times,  when  we  visited  Rome,  after  the 
conquest  of  Carthage,  after  the  defeat  of  Philip,  and 
after  that  of  Antiochus,  we  were  escorted  from  a  man 
sion  furnished  us  by  the  public  into  the  senate  house, 
to  present  our  congratulations  to  you,  conscript  fathers, 
and,  from  the  senate  house  to  the  capitol,  carrying 
offerings  to  your  gods.  But  now,  from  a  vile  and  filthy 
inn,  scarcely  gaining  a  reception  for  our  money,  treated 
as  enemies,  and  forbidden  to  lodge  within  the  city, 
we  come,  in  this  squalid  dress,  to  the  Roman  senate 


GREECE      &      ROME 115 

house;  we,  Rhodians,  upon  whom,  a  short  time  ago,  you 
bestowed  the  provinces  of  Lycia  and  Caria."  (Livy, 
XLV,  22.) 

A  little  later  on,  however,  when  the  republic  had  be 
come  more  conscious  of  its  strength,  it  absolved  itself 
from  courtesies  other  than  those  of  wood  and  salt, 
which  were  the  least  that  even  a  parockus  or  an  innkeeper 
could  have  done;  and  we  find  envoys  lodged  very  simply, 
friend  or  enemy,  in  an  inn  of  the  street. 

Wayfarers,  however,  unless  provided  with  the  diploma, 
that  magical  charm  that  opened  more  doors  than  sesame, 
would  perforce  be  driven  by  necessity  to  apply  to  such 
establishments  as  the  inns  for  food  and  shelter  when 
travelling,  but,  as  Marculphus  would  have  us  see,  the 
mere  presentation  of  the  diploma  bearing  the  seal  of  the 
reigning  prince,  (those  of  Augustus  bore  a  sphynx),  at 
once  procured  the  bearer  a  hearty  welcome,  excellent 
fare,  a  comfortable  lodging,  and  all  the  heart  could 
desire.  The  remains  of  the  Roman  mansio  in  the  Great 
St.  Bernard  have  been  excavated  and  examined,  and  I 
take  great  pleasure  in  quoting  from  LancianTs  Roman 
Campagna,  pp.  32  and  33,  to  fill  in  the  details  of  the 
picture: 

"The  Roman  hospice  (mansio  in  summo  Paenino) 
stood  a  quarter  of  a  mile  to  the  south  of  the  present  one, 
and  comprised  a  temple  to  the  god  of  the  mountain,  a 
hospice  for  travellers,  stables,  and  watering  troughs,  and 
store-houses  for  fuel  and  provisions.  The  mansio  or 
hospice  was  built  of  stone,  with  an  elaborate  system  of 
hypocausts  and  flues  for  the  distribution  of  heat  through 
the  guest  rooms.  The  roof,  made  of  tiles  from  the  lime 
kilns  of  the  Val  d'  Aosta,  had  projecting  eaves  in  the 
old  Swiss  style." 

In  the  times  of  Polybius,  almost  contemporary  with 
the  Rhodian  envoys  of  whom  we  have  spoken  above, 


116 THE      INNS      OF 

inns  were  numerous  along  the  great  roads  of  Italy. 
This  is  proved  by  an  interesting  passage  in  the  works  of 
the  great  historian  of  the  Punic  War.  He  was  a  cul 
tured  Greek  of  good  social  position.  His  travels  took 
him  well  over  Italy,  and  he  commented  upon  what  he 
saw.  After  having  stated  that  in  his  time  the  price  of 
wheat  was  four  obols  per  Sicilian  medimnus  (about  ten 
gallons),  and  that  of  barley  two  obols,  a  metretes  of  wine 
costing  the  same  as  a  medimnus  of  barley,  he  goes  on  to 
say  "that  the  cheapness  and  abundance  of  all  articles 
of  food  will  be  most  clearly  understood  from  the  following 
fact.  Travellers  in  this  country,  who  put  up  in  inns,  do 
not  bargain  for  each  separate  article  they  require,  but 
ask  what  is  the  charge  per  diem  for  one  person.  The 
innkeepers,  as  a  rule,  agree  to  receive  guests,  providing 
them  with  enough  of  all  they  require  for  half  an  as  per 
diem,  i.  e.,  the  fourth  part  of  an  obol,  the  charge  being 
very  seldom  higher."  (Lib.  II,  15.) 

Unless  human  nature  has  undergone  a  very  decided 
change,  we  are  forced  to  the  conclusion  that  the  table 
set  in  such  places  must  have  been  meagre  and  plain  in 
the  extreme,  and  the  landlord  of  classical  Italy  must 
have  been  a  blood  brother  to  him  of  whom  Gibbon  said, 
in  his  Autobiography: 

"Under  an  air  of  profusion,  he  concealed  a  strict 
attention  to  his  interest,5*  yet  the  master  of  sarcasm  does 
not  complain  of  the  table.  The  only  difficulty  in  the 
situation  lies  in  the  continual  carping  and  clamoring  of 
the  travellers  who,  if  they  paid  no  more  than  half  an  as 
for  a  day's  lodging  en  pension,  could  not  be  said  to  have 
paid  anything,  and  for  that  reason  could  not  be  accorded 
the  right  to  damn  their  dinner,  as  Fielding  says. 

In  early  times,  the  inns  of  this  class  were  no  better 
than  hovels,  badly  roofed  and  insecurely  fastened.  In 
Petronius,  the  revellers  return  to  their  miserable  sane- 


GREECE      &      ROME 117 

tuary  at  night  and  cannot  get  in  because  the  old  beldame, 
their  landlady,  had  been  swilling  so  long  with  her  custom 
ers  that  you  could  have  set  her  afire  without  her  know 
ing  it.  Trimalchio's  courier  rescued  them  from  a  night 
in  the  street  by  smashing  in  the  door.  Many  of  these 
establishments  were  mere  sheds  such  as  used  to  be  seen 
along  the  Appian  Way,  and  which  were  called,  according 
to  Festus,  ceditae,  because  a  certain  Ceditius  had  been 
the  proprietor  of  a  great  number  of  them.  As  the  rental 
of  such  huts  to  an  innkeeper  assured  the  owner  a  good 
profit,  and,  according  to  Varro,  played  no  unimportant 
part  in  supporting  the  cultivation  of  a  piece  of  land  on 
which  the  house  had  been  built,  nearly  every  landowner 
followed  so  common-sense  an  example  and  built  such  a 
shed  at  the  boundary  of  his  property. 

Wealthy  landowners  sometimes  refused  to  lease  to 
innkeepers,  reserving  to  themselves  such  rights,  and 
erecting  little  booths  along  the  road  which  bordered 
their  property.  Here  they  could  break  the  tedium  of  a 
long  and  tiresome  journey,  have  a  comfortable  place  in 
which  to  rest,  and  avoid  placing  their  persons  and  edu 
cated  palates  at  the  mercy  of  innkeepers  and  their 
scullions.  The  great  patricians  had  many  estates  in  the 
various  parts  of  the  peninsula;  these  they  visited,  as 
their  moods  dictated,  and,  as  a  general  thing,  they  main 
tained  small  establishments  such  as  are  described  above 
for  their  personal  comfort  and  convenience.  To  institu 
tions  such  as  these,  the  name  diversorium,  or  the  dimin 
utive  diversoriolum,  were  given,  Cicero  wanted  a  lodge 
of  this  kind  on  the  road  to  Terracina,  in  order  that  he 
might  not  always  inflict  himself  upon  Fabius  GaJlus  when 
he  visited  in  the  neighborhood,  but  he  either  lacked  the 
means  or  the  amount  necessary  was  always  spent  in 
advance  on  books  and  statues,  and  when  he  no  longer 
travelled  as  a  governor,  and  no  longer  possessed  that 


118        THE      INNS      OF 

title  and  the  right  to  avail  himself  of  free  lodging  such 
as  the  parochi  supervised  and  kept  in  readiness  along  the 
great  roads,  he  was  always  forced  to  fall  back  upon  the 
hospitality  of  his  friends;  accepting  shelter  with  Gallus 
whenever  he  returned  from  Sicily,  or  with  Lepta  if  he 
came  from  the  other  direction;  but  in  the  absence  of  his 
friends  he  had  no  other  choice  than  that  of  lodging  in  an 
inn.  In  his  case  he  was  fortunate,  for  Macula  seems 
to  have  been  a  much  finer  type  of  innkeeper  than  was 
commonly  to  be  encountered.  This  innkeeper  knew  his 
duties  and  appears  to  have  confined  his  activities  strictly 
to  them  and  to  proprieties  far  above  his  own  station  in 
life.  The  wine  he  served  was  good,  he  himself  esteemed 
it  and  drank  it,  though  Cicero  seems  to  have  preferred  a 
mixture  of  this  wine  and  a  little  Falernian;  he  had  only 
a  few  rooms  in  his  inn,  and  they  were  so  small  that  the 
great  orator,  on  his  way  to  meet  Caesar  who  was  return 
ing  from  Spain,  feared  there  would  not  be  room  for  the 
equipages  and  attendants. 

The  inns  along  the  great  roads,  then,  were  mere  ordi 
naries  and  such  dining-rooms  as  they  maintained  were 
small  and  few  in  number,  in  fact,  a  majority  of  such  public 
houses  must  have  been  huts  where  the  individual  could 
obtain  food  and  shelter,  but  often  they  were  equipped 
with  neither  stables  for  the  animals  nor  sheds  for  the 
vehicles.  Others  there  were,  however,  in  which  condi 
tions  such  as  these  did  not  obtain:  they  were  stables  out 
and  out,  and  travellers  were  obliged  to  bed  themselves 
down  upon  a  "donkey's  breakfast,"  among  the  horses 
and  mules.  Places  of  such  rustic  simplicity  were  neces 
sarily  poorly  constructed  and  probably  lacked  bolts  and 
bars  to  fasten  their  doors.  There  is  a  legendary  episode 
in  the  life  of  Severus  which  is  said  to  have  occurred  in 
such  an  inn.  The  future  emperor  at  the  time  of  this 
adventure  was  serving  as  a  centurion,  and  necessity 


GREECE      &     BO  ME 119 

bedded  him  down  on  the  straw  of  a  stable.  As  he  was 
making  the  most  of  his  situation  a  serpent  glided  in  and 
coiled  itself  close  to  his  head.  It  did  not  strike  him, 
however,  and,  at  the  first  startled  outcries,  it  disappeared 
and  an  adventure  which  for  the  moment  threatened  him 
with  grave  danger  was  turned  into  an  omen  favorable  to 
his  future.  It  was  construed  as  a  divine  portent  which 
announced  to  Severus  the  lofty  destiny  in  store  for  him. 

The  collective  term  used  to  denote  an  inn  was  deter- 
sorium;  this  applied  to  an  establishment  with  or  without 
stables,  but  when  reference  was  made  to  the  keeper  the 
term  used  was  stabularius:  should  the  institution  be  one 
of  those  dingy,  moth  eaten,  vermin  ridden  pot-houses, 
the  term  used  to  describe  it  was  caupona. 

The  taberna  deversoria  were  slightly  more  pretentious; 
here  one  could  lodge  and  eat  and  drink;  it  is  probably 
one  of  these  establishments  which  was  conducted  by  the 
hostess  in  the  Isernian  inscription. 

The  tabema  meritoria  were  a  sort  of  rooming  house 
and  tavern  combined.  Their  custom  seems  to  have  been 
less  transient  than  that  of  the  taberna  deversoria. 

It  is  of  the  deversorium  that  Horace  speaks  when  he 
scolds  his  nag  for  turning  in  at  every  inn  and  tavern 
along  the  road;  poor  habit-ridden  beast,  had  your  owner 
had  you  long  in  his  possession? 

Baiae,  Musa  protests,  will  not  do  for  my  case, 
And  has  caused  me  no  little  ill-will  in  the  place, 

Needs  must,  then,  to  change  my  old  quarters,  and  spur 
My  mare  past  the  inns  so  familiar  to  her. 
"  Woa,  ho !    I'm  not  going  to  Baiae's  bay, 
Nor  to  Cumae!"  her  choleric  rider  will  say, 
Appealing  to  her  through  the  left  rein,  because 
Saddle-horses,  you  know,  have  their  ears  in  their  jaws. 

— Epist.  Lib.  1, 15,  Martin's  Translation. 


120 THE      INNS      OF 

There  is  no  rancor  in  this  passage,  and  Horace's  ex 
periences  along  the  Baiae  road  must  on  the  whole  have 
been  pleasant.  It  is  otherwise,  however,  in  regard  to  the 
inns  on  the  road  between  Capua  and  Rome,  and  the  term 
employed  by  Horace  to  characterize  them  expresses  the 
contempt  in  which  lie  holds  them,  a  term  not  to  be  liter 
ally  translated  here,  though  the  passage  reads  thus: 

But  surely,  friend,  the  man  who  gains  an  inn, 
Besplashed  with  mud,  and  soaking  to  the  skin, 
When  on  his  way  from  Capua  to  Rome 
Will  not  desire  to  make  that  inn  his  home. 

— Epist.  Lib,  1, 11.    Martin's  Translation. 

And  with  what  care  the  refined  taste  of  the  poet 
evaded  the  pot-houses  on  the  road  to  Brindisium,  when 
ever  possible.  How  cheerfully  he  said  farewell  to  such 
asylums;  how  easily  he  contented  himself  with  the  slim 
and  precarious  hospitality  of  the  little  cottage  near  the 
Campanian  bridge  and  the  meager  rations  issued  by  the 
parochus.  How  worn  out  with  boredom  he  was  when 
he  paid  his  compliments  to  the  swarming  inns  and 
taverns  of  Caudium,  Caudi  cauponas,  on  his  well  pro 
visioned  way  to  the  villa  of  Cocceius,  so  magnificent,  so 
well  stored  with  luxuries  of  every  description,  and  so 
well  found  in  necessities,  plenissima  villa!  Then  continu 
ing  his  route,  he  tarried  with  the  innkeeper  at  Bene- 
ventum.  Here  the  fiery  ardor  of  the  landlord  had  nearly 
set  the  place  on  fire,  for  while  that  worthy  was  turning 
some  thrushes  which  were  roasting  over  a  hot  fire  of 
grape  vines,  a  blazing  brand  flew  out  of  the  brazier  and 
set  the  kitchen  on  fire.  The  scullions  and  guests  were 
greatly  excited,  the  latter  chiefly  because  their  supper 
was  thus  menaced;  with  one  accord  they  rushed  to  the 
rescue  of  their  food  and  then  put  out  the  fire  raging  in 
the  kitchen: 


GREECE      &     ROME  121 


Hence  without  halting,  on  we  post 
To  Beneventum,  where  our  host 
Escaped  most  narrowly  from  burning; 
For  while  he  was  intent  on  turning 
Some  starveling  thrushes  on  the  coals. 
Out  from  the  crazy  brazier  rolls 
A  blazing  brand,  which  caught  and  spread 
To  roof  and  rafter  overhead. 
The  hungry  guests,  oh  how  they  ran! 
And  frightened  servants,  to  a  man, 
The  supper  from  the  flames  to  snatch, 
And  then  to  quench  the  blazing  thatch* 

The  beds  in  such  inns  were  not  softer  than  sleep,  and 
the  mattresses,  as  we  learn  from  Pliny*  were  stuffed  with 
the  largest  tufts  of  a  certain  species  of  reeds,  in  place  of 
goose  feathers.  Horace  knew  by  experience  that  upon 
these  narrow  couches  one  was  visited  more  frequently  by 
insomnia  than  by  dreams. 

For  this  reason,  that  he  might  charm  away  a  little  of 
the  dreary  emptiness  of  a  "white  night/*  which  lay  ahead 
of  him,  he  made  certain  advances  to  one  of  the  strapping 
slaveys  attached  to  the  establishment  for  the  purpose  of 
rendering  all  manner  of  service  to  a  none  too  discriminat 
ing  public.  There  were  always  several  of  these  rustic 
Hebes  about  the  premises,  and,  in  the  eyes  of  the  Roman 
law,  none  shirked  this  double  duty.  This  lass,  it  seems, 
not  looking  forward  with  any  degree  of  pleasure  to  a  night 
spent  in  such  distinguished  company  as  that  of  the  poet, 
preferred  to  rendezvous  more  pleasantly,  and  perhaps 
more  energetically,  with  that  distinguished  individual 
who  served  Horace  in  the  capacity  of  master  of  horse. 
His  night,  therefore,  came  to  naught.  To  naught,  did  I 
say?  Nay,  let  us  read  what  the  poet  himself  says,  in 
this,  the  only  passage  in  all  his  works  in  which  he  can  be 
accused  of  absolute  sincerity  in  speaking  of  the  fair  sex; 
the  sex,  which,  alas,  he  often  found  magnificently  false: 


THE      INNS      OF 


'Twas  there,  O  fool,  O  dolt  supreme, 
I  waited  for  a  lying  jade 
Till  Sleep  on  me  his  finger  laid, 
And  I,  still  panting  with  desire, 
My  pulse  athrob,  my  blood  afire, 
Sank  into  slumber;  and  it  seems 
That  I  possessed  her  in  my  dreams. 

Those  whose  associations  had  accustomed  them  to  a 
finer  environment  would  have  always  missed  something 
in  these  inns:  the  kitchen  was  very  likely  to  be  carelessly 
kept  and  was  often  ill  provided.  The  wine  was  often 
vile  but  in  some  parts  of  the  country  the  lack  of  good 
water  was  even  more  keenly  felt;  especially  in  Northern 
Italy:  and  even  in  Rome,  notwithstanding  the  marvelous 
system  of  aqueducts,  there  were  continual  brushes  be 
tween  the  water  porters  and  the  publicans,  who  waged 
a  never-ending  warfare  over  a  matter  of  a  pint|  The 
aediks  were  being  constantly  involved  in  such  brawls, 
which  always  spread  to  the  rabble  and  roistering  vaga 
bonds  whose  ends  were  best  served  by  fomenting  disorder 
to  serve  as  a  screen  for  their  designs  upon  the  money  and 
goods  of  those  in  the  neighborhood.  The  officials,  on 
their  part,  were  always  on  the  alert  to  prevent  fraud  in 
measures  or  by  adulteration;  to  prevent  trespass  upon 
the  aqueduct  system  and  damage  to  the  same,  with  the 
consequent  waste,  which  might  have  interfered  with  the 
supply  which  kept  the  fountains  going.  At  Ravenna, 
conditions  were  much  worse;  there  it  was  sometimes  diffi 
cult  to  find  even  a  single  cistern  which  was  not  dry  to  the 
deepest  part.  All  publicans  were  reduced  to  the  dreary 
lot  of  him  of  whom  Martial  makes  sarcastic  mention: 
Epigrams,  lib.  HI,  57. 

In  an  inn  at  Ravenna,  the  other  day 

I  was  bilked  by  the  wiles  of  a  cheat; 
When  I  ordered  my  wine  mixed  with  water,  the  gay 

Deceiver  retailed  me  wine  neat. 


GREECE      &      ROME 123 

and  again  mine  author  says  in  another  pungent  epigram: 

I'd  rather  own  a  cistern  at  Ravenna 
Than  a  vineyard  in  a  clime  more  favored  still, 

For  I  could  then  sell  water 

At  a  price  that  soon  had  otighter 
Make  me  richer  than  the  dreams  wine  could  fulfill. 

Their  only  hope  of  relief  ky  in  the  showers  of  rain 
that  filled  the  cisterns  in  succession:  for  them  it  was  better 
than  a  heavy  crop  of  grapes  and  a  plentiful  vintage. 

"My  Dear  Ovid/5  writes  Martial,  "you  report  that 
the  rains  have  made  havoc  with  the  vintage.  What  of 
it?  The  rain  is  far  more  beneficial  for  wine  than  you 
would  think.  Coranus,  the  innkeeper,  was  able  to  refill 
a  hundred  amphorae  or  so/* 

Wealthy  travellers,  who  knew  beforehand  what  the 
penury  common  to  inns  had  in  store  for  them,  took  their 
precautions  far  in  advance  whenever  the  chance  of  the 
road  obliged  them  to  apply  there  for  lodgings;  in  the 
manner  of  the  Epicurean  Philoxenes  of  Cytheria,  who 
only  travelled  when  preceded  by  a  train  of  slaves  loaded 
with  wines  and  everything  proper  and  necessaiy  for  even 
the  most  educated  and  delicate  of  tastes;  it  was  probably 
his  example  which  prompted  Sir  Walter  Scott  to  emulate 
him  in  Peveril  of  the  Peak:  and  Kegnard  the  subtle  harp 
of  malignant  indirection  remarks : 

Who  are  not  always  burdened  by  books  of  the  law 

Bear  their  pepper  ground  fine  and  their  food  in  their  maw. 

When  wealthy  and  powerful  transients  arrived  at 
such  establishments,  it  was  with  an  entire  train  of  slaves 
and  sumpter  mules,  minions,  kpdogs,  carriages  and  all 
the  panoply  of  ostentation.  They  also  carried  with  them 
a  complete  culinary  apparatus,  and  on  some  occasions, 
when  the  highest  caste  was  involved,  portable  garden 
plots  with  growing  melons  and  early  vegetables  were 
transported,  as  was  done  by  Tiberius. 


124 THE      INNS      OF 

Ordinarily,  however,  the  wealthy  classes,  though  hold 
ing  in  extreme  contempt  the  chipped  and  dirty  cups  and 
the  lame  dishes  of  the  inns  and  taverns,  contented  them 
selves  with  merely  carrying  their  own  dishes  and  para 
phernalia  along  with  them.  In  this  latter  class  we  may 
place  Martial's  Calpetianus  (Lib.  VI,  94) : 

"Calpetianus  is  always  served  from  golden  vessels; 
whether  he  dines  in  the  city  or  at  home;  whether  he  goes 
on  a  picnic  or  not.  Thus  also  is  he  served  at  a  tavern, 
and  thus  in  the  country.  Has  he  no  other  service?  He 
has  none  of  his  own/' 

Those  who  adventured  with  such  spoils  as  these  into 
the  clutches  of  the  innkeepers  frequently  did  so  at  con 
siderable  risk.  The  inns  were  generally  isolated,  some 
times  at  some  little  distance  from  other  habitations  along 
the  great  roads  which  themselves  were  but  little  fre 
quented  except  by  those  engaged  in  repairs:  they  were 
commonly  under  the  eagle  eye  of  an  accomplished  scoun 
drel,  the  receiver  and  fence  for  all  the  robbers  and  night- 
pads  in  the  district:  such  hostelries  were  nothing  if  not 
out  and  out  Snug  Harbors  for  the  predatory  classes  whose 
methods  lacked  the  sanction  of  law  if  not  that  of  com 
mon  usage.  There  were  many  such  inns  to  be  found 
along  the  more  deserted  roads  in  Italy;  the  proprietors 
doubtless  chose  their  locations  with  due  regard  to  cus 
tom,  immunity,  and  rapacity,  and  all  the  art  of  a  specious 
landlord  could  not  detract  from  their  aspect  of  sinister 
purpose, at  best  it  could  be  softened  down:  as  an  example 
we  have  in  mind  the  malalbergo  on  the  long  road  between 
Bologna  and  Ferrara,  the  only  inn  in  the  whole  district, 
or,  yet  again,  the  post  house  at  Monteroni  on  the  Roman 
Campagna  (Torre  di  mezza  via),  of  which  William  Savage 
speaks  so  eloquently  and  with  such  spirit: 

"One  abandoned  enough  to  have  ventured  himself  in 
such  a  place  ought  to  have  gone  to  the  gallows;  a  sen 
tence  merited  ten  times  over/* 


GREECE      &      ROME 125 

Every  dangerous  refuge  such  as  this  was  almost  cer 
tainly  the  sanctuary  of  vagabonds  and  criminals,  and  the 
caupona  of  ancient  Italy,  and,  I  regret  to  say,  the  deter- 
soria*  as  well,  were  closely  allied  in  creed  to  the  establish 
ment  of  which  Savage  speaks. 

Savage  also  speaks  of  the  mal  aria  (malaria)  which 
aided  the  cause  of  the  cutpurses,  and  which  still  infests 
the  Roman  Campagna.  It  was  a  case  of  danger  succeed 
ing  danger,  and,  as  is  easily  seen,  from  the  remarks  of 
Didier  on  the  post-house  at  Monteroni,  the  ancient 
Roman  station  (ad  turres),  the  robbers  which  caused  such 
terror  of  old  have  yielded  before  the  fever  which  today 
has  everywhere  established  itself: 

"A  great  house  of  stone,  in  these  reaches  a  rare  thing, 
rears  itself  from  the  edge  of  the  road;  it  is  Monteroni, 
the  only  posting  house  between  Rome  and  Civita  Vecchia. 
I  enter,  solitude  reigns  throughout;  not  a  soul  comes  for 
ward  to  receive  me.  I  call,  and  a  silence  as  icy  and  im 
personal  as  death  responds  to  my  voice.  At  last  I  dis 
cover  two  postillions  lying  on  the  floor  on  a  filthy  and 
ragged  mattress;  two  others  are  lying  wrapped  in  their 
cloaks,  not  before  the  fire,  however,  but  in  the  center 
of  the  hearth  itself.  Every  one  of  them  had  the  fever 
and  they  were  so  weak  that  it  would  have  been  impos 
sible  for  any  of  them  to  have  mounted  a  horse.  Of  them 
I  was  unable  to  obtain  bread,  and  it  was  the  same  with 
water/* 


126  THEINNSOF 


CHAPTER  IK. 

The  fate  of  the  Arcadian  merchant — Dangers  lurking  in  inns — 
Petrvnius  and  Giton — Drunken  flute  girls  and  Gaditaman  dances — 
Scenes  of  debauchery — Edicts  grant  absolution — Liquor  situation  under 
Domitian — The  Syrians  and  Levantines — Looseness  of  their  women — 
Courtesans  and  their  arts  of  pleasing. 

There  would  be  little  difficulty  in  citing  a  thousand 
instances  of  thefts  and  murders  perpetrated  in  the 
cauponae  of  the  ancient  world,  but  we  shall  content  our 
selves  with  two,  Cicero  and  Valerius  Maximus  shall  sup 
ply  the  narrative,  and  we  shall  reserve  for  ourselves  the 
easier  task  of  the  commentator.  First,  let  us  begin  with 
the  tragic  fate  of  the  Arcadian  merchant;  a  study  in 
telepathy  and  crude  psychology.  It  is  true  that  the  thing 
took  place  in  Greece,  but  it  might  as  easily  have  hap 
pened  in  Italy.  It  is  one  of  the  selections  from  the  works 
of  the  great  orator  which  in  the  past  were  used  by  the 
instructors  to  give  their  pupils  a  thrill  and  to  show  them, 
perhaps,  that  not  all  Latin  classics  were  as  dry  as  a  too 
thorough  going  knowledge  of  grammar  and  prosody  would 
have  them  seem. 

"Two  Arcadians  who  were  intimate  friends,  were 
travelling  together;  and,  arriving  at  Megara,  one  of  them 
took  up  his  quarters  at  an  inn,  but  the  other  went  to 
lodge  at  the  house  of  a  friend.  After  supper,  when  both 
had  retired,  the  Arcadian  who  was  staying  at  his  friend's 
house  received  a  visitation  from  the  apparition  of  his 
fellow  traveller  at  the  inn,  the  specter  besought  hrm  to 
come  immediately  to  the  assistance  of  his  friend,  as  the 
innkeeper  was  bent  upon  murdering  him.  Alarmed  at 
this  intimation,  he  started  from  his  sleep,  but,  on  reflec 
tion,  thinking  it  nothing  but  an  idle  dream,  he  lay  down 


GREECE      &      ROME 127 

again.  Presently  the  apparition  reappeared  to  him  in 
his  sleep,  and  entreated  him,  that  though  he  would  not 
come  to  his  assistance  while  yet  alive,  that  he  would  not 
leave  his  murder  unavenged,  at  least.  The  spectre  told 
him  further,  that  the  innkeeper,  after  having  murdered 
him,  had  cast  his  body  into  a  dung-cart,  where  it  lay 
covered  with  filth;  and  begged  him  to  go  early  to  the  gate 
of  the  town,  before  any  cart  could  leave  the  town* 
Much  wrought  up  by  this  second  visitation,  he  went  early 
next  morning  to  the  gate  of  the  town,  and  met  with  the 
driver  of  the  cart,  and  asked  him  what  he  had  in  his 
wagon.  The  driver,  upon  this  question,  ran  away  in  a 
fright.  The  cadaver  was  then  discovered,  and  the  inn 
keeper,  the  evidence  being  clear  against  him,  was  brought 
to  punishment."  (Cicero  De  Divinatione,  Lib*  I,  27.) 

In  commenting  upon  this  passage  it  is  my  belief  that 
here  is  related  one  of  those  sombre  and  sordid  chapters  in 
Criminal  Law,  used  as  an  illustration  common  to  human 
experience:  in  other  words,  history  of  inns  and  taverns 
was,  in  ancient  times,  an  integral  part  of  the  history  of 
brigandage  and  thuggery;  and  many  of  the  hospices  in 
Western  Russia  and  the  provinces  bordering  that  great 
frontier  are  strikingly  akin  to  this  little  inn  at  Megara. 

In  another  work  Cicero  relates  an  affair  of  the  same 
sort  as  an  example  of  conjecture,  or  question  of  fact  in 
a  criminal  matter,  and  for  that  very  reason  it  lends  weight 
to  the  case  itself  as  a  corollary  thereof.  The  passage 
occurs  in  the  treatise  on  Invention,  Lib.  n,  chap.  4 : 

"At  present,  let  us  begin  with  the  conjectural  state 
ment  of  a  case  of  which  this  example  may  be  sufficient 
to  be  given. 

"A  man  overtook  another  on  his  journey,  as  he  was 
going  on  some  commercial  expedition  or  other,  and  carry 
ing  a  sum  of  money  with  him*  As  men  often  do,  he 
entered  into  conversation  with  his  new  acquaintance  on 


128 THE      INNS      OF 

the  way,  the  result  of  which  was,  that  both  proceeded 
together,  with  some  degree  of  friendship,  and,  when  they 
had  arrived  at  the  same  inn,  they  proposed  to  have  dinner 
together  and  to  occupy  the  same  apartment.  Having 
dined,  they  retired  to  rest  in  the  same  room.  But  when 
the  proprietor  (for  that  is  what  is  said  to  have  been  dis 
covered  since,  after  the  man  had  been  detected  in  another 
crime),  after  the  proprietor  had  scrutinized  one  of  them 
closely,  that  is  to  say,  the  one  who  had  the  money,  he 
came  in  the  night,  after  having  assured  himself  that  both 
were  sound  asleep  as  men  usually  are  when  worn  out, 
drew  from  its  sheath  the  sword  of  the  one  who  had  not 
the  money  (he  had  the  sword  lying  by  his  side),  murdered 
the  other  man  with  it,  took  away  his  money,  replaced 
the  bloody  weapon  in  its  sheath,  and  returned  to  his  bed. 

But  the  man  with  whose  sword  the  murder  had  been 
committed,  arose  long  before  dawn  and  called  his  com 
panion  over  and  over  again;  he  thought  that  because  he 
did  not  answer  he  was  overcome  with  sleep,  so  he  took 
his  sword  and  the  rest  of  the  things  he  had  with  him, 
and  departed  alone  on  his  journey.  Not  long  afterwards, 
the  innkeeper  raised  a  hue  and  cry  that  the  man  was 
murdered,  and  in  company  with  some  of  his  lodgers,  set 
off  in  pursuit  of  the  man  who  had  gone  away.  They 
arrest  him  on  his  journey,  draw  his  sword  out  of  its  sheath, 
and  find  it  bloody.  The  man  is  brought  back  to  the  city 
by  them,  and  is  put  on  trial.  On  this  comes  the  allega 
tion  of  the  crime:  "  You  murdered  him"  and  the  denial: 
"1  did  not  murder  him"  and  from  this  must  be  gathered 
the  statement  of  the  case.  The  question  in  the  conjec 
tural  examination  is  the  same  as  that  submitted  to  the 
judges:  "Did  he  murder  him  or  not?" 

This  conjectural  statement  serves  but  to  instruct  us  in 
the  dangers  that  lurked  in  ancient  inns,  more  sinister,  for 
all  their  covering  screen  of  creeper  roses,  than  those  gaunt 


GREECE      &      ROME 129 

and  ill  reputed  hospices  of  Calabria  and  the  Roman 
Campagna. 

Although  nocturnal  gullet  slashers  practiced  their 
calling  until  it  became  a  crime  of  habit,  the  thief  and 
the  fence  were  even  more  frequently  guilty  of  derelictions 
which  savoured  of  habitude,  and  a  rascally  steward  or 
some  slave  trusted  with  the  keys  to  cellar  and  storehouse 
was  the  surest  and  best  purveyor  of  supplies.  Rarely 
did  the  good  host  neglect  an  opportunity  so  opportune 
to  get  such  useful  tools  completely  into  his  power;  a 
custom  that  still  thrives  in  certain  parts  of  Italy.  His 
larder  was  stocked  with  wines  and  supplies  from  the 
estates  of  wealthy  patricians  who  knew  not  the  extent  of 
their  holdings,  but  who  would  have  unhesitatingly  pun 
ished  robbery  with  flaying,  if  not  with  actual  crucifixion. 
In  connection  with  expert  methods  in  buying,  let  us  again 
cite  William  Savage. 

"The  innkeeper  at  Tavolato,"  says  he,  "serves  no 
vintage  other  than  that  which  the  waggoners  smuggle, 
or  frequently  steal  from  their  masters  and  carry  to  the 
town;  this  is  well  known  to  every  Roman.  In  exchange, 
the  landlord  gives  them  food.  The  innkeeper  at  Porta 
San  Pancrazio  furnished  his  cuisine  in  that  way  with  fish 
brought  by  the  fishermen  who  stole  them  and  smuggled 
them  into  the  town." 

Should  we  then  wonder  that  the  tavern-keepers  of  the 
ancient  world  gave  such  commodities  a  welcome  none  the 
less  cordial  because  of  the  sources  from  which  they  came? 
And  then,  they  were  very  cheap !  Did  not  the  Romans 
have  a  market  for  stolen  goods,  and  did  not  Ascyltos  and 
Encolpius  determine  to  sell  there  the  mantle  which  they 
had  come  by  in  the  same  devious  manner  in  order  to 
redeem  the  ragged  tunic  with  the  gold  pieces  sewn  into 
its  hem,  and  thus  at  a  small  sacrifice,  procure  for  them 
selves  a  handsome  profit?  What  difference  if  they  knew 


130 THE      INNS      OF 

themselves  forced  to  buy  back  their  own  property. 
Ascyltos  plumbed  the  situation  when  he  manifested  so 
little  stomach  for  the  law,  and  the  night  prowling  shyster 
lawyer  who  would  sequester  the  spoil  in  hopes  that  the 
owners  would  not  dare  claim  it  for  fear  of  being  charged 
with  crime,  is  a  final  touch  as  eloquent  as  it  is  penetrat 
ing.  Let  us  not  hesitate  to  speak  the  truth  of  these  lowly 
financiers,  in  any  case  they  cannot  invoke  the  law  of  libel. 

As  their  profits  were  never  equal  to  their  avarice, 
they  invoked  other  expedients  to  eke  out  their  gains, 
expedients  not  more  elevated  than  the  natures  and  indi 
viduals  whose  needs  they  were  to  satisfy;  thus  a  lucrative 
sideline  was  added  to  their  vile  calling  and  served  to 
accentuate  it,  as  they  were  always  ready,  for  a  price,  to 
lend  their  assistance  and  establishments  for  purposes  of 
entertainment.  It  is  at  the  door  of  an  inn  at  the  corner 
of  a  deserted  cross-road  that  Petronius  has  Encolpius 
discover  Giton,  that  classical  prototype  of  all  the  fairy 
god-children  who  have  come  after  him,  it  is  in  an  inn 
that  most  of  their  relationships  are  consummated,  it  is 
in  an  inn  that  Giton  confesses  to  Encolpius  his  suspicions 
of  Ascyltos,  and  his  reasons  for  them,  pressing  the  tears 
from  his  eyes  with  the  balls  of  his  thumbs;  and  that  narra 
tive  furnishes  us  with  proof  positive  that  the  deversorium 
was  an  excellent  counterpart  to  the  lupanar  of  Sotades. 
The  boys  attached  to  the  inns  were  ordinarily  accomplices, 
though  sometimes  the  victims  of  these  frightful  debauches. 
On  this  account  we  find  in  Plautus  that  the  puer  caupon- 
arius  has  all  the  attributes  of  Hylas  and  Giton,  and  out 
of  the  fullness  of  experience  one  might  have  spoken  for 
the  other. 

Much  is  to  be  said  of  the  different  kinds  of  hospices 
and  inns,  their  arrangements,  and  the  life  which  went 
on  in  them,  but  the  best  source  of  information  lies  in  the 
names  they  bore.  Of  the  deversorium  we  have  already 


GREECE      &      ROME 131 

spoken;  it  was  a  stopping  place.  There  is  little  doubt 
that  these  institutions  catered  to  demands  other  than 
mere  lodgings  and  food  (which  was  generally  bought  by 
the  guests  themselves),  but  their  principal  custom  was 
probably  derived  from  transients  and  strangers,  rather 
than  from  the  natives.  The  caupona  and  the  taberna 
meritoria,  in  addition  to  sheltering  transients  and 
strangers  maintained  bar-rooms  and  restaurants  as  well; 
it  is  therefore  probable  that  the  bulk  of  their  patronage 
came  from  the  natives  who  forgathered  here  to  drink 
and  gossip,  amuse  themselves  with  singing  girls  or  flower 
girls,  and  drive  away  dull  care  generally.  The  caupona 
were  at  least  partly  furnished,  and  this  was  certainly 
true  of  the  dabulum,  in  proof  of  which  we  quote  Pe- 
tronius,  chapter  97: 

"Eumolpus  was  speaking  privately  with  Bargates, 
when  a  crier  attended  by  a  public  slave  entered  the  inn 
(stabulum),  accompanied  by  a  medium  sized  crowd  of 
outsiders.  Waving  a  torch  that  gave  off  more  smoke 
than  light,  he  announced:  *  Strayed  from  the  baths,  a 
short  time  ago,  a  boy,  about  sixteen  years  of  age,  curly 
headed,  a  minion,  handsome,  answers  to  the  name  of 
Giton.  One  thousand  sesterces  reward  will  be  paid  to 
anyone  bringing  him  back  or  giving  information  as  to  his 
whereabouts.9  Ascyltos,  dressed  in  a  tunic  of  many 
colors,  stood  not  far  from  the  crier,  holding  out  a  silver 
tray  upon  which  was  piled  the  reward,  as  evidence  of  good 
faith.  I  ordered  Giton  to  get  under  the  bed  immediately, 
telling  hi™  to  stick  his  hands  and  feet  through  the  rope 
netting  which  supported  the  mattress,  and,  just  as  Ulysses 
of  old  had  clung  to  the  ram,  so  he,  stretched  out  beneath 
the  mattress,  would  evade  the  hands  of  the  hunters.5' 

A  traveller  of  the  better  class  would  have  found  only 
a  mediocre  standard  of  comfort  here,  however,  as  we 
shall  see  from  a  further  scrutiny  of  Petronius  and  Horace, 


182  THE      INNS      OF 

to  say  nothing  of  Hadrian's  biting  criticism  of  such 
places,  and  the  numerous  tenantry  who  lived  at  public 
expense  but  paid  no  rent. 

"The  public  servant,  however,"  again  the  Arbiter  is 
speaking,  "was  not  derelict  in  the  performance  of  his 
duty,  for,  snatching  a  cane  from  the  innkeeper,  he  poked 
underneath  the  bed,  ransacking  every  corner,  even  to  the 
cracks  in  the  walL  Twisting  his  body  out  of  reach,  and 
cautiously  drawing  a  full  breath,  Giton  pressed  his  mouth 
against  the  very  bugs  themselves." 

Innkeepers  were  necessarily  privy  to  all  the  disorders 
originating  in  their  neighborhood.  If  they  happened  to 
be  old,  as  was  the  case  with  the  hostess  in  Apuleius,  they 
were  go-betweens  as  subtle  as  they  were  shameless.  An 
excellent  example  of  such  a  character  is  seen  in  that  mime 
of  Herondas  in  which  the  old  woman  whose  guile  has 
long  since  taken  the  place  of  beauty  and  charm,  is  brought 
to  bear  in  favor  of  the  rich  young  suppliant  who  desires 
certain  little  favors  at  the  hands  of  the  young  wife  of  a 
soldier  away  in  the  wars. 

The  younger  members  of  the  sorority  of  coparum  did 
not  place  insuperable  difficulties  in  the  path  of  a  mutual 
understanding,  and  money  or  other  valuable  considera 
tions  rarely  failed  in  making  easier  the  path  of  conquest. 
The  deversorium  and  the  caupona  were  sometimes  denoted 
by  another  term,  ganea,  a  word  which  old  Calepin  renders 
in  his  archaic  manner — taverne  bourdeliere — &  pimp's  pot 
house. 

If,  on  the  other  hand,  we  adopt  the  etymology  pointed 
out  by  Pestus,  the  term  ganea  should  mean  a  subter 
ranean  tavern,  hidden  away  in  the  rocks  and  woods,  such 
as  bordered  the  banks  of  the  Tiber  almost  to  Ostia,  and 
the  coastline  of  the  Gulf  of  Baiae.  The  Roman  women, 
who>  in  obedience  to  Nero's  orders,  changed  the  austere 
stola  for  the  vestments  of  tavern  singing  girls,  were  com- 


GEEECE      &      ROME 133 

pelled  to  establish  themselves  in  these  grottos  of  revelry, 
and  comport  themselves  in  a  manner  natural  to  their  new 
calling.  Suetonius  has  pictured  them,  standing  at  the 
thresholds,  hailing  all  the  passing  boats  with  their  cries, 
and  inviting  sailors  and  passengers  alike  to  land  and  par 
take  of  their  hospitality. 

It  was  guttlers  (heUuones)  such  as  these  that  Cicero 
flayed  so  savagely  because  of  their  social  habits,  their 
everlasting  readiness  for  an  orgy;  and  when  one  of  them 
answered  an  appeal  such  as  this,  and  entered  the  low 
and  narrow  door  of  the  ganeum,  the  comessatio  began, 
and,  after  having  been  prolonged  for  days  on  end,  re 
sulted  in  a  horrible  mess  of  broken  cups,  upturned  tables, 
sodden  serving-boys  sleeping  off  the  effects  of  their  wine, 
drunken  flute  girls,  and  Gaditanian  dancers  exhausted 
with  drunkenness  and  with  the  voluptuous  contortions 
of  their  native  dances. 

The  ganea,  then,  were  generally  the  abodes  of  clandes 
tine  debauchery  where  License  veiled  itself  in  impene 
trable  mystery  and  shadow.  Sometimes  they  were  known 
as  lustra  (a  den  of  some  animal,  sometimes  a  stew) 
because  of  the  secrecy  in  entering  them,  even  as  an 
animal  will  not  betray  its  den;  and  those  forgathering 
in  such  places  took  the  greatest  precautions  against  being 
seen  and  recognized.  Swaggering  roisterers  pursuing  new 
sensations  entered  the  ganea  with  covered  heads,  as  did 
Antonius  the  tavern  at  Red  Rocks,  and  their  exit  was  as 
well  screened  as  their  entrance.  The  law  required  that 
women  of  the  town  be  registered  on  the  rolls  of  the 
aedile,  but  the  number  of  clandestine  evaders  probably 
equalled,  if  it  did  not  exceed,  the  number  actually  regis 
tered,  and  a  large  percentage  of  these  evaders  were  in 
some  way  associated  with  the  ganea. 

The  extreme  caution  which  was  exercised  in  regard 
to  these  establishments  was  due  then  to  two  causes:  the 


134 THE      INNS      OF 

desire  of  the  frequenters  to  escape  the  obloquy  which 
would  certainly  have  followed  detection  and  publicity, 
and  the  necessity  which  drove  the  entertainers  to  avoid 
the  aedile's  register  and  the  exile  which  would  have 
resulted  from  discovery  of  their  actual  profession.  No 
noisy  arguments  or  drunken  laughter  were  loud  enough 
to  be  heard  on  the  outside  and  attract  unwelcome  atten 
tion  and  curiosity,  nor  were  brawls  permitted  to  menace 
the  sanctuaries  frequented  by  the  wealthy  and  influential 
classes.  The  Roman  police  were  not  the  dupes  of  these 
deceptions,  they  kept  a  tolerant  watch  more  for  effect 
than  anything  else,  although  it  is  highly  probable  that 
the  question  of  refined  blackmail  often  came  up  for 
settlement.  The  real  difficulty  lay  in  the  fact  that  the 
classes  frequenting  the  more  sumptuous  of  the  ganea 
were  beyond  the  reach  of  police  regulations  by  reason  of 
their  wealth  and  influence. 

In  the  taverns  and  inns,  however,  no  such  caution 
was  necessary,  as  the  very  calling  which  tavern  girls 
followed  absolved  them  from  the  penalties  imposed  by 
laws  against  adultery  and  prostitution.  When  edicts 
were  issued  the  authorities  generally  granted  absolution  to 
such  entertainers  of  this  class  as  had  come  into  their  net. 

"Such  persons,"  it  is  the  formal  language  of  the  code 
of  Theodosius,  "such  persons  shall  be  held  as  being  im 
mune  against  the  judicial  proceedings  of  the  law  against 
adultery  and  prostitution,  as  the  very  indignity  of  their 
life  is  an  insult  to  the  laws  they  should  observe/5 

Nor  were  the  innkeepers  dealt  with  severely  by  the 
law  makers.  It  is  true  that  they  were  responsible  to 
guests  for  belongings  and  property  stolen  or  misappro 
priated,  unless  they  could  prove  that  due  care  and  dili 
gence  had  been  exercised  to  preserve  the  property  and 
protect  the  owner.  But  in  those  cases  which  we,  with  a 
well  developed  genius  for  evading  responsibility,  lay  at 


GREECE      &     ROME 135 

the  door  of  the  Almighty,  no  ancient  landlord  was  respon 
sible.  He  had  no  such  blanket  alibi.  It  was  due  to  the 
calling  they  followed,  their  penchant  for  prostitution, 
their  professional  hospitality,  their  substitution  and 
adulteration  of  wines,  that  they  were  denied  the  free 
enjoyment  of  their  goods.  They  could  not  act  as  guar 
dians  for  children,  they  were  deprived  of  the  right  of 
taking  oath,  and,  except  in  special  cases,  they  were  not 
permitted  the  right  of  accusation  in  justice.  Let  us 
contrast  the  situation  of  these  Roman  innkeepers  and 
procurers  with  that  marvelous  Pornodidascalos  in  Heron- 
das.  Here  indeed  is  hardihood  untrammeled  by  the 
slightest  scruple. 

Unfortunately,  laws  had  their  loop-holes  then  as  now, 
and  were  generally  ineffective  in  restraining  rascally  inn 
keepers  because  the  latter,  by  their  very  birth  and  calling, 
were  below  the  law  and,  as  Gibbon  says,  "  beneath  con 
tempt.'*  The  only  punishment  which  could  legally  have 
been  inflicted  upon  gentry  such  as  these  was  to  expel 
them  from  Rome  and  its  environs,  and  thus  striking  at 
the  very  root  of  their  calling.  Such  a  proceeding  was, 
of  course/entirely  out  of  the  question  because  of  the  great 
inconvenience,  not  to  say  actual  hardship,  which  would 
have  beset  a  multitude  of  innocent  bystanders  in  a 
center  of  population  as  great  as  Rome. 

Under  Domitian,  another  method  of  dealing  with  the 
liquor  situation  was  briefly  tried  out.  It  is  interesting 
as  constituting  what  is  probably  the  earliest  chapter  in 
the  history  of  what  the  kte  B.  L.  Taylor  loved  to  call 
"The  League  For  Making  Virtue  Odious,"  and  is  related 
by  that  amiable  old  pagan  Suetonius,  in  his  life  of  that 
odious  tyrant.  Imperial  Caesar  dropped  his  fly  swatter 
long  enough  to  sign  an  edict  forbidding  the  planting  of 
any  more  vines  in  Italy,  and  decreeing  that  half  the 
vineyards  in  the  provinces  must  be  uprooted  (Chap.  7). 


136  THEINNSOF 


In  chapter  14,  we  learn  the  sequel,  we  are  informed 
that,  due  to  the  subtle  propaganda  contained  in  a  clever 
Greek  verse  which  was  scattered  broadcast,  Domitian 
was  led  to  moderate  his  aquanacreontic  ardor  and  set 
aside  his  decree*  We  append  a  translation  of  this  little 
verse:  a  translation  freely  made  which  is  still  as  literal  as 
it  is  exact: 

Though  you  devour  me  to  the  root 
Sufficient  wine  I'll  still  produce 
For  every  sacrificial  use 
When  Regal  Caesar  is  the  goat! 

What  shall  we  say  of  the  citizenship  of  these  inn 
keepers,  these  pestilential  pot-house  peelers?  Ordinarily, 
they  were  f reedmen  who  had  emancipated  themselves  by 
one  method  or  another  and  refused  thenceforth  to  place 
themselves  under  communal  law,  but  more  frequently 
still,  they  were  strangers,  of  a  servile  race  which  had 
been  conquered  by  the  Romans  in  the  Levant.  They 
had  emigrated  to  the  city  and  came,  at  last,  to  infest  the 
whole  of  Italy.  These  are  the  wages  of  conquest:  the 
women  of  a  more  sophisticated  but  less  virile  race  will 
play  no  unimportant  part  in  avenging  the  infamies  of 
their  country  upon  its  conquerors  by  expert  instruction 
in  new  and  more  demoralizing  lessons  in  social  manners 
and  morals,  and  new  sensations.  So  it  was  with  the 
Vandals  in  Africa.  In  like  manner  the  men  of  the  sub 
ject  races  play  into  the  hands  of  their  female  allies,  and 
the  final  result  is  a  civilization  literally  bled  white  finan 
cially  and  physically.  Horace  had  much  of  this  in  mind 
when  he  wrote  his  Hymn  to  the  Romans:  that  grand  and 
stately  lamentation  which,  viewed  in  the  light  of  what 
later  came  to  pass,  seems  to  have  been  of  the  very  stuff 
of  which  true  prophecy  is  made — prophecy  indeed,  requir 
ing  centuries  for  its  fulfilment: 


GREECE      &      ROME 137 

How  Time  doth  in  its  flight  debase 
Whatever  it  finds !    Our  fathers*  race 

More  deeply  versed  in  ill 
Than  were  their  sires,  hath  borne  us  yet 
More  wicked,  duly  to  beget 

A  race  more  vicious  still. 

— Martin's  translation. 

The  Syrians  and  other  Levantines,  "nations  born  for 
slavery,"  as  Cicero  cuttingly  says  of  them,  were  especially 
numerous  at  Rome,  and  preyed  upon  her  vitals  by  the 
exercise  of  the  vilest  professions.  They  bound  themselves 
to  the  service  of  the  overseers  of  the  games,  sprinkled 
the  sand  of  the  arena,  watered  the  horses,  had  the  care 
of  the  great  awning  which  shielded  the  spectators  from 
the  rays  of  the  summer  sun.  They  competed  with  the 
untutored  labor  of  the  city  and  introduced  problems  which 
California  understands  better  than  the  Eastern  portions 
of  our  own  country.  They  even  entered  the  service  of 
rich  patricians  and  matrons;  they  delivered  notes  and 
letters,  in  a  word,  they  supplied  the  needs  of  the  most 
infamous  callings,  and  frequently  at  some  little  peril  to 
their  own  skins.  In  the  fragments  of  Menander  (The 
Arbitrants)  we  have  a  Syriscus  (Syrian),  a  charcoal 
burner  and  tenant  slave;  and,  strange  to  relate,  he  is  one 
of  the  finest  characters  in  the  play;  he  is  good  through 
and  through.  In  the  Adelphoi  and  the  Self  Tormentor  of 
Terentius,  we  have  a  Syrus. 

Levantine  women  likewise  entered  service,  even  as 
did  the  designing  Syrian  in  the  Mercator  of  Plautus; 
but  when  circumstances  permitted  them  to  follow  their 
inclinations  and  choose  freely,  they  reverted  to  that  con 
dition  to  which  their  oriental  surroundings  and  habits 
of  life  had  accustomed  them,  debauched  adventuresses, 
worshipping  their  figures,  lascivious  dancers  like  the 
Gaditanian  gypsies  of  the  present  day,  players  of  lyres, 


138        THE      INNS      OF 

singers  of  obscene  odes  and  Fescennine  verses  at  the 
cross-roads  and  taverns;  in  a  word,  ambuniae,  as  Horace 
calls  them,  in  one  of  his  Satires  which  is  never  translated; 
flute  players  whose  lack  of  morals  and  restrained  decency 
were  compensated  for  by  physical  beauty  and  an  in 
satiable  desire  to  please  in  any  way  that  might  yield  a 
handsome  profit. 

Even  at  Rome  the  name  they  bore  had  a  popular 
significance  closely  allied  to  that  which  is  the  heritage 
of  the  gypsy  of  the  present  time,  and  the  ambuniae  came 
to  be  associated  with  that  class  of  sinuous  and  supple 
Syrians,  adepts,  dodae  puellae,  if  you  will,  in  every  phase 
of  the  finer  and  more  sensuous  varieties  of  such  enter 
tainments. 

The  greater  part  of  them,  and  they  had  a  gild,  or,  as 
Horace  calls  it,  a  college,  the  greater  part  of  them  to 
lend  an  air  of  refinement  worthy  of  their  calling  (call  it 
an  artistic  background  if  you  will),  had  opened,  either 
in  Rome  itself,  or  in  the  immediate  limits  and  suburbs, 
inns  and  taverns  in  which  music  and  dancing  were  usual 
and  a  part  of  the  entertainment;  the  ancestor  of  the 
nautch  girl  of  Algeciras  or  Cairo  or  Bassora.  Her  ex 
quisite  discernment  prompts  her  naturally  to  choose  the 
raiment  which  will  add  most  to  the  advantages  with 
which  a  benevolent  nature  has  endowed  her:  if  she  be 
of  exceeding  loveliness,  her  strophium  will  be  Grecian  in 
simplicity;  if  her  beauty  has  reached  its  acme  and  begun 
to  wane  she  will  adorn  herself  with  colors  of  Syrian 
gorgeousness,  a  confession  that  she  can  no  longer  afford 
the  simplicity  that  scorns  adornment  and  relies  solely 
upon  its  own  excellence.  In  her  are  combined  all  the 
attributes  of  all  the  courtesans,  all  their  arts  of  pleasing 
and  entertainment,  yet  the  strophium  is  always  there 
because  it  is  an  integral  part  of  Syrian  cultus,  an  em1  '^m 
sacred  to  Dionysus.  On  the  occasion  of  orgies  and  dances 


GREECE      &      ROME 139 

they  are  unwound  by  the  expert  fortune  tellers,  imported 
along  with  other  superstitions  from  the  Levant.  If,  at 
times,  they  drop  their  clacking  castanets,  whose  sexy 
clucking  punctuates  their  dancing  and  makes  their 
audience  more  pliant  to  their  demands,  it  is  but  to  take 
up  the  sceptre  of  the  seeress,  to  roll  the  threads  of  a 
thousand  colors  around  the  magic  rhombus,  or,  better 
yet,  with  herbs  of  secret  virtues,  to  compound  philtres 
to  restore  lost  love  and  virility,  philtres  such  as  have' 
cost  many  a  husband  or  flagging  lover  sick  of  an  old 
passion,  his  life.  One  of  the  herbs  of  which  they  made 
continuous  use  took  its  name  from  their  cult:  ambujea; 
and,  if  Horace,  in  his  second  satire  has  classed  them  with 
the  pharmacopoliae  or  poisoners,  it  is  surely  because  he 
was  well  informed  as  to  their  empiric  practices.  Lysis- 
trata  was  not  a  name  common  among  them. 

The  atmosphere  of  mysticism  which  surrounded  them, 
their  fortune  telling,  the  utter  lack  of  knowledge  prevalent 
in  those  times,  caused  the  common  people  to  regard  them 
as  witches,  and  popular  imagination  endowed  them  with 
strange  and  horrible  attributes.  Fingers  were  placed 
softly  upon  lips  when  they  were  passing  by;  their  dances 
were  regarded  with  secret  terror,  and  the  more  timid  and 
superstitious  dared  not  go  near  the  places  where  they 
lived,  or  take  a  guest  and  dine  in  an  inn  conducted  by 
one  of  them.  It  was  said  and  believed  that  they  served 
travellers  with  a  kind  of  cheese  which  immediately 
changed  those  who  had  eaten  it  into  beasts  of  burden. 
St.  Augustine  has  an  interesting  passage  in  which  he 
satirizes  popular  ignorance  on  such  a  subject,  and  the 
terror  with  which  the  ignorant  regarded  the  witches  of 
the  inns. 

The  sensible  man,  however,  saw  in  such  gossip  a  sure 
protection,  and  permitted  it  to  go  unchallenged;  although 
he  would  never  have  permitted  himself  to  be  caught  in 


140  THE      INNS      OF 


such  company,  any  more  than  he  would  have  dreamed 
of  associating  with  the  common  lot.  Such  patricians  as 
Piso  and  Antonius  furnish  illustrations  as  to  what  is 
meant;  then,  too,  there  was  a  fraternity,  if  such  I  may 
venture  to  call  the  unsexed  of  Cybele,  who  were  fully 
alive  to  the  possibilities  of  advantage  and  profit  which 
were  to  be  extracted  from  miracles  a<nd  sorcery;  they 
stood  in  no  awe  of  the  ambuniae.  The  poets  also  fre 
quented  the  rustic  taverns  kept  by  such  charming  hos 
tesses;  the  strange  charm  of  these  women,  so  subtle,  so 
beautiful,  and  finally,  so  mentally  able,  attracted  the 
bards,  and  drunkenness  forged  the  chains  that  held  them 
captive. 

Lucilius  made  a  famous  journey  from  Rome  to  Capua, 
and  from  Capua  through  the  Straits  of  Messina,  a  long 
and  charming  voyage.  Horace,  in  his  trip  to  Brindisium, 
followed  as  closely  as  possible  in  the  footsteps  of  his 
predecessor,  and  his  account  of  his  own  trip  was  probably 
based  upon  that  of  Lucilius* 

Lucilius  made  one  of  his  happier  halts  at  an  inn  kept 
by  one  of  these  Syrian  hostesses:  who  or  what  she  may 
have  been,  we  do  not  know.  Was  she  the  counterpart 
of  the  toothless  old  crone  whom  Apuleius  describes,  or 
was  she  a  lithe  and  lissome  ambunia?  The  unique 
hemistich  which  preserves  that  little  episode  in  the  poet's 
excursion  tells  us  nothing  of  this  except  by  inference, 

"However,  she  was  a  Syrian  tavern-keeper/5  That 
is  all  the  fragment  tells  us,  a  mutilated  remnant  of  what 
was  the  third  book  of  the  Satires  of  Lucilius.  If  only 
he  had  informed  us  of  the  place  and  manner  in  which 
he  met  that  Syrian!  But  no;  the  word  "she/5  cannot 
explain  or  amplify  what  followed  the  meeting,  and  one 
may  only  infer,  from  the  place  which  the  fragment  occu 
pies,  that  Lucilius  was  almost  at  the  end  of  his  journey 
when  he  met  her.  The  word  "however,"  might  cause 


GREECE      &      ROME 141 

the  reader  to  believe  that  inns  were  not  numerous  at 
the  place,  and,  though  the  inn  may  have  been  sadly 
lacking  in  comforts,  he  saw  possibilities  in  the  nation 
ality  and  person  of  his  hostess  which  might,  in  a  measure, 
annul  the  other  disadvantages,  although  he  had  for  some 
time  sought  for  a  resting  place  to  his  tastes,  and  that 
his  arrival  was  in  the  nature  of  that  of  a  providential 
guest.  Was  he  well  entertained?  Did  he  find  there  a 
crackling  fire  and  a  cosy  hearth?  Some  authors  would 
have  the  reader  see,  in  that  Syrian's  tavern,  a  wretched 
establishment  like  that  of  which  another  fragment  makes 
mention,  and  which,  on  a  par  with  the  inn  in  which 
Horace  was  so  well  smoked  at  Beneventum,  could  supply 
Lucilius  neither  faggots,  oil,  nor  asparagus,  "nothing 
which  he  wanted,"  but,  as  far  as  we  are  concerned,  know 
ing  what  we  do  of  the  inns  kept  by  the  ambuniae,  we 
will  give  the  preference  to  that  exquisite  little  pastel  of 
the  ancient  poet  which  delineates  a  Syrian;  a  pretty 
house  with  a  well  filled  larder  of  which  he  speaks  in  yet 
another  fragment  of  the  same  book.  She  it  is  whom 
we  prefer  to  see  at  the  head  of  a  table  loaded  with  food 
well  cooked  and  tastefully  served:  "an  exclamation  of 
starvation,5*  as  Labitte  remarks,  "we  will  open  our  jaws 
and  devour  the  profit/5  And,  if,  on  that  trip,  more 
famous  for  fasting  than  feasting,  he  might  well  make  the 
most  of  such  an  opportunity  for  an  orgy  as  is  indicated 
in  still  another  fragment,  and  write,  in  its  honor,  that 
verse  of  lively  jubilation,  "the  jugs  are  standing  on  their 
heads,  and  our  sober  senses  with  them,"  which  surely 
ought  to  be  the  case  during  that  same  dalliance  at  the 
shrine  of  the  Syrian  hostess. 

Such  an  hypothesis  would  be  utterly  without  meaning 
in  a  tavern  which  was  sordid,  a  dirty  and  smoky  lodging, 
and  I  find  myself  in  full  accord  with  what  the  poets 
have  told  us  of  these  oriental  inns. 


142  THEINNSOF 


CHAPTER  X. 

The  cabaret  dancer—Banquets  of  the  Patricians — Voluptuous 
dances — Gallus  describes  the  charms  of  a  siren — Dice  throwing  and 
gambling — The  murder  of  Claudius — The  Appian  Way — The  first 
Christians. 

Happy  and  fortunate  in  finding  a  little  gem  of  an 
tiquity  less  mutilated  than  the  remains  of  Lucilius,  we 
will  attempt  a  translation  or  paraphrase  of  Virgil's  Copa: 
the  most  charming  and  the  most  authentic  of  all  the 
fugitive  poems  attributed  to  him  under  the  collective 
title  Catalecta.  A  famous  French  savant  has  described 
this  bit  of  realism  as  a  beautifully  cut  cameo.  The  charm 
and  grace  of  this  figure  have  left  their  impression,  and 
the  deftness  of  the  hand  that  chiselled  her  is  unquestioned. 

THE  CABARET  DANCER 

"Copa  Syrisca,  caput  Graeca  redimita  mitella," 
A  Grecian  head-band  binding  her  hair, 
The  wine-flushed  Syrian  siren  sways 
To  the  titillating  clack  of  her  castanets, 
La  the  spell  of  the  dance  that  Passion  begets 
Of  smouldering  Desire  that  seethes  to  flare 
In  the  smoke  of  her  tavern:  sinuously  fair 
She  sings  her  appealing  lay: 
"Ah,  why  wilt  thou  broil  in  the  dust  and  heat, 
When  wine  awaits  in  a  cool  retreat, 
And  a  couch  of  grass,  or  a  garden  nook 
Treflised  with  roses?    A  shepherd's  flute 
Murmurously  twitters,  a  brawling  brook 
Writhes  on  its  way  to  the  strum  of  a  lute: 
Ktch-covered  puncheons  of  beaded  wine, 
Chaplets  of  crocus  and  violets  blended, 
Garlands  of  buttercups  studded  with  roses, 
Wicker-work  baskets  of  fresh  lilies,  tended 
By  water-sprites:  yon  osier  hamper  discloses 


A  CABAEET  GIRL 


GREECE      &      ROME 143 

Cheeses  and  chestnuts  and  plums  ...  all  are  thine: 

Apples  that  blush  with  the  vigor  of  Fall, 

Mulberries  blood-red,  grapes  in  great  clusters, 

Bice-colored  melons  that  hang  from  their  stems, 

Ceres  her  daintiest  gifts  for  thee  musters, 

Handmaids  of  Venus  to  fly  at  thy  call, 

Bromius  waits,  and  all  kill-joys  condemns. 

Priapus  guards  with  his  sickle  this  spot, 

Heavy  his  attribute,  but  maids  fear  him  not. 

Enter,  Sir  Falstaff,*  spare  thy  jaded  ass, 

Vesta's  delight  .  .  .  nay,  nay,  thou  shalt  not  pass; 

The  thickets  resound  with  the  katydid's  song, 

The  lizard  has  lurked  in  her  cool  retreat  long, 

Come!    Lie  on  a  couch  and  recline  at  thy  ease, 

Slake  thy  thirst  with  new  wine,  in  surroundings  that  please; 

Come!    Weary  One,  rest  in  the  shade  of  the  vine 

And  thy  heavy  head  quickly  with  roses  we'll  twine; 

Aye,  kiss  while  ye  may  yon  tender  young  mouth, 

While  the  tide  of  thy  life  sets  strong  from  the  South; 

Away  with  those  grim  puritanical  ways, 

Mere  dregs  of  those  ruder  and  earlier  days; 

Wilt  save  these  fragrant  wreaths  to  mourn  thy  dust? 

Or  crown  thy  tombstone?    Nay,  that  were  not  just!'* 

"  Bring  wine  and  dice !    Tomorrow's  cares  for  them  that  are  so  dumb, 

Death  tweaks  mine  ear  and  whispers  low,  Live  while  ye  may,  I  come/* 

Not  a  detail  is  lacking  in  this  picture,  nor  is  there 
the  slightest  forcing  to  render  it  cheerful  and  true  to 
life*  We  can  see  ourselves  in  a  dining-room,  a  shady 
arbor  of  creeper-roses  festooned  with  leafy  vines;  from 
such  a  sanctuary,  simple  in  its  elegance  and  taste,  we 
can  look  out  into  the  glaring  sunlight  and  see  the  heat 
waves  tremulous  in  the  air  while  we  quaff  our  cool  wine 
or  acidulous  beverage  in  the  fragrant  shadows  of  the 
arbor,  and  lazily  watch  the  dancing  and  listen  to  the 

*Exception  may  be  taken  to  an  anachronism  in  rendering  Caly- 
bita  by  the  Shakespearean  Falstaff,  but  those  who  are  jjifted  with 
penetration  may  applaud.  The  others  matter  nothing  to  the 
translator. 


144 THE      INNS      OF 

music:  tlie  mid  watch  lookout  on  a  sailing  vessel  in  the 
tropics  offers  no  finer  opportunity  for  philosophical  intro 
spection  than  we  have  here,  where  everything  attracts 
to  rest  and  repose.  Rare  indeed  is  the  intellect  that  has 
the  power  of  divorcing  itself  from  its  immediate  sur 
roundings,  or  the  memory  of  those  which  have  oppressed 
it,  and  thinking  deeply  and  constructively,  following  the 
course  of  a  thought  from  its  birth  to  the  effectuation 
of  the  plans  it  has  germinated.  Propertius  has  written 
delightfully  of  "tables  set  under  an  arbor  of  vines,"  and 
in  another  pointed  passage  he  makes  allusion  to  the 
suspicions  with  which  the  mind  of  his  mistress  was 
charged:  if  the  text  be  in  order*  Propertius  was  a  fre 
quenter  of  taverns: 

"Learn  what  this  night  struck  panic  through  the 
watery  Esquiline;  when  all  the  neighbors  ran  headlong 
through  the  New  Fields,  when  a  noisy  brawl  broke  out 
in  a  secret  tavern,  and  brought  shame  on  my  fair  name, 
though  I  was  not  there.9'  (Eleg.  Lib.  IV,  2  and  3.) 

Cups  of  every  size,  amphorae,  chalices,  flutes,  stringed 
instruments,  all  were  tossed  in  a  heap  upon  the  violets 
and  roses  with  which  the  floor  and  tables  were  strewn, 
but  alas,  the  wine  which  spouted  from  these  vessels  was 
not  generally  of  the  finer  vintages,  it  was  probably  vappa, 
a  product  which  the  discriminating  Spaniard  or  French 
man  would  contemptuously  term  "corked.35  Such  a 
product  as  this  stood  in  need  of  all  the  fortification  which 
pitch  could  give  it. 

The  hostess  of  Virgil  is  the  prototype  of  her  to  whom 
the  Abb6  de  Bends  paid  troubadour  compliment  many 
centuries  later,  nor  were  her  wines  more  potent  than  her 
eyes: 

The  mistress  of  the  cabaret, 

A  sweet  enchantress  sans  her  comb: 

The  god  of  Love  designed  this  fay, 

A  lissome  Hebe,  in  her  home. 


GREECE      &      ROME 145 

And  Bacchus,  seated  on  his  cask, 
Mistakes  her  for  a  water-sprite; 
Were  water  all  her  world  could  ask, 
Twere  still  the  same:  her  eyes  are  bright. 

Here  will  never  be  found  tlie  luxury  and  the  succu 
lence  that  characterized  the  banquets  of  the  patricians, 
the  infinite  number  of  dishes  and  delicacies,  and  the 
rarity  and  age  of  the  vintages.  The  charm  that  en 
chanted  genius  and  enthralled  the  limpid  soul  of  a  Virgil 
or  a  Theocritus,  given  naturally  to  a  gentle  melancholy 
induced,  perhaps  by  frail  health  and  an  extraordinary 
insight  into  causes  and  effects,  lay  in  the  utter  and 
poetic  simplicity  of  nature.  Here  such  a  rare  personality 
could  dream,  his  brain  could  teem  with  harmonies  and 
nocturnes  too  beautiful  for  expression:  melodies  unheard 
are  sweetest,  says  Keats,  who,  perhaps  of  all  moderns, 
had  most  in  common  with  the  Mantuan,  whose  sombre 
spirit,  which  imbued  whatever  it  touched  with  exquisite 
delicacy,  found  at  last  in  the  shade  and  soft  atmosphere 
of  Parthenope  a  peace  and  a  requiem  such  as  Stevenson 
must  have  dreamed  of  when  he  wrote  his  greatest  poem: 
"Under  the  wide  and  starry  sky/' 

Little  remains  to  be  said,  except  that  the  tables  were 
always  set,  the  latch-string  was  always  out,  and  the 
larder  was  always  full.  It  is  almost  as  though  one  were 
present  at  the  repast  with  which  Philemon  and  Baucis 
regaled  Zeus  and  Hermes,  or  in  the  rustic  cottage  of 
Hecale  when  Theseus  partook  of  her  hospitality;  flowers, 
dairy  products,  fruits:  here  we  have  the  soul  of  all  that 
is  hospitable:  the  gifts  of  Flora  and  of  Ceres: 

The  linen,  decked  with  flowers,  with  dainties  piled  high, 
A  little  milk,  fruit,  garden  stuff,  that  Ceres  don't  deny. 

Whether  it  be  Ovid,  or  Butilius,  it  is  still  a  commen 
tary  upon  Virgil  or  Theocritus! 


146 THE      INNS      OF 

As  with  Baucis,  so  with  the  Syrian  hostess,  the  little 
cheeses,  so  fresh  that  they  smear  the  wicker  work  osiers 
in  which  they  are  to  dry,  the  plums,  the  late  fruits  of 
autumn,  the  chestnuts,  the  sweetly  blushing  apples,  the 
melon  with  its  coloring  of  the  tropic  seas,  where  sound 
ings  are  not  too  great,  and  when  clouds  and  sun  are 
right,  the  blood  red  mulberries,  the  choice  grapes  on 
their  vine  cuttings:  it  is  a  repast  true  in  every  way  to 
the  standards  of  the  Georgics,  to  those  of  the  elder  Cato, 
or  to  those  of  Columella;  and  the  writer  remembers  well 
many  such  repasts  served  in  the  patios  of  Spanish  hachen- 
dado's  houses  in  happier  climes  under  a  canopy  of  cadena 
de  amor,  and  to  the  music  of  harps !  Mantua,  your  son  has 
done  you  greater  service  than  even  Shakespeare!  The 
only  factor  that  jars  is  that  he  also  wrote  the  Moretum, 
which  could  not  have  been  served  in  such  surroundings 
as  these. 

As  we  have  invoked  the  genius  of  things  as  they 
ought  to  be,  let  us  also  strengthen  the  illusion  by  imagin 
ing,  in  the  distance,  that  we  can  hear  the  twittering  of 
the  rustic  pipes,  in  the  hands  of  a  master  worthy  to 
compete  with  Marsyas,  swelling  from  the  dim  and  cool 
aloofness  of  a  Menaelian  grotto,  and  mingling  its  dulcet 
complainings  with  those  of  the  clear,  cold,  twisted  stream 
as  it  foams  and  chatters  through  its  rocky  bed,  leaping 
in  cascades  that  caress  the  verdure  with  their  vapor,  and 
that  enchant  the  ear  with  the  witchery  of  nature:  pebbles 
roll  along  and  the  water  foams  deliciously  around  them, 
the  very  source  of  the  water  of  life  and  certainly  one  of 
the  finest  opportunities  to  enjoy  its  most  ethereal  mo 
ments,  "Whose  limpid  sweetness  seems  to  speak  of  love," 
as  only  a  Frenchman  could  have  said. 

Now  the  guests  are  coming,  they  laugh  in  merriment 
as  they  cross  the  threshold  of  the  little  Roman  roadhouse; 
some  of  the  gayer  address  some  pointed  pleasantry  to 


GREECE      &      ROME 147 

the  worm-eaten  wood  god,  serving  the  cabaret  as  guar 
dian  genius  and  sign:  formidable  still  because  of  the  huge 
attribute  with  which  he  is  endowed  and  which  was  often 
used  to  club  trespassers  and  thieves,  or  otherwise  to 
coerce  them.  Truly  a  most  picturesque  mirror  in  which 
to  see  ourselves  and  the  place  into  which  we  have  come! 

Then,  too,  our  hostess  has  greeted  an  arrival  in  a 
manner  which  outdoes  the  finesse  of  the  Widow  Wadman : 
"Welcome,  Calybita  (Falstaff),"  the  guest  has  much  of 
the  rogue  about  him,  but  alas,  nothing  of  that  hardi 
hood  which  appeals  most  subtly  to  women;  "It  is  easier," 
says  Quartilla,  "it  is  easier  nowadays  to  meet  a  god 
than  it  is  to  meet  a  real  man!"  Falstaff,  you  are  older 
than  one  could  have  imagined,  but  no,  I  seem  to  recall 
the  melancholy  destiny  of  Abishag,  a  doubtful  comfort 
in  so  dark  an  age! 

Yes,  that  fat  rascal  who  has  just  arrived,  and  is  even 
now  dismounting  from  his  puffing  mule,  is  one  of  the 
priests  of  Cybele,  one  of  that  curious  fraternity  immune 
to  half  the  ills  that  human  flesh  is  heir  to,  a  peripatetic 
evangelist  who  trains  the  fat  of  laziness  with  drunken 
sprees  in  every  tavern  in  country  or  village.  The  worn- 
out  mule  is  tied  to  a  tree  near  the  gate  of  Rome,  along 
with  the  relics  sacred  to  the  ritual,  relics  which  some 
times  include  a  simulacrum  of  the  goddess.  Apuleius 
has  described  such  a  pilgrimage  and  the  palmers  who 
took  part  in  it,  their  slow  progress  through  the  country 
districts,  punctuated  by  the  clash  of  cymbals  and  the 
clucking  of  castanets,  the  lying  prophecies  that  distilled 
alms  without  in  the  least  instructing  the  superstition 
of  the  inhabitants.  They  danced  their  way  into  a  scanty 
and  doubtful  competence,  but  their  real  goals  were  the 
drinks  and  larder  of  the  tavern  where  their  style  would 
be  less  cramped.  Here  such  a  bonze  could  dance  him 
self  into  the  stupor  of  exhaustion,  recuperate  himself, 


148  THE      INNS      OF 


and,  if  necessary,  hypothecate  his  tambourine  or  cym 
bals  to  pay  his  score  and  obtain  the  means  of  returning 
to  the  city. 

We  shall  follow  the  fat  satyr  into  the  interior  of  the 
establishment.  The  odors  of  the  kitchen  will  appeal 
more  to  his  senses  than  the  fragrance  of  the  garden,  and 
the  smoky  atmosphere  of  the  little  inn  will  furnish  a 
setting  more  in  keeping  with  the  proprieties  to  which 
he  is  accustomed  than  the  clear  and  clean  air  of  the 
country.  He  has  come  to  this  place  to  get  away  from 
himself;  he  would  never  admit  this,  he  is  probably  un 
conscious  that  it  is  true;  he  wants  to  dance,  to  drink, 
to  sing,  and  perhaps  it  is  not  too  much  to  say  that  he 
even  has  a  flair  to  experiment  at  close  range  with  the 
few  active  sensual  possibilities  which  still  remain  to  him 
after  an  outraged  nature  has  exacted  her  inexorable  dues. 
Through  half  closed  eyes  he  watches  the  lithe  and  har 
monious  play  of  the  muscles  of  the  ambunia,  in  her 
bacchantic  posturings.  She  is  a  past  mistress  in  the  art 
of  the  cordax,  and  at  last,  as  a  tremulous  shiver,  an 
erotic  tic,  runs  through  the  length  of  that  slim  lithe 
figure,  as  the  yellowish  eyes  open  slowly,  voluptuously, 
the  lambent  flame  in  their  depths  scorches  the  onlookers, 
as  the  nostrils  twitch,  and  a  crooning  sigh  comes  throbbing 
from  a  bosom  charged  with  all  the  passions  of  all  the 
ages,  as  this  descendant  of  Semiramis,  this  cousin  of 
Artemisia  and  Rhodope,  this  Roxena  with  vigor  and 
skill  enough  to  exhaust  a  dozen  Alexanders,  this  human 
leopardess  as  impersonal  as  a  sphinx  stands  mute  before 
her  audience,  her  little  hands  grasping  convulsively  the 
firm  little  breasts  whose  nipples  protrude  through  the 
apple  green  silk  netting  which  confines  them — ah,  the 
charm,  the  subtle  appeal  that  lies  in  their  artificially 
colored  tips,  so  deeply  ruby  if  under  twenty,  so  golden 
after  twenty,  her  head  thrown  back  until  every  cord 


GREECE      &      ROME 149 

and  muscle  of  her  symmetrical  neck  stand  out,  and  give 
a  tonus  to  her  entire  being;  verily,  in  the  words  of  Field 
ing,  the  favored  among  her  audience  must  have  had  very 
much  or  very  little  of  the  hero  about  them  if  her  appeal 
proves  unavailing!  Now  she  has  rested,  and  wearily, 
automatically  she  dances  the  dance  of  the  Maenad;  a 
little  wine,  a  little  ripple  of  applause,  her  color  heightens, 
her  eyes  grow  brighter;  her  movements  become  more 
and  more  spirited,  the  thyrsus  has  been  tossed  aside, 
and  the  cluck  cluck  of  the  crotals  in  her  hands  stimulates 
her  audience  as  though  they  were  being  flagellated  with 
a  sprig  of  nettles;  more  and  more  abandoned  becomes 
the  dance;  through  a  dark  opening  which  leads  to  the 
garden  advances  a  troupe  of  Pans  and  Satyrs  under  the 
leadership  of  Dionysus  himself:  as  they  intone  the  hymn 
to  Bacchus:  "Etoe,  evoe"  chants  the  infatuated  rou6, 
and  as  the  tones  wax  higher  and  higher  they  roll  their 
heads,  and  as  they  wane  their  heads  droop:  faster  and 
faster  becomes  the  movement,  the  eyes  of  the  dancer 
sparkle  with  a  brightness  unhealthy  and  destroying,  the 
postures  fade  one  into  another  like  the  everchanging 
patterns  in  the  brilliant  skin  of  some  viper  that  writhes 
as  it  charms  its  victims:  the  tones  ascend  in  a  shrill 
crescendo,  a  rocket  of  passion  that  expires  in  a  thousand 
brilliant  sparks,  and  silence,  exhaustion,  and  satiety!  As 
the  dancer  falls,  she  is  caught  by  an  attendant  and  carried 
from  the  scene.  Soon  another  will  take  her  place:  bring 
stronger  wine,  on  with  the  dance,  let  joy  be  unconfined. 
Thus  do  the  emotions  of  the  audience  rim  the  entire 
gamut  of  titillation,  and  soon,  too  soon,  will  vigor  be 
replaced  by  a  softer  and  more  treacherous  substitute,  and 
the  nation,  suddenly  confronted  with  an  enemy  that 
knows  only  the  ritual  imposed  upon  those  who  are  the 
lawful  spoils  of  war,  will  find  its  manhood  impotent  and 
cowardly,  and  its  daughters  the  willing  prey  of  those 


150  THE      INNS      OF 

more  worthy  to  work  their  will  upon  them-  Thus  did 
Genseric  glut  his  barbarian  hordes,  and  thus  did  they  in 
their  turn  pay  the  ransom  to  an  enemy  more  cunning 
and  virile  than  they.  Thus  and  thus  only  has  civilization 
paid  the  wages  of  justice;  the  fittest  survive,  but  the 
term  needs  a  proper  definition*  In  the  Occident,  three 
dances  such  as  we  have  described  have  come  down 
through  the  ages:  they  are  the  French  chahut,  the 
Neapolitan  tarantella  (in  its  most  abandoned  form),  and 
the  baji  of  the  gypsies  of  Iberia  and  Balkan  Europe. 

Many  of  the  poets  of  antiquity  were  smitten  with  the 
charms  of  these  sirens,  but  one  citation  from  Gallus, 
whose  tragic  fate  has  colored  poetic  legend,  shall  suffice: 

" There  was  a  young  woman  named  Blanche;  fair  as 
a  lily  was  she,  and  her  black  hair  was  curled  with  an 
artistic  witchery,  I  saw  her  one  day,  and  she  had  a 
number  of  musically  chiming  little  bells  attached  to  her 
garments,  at  her  every  movement  they  tinkled  and  the 
tinklings  multiplied  themselves.  When  she  snapped  her 
white  fingers,  or  strummed  upon  a  lute,  she  imbued  the 
chords  with  a  sweet  and  haunting  harmony  foreign  to 
the  instrument.  She  danced,  and  I  was  lost:  I  loved, 
but  in  loving,  I  despaired.  I  suffered  agonies  from  a 
secret  wound,  but  the  agonies  were  sweet  as  the  hope  of 
life  itself.  I  have  carried  with  me  the  memories  of  the 
day  I  first  saw  her,  every  detail  is  perfect  in  my  mind, 
and  the  thought  of  her  has  filled  my  heart  unceasingly, 
I  dream  of  her,  day  dreams  too  enchanting  for  expression, 
and  at  night  .  .  .  ah,  at  night  ...  I  feel  the  fancied 
touch  of  lips  softer  than  the  wing  of  sleep.  I  invent 
imaginary  conversations,  intimate  little  confidences  with 
her,  and  yet  in  this  dialogue,  there  is  but  one:  question 
ings,  doubts,  fears;  all  that  might  have  been,  and  I  hum 
to  myself  the  soft  airs  she  was  wont  to  sing." 

The  dance  is  ended,  and  the  Syrian  follows  it  with 


GREECE      &      ROME 1L51 

other  diversions  to  amuse  the  wearied  senses  of  an  au 
dience  no  less  insatiable  than  she. 

"  Bring  wine  and  dice,"  cries  one,  and  now  pure  wine 
is  served,  "bring  on  the  dice/'  is  cried;  " Death  tweaks  the 
ear  and  whispers  low,  live  while  ye  may,  I  come!" 

The  dice  are  brought,  they  are  contained  in  an  ivory 
box,  and  in  the  hands  of  the  revellers,  hands  no  longer 
quite  steady,  they  begin  to  roll  and  bound  over  the  stone 
table  top.  The  game,  once  begun,  may  continue  without 
interruption  for  many  hours,  probably  for  two  or  three 
days  and  nights  with  varying  fortunes  and  chances  in 
the  game  of  senio  (game  of  six),  and  of  canicula  or  canis, 
(game  of  the  dog's  ace),  one  of  those  games  of  chance 
in  which  the  stakes  were  often  enormous,  and  in  which 
the  Romans  took  such  keen  delight.  The  dullard  Clau 
dius  was  by  nature  a  gambler,  as  both  Suetonius  and 
Seneca  relate,  and  that  the  dice  might  not  be  disturbed 
by  the  movements  of  his  litter,  he  had  constructed  a 
gaming  table  (alveum)  so  arranged  that  the  dice  combi 
nations  were  not  disturbed  by  the  gait  of  the  bearers. 
It  is  also  reported  that  he  wrote  a  treatise  on  dice  games. 

On  this  account  Seneca,  in  his  Apokolokintosis,  can 
invent  no  keener  punishment  with  which  to  plague  the 
dead  emperor  than  that  of  condemning  him  to  an  eternal 
game  of  dice  with  a  dice  box  full  of  holes. 

We  need  not  occupy  ourselves  with  the  gambling 
propensities  of  emperors,  however,  nor  with  the  weak 
nesses  of  the  senators  nor  prostitutes:  Seneca  has  dealt 
with  them  in  a  manner  better  than  we  could  hope  to 

rival: 

All  ye,  who  owe  your  wealth's  advance 
To  games  of  skill  and  gambling  chaace, 
Though  weighted  down  with  treasure; 
Yea,  iron-nerved  gambler,  risking  all, 
Take  heed,  lest  Death  and  Fire  recall 
Your  gold,  at  grim  Fate's  pleasure. 


152 THE      INNS      OF 

The  scene  depicted  above  is  meant  to  represent  a 
gambling  party  in  one  of  the  common  inns:  the  players 
are  probably  knaves  to  a  man;  they  have  taken  to 
gambling  after  having  had  a  drinking  bout,  and  will  do 
the  best  that  in  them  lies  to  cheat  their  way  to  victory, 
and  the  matter  will  presently  end  in  a  free  for  all  fight, 
Plautus  in  the  Curcullio  has  left  us  a  graphic  scene  of 
this  description.  His  hero  was  tempted  to  throw  dice 
with  a  soldier,  but  he  had  not  the  slightest  intention  of 
losing;  he  relates  his  prowess  and  dexterity  to  Phedromos, 
another  rapscallion  of  his  own  complexion: 

"\Vhen  we  had  eaten  well  and  drunk  our  fill,  he  pro 
posed  a  game  of  dice  to  me.  I  put  up  my  mantle  as  a 
pledge,  he  places  his  ring  in  escrow,  then  he  invoked 
Planesius  .  .  .  He  brought  in  four  blood-suckers.  I 
took  the  dice  for  my  turn  and  I  invoked  my  wetnurse 
Hercules.  "The  Royal  Throw,"  I  whisper  to  the  dice, 
"I  present  the  soldier  with  a  large  throw,  and  his  head 
falls  heavily  on  the  instant  he  sees  it,  and  he  falls  asleep. 
I,  I  slip  his  ring  off  his  finger  and,  for  fear  he  may  awaken, 
I  slip  under  the  bed,  very  quietly." 

In  1877  archaeologists  at  work  in  the  ruins  of  Pompeii 
uncovered  a  wineshop  of  the  sort  of  which  we  have  just 
spoken.  The  contemporary  life  is  illustrated  to  admir 
ation  on  the  plaster  in  one  of  the  front  rooms:  there  are 
four  scenes  in  all. 

In  the  first  scene,  on  the  left,  a  young  man  is  furiously 
kissing  a  slavey  dressed  in  garish  and  hideous  yellow 
garments.  She  is  fighting  him  off  and  the  legend  belong 
ing  to  the  scene  reads:  "NOLO  CVM  MVRTAL"  (I 
don't  want  you  to,  play  with  Myrtalis).  In  the  second 
panel  we  see  the  same  slavey  in  conversation  with 
Myrtalis.  Both  are  pointing  their  fingers  at  a  third 
woman  who  staggers  in  under  the  weight  of  an  immense 
wine  jar;  she  also  carries  a  glass.  The  legend  says: 


GREECE      &      ROME  153 


"QVI  VVLT  SVMAT  OCEAXE  VEXI  BIBES*  Let 
him  who  wants  take,  I  am  here,  Oceanus,  drink).  In 
the  third  panel  are  seen  two  gamblers.  They  are  seated 
on  opposite  sides  of  a  board  which  rests  upon  their 
knees.  There  are  several  latrunculi  (counters)  in  rows 
upon  the  board:  these  counters  are  of  different  colors, 
some  yellow,  some  black,  and  some  are  white.  One  of 
the  gamesters  has  just  thrown  the  dice:  "EXSIS*  I 
have  won),  he  cries.  The  other  points  to  the  dice  and 
says  "AUV  TRIA  DVAS  EST,"  (Xot  three,  it  is  two). 
In  the  fourth  and  last  scene  the  battle  is  in  full  swing: 
"I  did  not  throw  two  but  three,  I  won,"  and  the  other 
answers:  "You  s...o...b...I  won."  The 
landlord  has  entered  and  is  shoving  both  brawlers  out 
into  the  street:  "ITIS  FORAS  RIXATIS"  (Outside  to 
fight)  is  his  valedictory* 

Gambling  was  frowned  upon  by  the  authorities,  except 
during  the  brief  season  of  the  Saturnalia,  which  cor 
responded  more  or  less  roughly  with  our  Christmas  holi 
days,  except  that  the  period  was  longer. 

"Betrayed  by  the  rattling  of  his  dice-box,"  says  Mar 
tial,  "and  dragged  from  the  inn,  the  fuddled  gambler 
begs  mercy  of  the  aedile."  Great  license  was  permitted 
slaves  during  this  period  of  the  Saturnalia;  and  unpal 
atable  truths  were  told  to  masters  under  the  immunity 
conferred  by  the  season,  infants  were  allowed  the  game 
of  nuts,  the  game  that  ordinarily  symbolized  the  tem 
porary  emancipation  of  the  Roman  patrician  from  some 
of  those  six  unnatural  things  and  his  espousal  of  a  relative 
degree  of  normalcy  in  his  relations  with  society. 

"When  the  aedile  sent  his  lictors  to  pay  a  call  upon  some 
tavern-keeper,  it  followed  naturally  that  the  master  of 
the  place  was  the  first  arrested,  as  he  was  by  his  very 
calling  on  the  wrong  side  of  the  law;  then  there  was  the 
eternal  suspicion  of  loaded  dice.  Martial  speaks  of  one 


154 THE      INNS      OF 

individual  whose  addiction  to  such  lucrative  pastimes  was 
chronic:  "Gambling  with  one  or  more  loaded  dice." 

The  society  of  the  time  was  faced  with  the  necessity 
of  choosing  between  two  evils:  the  villainy  of  the  inn 
keepers  was  traditional,  but  the  inconvenience  which 
would  have  resulted  from  the  abolition  of  such  establish 
ments  would  have  resulted  in  a  still  greater  injury  to 
society  and  commerce. 

When  Tarquinius  Superbus  decided  that  the  knowl 
edge  and  influence  of  Turnus  Herodinus  of  Aricia  might 
be  fatal  to  his  own  interests,  he  bided  his  time  with  such 
patience  as  he  could  muster;  waited  until  after  the  latter 
had  denounced  his  imperialism  and  lack  of  faith  to  the 
allies,  and  then  accused  his  intended  victim  of  plotting 
his  death.  Witnesses  were  suborned  and  weapons  se 
cretly  conveyed  into  the  inn  where  Turnus  lodged.  By 
the  treachery  of  slaves  and  circumstantial  evidence  his 
guilt  was  established  and  the  Latin  Assembly  condemned 
him  to  death  by  drowning:  he  was  confined  in  a  basket 
weighted  with  stones  and  thrown  into  the  Aqua  Ferentia. 
(Livy,  I,  50-1.)  It  goes  without  saying  that  the  inn 
keeper  must  have  been  one  of  the  principals  in  this  busi 
ness,  otherwise  it  would  have  been  very  difficult  for  his 
establishment  to  have  been  so  well  prepared  as  to  entrap 
a  man  so  honest  and  fearless  as  Turnus. 

The  murder  of  Clodius  by  the  followers  of  Milo  took 
place  in  an  inn  at  Bovillae,  but  in  this  case  the  inn 
keeper  was  also  a  victim  without  having  been  in  the  least 
involved  in  the  affair-  The  wounded  Clodius  took  refuge 
in  this  inn  and  the  retainers  of  Milo  attempted  to  force 
the  doors.  The  place  was  well  defended,  however,  but 
the  besiegers  finally  forced  their  way  in  and  murdered 
the  innkeeper,  who  died  toe  to  toe  with  them,  fighting  to 
the  last.  Clodius  was  dragged  into  the  open,  hacked  into 
pieces,  and  left  on  the  road.  These  details  are  mentioned 


GREECE      &      ROME 155 

by  the  scholiast  on  Asconius,  but  Cicero  passes  over  them 
in  silence;  they  are,  in  effect,  a  terrible  indictment  of 
Milo,  who,  if  he  had  no  actual  part  in  the  butchery, 
nevertheless  gave  the  orders  to  force  the  barricades  of 
the  inn,  that  he  might  have  Clodius  at  his  mercy.  His 
enemy  was  already  seriously  wounded  and  the  result 
desired  had  been  attained:  it  therefore  looks  as  though 
the  entire  plan  was  the  result  of  cold  blooded  malevo 
lence,  and  Milo  must  have  thought  the  campaign  out  and 
left  the  details  in  the  hands  of  his  officers.  Nor  does 
Cicero  make  mention  of  the  fate  of  the  innkeeper  who 
died  more  gloriously  than  the  majority  of  the  members 
of  his  calling:  he  goes  even  further,  for  when  Milo  was 
placed  in  jeopardy  by  the  evidence  of  Licinius,  the  tavern- 
keeper  of  the  Circus  Maximus,  who  had  overheard  the 
slaves  of  Milo  plotting  the  death  of  Pompeius,  the  orator 
takes  his  revenge  and  makes  light  of  the  importance 
which  might  attach  to  evidence  from  a  source  so  pol 
luted,  and  ends  by  wondering  how  anyone  can  place  the 
least  credence  in  the  word  of  a  restaurant  keeper  (popae 
credimirabar). 

On  this  great  road  built  by  Appius  Claudius,  the  same 
down  which  we  have  already  chaperoned  Lucilius  and 
Horace  from  inn  to  inn  and  from  tavern  to  tavern,  we 
come  at  length,  twenty-three  miles  from  Rome  itself, 
midway  between  that  city  and  Capua,  to  a  village  in 
which  three  taverns  were  for  many  years  the  chief  at 
traction,  and  probably  the  first  buildings  on  the  site. 
This  hamlet  bears  today  the  name  Tre  Taberne,  in  clas 
sical  times  it  was  known  as  Tres  Tabernae  (Three  Tav 
erns).  Because  of  its  happy  situation,  a  short  distance 
from  Lanuvium,  and  at  most,  ten  miles  from  Aricia,  at 
the  crossroads  where  one  could  take  carriage  for  Antium, 
it  was  an  ideal  situation  for  a  post  house,  and  it 
was  the  last  stop  of  importance  before  the  traveller 


156        THE      INNS      OF 

reached  the  limits  of  the  Eternal  City  itself.  We  need, 
therefore,  manifest  no  surprise  at  learning  that  many  an 
illustrious  traveller  stopped  at  Tres  Tabernae,  and  that 
more  than  one  plan  of  action  which  had  a  profound  in 
fluence  upon  later  history  was  outlined  and  developed  in 
this  little  village  named  for  the  three  taverns.  Cicero 
made  many  stops  here;  rarely  did  he  leave  the  Antium 
road  to  travel  the  Appian  Way  without  first  stopping  to 
receive  his  letters  or  posting  such  as  he  had  ready,  and 
it  is  in  this  village,  so  little  in  keeping  as  to  name  with  the 
meeting  which  follows,  that  we  witness  the  first  interview 
of  the  apostle  Paul  with  the  members  of  the  new  sect  at 
Rome.  After  a  vexatious  journey,  the  apostle  had  ar 
rived  at  Tres  Tabernae,  where  he  was  greeted  by  the 
faithful  of  Rome,  apprised,  by  rumor,  of  his  arrival,  and 
there  he  gave  thanks  to  God  for  his  care  and  protection 
as  is  related  in  the  Acts  of  the  Apostles.  One  must  be 
struck  with  the  singular  destiny  which  gathered  there, 
in  the  presence  of  their  apostle,  in  a  village  of  taverns, 
the  first  faithful  of  a  sect  whose  God,  born  in  the  stable 
of  an  inn,  reckoned  Rahab  the  innkeeper  or  harlot  among 
his  ancestors,  and  whose  first  temple,  as  we  shall  see, 
was  raised  upon  the  same  site  as  that  of  an  inn  at  Rome, 
the  violent  objections  of  the  tavern-keeper  to  the  con 
trary  notwithstanding.  Could  any  illustration  serve 
better  to  show  the  reasons  that  prompted  the  first  Chris 
tians  to  subject  themselves  to  that  law  of  humility  ex 
tending  sometimes  even  to  ignominy,  and  the  observance 
of  which  was  one  of  their  first  duties? 

But  this  village,  sanctified  for  cause,  was  later  on  to 
become  the  bloody  theatre  of  signal  crimes.  The  ruin  of 
Maxentius  and  the  fall  of  the  pagan  empire  were  to  make 
this  historic  shrine  a  shambles,  and  its  last  days  were  to 
be  as  cruel  as  they  were  infamous. 


GREECE      &RO  ME  157 


CHAPTER  XL 

Death  of  Sererus — Tarern  signs — The  gardens  of  Saecenus — 
Intemperate  drinking  and  religious  festitals — Bear  steaks — Corn  mitts — 
Tarerns  and  trap  doors — Theodosius  purges  Rome  of  thieces  and 
harlots — The  splendor  and  wickedness  of  the  Roman  Baths. 

Flavins  Severus,  an  obscure  Ulyrian  adventurer,  was 
invested  with  the  purple  in  A,  D.  305.  He  was  the  rival 
of  Maximinus  and  Maxentius,  the  son  of  the  former,  and 
after  his  decisive  defeat  he  fled  to  Ravenna  for  refuge, 
looking  forward  in  terror  upon  the  gloomy  prospect  of 
captivity  or  death.  Maxentius,  to  expedite  matters, 
came  to  an  understanding  with  Severus  and  the  latter 
surrendered  under  the  most  solemn  promises  of  amnesty 
and  protection.  He  was  conducted  to  Tres  Tabernae  by 
the  retainers  of  his  captor  and,  without  the  slightest  re 
gard  to  promises,  he  was  held  in  close  captivity  and 
finally  offered  the  choice  in  the  manner  in  which  he  would 
meet  the  grim  reaper.  He  followed  the  example  set  by 
Seneca  and  many  others,  and  opened  his  veins. 

There  was  also  a  quarter  named  Tres  Tabernae  in 
Rome  itself,  and  this  is  the  probable  reason  for  the  error 
in  Victor  the  Younger,  who  has  reported  the  death 
of  Severus  as  having  taken  place  in  Rome,  despite  the 
evidence  of  Zosimus  and  others.  Not  a  few  of  the  quar 
ters  of  the  great  city  took  their  names  from  inns  or  tav 
erns.  The  quarter  known  as  the  Vicus  Ursi  Pileati  (The 
Quarter  of  the  Bear  of  the  Skull  Cap),  for  example, 
which,  according  to  Sextus  Rufus,  was  found  in  the  Es- 
quiline,  and  which  must  have  taken  its  name  from  the 
sign  of  some  itm  or  from  some  street  performance  with 
a  trick  animal*  The  cap  carried  with  it  the  implication 
of  freedom,  and  the  curious  antiquarian  may  easily  sup- 


158  THE      INNS      OF 

pose  that  the  original  owner  of  such  a  tavern  may  have 
been  known  by  the  name  of  Ursus  (Bear),  and  that  he 
was  probably  a  freedman.  Neither  would  it  be  difficult 
to  conjure  from  such  a  sign  a  picture  such  as  may  have 
inspired  Phaedrus  the  Fabulist  to  write  his  Battle  Be 
tween  the  Rats  and  the  Weasels.  It  is  also  of  interest 
to  note  that  today  in  the  same  quarter,  there  is  an  Osteria 
del  Orso  (Inn  of  the  Bear).  The  curiosity  of  the  pass 
erby  would  naturally  be  piqued  by  a  sign  so  promising, 
and  rival  establishments  would  scarcely  remain  long  in 
ignorance  of  the  commercial  value  of  such  a  tocsin.  It 
is  therefore  not  improbable  that  other  Skull  Capped 
Bears  were  born  in  remote  wards  of  the  city,  and  other 
signs  no  less  piquant  soon  made  their  appearance.  Ar- 
temidorus  mentions  an  inn  which  had  a  camel  for  a  sign: 
could  he  have  anticipated  that  this  grotesquely  malodor 
ous  animal  would,  one  day,  come  to  play  so  important  a 
role  in  the  national  life  of  the  greatest  of  republics?  The 
inn  of  Sittius  at  Pompeii  had  for  a  sign  an  elephant  in 
the  coils  of  a  serpent,  and  the  behemoth  is  led  by  a  dwarf. 
At  Narbonne  there  was  an  inn  which  had  a  cock  (gallus 
gaUinaceus)  for  an  emblem,  a  fact  that  throws  a  little 
light  upon  the  continual  employment  of  the  same  ex 
pression  by  Petronius.  Such  an  emblem  was  also  used 
by  one  of  the  stations  between  Utica  and  Carthage. 
There  were  the  Great  Eagle,  the  Little  Eagle,  the  Ser 
pent,  the  Great  Crane,  the  Sword,  the  Wheel,  the  Olives. 
Such  establishments  often  advertised  their  merits  (or 
lack  of  them)  through  the  mouths  of  their  owners  and 
sometimes  such  matter  appeared  upon  the  sign,  or  upon 
a  tablet  which  also  set  forth  the  prices  demanded.  In 
Italy  the  slogan  was  "  service  after  the  Roman  fashion 
and  standard/*  One  heavily  patronized  commercial 
hostelry  at  Lyons  had  Apollo  and  Mercury  on  its  sign 
board  and  the  inscription  deserves  quotation: 


GREECE      &      ROME 159 

MERCVRIVS  HIC  LVCRVM 

PROMITTIT  APOLLO  SALVTEM 
SEPTVMAXVS  HOSPITIVM 

CVM   PRAXDIO  QVI  VEXERIT 
MELIVS  VTETVR  POST 

HOSPES  VBI  MAXEAS  PROSPICE 

Mercury  promises  gain,  Apollo  health,  Septumanus 
hospitality;  whoever  enters  here  will  be  the  better  there 
for;  stranger,  watch  where  you  lodge. 

The  fifth  region  of  Rome,  which  was  probably  the 
Esquiline,  was  abundantly  furnished  with  taverns  be 
cause  of  the  institutions  in  the  vicinity:  The  Amphi- 
theatrum  Castrense,  where  the  legions  mustered  to  parade 
and  drill  and  where  gladiators  sometimes  trained  them 
selves  for  their  combats  with  man  or  beast,  the  vivarium, 
that  huge  menagerie  where  a  number  of  slaves  were  always 
on  duty  looking  after  the  animals  destined  for  the  games, 
and  last  of  all,  the  praetorian  camp  with  its  perpetual 
garrison  of  well  paid  soldiers.  The  immense  barracks  in 
which  the  guard  was  quartered  had  been  constructed 
under  Tiberius,  and  they  must  have  furnished  the  tav 
erns  with  a  steady  custom  which  yielded  the  vintners  a 
good  profit.  In  addition  to  the  foregoing,  the  gardens 
of  Maecenas  were  situated  on  the  summit  of  the  Esquiline 
Hill,  the  loftiest  site  in  Rome.  From  this  lovely  eleva 
tion  the  entire  city  was  spread  out  to  the  view  in  a  grand 
panorama.  The  idlers  and  transients  in  the  city  would 
necessarily  visit  a  place  so  famous  and  their  difficult  climb 
would  have  made  them  ready  and  eager  for  refreshment 
in  the  taverns  of  the  district,  a  factor  which  must  also 
have  weighed  with  the  innkeeper  when  choosing  his  site* 
Lastly,  a  short  distance  outside  the  walls,  there  was 
a  temple  of  Bacchus.  Many  years  later,  Constantino 
erected  on  its  foundations  the  mausoleum  of  his  daughter 
Constantina,  but  at  the  time  of  which  we  are  speaking, 


160 THE      INNS      OF 

the  devotees  of  the  god  of  drunkenness  would  have 
naturally  paid  their  compliments  to  the  taverns  after 
having  taken  part  in  the  ritualistic  rites  of  the  cult.  With 
all  the  foregoing  information  before  our  eyes,  we  are 
probably  justified  in  assuming  that  of  all  the  fourteen 
regions  of  Rome,  the  fifth  being  most  densely  populated, 
contained  the  greatest  number  of  inns,  because  of  economic 
reasons  furnished  by  the  institutions  grouped  there. 

In  the  earlier  years  of  the  city's  history,  such  curious 
sightseers  as  flocked  thither  from  all  over  Italy  at  the 
seasons  given  over  to  public  jollification  were  unable  to 
secure  quarters  in  the  inns  as  there  were  not  enough  of 
them  for  the  purpose.  On  this  account  it  was  customary 
to  erect  tents  in  the  public  spaces  and  in  the  inclosures 
of  the  temples.  Dionysius  of  Halicarnassus  tells  us  of 
an  encampment  of  the  Volscians  in  similar  circumstances. 
They  could  find  shelter  only  in  that  manner.  On  their 
return  to  their  own  country,  they  went  into  camp  along 
the  road  as  the  inns  were  also  scarce  in  the  country* 

But  the  sites  around  which  the  taverns  and  inns  would 
cluster  most  advantageously  would,  of  course,  be  those 
on  which  the  temples  stood,  and  wherever  there  was  a 
temple,  there  was  almost  certain  to  be  a  number  of  tav 
erns,  and  why  not,  one  would  ask?  Did  not  intemperate 
drinking  have  its  origin  in  religious  festivals?  According 
to  an  authority  well  versed  in  ancient  lore  "it  was  not 
the  custom  of  antiquity  to  indulge  in  wine,  or  any  other 
luxury  to  excess,  except,  indeed,  on  the  occasion  of  some 
sacred  festival:  which  is  the  origin  of  the  terms  'thoinai,' 
'thaliai,'  and  'methai.*  Thoinai  means  that  men  thought 
it  right  and  proper  to  drink  wine  on  account  of  the  gods: 
thaMai  they  assembled  and  met  together  in  honor  of  the 
gods,  and  the  term  methai  is  derived  from  the  custom  of 
using  wine  after  having  sacrificed/5* 

*Athenaens,  Lib.  I,  61,  Yonge's  translation. 


GREECE      &      ROME 161 

Another  reason  for  the  close  relationship  which 
throughout  antiquity  subsisted  between  the  public  houses 
and  the  temples  was  that  peculiar  taste  which  the  gods 
never  failed  to  manifest  in  preferring  for  their  ceremonies 
those  parts  of  the  sacrificial  victim  which  were  unfit  for 
human  consumption.  The  priests  and  their  cronies, 
however,  labored  under  no  such  handicap  and  merrily 
complimented  Jupiter  with  the  guts  and  garbage,  in 
complaisant  obedience  to  his  orders.  The  meat,  there 
fore,  must  be  eaten,  but  before  being  eaten,  it  must  be 
cooked,  and  an  understanding  and  sympathetic  inn 
keeper  and  his  menage  were  of  the  utmost  service  to  the 
clergy  in  attending  to  this  part  of  the  ritual.  This 
arrangement  was  equally  convenient  for  the  priesthood 
and  the  tavern-keepers,  as  the  one  was  assured  of 
the  finest  joint  and  the  other  of  excellent  meat  at  a 
moderate  price.  A  funeral  inscription  preserved  by 
Fabretti  has  perpetuated  the  name  of  a  freedman  of 
Q.  Critonius,  who  made  a  business  of  carving  such  ani 
mals,  and  of  his  concubine  Philenia,  who,  in  her  tavern, 
situated  on  the  Isla  de  Tiberi,  next  door  to  the  temples 
of  Jupiter,  Aesculapius,  and  Faunus,  served  her  patrons 
with  the  meat  from  the  animals  slaughtered  for  her  lord 
and  master.  The  term  popa  (a  priest's  assistant),  not 
withstanding  Forcellini's  objections,  must  be  taken  as 
representing  in  its  meaning  the  entire  relation  sub 
sisting  between  the  clergy,  the  innkeeper,  and  the  victims, 
and  Martial  and  Cicero  furnish  many  passages  in  sub 
stantiation  of  this.  As  for  popina  (an  eating-house)  it 
is  impossible  that  it  should  admit  an  etymology  other 
than  that  inherent  in  popa. 

If  the  modern  reader  could  only  place  entire  credence 
in  certain  of  the  writings  of  Tertullian,  which  perhaps 
are  but  moderately  tinctured  with  hypocritical  sancti 
mony,  the  innkeepers  set  up  shop  in  the  vicinity  of  the 


162    THE      INNS      OF 

circus  with  more  than  one  end  in  view,  and  not  because 

the  crowds  flocking  to  that  institution  would  be  certain 

to  give  them  much  patronage.    Their  reason,  according 

to  the  Christian  father,  was  that  thereby  they  would 

be  near  an  excellent  source  of  supplies  and  raw  material. 

Our  devout  and  rigorous  censor  of  Roman  morals  and 

manners  implies  that  the  savage  beasts  of  the  arena, 

for  all  the  majesty  of  their  ferocious  presence,  had  after 

all  an  ending  no  more  poetic  than  that  accorded  to  the 

common  alley  tom-cat,  and  garnished  the  stew-pans  of 

the  Roman  cooks.   What  an  ending!   And,  to  the  felines,, 

at  least,  what  a  satisfactory  and  poetic  climax!    Bear 

steaks  are  by  no  means  a  modern  conception:  Scintilla, 

the  mistress  of  Habinnas  the  stone  mason,  ate  some 

before  coming  to  Trimalchio's  table.    It  is  true  that  she 

indulged  herself  without  knowing  what  she  was  eating, 

and  it  must  have  been  equally  true  that  her  reaction 

when  suffering  from  better  information  would,  under  the 

circumstances,  have  pleased  the  victim  best  of  all.  These 

inns  and  taverns  near  the  circus  were  scarcely  more  than 

booths  or  stalls,  many  of  them  being  mere  sheds  in  the 

vicinity  of  the  institutions.    Such  also  were  the  cenabae 

in  which,  later  on,  we  shall  see  the  wine  merchants  of 

the  Forum  Vinarium  establish  their  headquarters.   There 

were  also  the  cenabulae,  rustic  ordinaries,  located  along 

the  banks  of  rivers;  they  were  generally  constructed 

from  light  tiles  and  were  covered  with  creeper  roses. 

Sometimes  the  cenabulae  were  also  known  as  tdb&rnulae. 

It  was  in  an  ordinary  such  as  this,  close  to  the  temple 

of  Concord,  that,  in  the  year  664  A.  U.  C.,  the?  praetor 

Sempronius  Asellio  perished,  a  victim  to  the  fury  of  the 

debtor  classes,  and  the  precedent  which  is  as  old  as  time* 

Inasmuch  as  the  thing  is  exceedingly  curious  we  shall 

permit  Valerius  Maximus  to  relate  the  occurrence.   After 

having  spoken  of  the  period  of  reaction  and  deflation 


GREECE      &      ROME 103 

which  followed  in  the  steps  of  the  Marsie  War,  when 
property  values  fell  and  there  was  little  money  in  circu 
lation,  when  debtors  were  unable  to  discharge  the  claims 
of  their  creditors,  and  the  situation  was  more  dangerous 
than  the  authorities  seemed  to  realize. 

"  Their  animosity  broke  out  with  horrible  fury  against 
Sempronius  Asellio,  the  praetor,  for  having  favored  the 
interests  of  the  creditors.  Infuriated  still  more  by  Lucius 
Cassius,  the  tribune,  they  fell  upon  the  praetor  when  he 
was  sacrificing  in  front  of  the  temple  of  Concord,  drove 
him  from  before  the  altars  of  the  public  place,  ran  him  to 
cover  in  a  little  tavern,  and  mercilessly  tore  him  to 
pieces."  (Lib.  IX,  7,  No.  4.) 

While  it  was  to  be  expected  that  the  taverns  would 
nestle  around  the  great  public  establishments,  such  as 
the  circus,  temples,  and  barracks,  they  were  also  par 
tial  to  a  site  near  each  of  the  two  hundred  corn  mills 
where  the  common  people  came  to  grind  the  corn  issued 
to  them  from  the  granaries.  The  work  incident  to 
turning  the  huge  mi]]  stones,  which  beasts  of  burden 
found  it  difficult  to  move,  was  exceedingly  trying  and 
fatiguing,  and  the  citizen  was  naturally  averse  to  doing 
more  than  necessary.  For  this  reason,  the  mills  were 
sometimes  idle  because  of  lack  of  help,  and  the  master 
millers  were  compelled  to  find  such  remedies  as  the 
situation  afforded,  often  sentencing  culpable  slaves  to 
serve  out  their  time  at  the  task  of  turning  the  TniH  stones. 
As  one  experience  was  generally  enough  for  even  the 
hardiest  sinner,  other  means  of  supplying  the  demand 
had  to  be  devised.  In  this  forced  recruiting  of  labor 
the  irms  and  taverns  played  a  very  important  part,  and 
were  out  and  out  accomplices  of  the  millers.  Let  us  cite 
a  passage  from  the  Historia  Ecclesiastica  of  Socrates  the 
Scholiast  which  informs  us  as  to  the  expedients  which 
were  invoked  and,  at  the  same  time  comments  upon  the 


THE      INNS      OF 


justice  of  Theodosius  in  dealing  with  the  conditions 
brought  to  his  notice  : 

"Although  the  emperor  Theodosius  did  not  remain 
very  long  in  Italy,  his  stay  was  nevertheless  productive 
of  great  and  solid  advantages  to  the  city  of  Rome,  not 
only  because  of  the  profusion  of  his  pardons  but  also 
through  the  repressing  of  disorders  and  the  rooting  out 
of  their  causes.  One  infamous  custom  he  abolished  which 
had  been  in  force  through  a  long  period  of  years.  The 
great  establishments  where  formerly  the  bread  had  been 
made  which  was  distributed  to  the  people  had,  as  the 
years  passed,  become  the  haunt  of  thieves.  A  number 
of  taverns  had  been  built  adjoining  the  mills,  and  the 
foresight  of  the  tavern-keepers  provided  a  number  of 
abandoned  women  to  attract  custom  and  patronage. 
Trap  doors  were  installed  to  permit  those  who  had  come 
there  for  diversion  to  be  taken  by  surprise,  and  by  means 
of  a  certain  contrivance,  such  unfortunates  were  dropped 
into  the  place  where  the  corn  was  ground.  There,  help 
less  and  in  confinement,  many  slaved  away  their  whole 
lives  without  their  relatives  or  friends  ever  being  able 
to  get  news  of  them.  It  so  happened  that  a  soldier 
belonging  to  the  forces  of  Theodosius  was  trapped  in  this 
snare:  he  drew  his  dagger,  wounded  those  who  attempted 
to  secure  him,  and  made  his  escape.  The  emperor,  when 
apprised  of  the  situation,  punished  the  officials  of  such 
establishments,  pulled  down  the  lurking  places  of  the 
thieves  and  harlots,  and  purged  Rome  of  that  filthy 
infamy/* 

To  enable  the  reader  to  grasp  the  details  of  the  pic 
ture  which  we  are  tracing  of  the  places  of  public  enter 
tainment,  which,  by  the  way,  were  always  subject  to  the 
authority  of  the  aediles  empowered  to  arrest  trouble 
makers  (loca  aedilem  metuenda),  as  Seneca  terms  them, 
we  are  compelled  to  give  some  little  space  and  attention 
to  the  baths  of  Rome. 


GREECE      &      ROME 165 

During  the  earlier  times  of  the  Republic,  the  aedile 
had  little  cause  to  make  official  entry  into  such  estab 
lishments:  he  contented  himself  and  the  public  conscience 
by  merely  seeing  that  they  were  clean  and  comfortable, 
and  kept  himself  informed  as  to  the  character  of  the 
patrons  who  came  there.  The  latter  cause  was  relatively 
unimportant  because  of  the  fact  that  luxury  had  not 
invaded  the  system.  The  bath  keeper  in  those  times 
•was  an  honest  man  exercising  an  honest  calling  and  one 
of  some  importance  to  the  public  weal,  as  Rome  was 
never  swept  with  such  epidemics  as  those  that  scourged 
the  boorish  uncleanliness  of  the  Middle  Ages.  The  baths 
and  the  water  supply  were  the  causes  of  this  long  im 
munity. 

But  the  corruption  of  manners  was  not  long  in  eating 
its  way  through  the  social  fabric  and  involving  the  bath 
ing  officials.  From  them  it  penetrated  to  every  depart 
ment  of  the  institution,  and  whatever  it  touched,  it 
corroded.  The  balneator  became  a  fornicator,  a  word 
which  indicates  with  sufficient  force  and  precision  the 
disorder  which  had  invaded  the  baths  and  the  calling 
which  the  expert  had  come  to  exercise  so  complacently. 
Respect  for  the  law  of  decent  propriety  which  had 
ordered  the  separation  of  the  sexes  in  these  institutions 
had  long  been  a  dead  letter,  and  the  law  itself,  a  grisly 
spectre  of  the  past,  a  nemesis  no  longer  invoked  by 
aedile  or  censor,  had  come  to  be  regarded  by  the  favored 
classes  with  that  amused  contempt  which  a  later  gener 
ation  has  held  to  be  the  just  reward  of  a  too  zealous 
paternalism  on  the  part  of  the  authorities:  it  must  have 
produced  on  their  minds  an  effect  similar  to  that  produced 
on  our  own  by  the  faces  of  the  older  and  more  barbarous 
reformers,  and  when  one  had  the  misfortune  to  be  born 
in  an  age  too  crude  to  appreciate  his  merits  at  their 
true  worth  he  might  well  have  found  himself  in  Dennis's 
shoes: 


166 THE      IXXS      OF 

But  Appius  reddens  at  each  word  you  speak, 
And  stares  tremendous  with  a  threatening  eye, 
Like  some  fierce  tyrant  in  old  tapestry. 

Usage  is  one  of  the  most  potent  factors  in  affecting 
the  moral  status  of  a  community,  whether  for  good  or 
for  evil,  and  prostitution  ran  rife  through  the  baths 
soon  after  people  began  to  be  admitted  to  them  in  a 
state  of  complete  nudity.  Instead  of  baths,  they  were 
transformed  into  immense  lupanars,  equipped,  in  later 
times,  with  every  aid  to  comfort  and  to  sensuousness. 
With  the  arrival  of  night,  which  cast  a  kindly  shadow 
upon  conditions  such  as  these,  licence  raised  its  ugly 
head,  and  a  troup  of  women  of  pleasure,  well  skilled  in 
every  specialty  and  refinement  in  their  calling,  arrived  at 
the  baths,  loitered  in  the  corridors  and  inside  the  doors, 
and  the  bath  attendants,  on  seeing  them,  opened  the 
cells  and  extinguished  the  outside  lights.  The  thermae 
were  open  day  and  night,  and  the  noise  and  bustle  about 
them  reminded  an  observer  of  the  clack  and  clatter  of 
a  great  restaurant.  Here  the  soft  and  insinuating  whisper 
of  lust  was  heard,  and  the  caressing  blandishments  of 
self  interest  had  unrestricted  play.  The  orgies  carried  on 
here  were  of  every  kind,  and  while  Cotytto  may  not  have 
presided  in  person,  her  pupils  were  scarcely  less  aban 
doned  than  their  preceptress.  The  curious  reader  is  at 
liberty  to  consult  Boulanger  for  the  particulars,  and  the 
works  of  Guido  Pancirollus  for  the  entertainment  and 
dancing.  All  the  world  might  have  forgathered  here  to 
dine,  and  nearly  all  the  Roman  world  did.  The  emperors 
were  patrons,  and  Caligula  was  one  of  the  most  enthu 
siastic  supporters  of  the  comessationes,  as  well  as  one 
of  the  first  to  set  the  fashion  by  which  he  perfumed  from 
head  to  heel,  his  body  carefully  depilated,  and  left 
reeking  with  the  odors  which  exuded  from  his  pores,  for 
it  was  then  the  fashion  to  perfume  the  wine  and  thus 


GREECE      &      ROME  167 


enhance  physical  appeal  by  temporarily  overcoming  un 
pleasant  body  odors.  Some  of  the  essences  used  in  this 
manner  were  cold,  others  were  in  the  form  of  vapor 
which  was  inhaled  and  did  away  for  a  short  time  with 
the  stench  of  impostumated  lungs  in  a  close  atmosphere. 
Our  modern  Lysistratas  have  much  to  learn  in  the  arts 
of  the  toilette.  In  the  times  of  which  we  speak,  particular 
and  expert  slaves  were  assigned  to  the  care  of  every 
orifice  and  every  feature,  and  they  all  had  special  terms 
to  designate  them  and  no  others.  A  Roman  dandy  or 
even  a  Roman  lady,  preparing  for  a  comessatio,  might 
have  even  taught  our  own  society  misses  a  little  lesson 
in  the  gentle  art  of  waiting.  Some  of  them  took  hours 
over  the  toilette. 

After  the  death  of  Caligula  the  customs  of  the  baths 
took  on  a  more  sombre  tone;  in  the  times  of  Seneca  they 
were  less  abandoned,  but  the  philosopher  remarks  scath 
ingly  that  although  the  baths  were  now  sweet  and  clean, 
the  populace  was  only  the  more  foul.  Under  Commodus, 
Caracalla,  and  Heliogabalus,  however,  they  reached  a 
state  of  depravity  and  luxurious  refinement  to  which 
there  is  no  parallel.  It  was  in  the  course  of  one  of  these 
entertainments  that  Caracalla  delivered  himself  from 
the  menace  of  his  brother  and  co-ruler,  Geta,  as  well  as 
dispatching  Sammonicus  Serenus  and  others  hostile  to 
his  power. 

Fastidious  men  about  town  often  arranged  love  trysts 
with  the  kdies,  and  the  scene  of  such  tender  encounters 
was  generally  laid  in  the  baths:  they  used  them  as 
moderns  do  the  institutions  of  our  times,  Ovid  advises 
lovers  to  meet  at  the  baths,  in  his  Art  of  Love. 

A  check  system  was  in  force  but  theft  of  clothing 
was  frequent  nevertheless.  Catullus  mentions  it,  and  in 
Petronius  we  find  a  skve  serving  the  rarest  vintages  to 
Encolpius  and  his  friends  because  they  had  intervened 


108 THE      INNS      OF 

to  rescue  him  from  the  fury  of  the  steward  whose  cloth 
ing  had  been  stolen  through  the  carelessness  of  that 
same  slave.  Eumolpus  philosophizes  on  the  same  sub 
ject.  He  had  the  greatest  difficulty  in  getting  possession 
of  his  meagre  wardrobe  and  had  to  be  completely  identi 
fied  before  the  officious  bath  attendant  would  surrender 
possession,  although  a  rogue  of  a  more  sinister  character 
got  attentive  service  almost  at  once  by  virtue  of  the 
natural  charm  of  his  person — proof  positive  to  Eumolpus, 
that  it  was  less  advantageous  to  polish  the  mind  than  it 
was  to  massage  the  body.  All  bath  attendants  were 
soon  regarded  in  the  eyes  of  the  law  as  either  prostitutes 
or  procurers.  The  reason  for  such  discrimination  lay  in 
the  demands  to  which  their  calling  made  them  heir. 
One  of  Martial's  characters  was  "unable  to  return  home 
sober  from  the  baths/*  and  Seneca  has  not  a  little  to  say 
upon  the  same  subject.  Nor  have  we  yet  reached  the 
most  distressing  phase  of  the  situation.  In  order  that 
every  possibility  might  be  discounted  and  every  taste 
accommodated,  huge  dining-rooms,  called  Nympheae,were 
maintained.  Here  women  emancipated  by  marriage 
from  the  restrictions  which  had  bound  them  while  still 
under  the  parental  roof,  amused  their  wearied  and 
voracious  leisure  by  inviting  all  the  gluttons  and  long 
nosed  parasites  whom  previously  they  had  hankered  after 
in  vain,  probably  the  most  striking  manifestation  of  the 
utter  depravity  which  had  invaded  and  corrupted  the 
entire  fabric  of  the  Roman  civilization.  A  newly  married 
couple,  on  the  day  after  the  bride  had  been  lifted  across 
the  threshold  of  her  husband's  door,  would  celebrate 
their  nuptials  in  one  of  the  magnificently  sumptuous 
dining  rooms  attached  to  the  baths,  amid  surroundings 
and  schemes  of  interior  decoration  of  the  most  "graphic 
and  elevating  kind,  and  amid  scenes  of  artistic  nudity 
which  we  have  no  words  to  describe,  although  Juvenal 


GREECE      &      ROME 169 

has  done  very  well  in  the  passage  which  he  devotes  to 
this  subject*  It  was  as  though  one  were  to  enter  an 
establishment  in  which  the  women,  chosen  for  beauty, 
blondness,  mentality,  and  the  most  exquisite  and  minute 
knowledge  of  all  the  demands  to  which  their  profession 
subjected  them,  and  the  most  complacent  skill  in  cater 
ing  to  these  demands,  were  to  entertain  their  guests 
between  silken  sheets  of  the  deepest  black!  The  practice 
has  much  to  recommend  it  as  man  has  been  relatively 
blind  since  Lynceus,  but  such  cannot  be  said  of  the  state 
of  mind  which  evolved  so  sensational  a  complex  and 
studied  with  deliberation  to  solve  it,  Roman  culture  was 
little  concerned  with  anything  but  the  quasi-artistic  at 
mosphere  of  such  ritualistic  orgies,  and  the  time  had  long 
passed  since  Horace  wrote  the  little  ode  to  the  simple 
country  maiden,  Phidyle,  whose  modest  soul  had  felt 
misgivings  at  the  poverty  of  her  sacrifice: 

TO  PHIDYLE 

If  thou  to  heaven  thine  upturned  palms  shall  lift, 
Sweet  Phidyle,  when  glows  the  crescent  moon 
With  virgin  splendor,  and  thy  simple  gift 
Shalt  offer  to  thy  gods  and  ask  thy  boon, 

Nor  scorching  drought  shall  smite  thy  fruitful  vine, 
Nor  blight  attack  thy  harvest  in  the  ear. 
Nor  shall  thy  flock  for  lack  of  pasture  pine 
When  Autumn  comes  and  chills  the  dying  year; 

Yea,  Wealth's  fat  victims  feed  in  pastures  lush, 
Or  graze  in  lanes  of  ilex  or  of  oak 
To  stain  the  ax,  amid  the  solemn  hush, 
And  die  beneath  the  consecrating  stroke; 

Thy  little  gods  require  not  such  of  thee, 
For  Innocence  hath  little  to  atone, 
And  wreaths  of  myrtle  or  sweet  rosemary 
Are  all  they  ask  to  make  thy  lot  their  own: 


170          THE      I  X  X  S      OF 

The  rarest  gift  that  Riches  can  confer, 
From  outraged  heaven's  justice  less  commands 
Than  does  the  humblest  sacrifice  of  her 
Who  brings  it  to  the  fane  with  spotless  hands. 

A  very  curious  passage  in  Pancirollus  describes  in 
some  detail  one  of  these  great  nympheae:  "Besides  these 
basilicae,  there  were  also  at  Rome  eleven  other  edifices 
called  nympheae,  as  Publius  Victor  informs  us*  They  were 
spacious  halls,  made  use  of  for  nuptials,  by  those  that 
had  no  conveniency  of  their  own  for  such  solemnities. 
And  for  this  end  (as  Zonaras  declares  in  the  Life  of  Leo 
the  Great)  these  nympheae  (I  suppose)  were  supported 
with  pillars.  They  were  built  with  kitchens,  parlors, 
closets,  and  the  like,  wherein  they  kid  towels  and  nap 
kins,  bowls  and  dishes,  and  other  utensils,  and  were 
called  nympheae  because  the  Greeks  called  the  bride  a 
nymph,  Capitolinus  tells  us  the  Gordian  the  emperor 
joined  baths  to  his  nympheae,  for  the  ancients  did  fre 
quently  bathe  before  supper;  and  'tis  easy  to  gather  as 
much  from  two  laws  of  Theodosius  and  Valentinian. 
Suidas  saith,  that  the  water  was  brought  to  these  bridal- 
houses  from  a  fountain,  called  now,  Enneacrunos,  and 
formerly,  CaUirrhoe. 

"These  nympheae  had  also  most  stately  and  ample 
piazzas,  large  enough  to  walk  in;  one  whereof  Augustus 
built  in  the  place  where  the  house  of  Vedius  Pollio  (whose 
heir  he  was)  was  ruinated,  and  inscribed  it  with  the  name, 
not  of  Pollio,  but  of  Livia,  as  Dion  writes.  And  many 
others  built  glorious  porticos."  In  the  1715  English  trans 
lation  of  this  old  antiquarian  is  the  following: 

These  were  large  and  capacious  Fabricks,  designed  for  the  cele 
bration  of  Nuptial  Solemnities,  and  us'd  only  by  those  who  had 
no  Houses  of  their  own:  But  this  is  contradicted  by  Akiatus  and 
Beroaldus;  who  think  it  to  be  a  very  foul  Error  to  imagine  these 
Nympheae  to  be  Genial  Apartments  appointed  for  marriages. 


GREECE      &     ROME 


171 


Some  take  them  for  Baths  built  by  Princes  for  the  sake  of  Pos 
terity;  wherefore  Julius  Capitolinus  saith,  that  no  Works  of  Gordian 
are  remaining,  besides  the  Nympheae  and  Baths.  So  that  these 
Nympheae  seem  to  be  Tepida  Lavacra,  Warm  Bagnios,  and  used  for 
Pleasure,  but  not  for  Health. 

But  where  is  the  Absurdity,  if  we  affirm  with  our  author,  that 
Gordian  did  only  adorn  his  Bridal-Houses  with  Baths  adjoining? 
And  what  Soloecism  is  it  to  say,  that  by  these  Nympbeae,  we  under 
stand  as  well  Baths  for  Women,  as  Nuptial  Chambers? 

Some  say  that  brides  were  called  Nymphs,  apo  to  nun  proto 
phainesthai,  because  they  now  expose  themselves  to  open  View, 
whereas  formerly  they  appeared  covered  with  a  Veil,  Nay,  the 
Greeks  call  Matrimony  itself  Nymphaeum,  because  (as  ftis  thought) 
Religion  and  Piety  were  propagated  by  Nymphs  to  Mankind,  in 
regard  no  Rite  or  Worship  was  ever  performed  without  their  being 
mentioned*  The  Deities  that  presided  o'er  the  Waters,  were  calTd 
Naiades;  and  because  these  Naiades  were  Nymphs  in  Corpora 
Tendentes,  therefore  Sobolis  propagandae  causa,  New-many'd  Girls 
were  term'd  Nymphs. 


172  THE      INN  SOP 


CHAPTER 

Caio  and  Ike  Sumptuary  Laws — Contempt  for  the  Law  enforcers — 
Orgiastic  dances — Prices  of  foods  and  wines  controlled — More  of  Nero's 
slumming  escapades — Julius  Capitolinus,  Commodus  andHelwgabalus, 
the  most  dissolute  of  a//,  patrons  of  the  low  taverns — Aurelian  cleans  the 
Augean  stables — Virgil  pays  court  to  the  divinities  of  hospitality — 
Horace  the  man  about  town. 

We  have  already  had  occasion  to  speak  of  the  gyne- 
comus  at  Athens  and  the  power  invested  in  the  office,  a 
power  that  prevented  gatherings  and  picnics  which  com 
prised  more  than  thirty  individuals:  we  now  find  the 
Roman  law  favoring  a  regulation  almost  the  same,  but 
applying  it  to  the  entertainments  in  the  nympheae.  With 
the  individual  guests  invited,  the  law  did  not  concern 
itself  further  than  to  limit  the  maximum  number  that 
could  be  in  attendance.  But  an  ancient  proverb,  a 
joyous  and  spirited  double  entendre,  took  a  sprightly 
revenge  upon  the  rule  limiting  the  number  of  guests  to 
seven: 

Septem  convivium  .  .  .  novem  convieium 

a  play  on  sound  and  sense,  signifying  a  convivial  party 
of  seven,  may  result  in  anything  from  a  new  meeting 
to  a  recognition  of  hostility,  or  nine  critics.  Varro  was 
a  trifle  more  indulgent  in  his  estimate,  for  Aulus  Gellius 
quotes  a  passage  from  the  Menippean  Satires  in  which 
the  following  passage  occurs:  That  though  the  number 
of  guests  should  not  be  smaller  than  the  number  of 
Graces,  yet  should  it  not  exceed  the  number  of  the  Muses. 
However,  there  was  still  another  reason  for  the  sur 
veillance  maintained  by  the  authorities,  an  inspection 
that  often  invaded  the  home  and  the  tavern.  Among 
the  Romans  some  of  the  more  austere  citizens,  such  as 


GREECE      &      ROME 173 

Cato,  saw  in  the  increase  of  luxurious  appetites  the  seeds 
of  ruin,  and  for  this  reason,  they  passed  certain  sump 
tuary  laws  designed  to  curtail  the  expenses  which  could 
be  incurred  in  private  dinners.    As  prodigality  would 
increase  the  prices  of  commodities  and  place  a  hardship 
upon  the  shoulders  of  the  common  people,  such  laws, 
though  opposed  during  their  passage  through  the  senate, 
were  generally  passed,  but,  like  many  of  our  own,  soon 
fell  into  neglect,  and  were  invoked  and  revitalized  from 
time  to  time.    Such  powers  were  placed  in  the  hands 
of  the  censors,  who  were  better  prepared  to  enforce  them 
because  of  the  nature  of  the  office  they  held.    One  of 
the  first  regulations  promulgated  after  the  passage  of 
the  earlier  sumptuary  laws  was  to  the  effect  that  the 
citizen  must  eat  his  meals  in  the  first  room  of  the  house, 
and  leave  his  gates  and  doors  wide  open  to  make  inspec 
tion  easier  and  more  rapid.    "And  this,"  says  Pancir- 
ollus,  whom  we  shall  have  frequent  cause  to  cite  in 
dealing  with  the  bypaths  of  antiquity,  "was  to  enable 
the  censors  passing  by  to  ascertain  whether  the  citizen 
living  there  was  complying  with  all  the  provisions  of 
the  law  and  keeping  within  the  limits  prescribed.  Accord 
ing  to  these  laws,  it  was  not  legal  to  serve  more  than 
one  hen;  no  poultry  should  be  specially  fattened  for  the 
table;  on  wedding  days  not  more  than  two  hundred 
asses  could  be  expended  on  the  entertainment,  on  certain 
festival  days  named  in  the  Fannian  Law,  one  hundred 
asses  could  be  expended,  on  ten  other  days  in  each  month 
not  more  than  thirty  asses  could  be  lavished,  and  on  all 
other  days  not  more  than  ten  asses  could  be  spent.  There 
were  several  of  these  laws,  passed  at  different  times,  but 
all  of  them  fell  eventually  into  neglect." 

The  Licinian  Law  also  provided  that  on  ordinary 
days  not  more  than  three  pounds  of  fresh  meat  should 
be  served,  and  not  more  than  one  pound  of  salt  meat* 


174    THE      IXNS      OF 

Extravagance  in  funerals  tad  been  prohibited  by  the 
Twelve  Tables,  and  a  law  of  the  dictator  Sulla  revitalized 
this  ancient  regulation  and  limited  also  the  amounts 
that  could  be  expended  upon  monuments:  precepts  which 
we  today  might  imitate  and  follow  to  advantage. 

Needless  to  say,  the  sumptuary  laws  were  the  occasion 
of  some  dissatisfaction,  and  the  pride  of  the  individual 
who  successfully  evaded  them  was  commensurate  with 
that  of  our  own  citizens  in  dealing  with  certain  of  the 
amendments  to  the  American  Constitution.  In  order 
that  they  might  have  finer  and  more  caustic  sport  at 
the  expense  of  the  censor  and  his  assistants,  his  living 
effigy  was  present  at  entertainments  during  the  saturn 
alia,  the  seasons  of  the  greatest  licence  and  drunkenness, 
and  filled  the  role  of  master  of  the  feast,  a  toastmaster 
charged  with  the  authority  of  regulating  the  drinks  and 
prescribing  the  rules  to  be  followed  under  a  satiric  and 
mocking  exterior,  the  very  personification  of  Folly  in  a 
merry  mood.  The  regulations  prescribed  by  him  were  a 
parody  of  the  laws  and  mannerisms  of  the  censor  in 
office.  He  was  chosen  by  lot  after  a  throw  of  the  dice. 
The  so-called  Cast  of  Venus  (do  not  our  own  dusky 
experts  at  African  golf  continually  call  upon  Little  Joe 
from  Kokomo  or  Little  Dick  from  Boston?)  decided  his 
election  and  crowned  him  king  of  the  revels.  Once 
named,  he  threw  himself  heart  and  soul  into  his  task, 
he  impersonated  the  censor  to  admiration,  and  if  the 
latter  happened  to  be  a  martinet  his  vagaries  and  man 
nerisms  were  imitated  and  the  mirth  ran  high*  With  all 
the  gravity  with  which  a  little  responsibility  always 
invests  a  light  weight,  this  pseudo-censor  would  take 
from  the  hands  of  the  obsonator  and  the  vinerius  the 
lists  setting  forth  the  dishes  and  the  vintages,  and  should 
they  prove  too  numerous  and  extravagant,  it  boded  ill 
for  the  host!  This  little  satire  on  manners  and  customs 


GREECE      &      ROME 175 

must  have  been  highly  diverting  to  the  other  guests 
and  might  even  be  said  to  approach  in  subtle  delicacy 
our  own  "ain't  prohibition  grand/'  heard  so  frequently 
when  the  juniper  and  the  coriander  begin  to  get  in  their 
insidious  work.  The  principal  charge,  however,  a  thing 
that  occupied  the  serious  attention  of  our  toastmaster, 
was  fixing  the  number  of  bumpers  to  be  tossed  off  by 
each  guest:  the  bigger  the  bumper  the  oftener  it  came 
around,  and  they  were  good  drinkers  in  those  days.  This 
mock-heroic  monarch,  personification  of  contempt  for 
law,  this  index  to  a  state  of  mind  that  considered  nothing 
but  its  own  amusement  and  convenience,  carried  matters 
to  the  very  heights  of  sardonic  banter  by  promulgating 
outlandish  orders  among  the  guests,  who  were  duty 
bound  to  obey  them  with  a  smile  even  as  the  serious 
orders  of  constituted  authority  provoked  sorrow  and 
tragedy  more  frequently  than  joy.  He  could  command 
a  guest  to  vilify  himself,  as  being  the  best  possible  author 
ity  upon  the  subject;  another  would  be  ordered  to  dance 
in  a  state  of  nature  and  to  sing  a  song,  a  third  would 
take  the  nude  flute  girl  upon  his  shoulders  and  lead  the 
orgiastic  procession  through  the  whole  establishment,  the 
customary  number  of  tours  being  three: 

Thy  praises  shall  be  sung 

By  youths  who  thrice  shall  dance  around  thy  shrine^ 
Happy  in  youth  and  full  of  this  year's  -wine. 

— Petronius,  Hymn  to  Priapus. 

Another  might  be  called  upon  to  blacken  his  face 
with  soot,  another  to  leap  into  a  pool  of  water  chilled 
with  December's  rigors-  Those  most  successful  in  execut 
ing  the  letter  and  spirit  of  the  orders  received  were 
awarded  as  a  prize  a  magnificent  sausage  or  other  appro 
priate  trinket  no  less  recondite. 

Such  is  the  nature  of  the  "so-called  human  race," 
that  so  fine  an  example  as  that  set  by  the  wealthy  liber- 


176 THE      INNS      OF 

tines  would  never  have  been  lost  upon  the  lower  orders, 
and  burlesques  of  a  more  revolting  character  took  place 
in  the  inns  and  taverns,  especially  in  those  which  lay 
beyond  the  city  walls,  although  the  eating-houses  and 
pot-houses  of  such  districts  as  the  Esquiline,  Velabri, 
Suburra,  Trans  Tiber,  and,  on  a  more  elaborate  scale, 
the  Peace  Ward  (Ticus  Pacis)  must  also  have  celebrated 
the  Saturnalia  in  a  lively  and  lubricous  manner.  The 
more  the  observer  gets  down  to  brass  tacks  with  the 
commoners,  the  deeper  one  descends  through  the  various 
social  strata,  the  more  he  will  encounter  satire,  acrid 
and  mordant,  merciless  to  those  in  power;  it  is  a  very 
natural  revenge;  they  who  suffer  most  and  oftenest  will 
always  be  found  ready  and  eager  to  pay  off  their  grudges 
when  license  and  usage  counter  a  temporary  immunity. 
When  the  Saturnalia  had  passed,  however,  the  Roman 
landlords  were  very  chary  of  permitting  the  authorities 
to  be  complimented  In  such  a  manner;  freedom  of  speech 
was  punished  severely  whenever  it  became  a  menace  to 
official  peace  of  mind,  and  even  at  that  early  day,  it 
was  a  case  of  the  greater  the  truth  the  greater  the  libel. 
The  aedile  and  his  four  myrmidons  were  empowered  by 
the  laws  to  inspect  all  places  where  food,  wine,  beer, 
and  other  luxuries  and  necessities  were  sold-  He  could 
order  merchandise  thrown  into  the  river  and  the  magis 
trates  would  sustain  him  in  all  his  official  acts,  though 
there  are  instances  on  record  where  this  official  has  per 
mitted  his  zeal  for  reform  to  outrun  his  common  sense, 
and  then  he  has  become  a  trifle  lumpy  in  spots,  as  when 
the  prostitute  Hostilia  drive  the  aedile  from  her  estab 
lishment  when  he  had  no  right  of  entry.  She  used  bricks 
and  stones  with  telling  effect  and  the  authorities  repri 
manded  the  aedile  as  being  in  the  wrong  in  going  to  the 
place  with  his  lictor. 

The  taverns  were  always  under  the  eye  of  the  police 


GREECE      &      ROME 177 

and  the  regulation  of  >uch  establishments  was  never  a 
task  to  be  undertaken  lightly.  Some,  which  came  within 
the  meaning  of  the  term  lupanar,  he  was  not  supposed 
to  enter  because  of  the  sacredness  of  his  office  and  the 
example  he  might  thus  furnish  others*  He  could  enter 
the  taverns  and  inspect  them,  however,  see  that  the 
prices  were  not  too  high,  and  cast  the  cold  eye  of  official 
formality  upon  the  weights  and  measures  to  see  that 
they  were  not  fraudulent,  but  conformed  to  the  stand 
ards  kept  in  the  temple  of  Ops  or  in  that  of  Jupiter 
Capitolinus,  Measures  found  dishonest  were  summarily 
broken  in  pieces  on  the  spot,  and  the  tavern-keeper  or 
retailer  was  in  for  a  crowded  half  hour  if  his  case  could 
not  be  compromised  in  some  manner-  This  law  per 
taining  to  weights  and  measures  was  enforced  in  every 
part  of  the  empire;  it  applied  in  an  equal  degree  to  the 
Roman  landlord  and  to  the  poor  scullion  who  conducted 
a  pitiful  stall  amongst  the  Volscians,  as  Juvenal  informs 
us,  and,  according  to  Persius,  to  the  retailers  even  at 
Aratium. 

We  do  not  know  whether  the  official  authority  of  the 
aedile  was  broad  enough  to  include  wine  in  its  scope; 
thus  permitting  him  to  condemn  adulterated  or  diluted 
products  and  order  them  dumped  into  the  river,  but  we 
do  know  that  the  vintners  from  Gades  to  Cappadocia 
were  past  masters  in  adulterating  and  diluting.  In 
Petronius,  Trimalchio  classes  all  the  bartenders  under 
the  sign  of  Aquarius,  and  Martial  has  something  to  say 
of  those  who  diluted  and  those  who  did  not. 

The  vineyards  are  swamped  with  continual  rains, 

But  my  innkeeper,  wilTe  or  niTe 

Serves  "wine  undiluted  and  won't  take  the  pains 

To  water  my  draught  though  it  kfll  me. 

Although  the  vigilance  of  the  aedile  had  little  to 
reward  it  in  dealing  with  the  subtlety  of  the  Roman 


178  THE      INNS      OF 

landlords  and  adulterators,  it  could,  nevertheless,  take 
certain  indirect  measures  against  the  former.  Several 
of  the  emperors  promulgated  decrees  empowering  the 
aediles  to  arrest  those  selling  certain  commodities  men 
tioned  by  name  in  the  instrument,  such,  for  instance,  as 
pastry.  Some  even  went  so  far  as  to  ban  the  sale  of 
every  article  of  food  except  peas  and  pulse  and  other 
vegetables,  and  this  may  throw  a  dim  and  flickering  light 
on  the  date  of  the  Satyricon,  as  Encolpius  and  Ascyltos 
had  only  a  two  as  piece  with  which  to  purchase  pease 
and  pulse  when  the  necessity  of  redeeming  the  lost  tunic 
with  the  gold  pieces  in  the  hem  suddenly  confronted 
them.  Such  decrees  must  have  gravelled  the  tavern- 
keepers  especially  when  they  had  ready  money  in  sight 
if  only  they  could  furnish  victuals;  by  feeding  their  cus 
tomers  they  sold  them  drink,  and  by  selling  rum  they 
got  the  profits.  Taverns  were  the  perpetual  cockpits 
where  the  disorders  and  breaches  of  the  peace  had  their 
origin  and  frequently  their  solution.  This  would  not 
have  been  so  bad,  but  unfortunately,  such  brawls  were 
carried  out  into  the  streets  and  resulted  sometimes  in 
riots  requiring  the  services  of  a  maniple  of  praetorian 
guards  to  quiet  the  mob  and  restore  order.  Tiberius 
was  the  first  to  issue  such  an  edict  and  it  was  extremely 
severe  in  the  penalties  it  provided. 

The  attitude  of  Claudius  is  more  difficult  to  gauge. 
At  one  time  we  find  him  confirming  the  severity  of 
Tiberius,  as  Dion  Cassius  reports,  and  at  another  he 
speaks  in  the  house  in  defense  of  these  establishments, 
and  removes  them  from  the  surveillance  of  the  aedile. 

Nor  was  Nero  less  inconsistent  than  Claudius  in  his 
persecutions  of  the  innkeepers.  He  was  one  of  the  prin 
cipal  actors,  in  fact  he  played  the  stellar  role,  in  the 
orgies  of  the  ganea  at  Baiae  and  along  the  coastline  of 
that  lovely  gulf;  he  spent  his  days  in  diversions  such  as 


GREECE      &     ROME 179 

these,  and  at  night  he  covered  his  head  with  a  freed- 
man's  cap  or  a  mantle  and  made  the  rounds  of  the  free- 
and-easies  in  the  city,  insulting  those  whom  he  met 
returning  from  supper,  striking  them  and  laughing  the 
while  as  they  were  stripped  of  their  cloaks;  entering  the 
smaller  cabarets  by  force,  pillaging  wherever  he  went 
and  sharing  his  booty  with  his  confederates.  Yet  this 
same  emperor  who  had  roistered  it  merrily  in  every  low 
dive  and  cabaret  in  the  city  did  everything  in  his  power 
to  control  the  traffic  of  the  innkeepers  and  keep  them 
within  bounds.  Xor  were  his  marauding  expeditions 
the  worst  services  he  did  the  tavern-keepers;  the  decree 
of  which  we  had  spoken  above  as  from  Petronius,  was 
of  Nero's  sanction  and  was  signed  by  him;  it  prevented 
the  sale  of  any  cooked  foods  in  the  taverns  and  restau 
rants,  save  only  vegetables,  notwithstanding  the  fact 
that  usage  had  long  compelled  them  to  serve  delicacies 
of  every  sort  before  his  time. 

Vespasian's  attitude  toward  public  houses  was  no  less 
severe,  but  he  was  parsimonious  and  austere  by  nature 
and  when  he  levied  war  against  these  middlemen  there 
were  none  who  could  accuse  him  of  double  dealing. 

Many  of  the  emperors  followed  the  examples  set  by 
Claudius  and  Nero  in  their  social  habits  and  debauch 
eries,  but  none  exceeded  these  two  odious  tyrants  in  the 
harshness  and  injustice  meted  out  to  the  innkeeping 
classes.  These  must  have  resulted  from  their  orgies. 
For  example,  we  know  that  Verus  was  given  to  the  fre 
quenting  of  public  houses,  and  spent  his  time  there  day 
or  night,  but  we  know  nothing  of  any  decrees  promul 
gated  by  bim  against  them  or  their  owners;  those  who 
had  amused  his  love  of  excess  were  safe  from  whatever 
spleen  he  might  feel  as  the  result  of  a  big  head,  and  his 
repentance,  if  he  manifested  any,  did  not  take  the  form 
of  prescriptive  edicts  and  cruel  and  unusual  punishments. 


180 THE      INNS      OF 

Julius  Capitolinus  does  not  leave  us  in  ignorance  of 
Verus's  predilection  for  taverns  and  restaurants,  nor  does 
the  malignity  of  the  chronicler  gloss  over  the  excesses 
committed  there. 

"Emulating  the  examples  set  by  Caligula,  Nero,  and 
Vitellius,"  says  mine  author,  "he  frequented  the  taverns 
and  haunts  of  vice  iat  night,  his  head  enveloped  in  a  cowl 
such  as  is  worn  by  vagrant  wayfarers;  disguised  in  this 
manner,  he  mixed  with  the  brawling  roisterers  and 
bullys,  took  part  in  their  battles,  and  came  home  with 
his  face  and  body  a  mass  of  bruises  and  contusions.  In 
spite  of  his  disguise,  he  was  well  known  in  these  taverns. 
Sometimes  he  amused  his  ennui  by  throwing  heavy  pieces 
of  money  at  the  vases  and  porcelains,  to  break  them." 

By  instinct,  this  emperor  was  devoted  to  low  amuse 
ments.  The  achievements  of  a  Caligula  seemed  common 
and  ordinary  to  him,  and  he  would  have  fallen  asleep 
over  them.  Caligula  established  a  lupanar  in  his  palace; 
Verus  set  up  a  tavern  in  his.  Caligula  served  his  familiars 
as  bogau  and  water-boy;  Verus  beguiled  his  in  his  capacity 
of  tavern-keeper  and  entertainer:  a  sort  of  chaperone 
to  predaciousness,  as  it  were:  in  other  words,  he  exer 
cised  all  three  callings  at  the  same  time. 

"His  manners/9  to  quote  again  from  Capitolinus, 
"his  manners  were  so  dissolute  that  on  his  return  from 
Syria  he  set  up  a  tavern  in  his  palace,  whither  he  betook 
himself  as  soon  as  he  could  leave  the  table  of  Marcus 
Aurelius;  here  he  rendered  services  and  extended  a 
hospitality  which  out-rivalled  all  the  infamies  of  Rome." 

According  to  Trebellius  Pollio,  the  habits  and  incli 
nations  of  Gallienus  were  closely  s*km  to  those  of  Corn- 
modus,  of  whom  we  have  just  spoken*  Of  hi™  also  it 
was  said  that  "he  passed  all  his  nights  in  the  taverns, 
and  lived  and  amused  himself  with  all  the  go-betweens, 
mimes,  actors,  and  actresses  and  witty  rascals,55  whom 


GREECE      &      ROME 181 

he  could  meet.  And  as  for  Heliogabalus,  we  need  not 
stay  our  progress  to  relate  his  exploits  when  Saltus  In 
his  Imperial  Purple  has  done  us  that  favor.  Had  there 
been  no  English  translation  of  the  Augustan  History,  we 
might  still  have  gone  into  his  career,  but  the  need,  if  it 
exists,  has  been  nobly  met.  Suffice  it  to  say  that  Helio 
gabalus  was  probably  the  most  dissolute  androgyne  that 
ever  dishonored  the  throne  of  any  nation.  Compared 
to  him,  Sardanapalus  was  an  immaculate  conception. 
This  emperor  was  a  constant  frequenter  of  caf6s  and  all 
they  stood  for  in  an  age  whose  unbridled  viciousness  has 
never  been  approached  in  public,  Commodus  was  the 
incarnation  of  evil,  a  brutish  and  uninstructed  evil,  his 
influence  could  scarcely  have  corrupted  the  minds  of 
those  about  him,  on  the  contrary,  he  filled  them  all  with 
the  most  raging  contempt,  as  is  shown  in  the  manner  in 
which  his  body  was  dragged  with  the  hook:  Heliogabalus, 
however,  more  abandoned  than  the  son  of  Marcus 
Aurelius,  had,  withal,  a  certain  refined  charm;  he  could 
appeal  to  the  better  feelings  of  strangers  upon  first  meet 
ing  them;  he  was  physically  very  handsome,  and,  on 
occasion  he  had  the  capacity  for  wit  without  cruelty. 
Such  a  character  may  be  a  frightful  menace  to  an  entire 
city,  especially  if  its  owner  is  invested  with  absolute 
power  and  inviolability.  This  is  especially  the  case  when 
the  individual  is  disposed  to  use  his  power  to  minister 
to  the  self  interest  of  others*  Under  Heliogabalus  every 
order  of  society  was  affected  by  the  festering  contagion 
induced  by  an  utter  lack  of  all  moral  values,  and  it  is 
left  to  the  melancholy  historian  who  wishes  his  race  well 
and  to  the  malignant  chronicler  who  perhaps  has  suf 
fered  under  a  tyranny  no  less  bitter  in  that  its  mandates 
were  couched  in  gentle  terms  and  soothing  phrases,  to 
comment  upon  conditions  which  surround  them. 

It  is  with  relief  that  we  turn  this  filthy  page  and 


183  THE      INNS      OF 

come  at  length  to  the  age  of  Aurelian,  that  stern  re 
storer  of  character  and  discipline  who  only  preoccupied 
himself  with  inns  long  enough  to  instruct  one  of  his 
lieutenants  to  see  that  the  soldiers  did  not  lavish  upon 
the  eating-houses  and  taverns  the  pay  from  the  money 
belts  worn  by  them.  The  same  thought  must  have  ani 
mated  Hadrian  in  the  sparkling  retort  courteous  which 
he  sent  to  Floras.  Aside  from  the  fact  that  he  was  a 
poet  and  a  friend  of  Hadrian,  we  know  nothing  of  Floras: 
some  authorities  have  been  inclined  to  attribute  the 
Copa  to  him.  He  had  written  in  a  bantering  style  to 
Hadrian: 

No  Caesar  would  I  want  to  be, 

Inspecting  Britain's  wastes, 

Lurking  in  savage  (Germany) 

No  Scythian  frosts  would  suit  my  tastes.  ,  .  . 

And  Hadrian  answered  him: 

No  Moms  would  I  want  to  be, 
Inspecting  bar-maid's  waists, 
Lurking  in  a  hostelry, 
No  fat  round  insects  suit  my  tastes. 

The  inns  play  a  greater  part  in  public  life  than  ever 
before,  some  are  sumptuous,  but  the  majority  must  still 
have  been  tawdry  and  repulsive.  Yet  Floras  did  not 
stand  alone  in  paying  his  court  to  the  divinities  of 
hospitality.  Many  of  the  finest  poetical  geniuses  of  all 
ages  were  similarly  smitten.  We  have  already  called 
attention  to  Virgil's  Copa,  that  lithe  and  sinuous  pur 
veyor  of  sensations;  we  have  seen  Lucilius  react  to  the 
advances  of  another  of  the  same  species;  and  Horace  in 
his  writings  speaks  of  many  affairs  with  innkeepers. 
The  epithets  which  he  bestows  upon  them  are  generally 
sarcastic,  auguring  unpleasant  experiences  and  dissatis 
faction  with  their  customary  hardihood  at  impudent 


GREECE      &      ROME  _  183 

repartee,  which  was  more  in  the  style  of  the  bludgeon 
than  the  rapier.  "Yon  vintner,  an  exceeding  knave," 
says  our  author,  in  instructing  neophytes  in  the  rhetorical 
art  of  treating  subjects  in  a  manner  natural  to  themselves 
and  to  human  experience.  Elsewhere  he  speaks  of  the 
greasy  eating-house,  though  the  passage  may  mean  the 
reverse  as  he  is  remonstrating  with  his  steward  who  is 
totally  lacking  in  appreciation  for  the  rustic  life  on  the 
Sabine  farm,  and  has  requested  a  transfer: 

A  wench, 

The  greasy  luxury  of  a  tavern  bench, 
*Tis  this  I  see,  that  makes  you  long  for  town, 
And  you  on  that  dear  nook  of  mine  look  down; 
Because  the  spiee  of  Eastern  climes  you  know 
As  soon  or  sooner,  theme  than  wine  will  grow; 
Because  too  there's  no  tippling  house  hard  by 
To  drop  into  whenever  you  feel  dry; 
No  piping  jade  your  heavy  heels  to  set 
Jigging  and  jumping  to  her  flageolet. 

(Martin's  Translation.) 

In  another  passage  he  uses  the  term  caupona  and 
again  it  is  to  express  dissatisfaction;  he  advises  his  friends 
Scaeva  to  go  to  Ferentinum  for  rest  and  relaxation  as 
the  noise  of  Rome  is  scarcely  less  nerve  wracking  than 
that  of  an 


If  what  you  lack  be  sweet  unbroken  rest, 
And  sleep  till  after  dawn;  if  you  detest 
Worry,  and  dust,  and  smother,  and  the  din 
Of  cars  and  carts,  and  of  a  noisy  inn.  .  .  . 

However,  Horace  was  too  much  of  the  man-about- 
town  not  to  have  regaled  himself  many  times  in  the 
taverns  of  a  gayer  aspect:  more  than  once,  as  he  tells 
his  steward,  he  had  tasted  the  delights  his  steward  craves, 
but  he  was  ever  a  critic  denouncing  the  uproar  of  the 


184  THE      INNS      OF 

inns  and  taverns  as  one  of  the  plagues  with  which  Rome 
was  afflicted. 

Martial  expresses  himself  more  freely;  he  delights  in 
taverns  and  avows  it  without  the  least  restraint: 

"An  innkeeper,  a  butcher,  baths,  a  barber,  a  well 
furnished  exchequer,  a  few  books  of  my  own  choice,  a 
friend  not  too  ignorant,  a  young  lady  who  is  pleasing 
to  my  slave,  a  huge  fellow  of  a  slave,  not  too  lively,  but 
of  an  age  which  will  permit  him  a  long  life;  give  me  these, 
Rufus,  and  let  them  even  be  at  Byzantium,  but  I  will 
cede  you  the  baths  of  Nero  with  all  my  heart/5 

Sometimes  he  wets  his  youthful  muse  with  wine  of 
Crete,  country  of  Minos,  that  wine  which  is  the  nectar 
of  poverty: 

"The  vines  of  Crete,  country  of  Minos,  produce  that 
liquor,  the  ordinary  wine  of  the  people/* 

Again  he  may  have  felt  impelled  to  take  a  meagre 
repast  from  one  of  the  peripatetic  stalls  which  a  yelling 
cook  pushed  from  tavern  to  tavern.  This  may  not  have 
satisfied  the  inner  man,  but,  nevertheless,  he  got  some 
of  his  finest  touches  from  surroundings  and  contacts  such 
as  these. 

Syriscus  has  run  at  so  rapid  a  pace 

"IWeen  the  benches  of  tavern  and  stew 

That  he's  now  neck  and  neck  in  a  bankruptcy  race 

And  the  million  lie  had  is  run  through; 

"A  million  devoured!    What  a  glutton/*  you'll  say; 

Aye,  a  gulligut  glutton,  to  do  it  that  way! 


GREECE      &ROME  185 


CHAPTER 

The  literati — Philostratus*s  beautiful  tribute  to  a  cabaret  girl — Nero 
as  a  cabaret  singer — Catullus  flays  the  lewd  taverns — Juvenal* s  descrip 
tion  of  the  lupanars — Patricians  liberal  patrons,  many  being  tavern 
owners — Trimalchio  speculates  in  wine — Plutarch  tells  of  the  baseness  of 
the  inns, 

The  literati  and  declaimers  of  the  times,  the  rheto 
ricians  and  out  at  elbow  philosophers  and  intellectuals, 
made  the  taverns  and  thermopolia  their  headquarters: 
here  they  gathered  to  gossip  and  discuss  affairs  of  eveiy- 
day  life,  and  they  were  probably  no  vainer  or  more 
verbose  than  the  expatriated  sophists  who  came  from 
Greece  in  the  times  of  the  Scipios  under  the  pretext  of 
refining  the  local  customs  and  social  usages,  and  giving 
a  rhetorical  and  artificial  polish  to  the  rude  vigor  of  the 
old  Latin  tongue.  In  reality,  however,  they  set  a  fine 
example  of  tavern  swilling  and  wenching,  and  the  term 
pergraecari  (to  drink  like  a  Greek)  was  coined  to  describe 
their  cultivated  avidity  in  this  exercise. 

Plautus,  who  was  contemporary  with  them,  has  drawn 
a  picture  which  enables  us  to  see  them  as  they  were, 
enveloped  from  head  to  heel  in  their  cloaks,  which  were 
equipped  with  cowls  to  cover  the  head.  They  stagger 
under  the  weight  of  the  books  they  are  carrying,  on  their 
way  to  the  tavern,  there  to  drink  themselves  into  a 
state  of  philosophical  abstraction  which  will  make  them 
for  hours  immune  to  all  the  crudities  with  which  they 
are  surrounded.  Let  one  of  them  catch  the  scent  of 
wine  and  he  becomes  prudent,  simulating  the  countenance 
of  a  drunken  man  under  a  thoughtful  mien  of  philosophy. 
Under  the  emperors  they  are  still  the  same,  displaying 
the  same  old  vices  and  masquerading  under  the  same 


186 THE      INNS      OF 

philosophy.  One  of  them,  however,  has  avowed  his 
intimacy  and  has  immortalized  the  object  of  his  adora 
tion:  I  speak  of  Philostratus,  a  Greek  sophist  of  the 
deepest  dye,  yet  who  did  yeoman  service  in  refining  the 
crudities  of  a  language  already  effeminate,  a  language 
degenerating  under  the  subtleties  of  a  philosophy  of 
decadence.  His  example  was  one  that  others  could 
follow:  he  frequented  taverns  as  he  chose.  If  he  per 
mitted  sentiments  so  exquisite  to  flow  from  his  pen  it 
must  have  been  because  he  was  more  moved  by  love 
and  artistic  appreciation  than  by  drunkenness.  A  girl 
of  the  cabarets  has  attracted  his  glance;  probably  to 
order  something  to  drink:  he  sees  her  eyes,  and,  like 
Catullus  translating  Sappho, 

A-down  my  limbs  flows  subtle  flame 
My  ears  are  ringing  with  her  spell 
My  eyes  see  naught  but  night! 

Yes,  the  glance  of  an  eye  weaned  him  away  from  the 
fetishes  of  a  lifetime;  he  ceased  scoffing  at  chastity,  and 
wrote  three  little  letters,  one  might  almost  be  tempted 
to  call  them  madrigals,  that  contain  the  finest  essence 
of  worshipful  appreciation.  These  resulted  from  the 
spell  which  the  tavern  Hebe  threw  over  him  and  were 
born  of  the  inspiration  with  which  she  fired  his  soul. 
They  are  sincere,  they  voice  a  refined  passion,  they 
have  survived  the  ages,  and  they  are  of  the  very  stuff 
of  the  gallantry  not  only  of  Greek  antiquity,  but  of  the 
gallantry  of  all  time. 

Charmingly  simple,  they  must  have  been  addressed 
to  a  character  no  less  lovely. 

TO  A  CABARET  GIRL 

"Everything  about  you  delights  me;  to  me  your  robe 
of  linen  is  the  peplum  of  Isis;  your  tavern  the  temple  of 


GREECE      &      ROME 187 

Aphrodite,  your  chalices  so  round  and  shining  the  eyes 
of  Hera,  your  wine  has  the  bouquet  of  ambrosia  itself, 
and  the  three  fingers  you  extend  to  take  up  the  cup  are 
like  the  triple  rose  entwined  in  the  sacred  chaplet. 

"I  tremble  lest  the  cup  shall  fall,  but  no,  it  is  as  firm 
in  your  hand  as  a  sun  dial  on  its  base,  and  reminds  me 
of  a  flower  pushing  out  and  growing  from  between  your 
fingers. 

"If  you  would  touch  the  cup  lightly  with  your  lips 
and  warm  the  wine  with  your  breath  it  would  be  sweeter 
than  nectar.  It  would  run  through  every  vein  and  every 
nerve  would  tingle.  It  would  be  more  than  wine  ...  it 
would  be  a  draught  of  kisses. 

"Your  cups  are  of  glass.  In  your  hands  they  become 
silver  and  gold  and  your  touch  communicates  to  them 
I  know  not  what  of  softness  and  gleaming  charm.  Yet 
it  is  a  transparence  dull  and  without  reflection,  like  that 
of  a  sleeping  lake.  Ah,  how  it  differs  from  the  radiance 
of  your  eyes  sparkling  with  the  joyous  spirit  of  your 
countenance.  What  sweetness  they  convey  to  me,  with 
what  a  thirst  for  kisses  they  inflame  my  senses! 

"The  cup  is  fragile  and  easily  broken,  place  it  upon 
the  table;  with  such  eyes  as  yours,  I  have  no  other  need. 

"Your  glances  alone  intoxicate  me  even  as  do  those 
of  the  adorable  child*  the  cupbearer  to  the  god  of  gods, 
under  whose  soft  glances  Zeus  brings  on  his  drunkenness. 

"Yea,  serve  me  no  more  with  that  flavorless  nectar, 
water  alone  shall  suffice;  bring  but  the  cup  to  your  lips, 
implant  thereon  your  kisses,  and  when  I  would  drink 
present  it  to  me.  Where  is  the  man  who  could  demand 
wine,  the  gift  of  Dionysus,  when  Aphrodite  offers  him 
her  ambrosia? 

"Your  eyes  are  more  transparent  than  the  crystal  of 
your  cups,  and  they  mirror  your  soul.  The  color  of 
your  cheeks  is  more  brilliant  than  that  of  the  wine  itself. 


188 THE      INNS      OF 

The  whiteness  of  your  linen  robe  is  reflected  in  your  face, 
and  your  lips  are  tinted  with  the  blood  of  roses.  Your 
eyes,  humid  and  lovely,  are  like  those  of  the  statues 
adorning  our  fountains;  they  weep  with  the  joy  of  living. 
Yea,  you  are  one  of  the  nymphs. 

"And  they  whom  you  cause  to  halt  in  their  course, 
who  remain  when  their  intention  was  to  pass  by  without, 
yea,  you  know  how  to  invite  them  without  speaking 
a  single  word. 

"As  for  myself,  what  a  thirst  I  had  the  first  time  I 
saw  you.  The  cup  remained  immovable  in  my  hand  in 
spite  of  my  unwillingness.  I  could  not  bring  it  to  my 
lips.  I  drink  to  your  eyes." 

Any  and  all  of  these  little  pastels  might  have  been 
odes  of  Anacreon  to  the  nymphs  of  the  vintages,  and 
they  have  immortalized  a  hostess  whose  exquisite  sim 
plicity  and  loveliness  could  only  detract  from  itself  by 
adornment.  With  such  a  subject  poetic  enthusiasm  and 
lyric  rhapsody  cannot  be  out  of  place,  whether  it  be  a 
tavern  girl  or  a  geisha,  and,  as  we  have  remarked,  many 
of  the  classical  poets  and  many  that  have  come  after 
them  gained  their  finest  inspiration  from  the  girls  of 
the  cabarets.  The  Syrian  ambibia  has  danced  for  us, 
we  have  been  enthralled  by  the  rustic  flute  that  enchants 
the  echoes  of  garden  and  tavern,  and,  if  we  search  dili 
gently  enough,  perhaps  we  shall  find  the  material  with 
which  to  complete  our  picture  of  the  olden  time,  the 
lyric  and  poetic  side  of  the  tavern  life  of  Rome.  It  is 
not  our  intention  to  introduce  our  readers  to  any  ordi 
nary  songbird  such  as  is  to  be  met  with  in  our  own  caf  6s 
chantants;  nor  shall  we  inflict  the  falsetto  screechings  of 
a  cabaret  lizard  upon  the  unwilling  ears  of  our  patrons 
and  torture  their  patience  with  doubtful  and  obscene 
double  entendres.  For  lack  of  a  performer  more  illus 
trious,  we  shall  introduce  Nero  himself;  Nero,  whose 


GREECE      &      ROME 189 

joy  and  pride  lay  in  singing  in  the  taverns,  garbed  as  an 
entertainer,  and  who  decreed  a  f£te  day  whenever  he 
thus  distributed  his  largesse.  Philostratus  has  related 
a  very  curious  fact.  He  is  speaking  of  the  exile  of 
Demetrius,  a  cynic  philosopher  contemporary  with  him 
self,  but  less  addicted  to  questionable  places  and  more 
restrained  and  austere  in  his  manner  of  speaking  and 
writing. 

"One  day  Demetrius  was  ranting  in  the  gymnasium, 
the  object  of  his  scorn  was  the  institution  of  the  baths. 
He  characterized  them  as  places  which  catered  to  ex 
travagance  and  which  served  all  the  effeminates  who  went 
there  for  the  purpose  of  polluting  their  bodies  under  the 
pretext  of  washing  them.  It  so  happened  that  on  that 
very  day  Nero  was  singing  in  a  cabaret  next  to  the 
gymnasium,  and  had  surpassed  himself.  He  was  clad 
like  any  innkeeper,  in  a  pair  of  drawers  and  the  rest  of 
his  body  was  naked.  Tigellinus,  the  praetorian  prefect, 
informed  him  as  to  what  Demetrius  had  said  and  con 
strued  the  words  as  a  satire  directed  against  Nero's 
conduct  in  the  cabaret.  Nero  was  furious  and  deported 
Demetrius,  *as  though,'  says  Philostratus,  'the  baths 
might  have  tumbled  down  before  the  breath  caused  by 
his  words."  This  anecdote  is  curious  not  only  because 
of  what  it  teaches  us  of  Nero,  but  also  because  it  bears 
out  what  we  have  said  of  the  understanding  which  existed 
between  the  baths,  gymnasia  and  the  taverns.  According 
to  Isadore  of  Seville  (Origines,  Lib.  XIV,  Chap.  2),  the 
taverns  adjoining  the  baths  went  under  the  name  popinae, 
but  Lefebre  (Agnostiques  Lib.  HI,  Chap.  28),  remarks 
that  the  cabarets  operating  with  the  gymnasia  at  Rome 
were  called  ebeterwn. 

We  should  not  be  astonished  at  the  praise  lavished  by 
Philostratus  upon  the  cabaret  girl:  the  Roman  innkeepers 
were  not  blind  to  beauty,  nor  were  they  oblivious  to  the 


190  THE      INNS      OF 


effect  of  exquisite  loveliness  upon  trade.  Twenty  cen 
turies  later  we  shall  see  Madame  Bourette,  the  Muse  of 
Lemonade  Sellers,  enthroned  in  her  caf£  in  the  rue  Bour 
bon- Villenueve:  the  goddess  who  reigns  in  the  caf4  du 
Bosquet  does  so  by  virtue  of  her  beauty  and  charm;  and 
many  another  Hebe  shall  officiate  in  establishments  where 
sherbet  is  sold,  or  chocolate,  where  the  prices  are  high  but 
the  buying  public  is  more  than  anxious  to  bask  in  the  light 
of  the  beauty's  smiles;  to  court  her  favors,  and  press  a 
fortunate  moment  for  all  it  is  worth.  In  them  is  the 
origin  of  the  charming  cashier  system. 

They  knew  well  that  a  pretty  face,  animated  with  the 
joy  of  living,  is  a  finer  appeal  to  good- will  than  the  most 
subtle  and  piquant  sign;  a  glance  of  the  eye  was  more 
potent  than  all  the  haranguing  of  an  obsequious  and 
fawning  predaciousness  at  the  threshold  of  the  tavern,  as 
for  instance  we  find  in  Juvenal: 

"And  when  it  pleases  Lateranus  to  go  back  to  the  all 
night  tavern,  some  Syro-Phoenician  runs  forth  to  meet 
him — some  denizen  of  the  Idumaean  Gate  perpetually 
drenched  with  perfumes — and  salute  him  as  lord  and 
prince  with  all  the  airs  of  a  host;  and  with  him  comes  the 
venal  Cyane  with  her  robe  tucked  up,  carrying  a  flagon 
of  wine/5  (Sat.  VIII,  158  et  seq.) 

And  then  again  we  may  take  the  case  of  Aulus  Bin- 
nius,  the  jolly  tavern-keeper,  of  whom  Cicero  speaks  so 
slightingly  in  what  is  probably  the  finest  defense  for  the 
wild  oat  fields  sown  by  the  exuberance  of  youth: 

"And  it  is  also  reported  to  us  that  you  suborn  an 
entertainer  of  many  guests,  a  certain  Aulus  Binnius,  an 
innkeeper  on  the  Via  Latina,  to  say  that  violence  was 
offered  to  him  in  his  own  tavern."  (Pro  Cluentio, 
ch.  59.) 

The  women  of  the  common  people  well  knew  what 
success  would  wait  upon  their  charms  if  they  became 


GREECE      &     ROME 191 

cabaret  girls:  therefore,  when  they  abandoned  their  status 
of  virtuous  mediocrity  where  virtue  was  too  often  its  own 
reward,  it  was  with  full  knowledge  of  what  to  expect  and 
a  willingness  to  pay  the  price  necessary;  to  marry  a  tavern- 
keeper  was  the  goal  they  set  themselves  to  reach.  They 
generally  consulted  some  oracle  or  other  as  to  what  the 
matrimonial  future  had  in  store  for  them: 

"The  woman  who  displays  a  long  gold  chain  on  her 
bare  neck  inquired  before  the  pillars  and  the  clusters  of 
dolphins  whether  she  will  throw  over  the  tavern-keeper 
and  marry  the  rag  man/5  (Juvenal  "V7!,  589  et  seq.) 

Custom  and  good-will  flowed  into  taverns  such  as  these 
where  pretty  young  women  were  in  attendance;  but  their 
morality  was  in  inverse  ratio  to  their  business  and  the  very 
nature  of  the  calling  augured  complaisance.  See  what 
havoc  two  beautiful  eyes  can  make!  How  powerfully 
they  attract  custom!  When  the  mistress  whom  Catullus 
loved  so  deeply  ran  away  from  her  house  to  the  tavern 
near  the  temple  of  Castor  and  Pollux,  see  how  the  patron 
age  increased:  two  hundred  customers  at  the  very  least, 
but  such  customers!  All  more  or  less  hardened.  And 
see  how  well  the  tavern  deserved  to  be  flayed  by  the  in 
dignant  poet  in  the  injurious  epithet  with  which  he 
salutes  it:  Salax  taverna — lewd  tavern: 

"Lewd  tavern,  the  ninth  sign-post  from  the  pileated 
brothers*  temple,  and  you,  its  frequenters,  do  you  think 
that  you  alone  have  the  attributes  of  manhood?  That 
you  alone  are  licensed  to  kiss  the  girls  all  and  sundry 
and  hold  all  other  men  at  naught,  you  rank  he-goats? 
Is  it  because  you  sit  there  night  and  day,  a  hundred 
boobies  or  two,  that  you  tliniTr  I  will  not  venture  to  tackle 
the  whole  two  hundred  of  you  at  once?  Aye,  but  you 
may  think  it,  and  I  will  write  inscriptions  all  over  the 
front  of  your  tavern.  For  my  girl  who  has  fled  from  my 
bosom,  my  girl,  whom  I  loved  as  woman  was  never  loved 


192 THE      INNS      OF 

before,  for  whom  I  have  waged  great  wars,  has  sat  herself 
down  there;  and  now  you  all  make  love  to  her;  pleasant, 
comfortable  fellows,  and — what  is  really  too  bad — all  of 
you  pitiful  knaves,  gallants  of  the  by-streets,  and  you, 
Egnatius,  above  all,  one  of  the  long  haired  race  from  the 
rabbit  warrens  of  Celtiberia,  you  whose  merit  consists 
in  a  bushy  beard,  and  teeth  bleached  white/* 

Catullus  complains  bitterly  of  the  injury  done  him, 
but  he  makes  no  allowance  for  the  fact  that  he  had  taken 
her  from  a  similar  place  when  he  came  to  an  understand 
ing  with  her.  That  was  the  usual  custom,  and  all  the 
women  who  have  been  loved  and  immortalized  in  the 
couplets  of  the  Latin  poets  probably  came  from  places 
such  as  the  one  spoken  of  above.  They  were  daughters 
of  lupanar  or  tavern.  In  writing  of  the  Syrian  hostess 
Virgil  did  not  stoop,  he  merely  followed  the  example  set 
by  Catullus  and  Lucilius  before  him.  Horace  flirted 
with  the  mendax  puetta  (lying  jade)  in  the  smoky  house 
at  Trivicum,  and  the  calling  she  exercised  made  not  the 
slightest  difference  to  him.  Propertius  had  an  inveterate 
passion  for  intrigues  such  as  these,  and  whenever  his 
trifling  with  Thais  or  Phyllis  threw  Cynthia  into  trans 
ports  of  jealous  rage  her  fury  spent  itself  on  his  devoted 
head:  she  would  rush  with  dishevelled  hair  into  the  rustic 
arbor  in  which  Propertius  had  abandoned  himself  to 
drunkenness  under  the  charm  of  their  dances  and  the 
blandishment  of  their  caresses.  Where,  then,  could  they 
find  sanctuary,  except  in  the  tavern  that  knew  them  first? 
And  Cynthia,  or,  if  we  are  to  believe  Apuleius,  Hostia, 
was  always  too  faithless  herself  to  have  been  permitted 
to  exercise  the  rights  conferred  by  honest  jealousy. 
Whither  then  could  she  betake  herself  when  pride  de 
manded  that  she  abandon  her  lover?  To  an  iim  on  the 
Appian  Way,  the  retreat  of  others  no  less  disorderly, 
where  she  was  free  without  reproach  to  enjoy  the  em- 


GREECE      &     ROME 193 

braces  and  lavish  favors  of  some  new  admirer,  or  some 
libertine  who  had  introduced  her  into  his  silken  litter. 

Shall  we  longer  remain  in  doubt  that  the  taverns  of 
Rome  were  lupanars?  Perhaps  the  only  difference  lies 
in  the  fact  that  they  were  completely  open  to  the  public 
gaze,  they  were  located  on  the  forum  and  in  conspicuous 
places  where  all  the  world  could  see  what  went  on  and 
hear  the  brawls  and  uproar.  The  lupanars,  however, 
were  hidden  away  on  dark  and  narrow  alleys  which 
Plautus  calls  angiporta.  The  taverns  were  entered  openly 
without  attempt  at  concealment,  and  through  the  front 
door;  whereas  in  the  case  of  the  lupanars  prudence  veiled 
its  head  and  waited  till  night  to  glide  into  them.  From 
this  the  term  latebricolae  (they  that  dwell  in  lurking 
places,  or,  if  you  prefer,  friends  of  darkness)  was  derived: 
it  was  used  to  characterize  those  who  frequented  the 
lupanars.  Aside  from  what  has  been  said  above,  the 
two  institutions  were  almost  identical;  whatever  was 
found  in  one  could  be  had  in  the  other,  good  cheer  and 
luxurious  debauchery.  A  passage  in  the  Poenulus  of 
Plautus  is  very  much  to  the  point  and  furnishes  a  vivid 
scene.  I  refer  to  the  entry  of  the  slave  Syncerastus  into 
the  house  of  his  master  the  procurer.  There  is  little  room 
for  error  here.  He  always  speaks  of  tavern  and  lupanar 
as  synonyms,  a  propriety  which  would  have  included 
the  guests  as  well.  Syncerastus  arrives  upon  the  scene 
with  his  arms  laden  with  vessels  for  sacrifice  and  orgy; 
all  this  paraphernalia  he  has  brought  to  Rome  and  he 
begins  by  speaking  of  his  worthy  master  and  the  estab 
lishment  conducted  by  him: 

"It's  very  clear  that  gods  and  men  neglect  the  benefit 
of  him  who  has  a  master  with  a  character  like  my  mas 
ter's.  There's  not  another  person  anywhere  in  the  whole 
world  more  perjured  or  more  wicked  than  my  master, 
nor  one  so  filthy  and  so  defiled.  So  may  the  gods  bless 


194 THE      INNS      OF 

me,  I'd  rather  pass  my  life  either  in  the  stone  quarries 
or  at  the  mill,  with  my  sides  hampered  with  heavy  irons, 
than  pass  this  servitude  with  a  procurer.  What  a  race 
this  is!  What  corrupters  of  men  they  are!  Ye  gods, 
by  our  hopes  in  you,  every  kind  and  condition  of  men 
you  may  see  there,  just  as  though  you  had  come  to 
Acheron — horse  and  foot — a  freedman,  a  thief,  or  a  run 
away,  if  you  choose,  one  whipped,  chained  or  condemned. 
He  that  has  got  the  wherewithal  to  pay,  whatever  sort 
of  person  he  is — all  kinds  are  taken  in;  throughout  all 
the  house,  in  consequence,  are  darkened  spots,  Hiding- 
places;  drinking  and  eating  are  going  on  just  as  in  a  cook- 
shop,  and  in  no  less  degree.  There  may  you  see  epistles 
written  in  letters  inscribed  on  pottery,  sealed  with  pitch: 
the  names  upon  them  are  a  cubit  long,  such  a  levy  of 
vintners  we  have  got  at  our  house."  (Plautus,  Poenulus, 
Act  IV,  Scene  ii.) 

Were  we  to  take  a  trip  through  our  own  cabarets  we 
would  not  fail  to  recognize  the  types  of  Plautus,  and  we 
mention  these  types  in  order  that  we  may  fill  in  all  the 
details  and  make  a  complete  picture. 

With  this  in  view,  let  us  then  cite  a  passage  from 
Juvenal,  to  give  the  finishing  touches  to  the  votaries  and 
the  establishments  we  have  been  describing.  The  pas 
sage  is  from  Satire  VIII,  line  146  et  seq.: 

"The  bloated  Lateranus  whirls  past  the  bones  and 
ashes  of  his  ancestors  in  a  rapid  car;  with  his  own  hands 
this  muleteer  consul  locks  the  wheel  with  the  drag.  It 
is  by  night,  indeed,  but  the  moon  looks  on;  the  stars 
strain  their  eyes  to  see.  When  his  time  of  office  is  over, 
Lateranus  will  take  up  his  whip  in  broad  daylight;  not 
shrinking  to  meet  a  now  aged  friend,  he  will  be  the  first 
to  salute  him  with  his  whip;  he  will  unbind  the  trusses 
of  hay,  and  deal  out  the  fodder  to  his  weary  cattle. 
Meanwhile,  though  he  slays  woolly  victims  and  tawny 


GREECE      &      ROME 195 

steers  after  Xuma's  fashion,  he  swears  by  no  other  deity 
before  Jove's  high  altar  than  the  goddess  of  horseflesh,  and 
the  images  painted  on  the  reeking  stables.  And  when  it 
pleases  him  to  go  back  to  the  all  night  tavern,  a  Syro- 
Phoenician  runs  forth  to  meet  him — &  denizen  of  the 
Idumaean  Gate  perpetually  drenched  in  perfumes — and 
salutes  him  as  lord  and  prince  with  all  the  airs  of  a  host; 
and  with  him  comes  venal  Cyane,  her  robe  tucked  up, 
carrying  a  flagon  of  wine  for  sale.  An  apologist  will  say 
to  me,  *we  too  did  the  same  thing  as  boys/  Perhaps: 
but  then  you  ceased  from  your  follies  and  let  them  drop. 
Let  your  evil  days  be  short;  let  some  of  your  misdoings 
be  cut  off  with  your  first  beard.  Boys  may  be. pardoned; 
but  when  Lateranus  frequented  those  hot  liquor  shops 
with  their  inscribed  linen  awnings,  he  was  of  ripe  age, 
fit  to  guard  under  arms  the  Armenian  and  Syrian  rivers, 
and  the  Danube,  and  the  Rhine:  fit  to  protect  the  person 
of  his  emperor.  Send  your  legate  to  Ostia,  O  Caesar, 
but  search  for  him  in  some  big  cook-shop.  There  you 
will  find  him,  lying  cheek  by  jowl  beside  a  cut-throat,  in 
the  company  of  bargees,  thieves,  and  runaway  slaves, 
beside  hangmen  and  coffin  makers,  or  of  some  eunuch 
priest  lying  drunk  with  idle  timbrels.  Here  is  Liberty 
Hall!  One  cup  serves  for  everybody,  no  one  has  a  bed 
to  himself,  nor  a  table  apart  from  the  rest.  What  would 
you  do,  friend  Ponticus,  if  you  chanced  upon  a  slave  like 
this?  You  would  send  him  to  your  Lucanian  or  Tuscan 
bridewell.  But  you  gentlemen  of  Trojan  blood  find  ex 
cuse  for  yourselves;  what  would  disgrace  a  huckster  sits 
gracefully  on  a  Volesus  or  a  Brutus!" 

At  last  the  tableau  is  complete;  not  a  thing  has  been 
omitted  nor  a  type  overlooked.  You  have  beheld  every 
variety  of  eating-house  glutton  or  tavern  parvenu;  the 
tricones,  and,  as  Seneca  has  called  them,  in  speaking 
of  their  wine  swilling,  scordali.  We  have  beheld  the 


196  THE      INNS      OF 

priests  of  Cybele,  fat  and  thick  set,  who  fraternize  with 
the  Syrian  ambubia,  and  the  thieves  who  are  doubtless 
as  well  received  there  as  at  the  public  baths,  if  we  may 
pkce  credence  in  what  Seneca  has  to  say:  and,  in  addi 
tion,  the  pack  of  idle  and  slanderous  slaves  who  have  come 
here  in  attendance  upon  their  masters  and  who  occupy 
their  leisure  by  getting  drunk  and  gossiping.  Who  knows 
but  they  may  have  been  sent  here  to  get  them  out  of  the 
way? 

"While  the  performance  is  going  on/5  says  Plautus, 
in  the  prologue  to  the  Poenulus,  "you  lacqueys  make  an 
onset  on  the  cookshops;  now,  while  there's  an  oppor 
tunity,  now  while  the  monogrammed  tarts  are  smoking 
hot,  hasten  there." 

The  tavern-keeper,  well  posted  in  every  detail,  knew 
the  secrets  of  every  customer  of  importance  who  patron 
ized  him — a  splendid  chance  for  blackmail  and  a  fruitful 
source  of  profit,  favor,  and  immunity.  Ammianus  Mar- 
cellinus  remarks  that  no  matter  how  haughty  the  pa 
trician  of  his  times  was  to  provincials  bearing  letters  of 
introduction,  no  matter  how  studied  his  insolence  to  those 
from  whom  he  had  nothing  to  gain,  whenever  he  met  at 
the  baths  with  any  of  the  ministers  of  his  pleasures,  he 
would  become  gentle  courtesy  itself  and  his  condescension 
was  not  that  of  noble  to  commoner  or  slave,  but  that  of 
friend  to  friend. 

"Close  the  doors  and  windows,"  says  Juvenal,  "ex 
tinguish  the  lights,  stop  up  all  the  cracks,  dismiss  all  the 
witnesses,  and  though  the  noises  of  the  neighborhood 
prevent  tilings  from  being  heard,  before  dawn,  before  the 
cock  crows  for  the  second  time,  the  tavern-keeper  will 
know  not  only  everything  that  was  said,  and  everything 
that  was  done;  and  not  he  alone,  the  cook,  and  the  staff 
of  the  establishment." 

Thanks  to  Plautus  and  Juvenal  we  have  been  able  to 


GREECE      &      ROME 197 

see  the  patrician  in  his  relationship  to  the  taverns  and 
inns,  we  have  also  followed  the  footsteps  of  other  less 
exalted  disciples  of  the  same  cult,  and  why  should  we 
manifest  astonishment,  when  even  the  emperors  set  them 
all  an  example?  But  we  shall  be  astonished  at  learning 
that  the  Roman  nobles,  not  content  with  merely  haunting 
the  taverns,  sometimes  turned  taverner  on  their  own 
account.  The  thing  is  so  strange,  and  the  Roman  pa 
trician  was  so  jealous  of  his  standing,  that  we  would  not 
believe  it  possible  were  it  not  for  the  testimony  of  such 
a  witness  as  Pliny: 

"In  the  ninth  year  of  the  reign  of  Tiberius,  the  eques 
trian  order  was  brought  together  into  a  single  organiza 
tion.  The  formulae  giving  the  right  to  wear  the  ring 
were  drawn  up,  in  the  consulship  of  C.  Asinius  Pollio 
and  C.  Antistius  Vetus,  in  the  year  of  Rome  775,  and,  a 
thing  very  remarkable,  an  instance  of  futility  caused  the 
change. 

"C.  Sulpitius  Galba,  seeking  to  conciliate  the  good 
graces  of  the  prince  by  decisions  of  a  young  man,  had 
established  penalties  for  the  infractions  to  which  tavern- 
keepers  were  liable.  He  complained  to  the  senate  of 
great  opposition  to  his  plans.  'The  proprietors  of  illegal 
establishments/  said  he,  *  evaded  these  penalties,  thanks 
to  their  rings.*  It  was  enacted  that  no  person  should  wear 
the  equestrian  ring,  whoever  he  might  be,  unless  his  father 
and  his  father's  father  before  him  had  been  free,  and  fur 
thermore,  unless  he  possessed  400,000  sesterces,  and  un 
less  he  could  be  admitted  to  sit  in  the  first  fourteen  rows 
of  the  theatre,  according  to  the  provisions  of  the  Julian 
Law.55  (Pliny,  Hist.  Nat.  Lib.  XXXHI,  ch.  8.) 

Such  legislation  would  have  been  futile  had  it  not 
been  fortified  with  other  measures  which  nullified  any 
possibility  of  a  tavern-keeper's  being  able  to  scale  the 
social  and  economic  ladder  and  rise  to  a  position  which 


198 THE      INNS      OF 

entitled  him  to  rank  with  the  patrician.  While  these 
measures  dealt  the  whole  innkeeping  class  a  severe  blow, 
they  were  by  no  means  prostrated;  and  though  the  lowly 
wine  seller  might  not  aspire  to  the  rank  of  a  knight,  the 
processes  of  economy  enabled  him  to  sate  his  ambitions 
along  other  lines:  his  vanity  made  him  ape  the  fads  and 
fashions  set  by  the  nobles,  and  his  wealth  placed  the  neces 
sary  means  in  his  hands.  The  most  outstanding  instance 
of  bigoted  arrogance,  yet  kind  hearted,  withal,  is  the 
character  of  Trimalchio.  Martial  in  several  of  his  epi 
grams  has  summed  this  situation  up  and  in  one, especially, 
he  has  left  us  nothing  to  be  desired: 

**  Cultured  Bononia,  a  cobbler  gave  you  an  exhibition, 
and  a  fuller  gave  one  to  Mutina.  Where,  now,  shall  the 
tavern-keeper  give  his?"  (Lib.  IH,  59.) 

In  Petronius  we  find  Norbanus  using  this  means  to 
political  affluence  and  position,  and  it  is  well  known  that 
Julius  Caesar  used  the  same  device  upon  an  unprece 
dented  scale  in  preparing  the  minds  of  the  people  to  take 
his  yoke  upon  their  necks. 

The  tavern-keepers  and  the  callings  allied  to  that  of 
innkeeping  were  prosperous,  as  a  rule,  as  they  tempered 
their  trust  to  the  necessities  of  a  given  situation;  where 
credit  would  do  them  good  they  sometimes  extended  it, 
where  failure  to  extend  credit  was  likely  to  procure  mine 
host  a  sound  drubbing,  he  was  liberal,  but  generally 
speaking  we  believe  the  attitude  of  Cleoereta,  the  laena 
in  Palutus's  Asinaria,  is  more  in  keeping  with  the  tenets 
of  the  past: 

"Daylight,  water,  the  sun,  the  moon,  the  night,  these 
things  I  purchase  not  with  money;  the  rest,  whatever 
we  wish  to  enjoy,  we  purchase  on  Grecian  trust.* 

"When  we  ask  bread  of  the  baker,  wine  from  the  wine 
shop,  if  they  receive  the  money  they  give  their  wares. 
*Cash  in  hand. 


GREECE      &      ROME 199 

The  same  principle  do  I  go  upon,  my  hands  always  Iiave 
eyes  in  them,  they  believe  what  they  see;  there's  an  old 
saying:  'Trust  is  good  for  nought/  you  know  whose  it  is, 
I  say  no  more/*  Act  I,  Scene  iii. 

There  was  great  profit  in  selling  wine:  Trimalchio 
remarked  that  he  had  laid  the  foundations  of  his  fortune 
by  a  lucky  speculation  in  wine  and  foodstuffs.  There 
was  also  a  fine  profit  in  selling  food  products  to  be  con 
sumed  where  sold:  although  the  landlord  had  the  right 
to  retail  all  sorts  of  vintages,  Falernian,  Caecubian, 
Setian,  his  real  profits  were  derived  from  the  sale  of  in 
ferior  products,  and  then,  as  always,  the  public  suffered 
as  a  consequence.  Adulteration,  artificial  fortifying, 
synthetic  ripening:  all  these  arts  were  generally  practised 
by  the  vintners  and  soon  brought  some  of  the  finest  wine 
producing  provinces  into  a  disrepute  which  they  little 
merited.  This  was  especially  true  with  certain  portions 
of  southern  France. 

As  far  as  the  innkeeper  went,  however*  the  beggars 
of  the  Porta  Trigemina  and  the  Velabrum  had  a  finer 
opportunity  to  taste  the  wretched  Laletanian  vintage  and 
get  from  its  cloudy  harshness  all  the  kick  that  could  be 
desired.  Martial,  who  must  have  known  this  wine  well, 
recommends  it  to  Sextilianus: 

"Sextilianus,  you  yourself  drink  as  much  as  five  rows 
of  benches;  you  could  get  drunk  drinking  as  much  water. 
Not  only  do  you  take  the  tokens  of  your  neighbors,  but 
you  ask,  also,  the  bronze  coins  of  those  farther  from  you. 
This  vintage  is  not  from  Pelignian  wine  presses  nor  was 
the  grape  juice  born  on  Tuscan  hillsides;  you  drain  dry 
a  jar  of  ancient  Opimian;  Massic  stores  furnished  the 
blackened  jars.  If  you  must  have  more  than  ten  drinks, 
Sextilianus,  go  and  get  cloudy  Laletanian  from  the  inn 
keeper/'  (Epigr.  Lib.  I,  27.) 

Tavern-keepers  were  so  accustomed  to  serving  base 


£00 THE      INNS      OF 

and  inferior  vintages  without  discussion,  and  without 
even  ascertaining  whether  the  customer  had  any  prefer 
ence  in  the  matter  of  drink,  that  when  some  guest  did 
demand  better  wine  it  was  the  cause  of  some  surprise  and 
sometimes  got  the  would-be  purchaser  into  difficulties. 
Mine  host  was  forward  to  require  an  explanation  of  such 
an  anomaly  on  the  part  of  some  slave  or  some  lowly 
commoner,  and  the  rumor  would  soon  filter  out  that  some 
lord  or  high  official  was  lodged  there  for  the  time  being. 
The  Roman  orator  Marcus  Antonius,  grandfather  of  the 
triumvir,  would  not  otherwise  have  been  dragged  from 
his  hiding-place  in  the  proscriptions  of  Marius.    And  so 
it  has  always  been:  the  insatiable  curiosity  of  a  tavern- 
keeper  and  the  gossipings  of  some  slaves  have  often  been 
the  causes  which  have  led  to  discovery  and  to  murder. 

Plutarch  has  related  the  episode  with  all  his  verve 
and  realism,  and  the  facts  speak  for  themselves  in  utter 
condemnation  of  the  baseness  of  the  tavern-keepers,  and 
their  addiction  to  delation;  their  malignant  espionage, 
and  their  perpetual  league  with  the  slaves  and  des 
peradoes: 

"Marcus  Antonius  the  orator,  though  he,  too,  found 
a  true  friend,  had  ill  fortune.  The  man  was  but  poor 
and  a  plebeian,  and  as  he  was  entertaining  a  man  of  great 
rank  in  Rome,  trying  to  provide  for  him  with  the  best  he 
could,  he  sent  his  servant  to  get  some  wine  of  a  neighbor 
ing  vintner.  The  servant,  carefully  tasting  it  and  bidding 
him  draw  better,  the  fellow  asked  him  what  was  the  mat 
ter,  that  he  did  not  buy  new  and  ordinary  wine  as  he 
used  to  do,  but  richer  and  of  a  greater  price;  he,  without 
any  design,  told  him,  as  his  old  friend  and  acquaintance, 
that  his  master  entertained  Marcus  Antonius,  who  was 
concealed  with  him.  The  villainous  vintner,  as  soon  as 
the  servant  was  gone,  went  himself  to  Marius,  then  at 
supper,  and  being  brought  into  his  presence,  told  him 


GREECE      &      ROME 201 

lie  would  deliver  Antonius  into  his  hands.  As  soon  as 
he  heard  it,  it  is  said  he  gave  a  great  shout,  and  clapped 
his  hands  for  joy,  and  had  very  nearly  risen  up  and  gone 
to  the  place  himself;  but  being  detained  by  his  friends, 
he  sent  Annius  and  some  soldiers  with  him,  and  com 
manded  him  to  bring  Antonius  *s  head  to  him  with  all 
speed.  When  they  came  to  the  house,  Annius  stayed 
at  the  door,  and  the  soldiers  went  upstairs  into  the  cham 
ber;  where,  seeing  Antonius,  they  endeavoured  to  shuffle 
off  the  murder  from  one  to  another;  for  so  great,  it  seems, 
were  the  graces  and  charms  of  his  oratory,  that  as  soon 
as  he  began  to  speak  and  beg  his  life,  none  of  them  durst 
touch  or  so  much  as  look  upon  him;  but  hanging  down 
their  heads,  every  one  fell  a  weeping.  "When  their  stay 
seemed  something  tedious,  Annius  came  up  himself  and 
found  Antonius  discoursing,  and  the  soldiers  astonished 
and  quite  softened  by  it,  and,  calling  them  cowards,  went 
himself  and  cut  off  his  head." 

The  strangest  thing  about  this  murder  is  that  the 
facts  as  elegantly  related  by  Plutarch  are  in  exact  agree 
ment  with  Voltaire's  relation  of  the  death  of  Coligny  in 
the  massacre  of  Saint  Bartholomew's  eve.  Stranger  still, 
the  manner  in  which  the  hiding  place  of  Antonius  was 
discovered  was  identical  with  that  of  General  Pichegru's 
betrayal — always  in  the  place  of  a  tavern-keeper  who 
may  or  may  not  be  involved  in  the  plot.  As  the  story 
of  Pichegru's  betrayal  is  an  excellent  commentary  upon 
that  of  Antonius  we  shall  introduce  it  here,  with  apologies 
to  Merim6e.  The  speaker  is  Madame  Leblane,  the  prin 
cipal  actress  in  the  affair  and  one  of  the  staff  of  the  theatre 
Clara  Gazul: 

"Ah,  Elisa,"  says  the  spy,  speaking  to  her  daughter, 
"in  affairs  such  as  these  nothing  can  be  neglected.  It 
was  by  means  of  a  roasted  chicken  that  I  was  enabled 
to  discover  the  hiding-place  of  General  Pichegru;  and 


202 


THE      INNS      OF 


without  boasting,  the  affair  did  me  great  honor,  to  say 
nothing  of  the  profit  it  provided.  Here  is  how  it  all 
came  about.  Your  father  was  alive  then,  Captain  Le- 
blanc.  He  had  returned  from  the  army;  he  had  wealth. 
We  had  a  good  time  of  it  and  lived  brilliantly.  One  day 
I  went  to  my  caterer  and  demanded  a  roasted  fowl  of 
him.  *My  God,  madame/  he  replied,  CI  am  greatly  dis 
tressed,  I  have  just  sold  my  last  one/  As  for  myself,  I 
knew  the  entire  quarter  and  I  wished  to  know  to  whom 
he  had  sold  it.  *  Who  got  it/ 1  demanded  of  him.  *  Such 
and  such  an  one/  he  replied,  *he  treats  himself  very 
well,  too,  and  every  day  for  the  past  three  days  he  has 
had  a  fowl  of  me  for  his  dinner/  Note  well  that  it  had 
been  just  three  days  since  we  had  lost  all  trace  of  General 
Pichegru.  I  turned  the  matter  over  and  over  in  my  head, 
and  I  said  to  myself,  'The  devil,  neighbor,  you  have  got 
an  appetite,  you  are  famishing/  Finally,  I  came  back 
the  next  day  and  purchased  some  partridges  which  were 
not  yet  cooked  done,  remarking  at  the  same  time  that 
I  would  send  my  scullion  for  them  when  they  were 
ready.  Then  my  man  of  the  great  appetite  entered  and 
bought  a  roasted  turkey,  and  a  fine  turkey  it  was,  too, 
take  my  word  for  it.  *Ah,*  said  I  to  him,  *what  a  thing, 
you  surely  have  a  great  appetite,  enough  for  two  persons 
for  a  week/  He  winked  his  eye  at  me  and  replied,  *  Yes, 
I  have  appetite  enough  for  two/  A  Frenchman  must 
always  make  the  best  of  an  opportunity  for  an  epigram, 
I  watched  him  with  both  eyes;  he  turned  away,  mounted 
his  horse,  and  set  off.  He  did  not  mislead  me  to  his 
advantage,  I  knew  that  he  knew  General  Pichegru.  My 
man  is  apprehended  and  he  surrenders  up  my  general 
with  right  good  will  as  an  honest  recompense,  and  I  for 
my  part,  six  thousand  francs*  worth  of  gratification/' 

Proof  positive  that  even  a  conspirator  should  have 
due  regard  to  the  finer  points  of  diet  and  that  one  should 


GREECE      &      ROME 203 

by  all  means  avoid  transgressing  the  proprieties  what 
ever  they  may  be  locally.  Eating  roast  fowl  or  drinking 
rare  wines  in  neighborhoods  in  which  such  luxuries  are 
not  common  articles  of  table  or  cellar  is  the  very  height 
of  stupidity* 

As  for  the  taverns  and  inns  of  classical  Rome,  we 
have  long  held  the  opinion  that  the  institutions  which 
resembled  them  most  strikingly,  were  the  cabarets  of 
papal  Rome,  and  we  have  the  evidence  of  William  Savage 
in  our  favor. 

"The  disposition  of  these  cabarets,"  says  he,  "is  uni 
form,  they  are  long  chambers  with  a  vaulted  ceiling,  a 
sort  of  shed  and  kitchen  combined. 

"Long  tables  are  found  here,  and  the  benches,  mere 
trestles,  evilly  constructed  and  crude  in  the  extreme, 
have  little  but  strength  to  recommend  them.  The  mas 
ter  of  the  place  is  seated  upon  a  kind  of  chair  or  on  a 
platform,  the  serving  boys  are  in  the  most  complete 
negligee,  the  walls  are  coarsely  painted,  some  bearing 
inscriptions  such  as  the  following: 

«  'QVANDO  QVESTO  GALLO  CANTARA,  AL- 
LORA,  CREDENZA  SI  FARA.' 

"  'When  that  cock  shall  crow  then  credit  will  be  given/ 
Above  the  inscription  is  a  rude  likeness  of  the  gallus 
gallinaceus  or  dunghill  cock,  and  the  emblem  is  surely 
the  very  pink  of  propriety;  a  pithy  commentary  upon 
the  honesty  of  the  host  and  the  trade  which  he  has 
gained." 

That  little  platform  on  which  the  host  is  seated  is 
but  a  repetition  of  the  older  one  on  which  the  bar-maid 
took  her  ease  and  the  trestles  or  benches  were  also 
copied  from  originals  more  ancient,  as  a  well  known  scene 
from  Pompeii  proves.  Martial  speaks  of  a  bench  ridden 
tavern  (seUariolae  popinae),  and  the  miserable  mural 
decoration  might  well  have  inspired  Phaedrus  to  excel 


204         THE      INNS      OF 

himself,  as  we  have  said  above.  Catullus  has  spoken  of 
writing  with  burnt  sticks  upon  the  walls  of  an  infamous 
tavern,  and  Juvenal  speaks  of  the  awnings  of  linen  in 
scribed  inscripta  lintea.  "When  Savage  speaks  of  the 
negligee  of  the  serving  boys  he  means  to  indicate  a  pic 
ture  such  as  Nero  must  have  made  when  harping  in  a 
pair  of  drawers.  The  resemblance  between  the  two 
institutions  so  widely  separated  in  point  of  time  is  strik 
ingly  close  in  every  detail. 

A  little  further  on,  Savage  speaks  of  the  signs  of  the 
merchants  and  says:  "Brandy  and  wines  sell  themselves 
without  any  sign/'  and  this  was  generally  the  case  in  the 
ancient  world  as  well.  Publilius  Syrus,  the  mime,  has 
preserved  in  his  Sententiae  one  ancient  proverb  which 
does  justice  both  to  the  situation  and  to  human  nature: 

"Vino  vendibili  suspensa  hedera  non  opus  est"  (a  wine 
good  enough  to  be  sold  needs  no  garland  of  ivy  to  garnish 
it),  which  is  the  same  as  the  ancient  French,  bon  vin 
point  d'enseign  and  the  biblical,  a  good  wine  needs  no 
bush*  In  connection  with  the  term  hedera  (ivy)  it  should 
be  remarked  that  a  tendril  of  ivy  was  an  attribute 
of  Dionysus,  even  as  the  bush  became  traditional  with 
our  own  cabarets  and  taverns.  Many  a  vintner  dis 
pensed  with  such  a  sign  because  of  the  truth  of  the 
proverb,  deeming  a  sign  almost  a  confession  of  selling 
inferior  vintages.  The  ivy,  however,  sacred  to  the  god, 
was  often  used  either  as  it  was  brought  in  or  else  in  the 
form  of  a  painting  over  the  door.  Sometimes  we  find 
bas-reliefs  in  which  the  ivy  is  the  motif.  A  vintner's 
establishment  was  found  at  Pompeii:  it  had  a  very 
poorly  executed  sign  on  which  were  depicted  two  men, 
probably  slaves  of  the  establishment,  clad  in  drawers, 
carrying  an  oblong  amphora  which  hangs  by  a  thong 
from  the  middle  of  a  long  pinga  pole  the  ends  of  which 
are  supported  upon  the  shoulders  of  the  two  slaves. 


GREECE      &      HO ME  205 


CHAPTER  XIV. 

Display  of  foods  in  restaurants — Profuse  in  their  use  of  garlic — 
Kitchen  utensils — A  Roman  plebe — All  night  taverns — Romans  fond 
of  mellow  wines  and  sweetened  liquors — "A  hot  drink's  as  good  as  an 
overcoat" — Hot  water  drinks  become  popular — The  murrhine  vase — 
Refrigeration — Snow  and  ice — An  Athenian  debauch — Age  of  glut 
tony — Cooks  and  scullions. 

The  restaurants  often  displayed  their  wares  in  the 
manner  in  which  ours  do  today.  Seneca  uses  the  term 
oculiferium  in  that  sense.  Here  they  laid  out  the  finest 
samples  of  their  wares  to  catch  the  eyes  and  stimulate 
trade.  Eggs,  goose  liver  pat£s,  sow  vulvas,  fowls,  game, 
and  the  like,  and  they  practised  a  refinement  which  is 
not  appreciated  amongst  us,  in  that  their  samples  were 
sometimes  put  together  in  a  glass  vase  full  of  clear  water 
or  other  crystal  menstruum.  The  optical  effect,  as  it  was 
tortured  by  magnification  or  diminution,  was  sometimes 
startling  to  say  the  least,  and  Macrobius  has  devoted 
some  little  space  and  trouble  to  explain  the  various 
illusions  and  effects  thus  produced.  We  come  at  last  to 
the  quarters  where  foods,  more  or  less  fresh,  were  on 
display.  It  may  be  a  goat,  and  the  customer  would  be 
asked  to  believe  that  the  poor  beast  had  browsed  in  a 
pasture  of  myrtle  and  eucalyptus  leaves,  and  was  satu 
rated  with  that  relish  because  the  bleeding  cuts  of  meat 
are  skewered  with  a  branch  of  that  wood,  even  as  today 
some  of  the  rural  butchers  in  France,  and  in  modern 
Greece  as  well,  adorn  with  laurel  some  meat  of  dark 
and  doubtful  ancestry,  and  retail  it  to  their  credulous 
customers  as  the  finest  delicacy.  Hence,  in  Greece,  at 
least,  it  is  always  well  to  insist  that  the  butcher  produce 
the  hide  and  hair  of  the  animal  in  question,  and  thus 
save  future  complications  and  dietetic  regurgitations. 


206 THE      INNS      OF 

Bits  of  pork  and  cheese  are  also  displayed  by  the 
Roman  eating-house  keepers,  even  as  was  the  case  with 
Philemon  and  Baucis,  and  in  the  Moretum  of  Virgil. 

"Quarters  of  pork  (hams)  salted  and  drying  hang 
above  the  hearth,  a  rounded  cheese  with  a  blade  of 
esparto  grass  run  through  its  centre  hangs  suspended 
from  the  rafters  and  with  it  a  bundle  of  fennel,  well 
tied,"  and  we  may  add  to  this  little  picture  the  scene 
from  Petronius  in  which  Oenothea  mounts  upon  the 
rotten  stool  to  take  down  a  piece  of  dried  hog's  cheek, 
scored  by  a  thousand  slashes  of  a  knife  proverbially  dull, 
a  commodity  coaeval  with  herself* 

However,  let  us  pass  by  the  display  at  the  doors  of 
the  restaurant  and  enter  the  interior  where  we  shall 
probably  find  little  in  keeping  with  the  display  outside. 

"No  regard  should  be  paid  to  such  displays,"  re 
marks  Seneca,  "mere  bait  thrown  to  the  buyer  who 
enters  the  place  but  once  before  he  finds  that  the  mer 
chandise  offered  by  the  establishment  is  not  at  all  in 
keeping  with  the  samples  hanging  from  above  the  doors." 

A  glutton  might  have  been  well  satisfied  to  have 
dined  upon  what  was  shown  outside,  but  only  a  slave 
or  some  poverty  stricken  artisan  would  have  been  tempted 
by  what  was  served  inside — an  excellent  commentary 
upon  the  character  and  commercial  honesty  of  the  exhibi 
tionists.  Everything  to  put  up  a  front — show  without 
substance.  The  kitchens  of  these  restaurants  were,  of 
course,  under  the  supervision  of  slaves,  and  the  menu 
was  neither  delicate  nor  various.  They  served,  for 
example,  lupines  for  the  Greek  cynics,  a  variety  of  coarse 
peas  which  were  boiled  in  a  great  quantity  of  water,  the 
resultant  mess  being  an  agglutinous  substance  of  so 
peculiar  a  consistency  that  the  patron  might  have  been 
equally  correct  in  his  table  technique  whether  he  drank 
it  or  whether  he  ate  it.  They  also  had  deer  (chick-peas), 


GREECE      &      ROME 207 

a  variety  of  vegetable  sold  either  in  porridge  or  fried. 
These  latter  were  held  in  great  esteem  by  the  commoners, 
and  candidates  for  the  higher  political  offices  frequently 
served  them  on  the  streets,  hoping  thereby  to  influence 
the  political  destinies  of  their  parties.  It  is  probable 
that  from  this  custom  we  have  derived  that  villainous 
delicacy  known  as  the  campaign  cigar,  which,  but  for 
the  smell  when  ignited,  might  have  been  mistaken  for 
tobacco.  Such  services  in  old  Rome  were  often  provoc 
ative  of  more  black  eyes  than  votes.  The  small  peddlers 
sold  chick-peas  under  the  arcades  and  porticoes  and  at 
the  games,  as  ours  today  sell  popcorn  and  peanuts. 
Horace  mentions  a  fellow  who  devoured  chick-peas  and 
nuts  during  a  performance  at  the  theatre.  The  customer 
in  the  eating-house  need  not  confine  himself  to  the  humble 
chick-pea,  however,  he  could  have  a  plate  of  beans  served 
in  their  pods,  raw  cabbage,  or  even  worse,  cabbage  which 
had  been  cooked  twice  (crambe  recoctd)  or  (repetita), 
plenty  of  raw  vegetables  reeking  with  vinegar,  and,  on 
days  of  splendid  extravagance,  he  might  even  establish 
contact  with  a  boiled  sheep's  head.  Delicacies  such  as 
these,  as  Juvenal  has  informed  us,  were  consumed  in  the 
riotous  company  of  cobblers,  hog  reeves,  and  the  like, 
characters  of  the  sort  to  round  out  the  society  of  the 
place  and  give  it  the  spice  of  infinite  variety.  Sometimes 
there  were  beets,  the  unsavory  tang  of  which  had  to  be 
tempered  with  a  sauce  made  from  pepper  and  wine: 

"To  give  the  flavor  to  the  wallowisli  beets,  the  food 
of  artisans,  the  cook  always  asks  for  wine  and  pepper." 
Martial  Epigr.  Lib.  XHI,  13. 

Everything  was  highly  seasoned,  and  rare  indeed  was 
the  occasion  when  one  would  not  almost  have  gagged 
himself  with  garlic  and  onions  or  some  other  garnish  of 
an  acid  or  peppery  savor;  some  used  asafoetida  to  fortify 
their  meats,  but  all  were  profuse  in  their  use  of  sauces. 


208      THE      INNS      OF 

Everything  was  prepared  by  the  cook,  the  master 
of  the  house,  his  woman,  or  by  a  special  servant  known 
as  the  focaria  (from  /oca,  a  hearth),  as  the  Digest  in 
forms  us*  A  kitchen  furnace,  set  up  against  one  of  the 
walls  of  the  establishment,  served  the  purposes  of  a 
modern  range,  while  four  great  vases  or  urns  of  baked 
clay  were  mortised  into  a  space  behind  the  table  which 
formed  the  front.  They  contained  the  cold  foods  pre 
pared  in  advance  and  kept  for  any  and  all  occasions. 
Behind  the  furnace,  where  the  focaria  labored  at  her 
tasks,  were  a  series  of  stone  or  marble  steps  or  terraces, 
three  in  number:  on  these  steps  were  ranged  the  vases 
and  measures  used  in  the  inn.  The  Digest  contains  a 
list  of  these  vessels  in  which  are  found  the  following: 

Calices,  round  cups,  ancones,  vases  shaped  like  a 
cone,  trullae,  ladles  or  scoops,  the  sextaria  were  vessels 
which  contained  the  sixth  part  of  a  congeum;  Plautus 
refers  to  them  in  the  Pounulus. 

There  were  two  back  stalls  in  the  establishment  un 
covered  at  Pompeii.  Mazois  has  made  an  exhaustive 
study  of  it  and  we  avail  ourselves  of  his  labors  and 
scholarship.  It  is  possible  that  these  rooms  were  de 
signed  for  vessels  too  huge  to  keep  in  the  front,  such, 
for  instance,  as  the  dolia,  congiaria,  and  the  like;  diners 
were  served  there  at  two  asses  per  capita,  and  all  the 
idlers  loafing  about  the  establishment  and  rendering  the 
proprietor  an  allegiance  almost  feudal  had  their  reward 
of  virtue  in  sitting  down  to  table,  welcoming  the  end  of 
a  perfect  day,  and  spending  a  night  in  watching  the 
posturings  of  a  demi  monde  demi  blonde  dancer,  some 
times  to  the  harp,  sometimes  to  the  flute,  or  indulge 
their  imaginations  with  obscene  stories  and  puns.  In 
the  age  of  Ammianus  Marcellinus  (A.  D.  360  circa), 
the  cabaret  was  almost  the  only  pastime  of  the  pro 
letariat  at  Rome.  "The  populace,"  says  he,  "had  no 


GREECE      &      ROME 209 

other  shelter  at  night  than  that  of  the  taverns,  or  the 
awnings  stretched  before  the  theatres;  they  gambled 
furiously  with  dice  and  made  filthy  noises  with  their 
nostrils." 

Let  us  conjure  a  picture  of  a  Roman  plebe  out  of  the 
mists  of  the  past;  let  us  strip  him  of  the  glamour  with 
which  legend  has  invested  him  and  see  him  as  he  actually 
was:  he  spent  his  nights  on  the  wet  straw  of  the  Vela- 
brum,  or  in  the  Esquiline  or  the  Suburra,  and  when 
morning  dawned,  he  came  shambling  along  to  the  stone 
benches  at  the  gate,  to  shake  off  his  dull  torpor  along 
with  his  vermin.  The  heat  in  the  inns  and  lodging- 
houses  was  suffocating,  and  more  comfort  was  to  be  had 
in  the  streets;  the  plebe  was  insufferably  filthy  in  spite 
of  the  magnificent  baths:  here  you  see  an  exemplar  of 
the  rulers  of  the  world!  What  then  must  have  been  the 
pot-houses  which  they  frequented?  The  answer  is  easy: 
they  swarmed  with  flies  and  mosquitoes,  kept  in  motion 
by  branches  of  laurel  or  palm,  but  the  worst  plague  seems 
to  have  been  the  fleas.  The  gentle  and  soft  spoken  Pliny 
says,  with  becoming  euphemism,  "the  insects  jumping 
so  during  the  summer,  rendered  the  taverns  unendur 
able,"  and  of  course  he  refers  to  the  flea.  Still,  Pliny 
would  never  have  entered  such  sanctuaries  as  those  that 
shielded  the  proletariat.  There  were  also  "all  night 
taverns  "  which  Juvenal  designated  by  the  term  pervigiles. 
We  must  remember  that  the  ancient  cities  were  unlighted 
by  night,  and  their  streets  were  generally  narrower  than 
civic  pride  of  today  would  countenance:  the  satirist  counts 
the  doors  of  these  all  night  taverns,  the  lights  of  which  cut 
into  the  murk  and  bloom  of  the  outside  like  a  friendly 
beacon  on  a  rocky  lee  shore.  Their  watchful  windows 
saw  everything  that  passed  in  the  night,  some  unwary  and 
unsuspicious  loiterer  saluted  with  chambered  bile  from 
a  second  or  third  story  window;  it  is  like  the  old  times  in 


210 THE      INNS      OF 

Edinburgh  when  garde  lieu  was  the  password  to  dry 
immunity.  Did  Strap  find  it  so,  or  had  Smollett  read 
Juvenal's  third  satire?  The  taverns  were  always  fur 
nished  with  substantial  shutters,  as  were  also  the  other 
shops  at  Rome;  features  which  are  still  characteristic 
of  all  the  native  shops  in  romantic  countries  and  their 
colonies-  By  means  of  these  heavy  shutters  the  owner 
could  make  himself  and  his  reasonably  secure  against 
the  night  and  the  menaces  it  held  over  him.  The  doors 
were  exceedingly  heavy  and  were  fastened  by  means  of  a 
system  of  chains  and  bolts:  a  small  trap-door  served  as 
a  peep-hole.  Juvenal  has  described  these  fastenings  in 
his  third  satire: 

And  all  is  silent 

When  the  grating  chains  have  clanked  into  place 
And  the  tavern  is  closed. 

Mazois,  however,  after  an  exhaustive  study  of  the 
Pompeian  inn  of  which  we  have  already  spoken,  is  far 
more  minute  in  his  descriptions:  "The  gate  of  the  place," 
says  he,  "was  made  fast  in  a  manner  very  like  that  in 
which  the  storehouses  at  Paris  are  secured:  by  means  of 
a  groove  in  the  threshold  of  the  door  and  of  another 
complementaiy  to  it  in  the  lintel  of  wood,  they  intro 
duced  bars  whose  ends  glided  at  once  into  these  two 
grooves;  a  wooden  bar  was  then  placed  behind  the  other 
bars  to  hold  them  immobile;  and  lastly,  as  the  door 
turned  upon  a  pivot,  fastened  itself  in  that  manner  and 
closed  the  opening  into  the  place/* 

There  were  certain  police  regulations  which  forbade 
the  taverns  to  remain  open  before  certain  hours  or  after 
a  specified  hour.  Ammianus  Marcellinus  cites  one  such 
order  issued  by  Ampelius,  praefect  of  the  city:  in  this 
instrument,  the  tavern-keepers  are  ordered  not  to  open 
their  places  before  the  fourth  hour. 


GREECE      &      ROME 211 

On  days  of  religious  feasts,  joyous  festivals,  or  occa 
sions  of  public  mourning,  the  taverns  were  compelled  to 
remain  closed.  We  know  of  few  particular  instances  in 
which  this  was  the  case;  we  do  not  know  the  precise 
terms  in  which  such  injunctions  were  couched,  but  we 
do  know  that  upon  the  occasion  of  an  emperor's  death, 
or  that  of  any  member  of  his  family,  these  injunctions 
were  especially  severe  and  those  who  evaded  this  rescrip- 
tion  were  sometimes  punished  with  death  for  their  pains. 
Cassius  Dio,  the  malignant  historian  of  the  senatorial 
order,  has  informed  us  that  Caligula  thus  rewarded  the 
supplications  of  a  poor  devil  who  had  kept  a  hot  drink 
emporium  open  on  the  day  set  aside  for  the  funeral  of 
the  emperor's  sister.  The  police  made  no  distinctions 
between  the  tavern-keeper  and  the  keeper  of  a  ther- 
mopolium  or  hot  water  establishment.  The  regulation  of 
Ampelius  makes  not  the  slightest  distinction  between 
them,  and  the  restrictions  which  bound  the  tavern- 
keeper  were  no  less  binding  upon  the  hot  water  seller; 
neither  could  open  before  the  fourth  hour. 

The  thermopolia  which  we  have  already  seen  estab 
lished  in  Athens  came  to  Rome  along  with  the  rest  of 
the  Greek  world  and  when  they  came  they  also  brought 
their  own  particular  customs  and  usages.  Their  pro 
prietors  conducted  a  sort  of  acid  drink  emporium,  they 
might,  in  fact,  almost  be  called  lemonade  sellers,  sellers 
of  decoctions  of  liquorice  or  other  sweet  flavors,  and  it 
is  highly  probable  that  there  was  a  special  local  name 
for  each  class  of  drinks  and  for  the  establishment  in 
which  they  were  sold.  A  painting  in  color  at  Pompeii 
represents  one  of  these  drinks  and  it  is  distinctly  yellow 
ish  in  color. 

The  Romans  were  always  fond  of  mellow  wines,  and 
also  of  other  sweetened  liquors,  some  of  which  were  dis 
tilled.  From  the  beginning  they  were  favorably  disposed 


THE      INNS      OF 


towards  thermopolia.  In  the  time  of  Plautus  such 
establishments  were  heavily  patronized,  not  only  by 
philosophers  but  also  by  all  sorts  and  conditions  of 
society.  Nearly  every  character  in  the  old  dramatist 
may  be  said  to  have  been  at  some  time  or  other  a  guest 
of  one  of  the  thermopolia.  In  the  Rudens,  for  instance, 
he  makes  one  of  his  heroes,  still  dripping  from  ship 
wreck,  say:  "By  Castor,  but  Neptune  is  a  bather  of  the 
coldest.  It's  certain  he  had  no  hand  in  inventing  thermo 
polia  because  his  drinks  are  salty  and  cold  as  ice/* 

In  the  Pseudolus,  a  glutton  cries  out:  "In  drinking, 
there  is  so  much  spiced  wine,  so  much  boiled  wine,  so 
much  must  and  hydromel  that  I  commence  to  make  an 
out  and  out  thermopolium  of  my  stomach/* 

And  in  the  Three  Penny  Bit  (Trinummus)  another, 
after  having  swilled  the  same  beverages  to  excess,  re 
marks:  "You  have  made  a  thermopolium  of  my  gullet 
(thermopotasti  guttur)  .** 

These  passages  should  suffice  to  show  how  the  stalls 
of  the  venders  of  hot  drinks  were  patronized,  but  in 
addition  we  may  also  cite  one  from  the  Cena  Trimal- 
chionis:  "A  hot  drink's  as  good  as  an  overcoat/*  The 
wines  were  often  toned  down  with  honey,  perfumed  with 
myrrh  and  spices,  or  fortified  with  some  feebly  acidulous 
excipient,  as,  for  instance,  the  flavor  of  cedar,  so  much 
in  favor  in  the  France  and  Italy  of  the  seventeenth  cen 
tury.  The  lemonades  still  to  be  had  in  Naples,  efferves 
cent  or  flat,  were  also  to  be  obtained  in  the  ancient 
thermopolia.  While  such  beverages  are  not  specifically 
mentioned  by  the  classical  authors,  there  are  passages 
in  Pliny  and  Martial  which  furnish  inferential  evidence 
that  they  were  sold,  and  we  possess  one  bit  of  evidence 
which  is  beyond  challenge:  the  traces  of  liquor  remain 
ing  on  the  stone  steps  and  in  the  vases  in  a  hot  drink 
emporium  uncovered  at  Pompeii.  Mazois  speaks  thus  : 


GREECE      &      ROME £13 

"Just  within  the  great  gate  of  the  building  where 
the  traces  of  the  vessels  still  remain  upon  the  marble  of  the 
counter,  and  the  steps  upon  which  rested  the  measures; 
here  we  have  evidence  as  to  the  real  nature  of  the  bever 
ages  sold.  In  bringing  the  services  of  chemistry  to  our 
aid  our  doubts  have  been  resolved.  Such  analysis  points 
to  acidulous  drinks.  At  the  door  of  the  thermopolium 
are  two  benches  exposed  to  the  noonday  sun  to  offer  a 
comfortable  loafing  place  in  winter  to  the  frequenters  of 
the  stall." 

The  innovation  of  hot  water  drinks  had  not  been 
long  introduced  in  Rome  before  it  became  very  popular 
with  both  patrician  and  plebe.  The  patrician  affected 
to  perfume  his  drink  with  spices,  such  as  myrrh,  cinna 
mon,  saffron,  and  the  like,  and  a  very  curious  passage  in 
Lucan's  Pharsalia  speaks  of  the  jets  of  such  perfumes 
(saffron),  which  spurted  out  and  perfumed  not  only  the 
air  but  also  the  breath  of  the  theatre  patrons.  The 
patrician  wanted  his  water  hot,  and,  though  he  did  not, 
and  would  not,  demean  himself  by  drinking  from  vessels 
other  than  the  most  expensive  and  beautiful,  the  com 
moner  contented  himself  with  the  kernel  of  the  matter 
by  having  recourse  to  common  clay.  The  patrician  had 
a  decided  preference  for  artificially  cooled  beverages  and 
made  use  of  snow  for  refrigerating  purposes.  There  is 
a  supposition  that  the  rarest  of  these  vases,  I  refer  to 
the  murrhine,  which  Petronius  Arbiter  is  said  to  have 
smashed  to  prevent  its  falling  into  the  hands  of  Nero 
after  its  owner's  suicide,  had,  within  itself,  the  property 
of  communicating  some  exquisite  essence  to  whatever 
decoction  was  being  digested  in  its  opalescent  depths, 
and  some  are  of  the  opinion  that  there  is  a  connection 
between  the  myrrh  of  antiquity  and  the  properties  said 
to  have  been  inherent  in  this  vase.  There  seems  to  be 
little  doubt  that  the  vase  derived  its  name  from  the 


214 THE      INNS      OF 

myrrh  of  antiquity.  It  is  composed  of  three  huge 
sections  of  opal:  the  first  forms  the  cup,  the  second 
the  stem  and  the  third  the  base.  The  cup  is  about  nine 
and  one-half  inches  high  and  about  six  inches  in  diam 
eter  at  its  greatest  measurement.  An.  exquisitely  carved 
swan's  head  dips  into  the  bowl,  a  lovely  allegorical  allu 
sion,  and  the  bottom  is  chased  with  geometrical  designs 
perfect  throughout.  The  Prince  of  Biscari  has  written 
a  monograph  on  the  cup,  which  merits  the  study  of  all 
experts  in  porcelains  and  vessels.  If  we  are  safe  in 
assuming  that  this  exemplar  is  in  fact  genuine,  the  long 
mooted  question  of  murrhine  vases  may  be  regarded  as 
settled:  they  were  of  opal,  and  not  of  sardonyx  or  chal 
cedony,  and  they  may  have  been  steeped  for  years  in 
tincture  of  myrrh  to  give  them  the  exquisite  qualities 
with  which  tradition  has  endowed  them.  In  bringing  this 
brief  dissertation  on  murrhine  vases  to  a  close,  I  should 
add  that  the  base  of  the  exemplar  described  is  about 
four  inches  in  diameter,  the  stem  about  two  and  one- 
half  inches  in  length,  and  the  greatest  diameter  of  the 
stem  is  about  one  and  one-quarter  inches. 

Nor  should  we  omit  mentioning  the  liot  drinks  which 
were  served  in  the  thermopolia  at  Rome  as  well  as  at 
Athens,  drinks  which  derived  their  names  from  Hellas. 
This  was  one  of  the  first  indications  of  their  commerce 
and  its  scope.  This  hot  drink  service  had  not  been  long 
introduced  at  Rome  before  it  had  become  as  popular  with 
the  patrician  as  with  the  plebeian.  The  nobleman 
affected  to  perfume  his  posset  with  spices  such  as  myrrh, 
cinnamon,  saffron,  and  the  like,  and  two  very  interesting 
passages  attest  the  importance  which  had  come  to  be 
accorded  these  adventitious  excipients.  Lucan  in  his 
Pharasalia  speaks  of  the  jets  of  saffron  which  spurted 
from  devices  in  the  theatres  and  perfumed  the  foyer  and 
the  breath  of  the  patrons  of  the  establishment,  and 


THE  HOSTESS  op 


GREECE      &      ROME 215 

Petronius  speaks  of  cinnamon  as  having  displaced 
essences  far  more  worthy,  if  a  trifle  more  domestic.  The 
patrician  wanted  his  water  hot  and  he  rarely  demeaned 
his  dignity  by  drinking  from  vessels  other  than  the  most 
costly,  whereas  the  commoner  had  to  content  his  inclin 
ations  with  mugs  of  clay  baked  to  the  hardness  of  tile* 
The  wealthy  also  had  a  decided  preference  for  cool  bever 
ages  and  used  snow  for  refrigerating  purposes.  Huge 
pits  were  dug  and  the  snow  was  stored  up  against  the 
arrival  of  the  hot  season.  A  Roman,  to  get  the  right 
temperature,  would  mix  very  hot  and  very  cold  liquids,  in 
accordance  with  Greek  usage,  and  he  imagined  that  by 
this  technique,  he  was  enabled  to  get  the  finest  and 
subtlest  tang  which  could  be  extracted.  Aristaenetus  has 
elegantly  described  the  practice  which,  to  modern  tastes, 
would  seem  to  be  unhygienic,  to  say  the  least. 

Ice  or  snow  was  heaped  up  upon  the  tables  beside  the 
steaming  drinks,  and  Pliny  the  Elder,  in  one  of  those 
phrases  of  ostentatious  antithesis  which  he  loves  to  use, 
remarks,  with  epigrammatic  force:  "Snow  they  drink 
as  well  as  ice,  and  their  voluptuousness  imposes  a  punish 
ment  upon  mountains/*  Seneca,  in  his  Questiones  Natu- 
rales,  speaks  in  the  same  manner  and  to  the  same  purpose* 
"See  them,  they  are  feeble,  wrapped  up  in  their  mantles, 
sitting  in  the  hall,  pale  and  sick,  not  only  drinking  the 
snow,  but  eating  it  as  well,  and  throwing  the  lumps  out  of 
their  cups  when  they  can  drink  no  more." 

With  such  a  demand  it  was  but  natural  that  there 
should  arise  at  Rome  a  retail  trade  in  refrigerants.  They 
had  an  excellent  example  on  which  to  go,  if  we  are  to 
believe  Athenaeus. 

"  Charles  of  Mitylene,  in  his  History  of  Alexander,  has 
told  us  how  we  are  to  proceed  in  order  to  keep  snow,  when 
he  is  relating  the  siege  of  the  Indian  city  of  Petra.  For 
he  says  that  Alexander  dug  thirty  large  trenches  dose  to 


216     THE      INNS      OF 

one  another,  and  filled  them  with  snow,  and  then  he 
heaped  on  the  snow  branches  of  oak;  for  in  that  way  snow 
would  last  a  long  time."  (Lib.  iii,  97.) 

A  passage  in  Seneca  also  deals  with  the  early  history 
of  refrigeration  and  refrigerants:  "The  Lacedaemo 
nians,"  says  he,  "hunted  down  the  perfumers  and  ordered 
them  to  quit  their  territories  without  delay,  because  they 
had  spoiled  the  oils,  they  who  had  operated  these  store 
houses,  these  snow  depots,  these  beasts  of  burden  em 
ployed  to  transport  the  aqueous  blocks  whose  savor  and 
color  suffered  from  the  straw  that  covered  them !  So  easy 
it  is  to  assuage  the  thirst  of  health!*5 

There  is  little  doubt  that  the  wealthy  had  their  icemen 
and  their  dealers  in  fresh  sea  foods  who  insured  the  quality 
of  the  product  sold,  and  we  ought  not  to  be  astonished 
that  refrigeration  had  come  to  play  an  important  part  in 
domestic  life  when  we  reflect  that  rare  fish  were  trans 
ported  immense  distances  in  the  water  of  their  native 
haunts  and  arrived  at  the  table  alive  and  in  perfect  con 
dition*  What  applied  to  the  establishments  of  the 
wealthy  would  also  perforce  apply  to  the  sumptuous 
dining-rooms  which  they  frequented,  and  if  we  find  scanty 
mention  of  such  refinements  in  the  inns  and  taverns  it  is 
to  be  attributed  to  the  haughty  exclusiveness  of  the 
patrician  class  that  entertained  its  cronies  and  the  in 
struments  of  its  pleasure  and  lubricity  in  its  own  sump 
tuous  establishments  where  there  were  no  ten  command 
ments  and  where  the  most  voracious  thirst  could  and 
would  be  quenched  temporarily  by  complete  coma,  an 
utter  disgust  for  food  and  wine,  a  feeling  that  included 
women,  and  life  itself.  When  a  parvenu  such  as  we 
have  in  mind  uses  his  peacock  feather  to  permit  further 
exercise  of  the  sense  of  taste  it  is  either  at  home  or  in  the 
house  of  a  friend  or  host. 

Let  us  examine  a  portrait  of  the  indulgence  of  a  great 


GREECE      &      ROME 217 

noble,  which  Lycon  has  drawn  for  posterity.  Our 
Athenian,  as  was  the  case  with  many  of  the  senators  at 
Rome,  was  what  we  would  call  in  modern  times  a  solitary 
drinker,  although  he  frequently  debauched  himself  in 
company.  He  would  totter,  from  the  chamber  where  he 
slept  to  the  chamber  where  he  drank,  and  back  again* 
To  have  gone  to  a  cabaret  would  have  been  wearisome 
and  a  disgrace.  He  spared  himself  the  trouble  of  coming 
home,  and  by  so  doing,  saved  his  vanity  from  the  con 
tempt  and  the  grins  of  the  populace  as  well. 

** Stupefied  by  excesses,"  says  Lycon,  "the  dreamer 
slowly  awakens  from  the  torpor  which  indigestion  and  the 
incontinence  of  his  waking  hours  have  prolonged  until 
noon;  his  eyes  puffed  with  wine,  clouded  with  humors,  are 
scarcely  able  to  endure  the  light  of  day  for  some  little 
time  after  his  discomfort  has  aroused  him.  He  is  sensible 
of  extreme  f aintness  as  though  his  veins  contained  wine 
instead  of  blood,  and  he  finds  it  beyond  his  power  to  lift 
himself  up  without  support.  At  last,  leaning  upon  two 
slaves,  faint  as  though  worn  out  by  his  slumber,  he  dons 
a  simple  tunic  without  an  outer  robe;  clad  in  slippers  as 
though  just  getting  out  of  bed,  his  head  wrapped  up  to 
protect  hi™  from  the  cold,  his  neck  stooped,  knees  weak, 
color  pale,  he  sets  his  yawning  course  from  the  bed 
chamber  to  the  hall  in  which  he  will  recline  to  banquet 
his  friends  and  drink  with  them;  there  he  will  find  certain 
convivial  familiars  of  whom  he  is  the  chief,  and  who  are 
animated  by  the  same  passions  that  move  him.  He 
hastens  to  expel  by  drinking  some  of  the  collywobbles 
with  which  his  black  melancholy  has  been  deepened  and 
embittered;  he  strives  to  regain  a  little  of  the  animation 
and  spirit  of  the  rest,  provoking  them  to  drink  and  mock 
ing  their  lack  of  capacity,  believing  that  as  much  credit 
is  to  be  had  from  such  an  engagement  as  from  one  on  the 
field  of  battle.  Time  makes  no  account  of  drinking,  it 


218  THE      INNS      OF 

comes  and  it  goes,  the  fumes  of  the  wine  obscure  all  eyes 
and  sets  them  all  to  weeping;  every  guest  is  drunk,  recog 
nizing  neither  himself  nor  anyone  else;  without  the  slight 
est  cause  one  gets  into  an  altercation  with  his  neighbor, 
another  would  sleep  but  is  forced  to  remain  awake,  a 
third,  'even  as  was  the  case  with  the  heroes  of  Petronius/ 
attempts  to  make  his  escape  and  evade  his  troubles  and 
his  tormentors  only  to  be  brought  back  by  the  porter  who 
has  prevented  him  from  leaving.  By  and  by,  another  is 
ignominiously  thrown  out  of  doors;  he  totters,  but  his 
slave  catches  him  and  leads  him  off,  and  as  he  staggers 
along,  he  lets  his  cloak  fall  into  the  mud  of  the  street.  At 
last,  our  guttler  is  left  alone  in  the  room,  monarch  of  all 
he  surveys,  nor  does  he  quit  the  cup  until  he  falls  asleep 
with  it  in  his  hand  or  at  his  mouth,  then  weaving  drunk- 
enly,  he  has  escaped  from  himself,  and  is  asleep/* 

Vastly  different,  this  illustrious  glutton  who  debases 
himself  in  secret  orgies,  from  the  man  of  the  people, 
whether  at  Rome  or  elsewhere.  The  politician,  if  he 
indulged  himself  at  all,  would  do  so  in  the  taverns  and 
inns,  where  he  could  cater  to  publicity  by  treating*  There 
his  wit  and  good  nature  would  have  free  scope,  his  delight 
lay  in  numbers,  he  is  a  past  master  at  putting  indigence 
at  ease  and  winning  the  confidence  of  the  out-at-elbow 
rabble;  blustering  and  roistering  fit  well  into  his  designs 
and  further  his  interests.  Such  a  politician  would  hold 
his  daily  banquets  in  the  popinae,  on  the  occasion  of  a  law 
suit,  an  election,  and  the  like,  to  the  accompaniment  of 
the  thousand  noises  of  the  Forum.  At  night  he  might 
indulge  in  one  of  the  nympheae,  in  the  name  of  the 
republic  or  the  emperor,  and  lastly,  on  those  occasions 
when  the  members  of  a  century  came  together  at  table 
the  scene  was  usually  laid  in  one  of  the  fine  and  sumptuous 
public  halls  set  aside  for  the  purpose.  There  he  could 
comfort  his  poverty  by  a  brief  sojourn  amid  scenes  of 


GREECE      &      ROME 219 

decorative  splendor,  a  willing  worshiper  of  the  god  of 
things  as  they  ought  to  be.  These  were  great  days  for 
the  commoner;  his  entertainment  cost  him  nothing  and 
he  revelled  in  luxury  and  riot  at  the  expense  of  policy. 
On  occasions  such  as  these,  he  could  compare  his  lot  to 
that  of  the  great  patrician,  and  the  silver  from  which  he 
ate  and  drank  was  but  an  added  sop  to  political  indirec 
tion  and  expediency.  There  is  a  passage  excellently  to 
the  point  in  the  Treatise  on  Rhetoricians,  addressed  to 
Herennius,  and  attributed  to  Cicero,  though  it  scarcely 
seems  worthy  of  the  best  powers  of  that  orator.  We 
have  here  a  very  curious  adventure,  such  an  example  of 
ostentation  and  bigoted  vanity  as  Shakespeare  or  Moli&re 
might  have  envied.  As  a  portrayal  of  Roman  false 
pretenses  it  has  few  equals  and  it  must  have  been  traced 
by  the  hand  of  a  master.  In  translating  the  episode  we 
wish  to  call  attention  to  the  fact  that  it  is  a  mine  of  in 
formation  upon  our  subject  and  it  may  have  been  in 
Quevedo's  mind  when  he  drew  his  Hablador.  Hie  char 
acter  is  the  true  and  unmistakable  ancestor  of  all  the 
poseurs  who  have  come  after  him.  An  advocate  is  speak 
ing,  probably  one  of  the  lumpy  faced  vulture  species  who 
haunted  the  Forum  or  the  Market  for  Stolen  Goods* 
Petronius  has  furnished  us  with  an  exquisite  portrait  of 
such  a  lawyer  in  his  story  of  the  stolen  mantle.  He  it  is 
who  dresses  down  our  fine  gentleman,  a  debtor  unable  to 
pay,  and  certainly  in  no  frame  of  mind  to  discuss  the 
obligation,  especially  with  such  a  specimen  of  humanity. 
The  battle  between  Shylock  and  D'Artignan  will  ever  be 
one  of  the  most  amusing  and  instructive* 

"Look  at  the  fellow/*  says  the  lawyer,  "he  wants  to 
pass  for  a  rich  man.  How  proud  he  is !  See  how  he  looks 
down  on  us,  as  if  to  say:  *  If  it  is  not  too  much  trouble 
I  may  give  you  what  you  want/  And  when  he  takes  his 
mantle  up  with  his  left  hand  he  imagines  all  the  world  is 


220  THE      INNS      OF 

dazzled  by  the  gleam  of  his  jewels  and  the  glitter  of  his 
gold  ring.    Then  he  calls  the  only  slave  he  owns,  I  know 
this,  but  you  do  not,  he  calls  .him  first  by  one  name  and 
then  by  another.     'Here,  Saimio/  says  he,  "come  here, 
see  to  it  that  these  barbarians  don't  annoy  me  by  crowd 
ing  around';  he  would  have  strangers  think  that  he  has 
chosen  his  slave  from  a  crowd  of  them.    He  orders  him 
to  place  couches  before  the  tables,  he  tells  him  to  go  to 
his  uncle  and  demand  an  Ethiopian  to  accompany  him 
to  the  baths,  or  to  lead  a  fine  saddle  horse  to  his  door,  or 
to  prepare  some  fragile  and  tinselled  pomp  for  his  false 
glory.    Then,  in  the  hearing  of  all  present,  'make  sure 
the  silver  is  all  accounted  for  before  night,  if  possible/  and 
the  slave,  well  knowing  the  character  of  his  master  makes 
answer,  'If  your  highness  wants  the  stuff  counted  in  a 
single  day,  you  should  send  several  slaves/    *  Very  well, 
go  and  attend  to  it  and  take  Libanus  and  Sosia  with  you. 
I  want  the  thing  done/    It  once  came  about  that  certain 
gentlemen  waited  upon  him,  gentlemen  who  had  enter 
tained  him  handsomely  when  he  was  travelling.    He  was 
a  little  put  out  because  of  this,  but  even  then  he  did  not 
recede  from  the  evil  propensity  of  his  nature.    *  You  have 
done  well  to  come/  said  he,  'but  you  would  have  done 
even  better  had  you  come  to  me  straight  away/    *We 
would  have  done  that/  was  the  reply,  'if  we  had  known 
where  your  house  was/    'That  is  easily  remedied,  come 
along  with  me/    They  followed  him.    In  the  meantime, 
all  his  talk  was  taken  up  with  ostentation  and  boasting. 
He  lectured  them  on  the  state  of  the  crops  and  informed 
them  that  he  no  longer  went  to  his  country  places  because 
all  the  houses  were  destroyed  and  he  had  not  ventured 
to  rebuild  at  Tusculum  where  he  was  even  then  restoring 
an  ancient  villa  on  its  old  foundations.    As  he  was  telling 
them  this,  he  led  them  into  a  house  where  he  was  known 
to  the  owner  and  where  he  knew  there  was  to  be  a  ban- 


GREECE      &      ROME 321 

quet.  *  Here's  where  I'm  staying/  he  informed  them* 
Then  he  fell  to  examining  all  the  silverware  in  sight,  he 
inspected  the  table  which  was  ready  set  and  expressed  his 
satisfaction  with  everything.  A  slave  came  and  in 
formed  him  privately  that  the  master  had  arrived,  and 
asked  him  to  go  about  his  business.  'Well,  come  along, 
friends/  said  he,  cmy  brother  has  just  arrived  from 
Salernum,  and  I  want  to  meet  him  on  the  road.  Please 
be  good  enough  to  return  at  the  tenth  hour/  The 
strangers  took  their  departure  and  he  hastened  away  to 
hide  in  his  own  house.  Then,  at  the  appointed  hour,  as 
he  had  stipulated,  they  returned.  They  inquired  for 
him  and  learned  who  really  owned  the  mansion.  They 
retired,  in  confusion,  to  an  inn.  Next  day  they  found  the 
fellow.  They  told  him  what  had  happened.  They  ex 
postulated  with  him.  They  accused  him.  He  made 
answer  that  they  had  mistaken  either  the  house  or  the 
street  and  that  he  had  waited  for  them  till  far  into  the 
night.  He  then  commissioned  Sannio  his  slave  boy  to 
get  vases,  vestments,  and  slaves  together.  The  Kttle 
servant,  who  did  not  lack  ability,  acquitted  himself  nobly 
and  his  master  led  his  guests  home.  One  of  the  finest 
houses  was  being  prepared  for  a  wedding  and  he  told  them 
he  had  loaned  it  to  a  friend  who  was  to  be  the  groom* 
His  slave  demanded  the  silver,  for  he  was  terrified  at 
having  acceded  to  the  request.  'Away  with  him/  said 
he,  'I've  loaned  him  my  house,  I've  given  him  my  slaves, 
does  he  want  my  silver  into  the  bargain?  notwithstanding 
the  fact  that  I  too  have  guests?  Well,  let  him  have  it, 
we  will  be  beautifully  served  on  Samian  ware  in  spite  of 
him/  "  (Lib.  IV,  50  and  51.) 

Mention  should  also  be  made  of  the  fact  that  the 
caterers  of  such  banquets  as  those  of  which  we  have 
spoken  were  no  less  vain  and  boastful,  no  less  difficult  to 
manage  than  the  parasite  whom  we  have  described.  For 


222          THE      INNS      OF 

many  years  they  had  little  or  no  consideration,  but  with 
the  decline  of  republican  severity  and  austerity,  the  calling 
which  had  formerly  been  regarded  as  vile  (vilissimum 
antiquis  mancipium  is  the  expression  used  by  Kivy), 
came  more  and  more  into  prominence  with  increase  of 
luxury  and  the  questionable  refinement  of  the  standards 
of  living,  and  the  haughty  patrician  was  compelled  per 
force  to  put  up  with  more  abuse  and  insolence  from  his 
cook  and  his  caterer  than  would  have  been  thought  pos 
sible.  Insolence  was  the  order  of  the  day,  but  a  good 
cook,  then  as  now,  was  difficult  to  obtain  and  it  was 
thought  worth  all  the  inconvenience  if  he  could  be  held. 
The  stern  age  that  had  produced  a  Cincinnatus  or  a 
Fabius  was  above  giving  the  slightest  consideration  to 
such  matters,  but  when  Rome  had  succumbed  to  the  tastes 
and  refinement  of  Lucullus,  and  the  age  of  gluttony  had 
dawned,  slaves  who  were  specialists  in  catering  and  cook 
ing  were  very  costly,  more  so  in  fact  than  those  serving 
as  short-hand  writers  or  copyists.  One  hundred  thousand 
ases  was  by  no  means  an  exorbitant  price  for  a  slave 
with  such  qualifications,  in  witness  whereof  I  would 
cite  the  figure  at  which  Sallust  purchased  the  famous 
Dama,  who  had  formerly  been  the  property  of  Nomen- 
tanus.  Whenever  an  elaborate  entertainment  was  in 
prospect  it  was  necessary  to  procure  the  services  of  some 
such  caterer  at  once,  and  by  any  means  necessary  to 
insure  the  desired  result,  and  the  host  often  had  to  bear 
in  silence  the  insolence  of  a  specialist  who  knew  his  craft 
was  indispensable.  It  was  never  the  custom  to  haggle 
over  the  price  which  such  a  culinary  artist  set  on  his 
services,  and  this  was  especially  true  if  the  prospective 
employee  had  received  the  title  "archimagirus,"  carried 
in  his  belt  the  traditional  carving  knife,  and  commanded 
a  numerous  horde  of  scullions.  Those  who  haggled,  or 
refused  to  pay  the  amount  demanded,  were  reduced  to  the 


GREECE      &      ROME 223 

lowest  terms  by  some  cook  of  nine  days*  experience,  and 
the  waste  accruing  from  his  ministrations  was  staggering. 
AsPlautushasit: 

"That  fellow's  a  nine-day  cook;  on  the  ninth  day 
He  will  go  about  his  business — cooked/3 

The  explanation  lies  in  the  Roman  customs  at  funerals. 
The  scullions  prepared  the  lentils  and  porridge  on  the 
ninth  day  after  a  funeral,  and  another  explanation  a 
trifle  more  recondite  is  that  they  were  competent  to 
prepare  the  repasts  during  the  nine  days  following  a 
funeral  when  their  employers  would  not  be  so  testy  as 
usual.  On  the  tenth  day,  however,  tragedy  was  certain 
to  stalk  abroad  in  the  land,  and  the  consequences  of  red- 
eyed  fury  suffering  from  indigestion  could  only  be  pre 
vented  by  the  hasty  departure  of  the  entire  kitchen  staff. 

We  need  not  speak  of  the  cooks  and  scullions  in  the 
establishments  of  the  small  vendors  of  sausages  (botularii) 
who  ran  hither  and  yon  with  their  smoking  ovens  (toma- 
cula  fumantia),  as  Martial  aptly  calls  them: 

"You  are  a  buffoon,  Caecilius.  You  are  like  the  fellow 
who  sells  pea  soup  to  the  idle  crowd,  like  the  vile  boys  of 
the  sellers  of  salt,  like  the  hoarse  cook  who  carries  smok 
ing  sausages  in  his  pans."  (Lib.  1, 42.) 

Hawkers  of  short-order  food  stuffs  went  among  the 
crowds  in  the  streets,  in  the  porticoes  and  arcades,  in  the 
tiers  of  seats  in  the  amphitheatre,  in  fact,  wherever  there 
was  a  prospect  of  business,  and  peddled  their  wares. 
There  were  also  portable  ovens  for  bread,  and  one  of  the 
keenest  memories  which  the  writer  has  of  old  Seville  and 
other  Spanish  cities  is  the  high,  resonant  singsong  cry — 
P — A — N,  that  echoed  and  re-echoed  in  the  dim  dark 
ness  of  the  narrow  and  crooked  streets  where  the  acoustics 
were  excellent  and  the  echoes  persisted  long  after  their 
cause  had  vanished  in  the  distance*  It  is  as  much  a 


224 THE      INNS      OF 

survival  of  culture  as  is  the  custom  of  advertising  lodgings 
by  twining  palm  fronds  or  newspapers  around  the  baran- 
illas  under  Spanish  windows;  a  usage  which  goes  back  to 
the  Middle  Ages  and  which,  in  its  primal  simplicity, 
meant  sanctuary.  Had  one  but  the  leisure  and  the  space, 
he  could  write  an  entire  chapter  on  such  survivals  as  had 
their  inception  in  taverns  and  inns. 

As  such  peddlers  continually  encroached  upon  the 
preserves  of  the  proprietors  of  eating-houses  and  thermo- 
polia  there  was  perpetual  hostility  between  the  factions 
they  represented.  No  gathering  could  escape  the  atten 
tions  of  these  peripatetic  hucksters,  who  promptly  betook 
themselves  and  their  stocks  in  trade  to  the  meeting. 
The  eating-house  keeper  and  his  vassals  would  then  make 
a  sortie  upon  the  enemy  and  attempt  to  drive  them  to  a 
stand  in  front  of  the  inn  or  tavern.  It  might  have  been 
thought  that  these  petty  dealers  were  in  Seneca's  mind 
when  he  coined  the  term  "  institores  popinarum,"  hawkers 
of  the  eating-houses.  The  strident  cries  of  these  retailers 
in  merchandising  their  wares  were  among  the  causes 
which  contributed  to  the  perpetual  noisy  uproar  of  Rome. 
And  in  all  this  garish  hurlyburly  not  the  least  strident 
were  the  cries  of  the  ragged  old  hags  who  sold  herbs,  she 
who  led  Encolpius  into  evil  ways,  as  described  by  Petro- 
nius,  and  she  of  whom  Persius  speaks  en  passant — crying 
her  herbs  to  attract  the  slaves. 


GREECE      &RO  ME  225 


CHAPTER  XV. 

The  adventure  of  a  Roman  parasite — The  age  of  gluttony— Hawkers 
of  food  everywhere — Caesar  Germanicus  suppresses  the  traffic— The 
wines  of  Italy  sold  by  the  slave*  of  the  producers — Lucullus  distributes 
100,000  casks  of  wine — Roman  rogues — Aurdian  takes  charge  of  wine 
markets — Dilution  of  wines— Women  condemned  for  drinking  during 
Early  Republic — Barber  shops  as  meeting  places. 

The  baths  were  always  in  a  state  of  turmoil  and  up 
roar,  due  to  the  limited  space  and  the  numbers  congre 
gating  there.  For  a  long  time  Seneca  lodged  in  the  first 
story  of  one  of  these  establishments,  and,  amongst  a 
myriad  of  discordant  sounds,  he  was  never  able  to  forget 
the  cries  of  the  eating-house  keepers  and  their  rivals,  and 
he  has  informed  us  with  a  certain  touch  of  grim  humor 
that  their  calls  topped  the  very  gamut  of  discord.  "  There 
are,"  says  mine  author,  "the  diverse  clamors  of  the 
pastry  sellers,  the  pork  butchers,  the  confectioners,  and 
also  the  yells  of  all  whose  trade  was  based  upon  tavern 
patronage,  and  each  and  every  one  to  sell  his  wares 
affected  a  particular  tone  and  modulation."  These  petty 
merchants  of  ancient  Rome  have  perpetuated  their  calling 
to  our  own  times.  We  see  them  in  Naples,  selling 
macaroni,  ravioli,  and  other  food  pastes;  we  see  them 
after  nightfall  in  the  British  Isles,  selling  fried  potatoes 
and  fish,  each  commodity  in  its  greasy  wrapper  of  brown 
paper;  but  in  some  cases  the  peripatetic  oven  has  been 
mounted  upon  wheels.  One  who  has  lived  in  Naples, 
especially  in  bohemian  quarters  in  the  art  colony,  needs 
only  to  cast  a  glance  at  the  picture  reproduced  at  the  end 
of  this  chapter  to  see  that,  aside  from  changes  in  raiment, 
Herculaneum  and  Parthenope  (the  ancient  name  for 
Naples)  differed  but  little  from  the  modern  city  in  the 


226 THE      INNS      OF 

matter  of  selling  food  stuffs.  The  dealer  is  seen,  standing 
in  front  of  his  smoking  utensil  which  is  mounted  upon  a 
tripod;  he  is  a  macaroni  vendor  to  the  life  in  everything 
except  clothing,  and,  were  his  hands  tied,  he*  too,  would 
be  dumb. 

We  do  not  know  whether  the  delicacies  esteemed  by 
the  inhabitants  of  the  realm  of  Naples  were  a  happy 
importation,  or  were  naturalized  at  Rome,  nor  do  we 
know  whether  the  petty  dealers  held  their  stocks  in 
common,  and  sold  them  to  the  men  on  the  street;  nor  do 
we  know  whether  they  had  a  guild  which  would  have  given 
them  enough  power  to  meet  the  competition  of  their 
rivals;  but  one  thing  is  certain:  their  industry  was  re 
warded  and  their  patronage  extensive,  their  wares  were 
exhibited  in  every  quarter  of  the  city. 

Some  chose  stations  under  the  porticoes,  near  a  pillar, 
and,  to  advertise  their  presence,  they  garlanded  the 
column  with  bottles  fastened  to  a  chain.  This,  in  im 
pudent  defiance  of  the  tavern  keeper  and  his  modest 
branch  of  ivy  or  bush.  Others  of  greater  hardihood,  who 
were  not  afraid  to  beard  their  enemies  even  more  openly, 
betook  themselves  to  the  Cupedinarum  forum  (the  forum 
of  the  confectioners)  and  braved  without  blenching  the 
fury  of  the  greater  merchants,  laying  hold  of  their  cus 
tomers  like  any  Bleeker-street  vendor  of  second-hand 
clothing.  They  ran  about  in  the  crowds  before  the  booths 
of  the  fishmongers,  butchers,  sellers  of  sweetmeats, 
poultry  merchants,  inviting  their  customers  to  come  and 
sample  their  wares,  and,  according  to  Terence,  they 
found,  in  each  calling,  a  means  to  advance  their  own 
interests. 

There  must  have  been  cause  for  great  rejoicing  among 
the  tavern  keepers  and  other  retail  dealers  when,  in  the 
times  of  Martial,  Caesar  Germanicus,  under  pretext  of 
clearing  the  streets  of  impediments  to  traffic,  promulgated 


\ 


RETURNING  FROM  THE  TAVERN 


GREECE      &      ROME 227 

a  decree  which  gave  the  death  blow  to  all  peddlers  who 
had  fattened  at  the  expense  of  established  business. 
Martial  has  addressed  an  epigram  to  Germanicus  on  this 
occasion,  and  given  us  much  information  on  Rome  and 
the  conditions  in  that  city: 

"The  audacious  shop-keepers  had  robbed  us  of  the 
entire  city,  usurping  even  our  thresholds.  You,  Ger 
manicus,  have  ordered  the  narrow  streets  to  be  widened, 
and  former  paths  to  become  roads.  Now,  no  pillars  are 
draped  with  chained  bottles,  nor  is  the  praetor  obliged  to 
walk  in  the  midst  of  the  mud.  No  razor  is  rashly  wielded 
in  the  midst  of  a  crowd,  nor  are  the  public  ways  cluttered 
with  kitchens.  Barber,  tavern  keeper,  cook-shop  -and 
butcher-shop  keep  on  their  own  thresholds.  Rome  exists 
now:  formerly,  it  was  simply  a  huge  shop."  (Lib. 
VII,  61.) 

This  epigram  of  Martial  has  been  taken  seriously  to 
heart  by  the  authorities  of  other  cities,  and  all  have 
profited  by  the  example. 

One  usage  there  was,  which  has  become  obsolete  in 
France  except  in  such  wine  producing  provinces  as 
Champagne,  but  which  persists  to  this  day  in  Italy  and 
Greece,  and  that  is  a  method  of  disposing  of  the  vintage 
by  means  of  a  slave  or  servant  of  the  proprietor,  at  the 
house  of  the  latter,  and  under  his  supervision. 

Such  establishments  are  to  be  seen  at  both  Naples  and 
Florence,  often  as  an  important  adjunct  to  the  most  im 
pressive  properties.  The  servant  stands  in  his  little  stall 
and  sells  the  wine  which  belongs  to  his  master.  You 
do  not  enter  as  though  it  were  a  tavern,  but  come  to  a 
wicket  through  which  you  pass  your  empty  bottle  and 
your  money;  a  few  moments  later  your  bottle  returns  to 
you  full.  According  to  Savage,  Leo  XII  was  of  a  mind 
to  set  this  fashion  of  wine  selling  in  Rome  because  of  the 
practises  of  the  innkeepers,  but  the  effort  came  to  nothing 


THE      INNS      OF 


as  it  was  bitterly  opposed.  The  Romans  under  the  popes 
were  not  desirous  of  being  reminded  in  that  manner  of 
their  republican  ancestors  and  of  those  under  the  empire. 
In  ancient  times  the  bulk  of  the  vintages  of  Italy  was 
retailed  in  the  manner  which  we  have  just  described. 
Many  such  places  have  been  uncovered  at  Pompeii. 
The  booth  communicated  with  the  house  of  the  owner 
and  the  latter  exercised  his  authority  and  superintended 
the  business  carried  on.  The  slave  in  charge  of  such  a 
booth  was  called  "caupo"  just  as  was  the  tavern  keeper. 
A  wealthy  property  holder  might  have  several  such 
booths  on  his  premises,  and  the  amount  of  the  vintage 
was  considered  in  rating  him  commercially  for  credit. 
In  the  case  of  the  very  rich  landowners,  inns  were  main 
tained  on  an  elaborate  scale  and  in  places  such  as  these  the 
traveller  could  find  food  and  lodging  as  well,  and  he  was 
safer  than  in  establishments  not  under  the  patrician's 
control.  Martial,  writing  to  Bassus  concerning  the 
country  place  of  a  nobleman,  adduces  as  a  bit  of  evidence 
showing  the  prosperity  of  the  owner,  that  the  slave  who 
sold  wines  had  no  leisure  in  which  to  pine  away  in  sloth. 
Hence  it  follows  that  such  stalls  must  have  been  highly 
profitable  to  the  owner.  The  great  proprietors  rarely 
permitted  themselves  to  be  annoyed  with  all  the  petty 
details  of  business.  It  is  true  that  Trimalchio's  coadjutor 
read  aloud  at  table  the  various  business  undertakings  in 
course  of  completion,  and  the  gossip  pertaining  to  the 
estates,  but  this  was  satire  of  the  finest.  Trimalchio  did 
not  even  know  that  the  Gardens  of  Pompeii  had  been 
purchased  for  his  account  and  demanded  to  be  kept 
better  informed  in  the  future,  a  wonderful  touch  of  real 
ism.  Nevertheless,  the  great  landowners  did  take  a  keen 
interest  in  property  titles  and  heavy  transactions  in 
wines  and  foodstuffs,  and  the  procurer  in  the  Pseudolus 
of  Plautus  sends  a  wealthy  merchant  to  his  Hedyle  to  be 


GREECE      &      ROME 229 

fleeced,  Alciphron  has  several  such  passages  to  the  same 
purpose.  We  are  justified  in  suspecting  that  Crassus  was 
engaged  in  huge  deals  in  which  wines  and  commodities 
were  involved.  The  edict  promulgated  by  him  two  years 
before  the  death  of  Marius,  during  his  censorship  with 
Lucius  Julius  Caesar,  prohibiting  thereafter  the  sale  of 
wine  of  Amineum,  one  of  the  finest  vintages  of  Italy,  and 
those  of  Greece,  at  the  low  price  of  8  ases  the  amphora, 
bears  eloquent  testimony  of  the  statement  made  above. 
Whether  the  decree  was  inspired  by  local  producers  in 
league  with  the  authorities,  producers  whose  products 
could  not  compete  with  better  merchandise  at  such  a 
price,  or  by  farsighted  political  expediency  designed  to 
enable  the  master  politician  to  outrival  the  luxuries  of 
Lucullus  after  his  return  from  Asia,  is  not  known.  We  do 
know  that  Lucullus  distributed  100,000  casks  of  wine  to 
the  people  when  he  returned  to  Italy;  and  we  also  know 
that  Crassus  was  instrumental  in  having  the  import  tax 
law  passed,  and  it  is  axiomatic  that  imposts  are  never 
free  from  self-interest,  at  bottom* 

Cato  himself,  notwithstanding  his  austerity,  was  in 
volved  in  certain  business  transactions,  but  anony 
mously;  he  acted  through  a  freedman  in  his  dealings  with 
the  greatest  rascals  in  Rome,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that 
his  factor  was  their  equal  in  finesse. 

"And  of  old  Cato  the  tale  is  told 

That  often  his  virtue  he  warmed  with  wine, " 

says  Horace.  More  power  to  him,  says  the  author. 
There  are  not  lacking  features  of  the  traffic  in  wines  and 
foods  that  convince  an  impartial  observer  that  the 
Arbiter  may  have  had  two  strings  to  his  bow  in  satirizing 
the  aediles  for  their  collusion  with  the  bakers.  Freedmen 
acting  in  the  interests  of  powerful  patricians  enjoyed  a 
degree  of  immunity  which  left  them  little  to  fear.  The 


230 THE      INNS      OF 

churlish  gate-keepers  (portitores)  of  Rome  took  careful 
precautions  against  inconveniencing  such  gentry  by  an 
over-meticulous  scrutiny  of  garment,  person,  or  cart,  and 
the  lure  of  gold  quieted  the  uneasy  suspicions  of  official 
authority.  One  might  almost  compare  an  inexperienced 
gate-keeper  of  old  Rome  with  a  young  naval  officer 
exercising  his  first  commissioned  authority  as  officer  of 
the  deck  on  a  battleship.  There  the  watchword  is  "do 
not  molest  the  admiral's  domestics."  Mercury  was  the 
god  of  thieves  and  diplomats,  and  he  had  also  enrolled 
many  officials  in  the  lists  of  his  priesthood.  The  spectacle 
afforded  by  the  rigid  censor  on  the  one  hand  and  the 
rascally  vintner  on  the  other,  each,  perhaps,  playing  into 
the  other's  hands,  each  holding  a  club  over  the  other's 
head,  must  have  afforded  the  keenest  humor  to  any 
bystander  knowing  all  the  facts.  The  wine  sellers  and 
oil  vendors  suffered  alike  for  their  pains,  although  the 
rigor  of  authority  was  directed  principally  against  the 
latter,  as  they  had  less  protection.  Their  improbity  has 
passed  into  a  proverb :  they  were  hand  and  glove  together. 
"They  all  make  a  compact  like  the  oil  sellers  in  the 
Velabrum." 

The  aediles  punished  smuggling,  but  the  cultus  of 
Mercury  also  dealt  with  malefactors,  and  the  penalties 
imposed  by  the  latter  were  inflicted  upon  all  who  trafficked 
in  flagrant  and  fraudulent  offenses:  on  cabaret  keeper 
and  oil  seller  alike,  although  the  latter  frequently  revisited 
their  reputation  for  commercial  malfeasance  on  the  heads 
of  the  innkeepers.  A  passage  in  the  Captivi  of  Plautus 
will  enable  us  to  judge  of  the  punishment  inflicted  by  the 
priest  of  Mercury  upon  a  rogue  more  indurated  still.  It 
ended  with  a  proverb  which  pilloried  public  morality, 
and  the  ends  of  justice  were  rarely  reached.  The  prac 
tise  developed  the  Lex  Talionis  to  a  high  degree  of  effi 
ciency.  The  punishment  actually  consisted  of  a  denun- 


GREECE      &      ROME 231 

elation  at  the  hands  of  the  priest  of  Mercury.  The 
tavern  keeper,  a  shameless  adulterator,  a  vendor  of  more 
commodities  than  the  vintner,  was  punished,  therefore, 
because  he  had  sinned.  But  the  evil,  the  inadequateness 
of  the  penalty,  remained,  and  our  retailer  finds  himself 
purified  after  the  ewer  has  been  emptied  over  his  head, 
even  as  the  sinner  after  baptism.  He  was  then  ready  to 
begin  all  over  again.  Ovid  describes  this  purification  in 
his  Fasti,  and  quotes  the  prayer  of  the  penitent  during 
the  imposition  of  the  sentence.  After  having  besought 
Mercury  to  pardon  him  for  having  misrepresented  his 
wares,  he  begs  the  god  to  pass  upon  whatever  he  sells  so 
he  can  lie  again: 

"Purify  me  of  perjuries  past,  that  the  gods  may  not 
occupy  themselves  with  my  concerns  if  I  lie  but  a  little; 
vouchsafe  me  certain  profits,  and  when  they  shall  have 
accrued,  permit  me  to  enjoy  them,  and  make  my  patrons 
believe  my  words  when  they  buy." 

The  public  complained  for  years  of  the  dearness  of 
wine  and  its  vile  quality.  Mercury  did  not  punish  the 
vintners.  He  found  his  godhead  in  a  difficult  situation. 
To  have  penalized  the  guilty  would  have  resulted  in  a  loss 
to  his  priesthood,  as  their  emoluments  would  have  been 
curtailed.  Under  Augustus,  matters  such  as  these  were 
taken  to  the  emperor,  but  little  account  was  made  of 
them.  The  sarcastic  banter  of  Octavian  was  equal  to  any 
occasion  and  it  is  reported  that  he  answered  a  thirsty 
plebe  that  Agrippa,  his  son-in-law,  had  already  taken 
active  measures  to  avert  death  from  thirst  in  watching 
carefully  over  the  spouts  of  the  public  fountains,  and 
that  consequently  the  complaint  could  not  be  based  upon 
fact.  Tiberius,  Claudius,  Nero,  and  Domitian  paid  more 
regard  to  the  exactions  of  the  vintners,  and  under  Pescen- 
nius  Niger  the  legions  voiced  their  complaints  against 
being  deprived  of  wine.  "What!"  says  he,  with  biting 


282         THE      INNS      OF 

sarcasm,  "you  demand  wine  with  the  Nile  at  your  feet!" 
The  troops  which  were  defeated  by  the  Moors  had  met 
the  situation  as  follows:  "We  have  not  been  provided 
with  our  rations  of  wine;  we  cannot  fight."  The  response 
this  time  was  more  mordant  still:  "You  should  blush 
with  shame,  because  those  who  have  taken  your  measure 
drink  only  water." 

During  the  reign  of  Aurelian  these  complaints  per 
sisted  and  that  prince  at  last  made  it  a  point  of  law. 
He  decreed  wine  should  be  placed  on  the  free  list  with 
bread,  oil,  meat,  and  pork.  He  ordered  the  vast  and 
well  wooded  plains  which  extended  to  the  maritime 
Alps  be  acquired  and  cleared;  that  the  hillsides 
might  be  set  with  vines  to  be  cared  for  by  numerous 
familia  of  slaves  to  be  established  in  the  country*  The 
wine  produced  by  this  experiment  was  to  be  disposed  of 
only  by  the  public  treasury,  and  disbursed,  free  of  im 
posts,  to  the  people.  After  this,  it  was  merely  a  question 
of  computing  the  daily  rations,  "facta  erat  ratio  dochae, 
cuparum,  navium,  et  operum,"  remarks  Vopiscus:  when 
Aurelian  listened  to  the  wise  advice  of  his  praetorian 
praefect,  who  told  him:  "If  we  issue  wine  to  the  Roman 
people  today,  we  shall  be  forced  to  serve  them  with  geese 
and  chickens  tomorrow."  The  advice  was  prudent,  and 
the  gratuitous  distribution  was  thereupon  suppressed. 
Thereafter  Aurelian  contented  himself  with  selling  in  the 
porticos  of  the  temple  of  the  Sun  such  vintages  as  had 
been  exempted  from  imposts  or  seized  by  the  Roman 
customs  officers  as  the  result  of  fraud  or  smuggling 
(fiscalia  vina).  Although  his  biographer  tells  us  nothing 
on  the  point,  he  doubtless  sold  the  merchandise  at  prices 
lower  than  the  market.  When  an  emperor  puts  the 
government  in  business,  the  chief  loser,  aside  from  the 
government,  would,  of  course,  be  the  tavern  keeper, 
and  the  people  had  every  reason  to  be  content,  as  they 


GREECE      &      ROME 233 

were  thus  able  to  purchase  better  wines  at  a  lower  price; 
and  Aurelian,  to  indemnify  them  for  not  making  free 
distribution  of  such  commodities  and  thus  putting  a 
premium  upon  nonproduction,  issued  to  them  white 
tunics  of  African  cloth  and  Egyptian  linen,  and,  perhaps, 
handkerchiefs,  such  as  had  not  been  seen  until  then. 

The  place  given  over  to  the  sale  of  wines,  in  ancient 
towns,  in  Italy  and  France  as  well,  in  Rome  and  in  Lyons, 
was  a  large  empty  space  surrounded  with  little  buildings 
(cenabae),  in  which  the  merchants  did  business.  The 
wine  market  at  St.  Bernard,  with  its  little  booths,  each 
numbered  and  bearing  on  its  fagade  the  name  of  the 
merchant  occupying  the  premises,  is  an  ideal  illustration. 
The  forum  vinarium  of  ancient  towns  differed  little  from 
this  example.  All  that  is  conveyed  to  a  Frenchman  by 
the  term  "March£  au  Vin"  (wine  market)  would  have 
been  found  in  the  Roman  forerunner  of  that  institution 
of  the  middle  ages,  little  larger  than  was  necessary  to 
house  the  press. 

The  wine  merchants,  whose  corporation  was  recon 
stituted  by  Alexander  Severus,  upon  what  grounds  we 
do  not  know,  used  these  little  cenabae  as  the  centres  from 
which  they  did  their  business.  In  them  lay  the  origin  of 
those  shops  of  Italy  which  we  now  know  as  canove  or 
cantine.  An  inscription  in  Gruter's  collection  informs 
us  as  to  their  establishment  in  Lyons — in  cenabis  con- 
sistentium.  In  the  same  collection  there  is  another 
further  along  in  which  mention  is  made  of  the  cenabenses, 
the  loafers  around  wineshops;  the  inscription  deals  with 
a  temple  consecrated  to  the  fortune  of  the  emperor  and 
the  protecting  genius  of  the  vintners*  gild: 

Fortunae  Augustae  sacrum,  et  genio  canabensiuin 
Sacred  to  the  inperial  fortune  and  to  the  genius  of 
the  vintners. 


234 THE      INNS      OF 

The  affairs  transacted  in  these  cenabae  at  Rome  were 
of  considerable  magnitude,  for  there  was  much  wine 
drunk  in  Italy,  and  the  vintages  numbered  about  eighty. 
Without  taking  count  of  the  synthetic  products,  such  as 
mulsum  (a  mixture  of  Falernian  and  honey),  Italy  alone 
produced  about  fifty  varieties  of  wine.  We  do  not  include 
within  our  estimate  the  spiced  beverages  and  aromatic 
drinks,  nor  those  perfumed  with  verbena,  calamus, 
myrrh,  aloes,  and  the  like,  or  even  those  vile  mixtures 
such  as  blitum  which  were  made  on  the  spot  by  the  land 
lord. 

Some  of  these  which  we  have  seen  flowing  in  torrents 
in  the  taverns,  where  the  art  of  the  vintner  had  rendered 
them  even  viler  than  they  were  before,  were  of  a  detest 
able  quality.    Their  bitter  taste  in  the  mouth,  the  tongue 
thickened  by  their  acridness,  they  could  be  freely  damned 
even  as  the  Greek  Cineas,  in  observing  the  loftiness  of  the 
trellised  vines  by  which  they  were  produced,  remarked: 
"Hey  would  do  well  to  hang  the  mother  of  such  wines 
as  high/'    Others  there  were,  however,  which  differed 
greatly  from  these  vile  plebeian  vintages;  among  such 
were  the  wines  of  Vaticani  or  of  Nomentani,  in  which 
qualities  no  less  rare  than  exquisite  were  inherent;  tart 
ness,  highly  flavored  and  haunting  bouquet,  and  a  tempered 
ardour.    With  Falernian  every  reader  of  Horace  and 
Martial  has  been  long  familiar;  there  was  also  Caecubian 
no  less  generous  and  no  less  celebrated,  although  greater 
pains  had  to  be  taken  with  it  and  it  had  to  be  aged  more  to 
get  the  finest  results;  the  true  imperial  wine  of  Italy,  how 
ever,  was  the  Setian,  which  was  also  a  better  stomachic 
than  either  of  the  preceding  and  was  long  the  favorite 
at  the  court  of  Augustus  and  probably  of  Tiberius  and 
Caligula  as  well.    The  wines  of  Sorrentum  were  long 
esteemed  as  tonics  for  disordered  stomachs  and  very 
helpful  as  an  aid  to  digestion,  but  which,  worse  luck,  had 


GREECE      &      ROME 235 

to  age  for  about  twenty-five  years  before  they  were  at 
their  best  maturity;  and  lastly  the  sweet  wines  of  Alba 
esteemed  for  frayed  nerves.  They  were  dry  wines  and 
were  better  than  Falernian,  and  agreeable  and  gentle 
tonics  for  the  stomach  and  digestion. 

These  were  the  precious  wines,  the  vintages  which 
required  careful  nursing,  and  which  would  bear  not  the 
slightest  neglect  from  the  time  of  picking  the  grapes  till 
the  moment  when,  gushing  and  foaming  from  the  pressure 
of  the  press  and  turned  into  the  huge  dolia,  remaining 
therein  thirty  days,  stirred  without  intermission  with  rods 
of  elm  to  prevent  the  lees  from  depositing  on  the  inside; 
lastly  drawn  off  to  clarify  and  often  rendered  more  limpid 
still  by  the  aid  of  pigeon  eggs  broken  into  them. 

Thus  prepared,  thus  placed  in  the  best  state  for 
preservation  and  keeping,  they  were  decanted,  not  like 
inferior  wines  into  leathern  bottles  and  wineskins  (culei), 
but  into  puncheons  (cadi)  of  terra  cotta  which  probably 
had  a  capacity  of  about  six  and  one-half  gallons;  into 
amphorae  of  a  like  capacity,  or  even  into  little  vessels 
(graeca  testa)  as  Horace  calls  them  (Lib.  I,  20)  which, 
on  account  of  their  elegant  form,  added  on  that  account 
to  the  price  of  the  wine  which  they  contained.  Such 
vessels  were  hermetically  sealed  with  a  cork  which  had 
been  first  dipped  into  boiling  pitch.  There  was  usually 
an  inscription  on  the  neck  of  the  vessel  which  told  the 
year  of  the  vintage,  and  usage  gave  the  name  of  the  consul 
of  the  year  in  which  the  wine  was  made  to  the  wine  itself. 
Petronius  speaks  of  Opiniam  and  Horace  of  wine  of 
Manlius's  consulate,  incidentally  giving  us  at  the  same 
time  the  year  of  his  own  birth  (Lib.  HI,  21).  After  the 
vessels  had  been  carefully  stoppered,  the  casks  and 
amphorae  especially,  they  were  deposited  carefully  on 
end  on  a  bed  of  fine  sand  in  the  cella  vineria,  a  sort  of 
little  cellar,  or  in  a  cool  shed  (horreum).  If  they  were  all 


236 


THE      INNS      OF 


small  and  of  equal  capacity,  of  an  elegant  and  graceful 
form  like  the  testa  graeca  for  example,  they  were  kept 
under  guard  in  the  hall  or  house,  disposed  in  niches 
arranged  in  the  walls,  even  as  we  have  seen  in  the  taverns 
and  pimping  houses  in  Plautus,  where  we  were  reminded 
that  the  pitch  legends  could  sometimes  serve  as  love 
letters. 

In  the  taverns,  therefore,  we  need  feel  little  surprise  at 
failing  to  discover  such  niches  holding  vessels  such  as  we 
have  spoken  of;  because,  ordinarily,  such  establishments 
were  not  frequented  by  the  classes  who  could  afford  to 
purchase  vintages  so  rare  and  costly,  but  by  the  poorer 
elements  who  had  little  opportunity  to  taste  the  Setian 
or  Caecubian  wines  but  who,  on  the  other  hand,  were 
habituated  to  the  cheap  concoctions  and  synthetic  forti 
fications  which  the  landlord  provided.  The  patrician 
left  the  plebe  to  wallow  in  his  own  drunkenness  and  filth 
in  these  public  houses,  but  for  himself,  his  house  was  well 
furnished  with  everything  his  tastes  could  remind  him  of, 
and  his  cellar  abounded  with  the  rarest  and  costliest  wines 
of  Italy  and  the  Grecian  archipelago.  His  stock  of  wines 
was  not  limited  to  his  cellars  but  often  took  up  more  room 
still  and  was  stowed  in  ranks  and  rows  even  in  the  atrium 
of  the  house.  Rank  and  quality  in  wine  was  carefully 
noted  by  ticket,  pitch  legend,  and  by  the  position  in  which 
it  was  placed. 

One  apartment  in  the  house  there  was,  however, 
where  wine  was  interdicted.  I  refer  to  the  suite  occupied 
by  the  women  of  the  establishment.  There  it  was  not 
only  a  vice  to  drink,  it  was  a  crime.  It  was  always  thus. 
Under  the  kings  and  during  the  first  years  of  the  republic, 
though  Rome^was  gross  and  barbarous,  the  severity  with 
which  such  drinking  was  punished  and  the  horror  with 
which  it  was  regarded  was  more  severe  than  under  the 
civilized  regime  of  the  emperors.  Romulus  placed  wives 


GREECE      &      ROME 237 

who  drank  wine  in  the  first  rank  of  culpable  women,  along 
with  those  getting  caught  in  adultery.  In  the  opinion 
of  the  ancient  legislator  both  offenses  merited  the  same 
punishment.  A  husband  who  killed  his  wife  drinking 
or  drunk  would  have  been  absolved  by  Romulus.  It 
was  left  to  the  women  to  have  charge  of  the  keys  to  the 
storehouse  or  cellar  and  have  access  to  them.  A  young 
girl  who  placed  them  in  her  closet  was  condemned  by 
parental  authority  to  starve  herself  to  death.  It  further 
appears  that  the  Roman  woman,  according  to  Cato,  was 
supposed  to  embrace  her  husband,  his  parents,  and  rela 
tives  on  first  seeing  them  each  day,  and  this  not  so  much 
in  sign  of  love  and  amity  as  to  assure  them  by  her  breath 
that  she  had  not  tasted  wine  (had  the  temetum  in  mind), 
for  in  ancient  times  this  was  the  word  used  to  convey  that 
meaning  and  the  later  derivation  temulentia  had  come 
to  mean  drunkenness. 

The  women,  menaced  by  such  severe  precautions 
depriving  them  of  wine,  made  the  best  of  the  matter  and 
contrived  to  content  themselves  with  liquors  less  stimu 
lating.  For  instance,  they  were  permitted  to  take  pas- 
sum,  a  wine  made  from  dried  grapes  and  thin  anodyne, 
which  people  used  to  garnish  their  delicacies  and  flavor 
them  much  as  we  used  brandy  or  hard  cider  to  fortify 
mince  meat,  or  preserved  fruits.  Martial  speaks  of  this 
beverage  as  also  does  Columella,  who  intimates  that  it  is 
new  wine  copiously  steeped  and  having  its  savor  aug 
mented  by  virtue  of  passing  this  produce  through  a  bed 
of  raisins  which  have  been  dried  by  the  sun.  This  must 
have  been  one  of  the  beverages  which  Plautus  had  in 
mind  when  he  puts  into  the  mouth  of  one  of  his  characters 
the  following  words:  " Prepare  the  honeyed  wine  (com- 
misce  mulsum);  make  ready  the  quinces  and  the  pears, 
that  they  may  warm  well  in  the  pans;  throw  in  the  cinna 
mon,5'  and  so  on*  This  must  have  been  real  pear  cider  as 


THE      INNS      OP 


that  which  is  extracted  from  the  same  fruit  in  Asia  Minor, 
according  to  Artemidorus,  and  such  as  that  made  from 
apples,  of  which  Plutarch  speaks. 

Women,  in  addition  to  these  beverages  so  innocuous 
were  also  permitted  a  liquor  called  def rutum,  which  was 
derived  from  the  lighter  vintages,  adulterated  with  water 
and  reduced  to  a  third  of  its  original  volume  by  long 
boiling. 

How  many  of  the  Greek  wines  were  interdicted  we 
cannot  say,  but  we  suspect  that  the  number  was  great, 
and  especially  did  this  apply  to  those  vintages  which  did 
not  arrive  in  Italy  diluted  with  water  in  a  proportion 
which  would  render  them,  according  to  belief,  improper 
for  secret  libations.  Notwithstanding  this  dilution,  which 
proves  less,  as  we  see  it,  the  fidelity  of  the  Greek  vineyard 
keepers  for  the  ancient  usage  of  sobriety,  than  that  their 
wine  merchants  followed  an  ancient  custom  of  cheating, 
they  were,  as  we  would  have  you  see,  the  vintages  pre 
ferred  by  the  gluttons;  they  were  always  dear,  but  their 
high  cost  added  only  to  the  merit  of  the  wine.  The 
impost  (portorium)  which  they  had  to  pay  as  luxuries, 
elevated  the  price  still  higher.  Always,  one  might  say, 
this  was  a  contribution  not  excessive.  It  did  not  exceed 
the  fortieth  part  of  the  value  of  the  object  sold;  but  the 
moderateness  of  the  impost  was  not  always  the  real 
reason  which  caused  the  high  price  to  be  sustained. 
Smuggling  operations  were  very  frequent — many  a  mer 
chant,  even  as  we  have  pointed  out  in  the  case  of  Cato, 
engaged  in  traffic  of  this  sort  with  impunity;  and  you 
must  know  that  if  the  contravention  required  courage, 
the  Roman  impost  must  have  been  rigorous. 

All  merchandise,  and  wine  especially,  which  was  im 
ported  in  a  province  which  also  exported,  whether  by 
land  or  water,  had,  without  exception,  no  privilege  to 
evade  the  law. 


GREECE      &      ROME 239 

It  is  true  that  a  traveller  might  import  merchandise 
for  his  own  particular  use  and  needs,  but  for  more  the 
tax  was  applied  always  without  prejudice  at  the  toll 
house,  which  as  a  general  thing  was  located  near  one  of 
the  bridges.  One  was  bound  to  declare  himself  at  the 
bureau  of  customs  the  objects  designated  by  the  law. 
If  he  made  a  false  declaration  and  the  misrepresentation 
was  discovered,  confiscation  followed. 

Those  who  complained  against  the  contribution  were 
not  less  numerous  than  those  who  avoided  it,  which  was 
the  cause  of  the  exaction,  and  especially  when  a  collector 
of  customs  bestirred  himself,  as,  for  instance,  Verres  or 
Fonteius.  These  reclamations  were  not  left  without 
authority.  The  latter  was  vehemently  accused,  for 
example,  of  having  unlawfully  levied  excessive  contribu 
tions  on  wines  while  in  command  of  Gaul,  and  it  required 
nothing  less  than  all  the  eloquence  of  Cicero  to  dissipate 
the  grief  caused  by  the  grave  charges  brought  against  the 
governor.  And  what  brought  all  this  about?  A  levy  of 
four  denarii  at  Toulouse  on  each  amphora,  under  the 
pretext  of  customs  duties  (portorii  nomine)  and  of  cer 
tain  other  smaller  imposts  levied  by  the  agents  of  Fon 
teius,  which  seemed  outrageous  to  the  wine  merchants 
of  certain  French  towns.  Pletorius,  the  principal  accuser, 
would  have  it  believed  that  this  levy  was  but  a  link  in  a 
system  of  fraud  powerfully  organized,  and  pretended  that 
Fonteius  had  not  conceived  in  Gaul  this  detestable  idea 
of  levying  an  excessive  impost  on  wine;  that  he  had 
worked  out  the  project  in  Italy,  and  that  the  plan  had 
also  its  agents  and  ramifications  in  Rome.  Nothing  is 
more  redoubtable,  in  an  affair  of  thievery,  than  for  one 
thief  to  accuse  another.  Unfortunate  Fonteius!  to  have 
been  placed  in  the  position  of  having  been  accused  by 
vintners. 

We  have  already  passed  in  review  a  goodly  number  of 


240 THE      INNS      OF 

gluttons;  we  are  able  likewise  to  say  that  in  our  painstak 
ing  visits  to  the  inns  of  the  environs  of  Rome  and  to  the 
taverns  of  the  great  city  which  we  have  visited  on  foot, 
we  have  seen  all  that  was  vile  in  the  Roman  dregs  with 
out  having  entered  as  yet  the  stalls  more  shameless, 
which  we  shall  later  throw  open  to  the  light  of  the  sun; 
and  we  shall  know  intimately  the  elite  of  the  vagabonds, 
the  fine  flower  of  the  ancient  rascals.  Some  may  resent 
a  graphic  picture  of  the  scenes  to  follow  before  the  close 
of  this  chapter,  but  we  shall  draw  them  still.  It  is  no 
part  of  our  plan  to  describe  to  the  readers  those  places 
of  public  reunion,  which  people  were  accustomed  to  fre 
quent  without  distinction  to  rank,  but  because  of  the 
relation  they  bore  to  hospitality,  we  find  ourselves  com 
pelled  to  introduce  our  readers  to  the  barber  shops  where 
the  man  about  town,  the  beaux-brummels  and  the  novel 
ists,  made  their  headquarters.  Here  luxury  grew  to  an 
unprecedented  height  and  when  we  reach  the  age  of 
Julian,  we  find  that  emperor  greatly  incensed  at  discover 
ing  that  society  had  so  degraded  itself  that  barbers  had 
become  an  important  part  of  the  cosmos.  We  shall  begin 
then  with  that  institution  of  many  professions,  the  female 
barber,  well  skilled  in  her  trade  of  hair-dresser,  barber, 
masseuse,  manicure,  and  prostitute.  In  her  shop  gath 
ered  the  slaves  to  homage  and  gossip,  to  sleep  on  the 
benches  while  waiting  to  conduct  their  infant  charges, 
then  at  school,  home  when  the  master  had  terminated 
his  lessons;  and  we  shall  find  here  plausible  scoundrels 
working  out  their  plans  of  campaign  and  preparing  their 
snares  even  as  in  the  cabarets,  effeminate  sissies  such 
as  Martial's  Priscius  who  dreaded  wind  and  dust,  dandies 
(belli)  always  occupied  with  comb  and  mirror  (inter 
pectinem  speculumcue  occupati)  as  Seneca  has  said  so 
spiritually. 

The  barber  at  least  ought  to  be  worthy  of  our  observa- 


GREECE      &      ROME 241 

tion.  TYhy,  you  will  ask?  Because  he  is  a  gossip  and 
for  that  reason  alone  is  well  worthy  to  figure  in  our 
gallery.  Have  not  gossips  and  curiosity  always  been 
considered  a  crime,  especially  on  the  part  of  barbers? 
Has  not  tittle-tattle  always  been  the  very  letter  and 
spirit  of  that  calling?  And  the  anecdote  of  the  barber 
who  demanded  of  an  unknown  customer  "How  shall  I 
shave  you?"  received  in  response  these  words  of  Spartan 
brevity:  " Without  speaking/'  Is  this  not  vouched  for 
by  no  less  an  authority  than  Plutarch,  and  is  it  not  always 
as  new  as  the  latest  gossip  in  the  corner  barber  shop? 

In  connection  with  the  barber  shops,  we  are  also 
bound  to  mention  the  stalls  of  the  perfumers  (nyropolia) 
and  also  those  of  the  doctors  (medicinae).  There  also 
among  the  Roman  empirics,  who  did  not  content  them 
selves  with  prescribing  drugs,  but  who  also  prepared 
those  which  they  sold,  with  their  own  hands.  There,  I 
repeat,  in  the  stalls  of  the  doctors,  like  those  of  our 
apothecaries,  dudes,  dandies,  and  novelists  congregated. 
And  we  may  also  suspect  that  other  frequenters,  more 
sombrely  intentioned,  were  to  be  found  there.  .  Did  not 
they  sell,  in  fact,  poisons  which  were  sometimes  used  as 
remedies,  but  which  could  bring  death  as  well  as  health? 
C*I  will  go  to  the  doctor,"  says  a  character  in  the  "Mer~ 
cator  of  Plautus,"  "and  there  with  poison  I  will  buy  death 
for  myself." 


242  T  H  E      I  N  N  S      O  F 


CHAPTER  XVL 

Meritoria  in  relation  to  lupanar — Inns  respectable  and  otherwise — 
Nero  again— Apuleius*  spirited  account  of  an  adventure  in  an  inn  of 
the  second  century. 

Next  we  shall  visit  the  meritoria.    They  are  places, 
I  assure  you,  which  you  will  never  be  able  to  know  well, 
no  matter  how  keen  your  curiosity,  except  at  the  expense 
of  your  modesty.    These  are  inns  of  which  the  most 
respectable  savor  somewhat  of  our  family  hotels,  but  of 
which  the  worst  could  scarcely  be  placed  upon  the  same 
level  as  the  lupanars.    In  fact,  the  terms  came  to  be 
almost  synonymous.   A  passage  in  the  Digest  enlightened 
us  completely  as  to  the  difference  between  the  meritorium, 
and  the  ordinary  lodging  house  (by  meritorium  we  refer 
to  the  honest  establishment).     "  There,"  says  TJlpian, 
"lodgers  remain  for  a  long  time  and  are  persons  known 
and  respected,  (in  longum  tempus,  certisque  personis)." 
In  the  other  the  lodger  is  a  transient  from  day  to  day 
(feme  in  dies)  and  is  a  person  unknown  and  uncertain. 
Other  places  there  were  which  belonged  to  this  latter 
class  but  which  were  of  a  lower  order  in  which  chance 
guests  could  rent  a  furnished  room  for  the  night.    These 
places  were  almost  invariably  dangerous.     They  were 
evilly  constructed  and  were  several  stories  high;  more 
crowded  even  than  our  tenements,  and  filthy  beyond 
description.    The  characters  of  their  lodgers  were  usually 
in  keeping  with  the  proprieties  of  the  place.    In  these 
meritoria,  poverty  stricken  families  were  accustomed  to 
live  from  day  to  day,  paying  for  their  lodging  for  a  short 
time  and  at  a  high  rate  and  when  they  were  unable  to 
amass  the  funds  necessary  to  maintain  them,  the  pro- 


GREECE      &      ROME 243 

prietor  ejected  them  without  scruple,  to  rent  another 
lodging  or  to  huddle  in  the  streets  or  in  the  dank  cold 
passageways.  There  flocked  always  the  vagabonds  which 
are  to  be  found  at  all  times  in  all  the  great  cities — a 
class  without  fire  or  roof  (sine  lare  certo)  as  Horace  says 
of  them,  who  roosted  where  they  could  but  lodged  no 
where.  The  women  and  the  children  of  Vitellius  were 
reduced  to  such  straits.  According  to  Suetonius,  ruined 
by  the  gormandising  of  that  glutton,  abandoned  by  hniri 
at  Rome  without  other  resource  than  the  house  in  which 
they  lived,  they  left  it  and  went  to  lodge  in  furnished 
lodgings.  They  did  not  leave  it  until  they  went  to  live 
in  the  imperial  palace  when  Vitellius  became  emperor. 

Tenants  such  as  these,  however,  were  rare  in  such 
lodgings.  Ordinarily,  the  classes  who  lived  in  the  meri- 
toria  were  so  poorly  dressed  and  so  unsociable  and  so 
pitiably  degraded  that  the  legislator  implicitly  declared 
it  fatal  to  propriety  to  live  in  such  a  situation,  and  in  the 
Codex  a  defence  is  based  upon  the  premise  that  a  house 
was  to  be  transformed  into  a  meritorium  or  lodging  house 
with  small  bedchambers. 

For  us,  and  without  doubt  the  legislator  took  the 
same  view,  that  law  is  more  than  a  civil  law,  it  is  also  a 
moral  law:  the  chief  reasons  for  its  passage  were  those  of 
propriety,  as  the  population  common  to  these  meritoria 
was  degraded  and  good  manners  had  to  be  safe-guarded, 
which  could  be  done  by  preventing  the  erection  of  estab 
lishments  where  scandal  and  crime  were  sure  to  originate. 
The  meritoria  were  in  effect  infamous  refuges  where  vice 
and  vicious  practices  flourished  and  crimes  of  luxury 
found  here  the  shadow  of  oblivion  and  the  secrecy  with 
out  which  they  could  not  flourish*  Especially  were  such 
lodging  houses  the  ordinary  refuges  of  adulterers.  The 
scandalous  usage  which  was  made  of  these  commodious 
retreats  became  at  last  so  general,  and  little  by  little  they 


244 THE      INNS      OF 

assimilated  to  themselves  so  completely  the  other  places 
of  debauchery,  that  finally,  as  we  have  said,  the  two 
words  meritorium  and  lupanar  came  to  have  the  same 
meaning.    When  Vopiscus  said  that  the  emperor  Tacitus 
gave  orders  as  to  certain  bad  places  of  the  city  he  refers 
to  the  meritoria;  with  Sparianus  it  is  the  same,  when  he 
cites  the  letter  of  Severus  reproaching  Rogonius  Cellus 
because  the  tribunes  of  his  army  ate  in  the  cook  shops 
but  slept  in  the  taverns  he  uses  a  significant  phrase^ 
"pro  tridinus  popinas  habent,  pro  cubiculis  meritoria." 
Lodging  houses,  as  was  but  natural,  took  also  sometimes 
at  Rome  the  name  meritorium.   Certain  verses  of  Juvenal 
do  not  permit  us  to  doubt  this.    He  shows  us  a  poor 
devil  of  a  traveller  who,  ill  in  a  lodging  house  in  the  most 
noisy  quarter  of  Rome,  where  the  uproar  is  torture, 
dies  then  from  lack  of  sleep;  and  another  who,  tor 
mented  by  his  indigestion,  caused  by  the  meal  which  he 
had  taken  in  that  inn,  lies  upon  his  stomach  and  cannot 
sleep  peacefully. 

To  designate  these  inhospitable  retreats,  the  word 
meritoria  is  used  by  the  satirists.* 

That  which  is  decisive  proof  that  by  meritorium  was 
meant  a  hotel  at  Rome  is  the  fact  that  one  does  not  call 
otherwise  the  immense  asylum,  a  veritable  hotel  of  dis 
abled  soldiers  in  which  at  the  expense  of  the  state  the 
old  wounded  veterans  were  maintained.  This  meri 
torium  stood  upon  the  site  occupied  today  by  the  church 
of  Santa  Maria  in  the  Transtiber. 

However,  the  inn  in  Rome  as  well  as  along  the  roads 
was  generally  called  simply  caupona,  whether  it  savored 
of  the  cabaret  or  not;  again,  the  term  diver sorium  was 
applied  and  sometimes  diverticulum,  because,  forsooth, 
they  were  found  upon  the  side  streets  and  not  upon  the 

*See  page  128  (See  Juvenal  Meritoria). 


GREECE      &      ROME 245 

public  ways  but  at  crossroads.  Tacitus  has  represented 
Xero  as  running  about  in  the  habiliments  of  a  slave, 
the  streets  of  the  city,  the  red  light  district,  and  the 
taverns  and  inns;  and  the  term  which  he  applies  is 
dwerticula. 

An  epigram  of  Martial  has  lent  color  to  the  charges 
frequently  preferred  against  the  innkeepers,  charges 
accusing  them  of  all  manner  of  theft  including  even  that 
of  robbing  the  pack  animals,  owned  by  their  guests,  of 
their  grain  and  fodder. 

"Muleteer,  accept  what  thou  dost  not  give  to  the 
uncomplaining  mules  as,  though  I  do  not  wish  to  give 
you  a  present,  neither  do  I  wish  to  give  it  to  the  land 
lord." 

The  Roman  inn,  fairly  well  provided  along  the  great 
routes,  could  lodge  beast  and  men  at  the  same  time; 
could  give  shelter  at  the  same  time  to  the  host,  to  the 
guest,  servants  and  baggage.  In  the  Menaechmi  of 
Plautus  the  hero  arrives  at  Rome  with  a  considerable 
equipage  which  he  sends  on  ahead  of  him  to  an  inn 
under  the  guard  of  one  whom  he  can  trust  and  also  of 
his  other  slaves;  nor  did  he  retain  those  things  esteemed 
of  greatest  value  in  his  baggage,  and  we  shall  find  it 
also  very  imprudent  to  thus  rely  upon  the  honor  of  an 
innkeeper  and  of  his  slaves* 

All  these  lodgings  came  at  a  high  rate,  but  were  not 
worth  what  they  cost.  Stratilax,  in  the  Truculentus,  a 
man  well  informed,  prevented  such  treatment  for  himself. 
"Hold,"  said  he  to  his  guide,  "I  would  be  led  into  a  tavern 
where  I  would  be  received  badly  for  my  money."  And 
it  was  worse  in  the  suburbs.  Judge  by  what  Harpax  says 
of  the  hag  Chrysis,  the  toothless  and  greasy  hostess 
whom  he  met,  "I  will  go  and  lodge  outside  the  gates, 
at  the  third  tavern,  with  the  old  woman  Chrysis,  gross 
as  a  hogshead,  lame  and  greasily  fat." 


246 THE      INNS      OF 

From  the  propriety  of  this  hostess,  judge  well  that 
of  the  lodging. 

In  the  city  or  in  the  suburbs,  the  majority  of  the 
inns  were  uncleanly,  frequented  by  peoples  of  all  sorts 
and  conditions,  a  medley  of  thieves,  debauchees,  and 
unsavory  lodgers,  and  the  eyes  of  the  prudent  aedile  and 
praetor  were  always  on  them.  Every  day  a  lictor  visited 
suspected  inns  where  espionage  was  thought  to  be  car 
ried  on. 

Many  a  passage  in  Petronius  has  recorded  perhaps 
too  faithfully  the  doings  and  life  of  institutions  such  as 
these,  and  Eumolpus  and  Encolpius  were  as  well  qualified 
to  speak  of  the  things  which  went  on  under  their  eyes 
as  they  were  to  take  part  in  them.  Marcus  Manicius, 
that  hardy  type  of  landlord,  is  as  universal  as  self- 
interest,  and  who  shall  say  that  the  sweet  predaciousness 
of  designing  widowhood  is  more  frequently  imposed 
upon  today  than  it  was  in  the  reign  of  Nero,  when  the 
laws  did  not  protect  it  so  thoroughly.  Apuleius  has  pre 
served  a  spirited  account  of  an  adventure  in  an  irm  of 
the  second  century.  He  had  arrived  at  Hypat^a,  in 
Thessaly,  and  being  a  mystic,  devoting  much  attention 
to  witchcraft  and  magic,  made  the  best  of  the  story  he 
puts  in  the  mouth  of  Aristomanes.  The  passage  occurs 
in  the  first  book  of  the  Metamorphosis  and  runs  as  follows: 

TALE  OF  ARISTOMENES,  THE  COMMERCIAL  TRAVELLER 

"I  am  a  native  of  JEgina,  and  I  travel  to  and  fro 
through  Thessaly,  JStolia,  and  Boeotia,  for  the  purpose 
of  purchasing  honey  of  Hypata,  as  also  cheese,  and  other 
articles  of  traffic  used  in  cookery.  Having  understood 
that  at  Hypata,*  which  is  the  principal  city  of  all  Thes- 

*Hypata.— This  was  a  famous  city  of  Thessaly,  situate  on  the  banks  of  the 
river  Spercheus. 


GREECE      &      ROME 247 

saly,  new  cheese  of  exquisite  flavour  was  to  be  sold  at  a 
very  reasonable  price,  I  made  the  best  of  my  way  to  that 
place,  with  the  intention  of  buying  up  the  whole  of  it. 
But,  as  generally  is  the  case,  starting  unluckily  with  the 
left  foot  foremost,*  all  my  hopes  of  gain  were  utterly 
disappointed.  For  a  person  named  Lupus,  a  merchant 
in  a  large  way  of  business,  had  bought  the  whole  of  it  the 
day  before. 

"Weary  with  my  rapid  journey,  undertaken  to  so  little 
purpose,  I  proceeded,  early  in  the  evening,  to  the  public 
baths,  when,  to  my  surprise,  I  espied  an  old  companion 
of  mine,  named  Socrates.  He  was  sitting  on  the  ground, 
half  covered  with  a  sorry,  tattered  cloak,  and  looked 
almost  another  person,  he  was  so  miserably  wan  and  thin; 
just  like  those  outcasts  of  Fortune,  who  beg  alms  in  the 
streets.  Consequently,  although  he  had  been  my  friend 
and  particular  acquaintance,  I  yet  accosted  him  with 
feelings  of  hesitation. 

"  "How  now,  friend  Socrates,9  said  I,  'what  is  the 
meaning  of  this?  Why  this  appearance?  What  crime 
have  you  been  guilty  of?  Why,  you  have  been  lamented 
at  home,  and  for  some  time  given  up  for  dead.f  Guard 
ians  have  been  assigned  to  your  children,  by  decree  of  the 
provincial  magistrate.  Your  wife,  having  fulfilled  what 
was  due  to  the  dead,J  all  disfigured  by  grief  and  long- 
continued  sorrow,  and  having  almost  cried  herself  blind 
with  excessive  weeping,  is  being  worried  by  her  parents  to 

*Left  foot  foremost. — To  start  on  a  journey  by  putting  the  left  foot  foremost  was 
considered  to  be  especially  significant  of  ill  luck;  so  much  so,  that  the  expression  came 
to  be  generally  used  to  denote  »  bad  omen. 

iGiten  up  for  dead, — "Condamatus  es."  After  a  person  was  dead  it  was  the 
custom  of  the  Romans  to  call  on  him  by  name,  for  the  purpose  of  recalling  him  to  life, 
in  case  he  should  be  only  in  a  trance.  This  ceremony  was  called  "  conclamatio,"  and 
was  generally  performed  while  the  body  was  being  washed,  once  a  day  for  seven  days; 
after  which  period  the  body  was  burnt. 

%Due  to  the  dead. — Ovid,  in  his  Fasti,  b.  L  1.  36,  mentions  ten  months  as  the 
period  assigned  by  Numa  for  widows  to  mourn  the  loss  of  their  husbands. 


248 THE      INNS      OF 

repair  the  misfortune  of  the  family  by  the  joys  of  a  new 
marriage.  But  here  you  come  before  our  eyes  like  some 
spectral  apparition,  to  our  extreme  confusion/ 

"  *O  Aristomenes !'  said  he,  cit  is  clear  that  you  are 
ignorant  of  the  slippery  turns,  the  unstable  freaks,  and 
the  ever-changing  vicissitudes  of  Fortune/ 

"As  he  said  this,  he  hid  his  face,  which  was  crimsoned 
with  shame,  in  his  cobbled  covering  of  tatters,  so  that 
he  left  the  rest  of  his  body  naked.  At  last,  unable  to 
endure  the  sight  of  such  a  miserable  spectacle  of  woe,  I 
took  hold  of  him,  and  endeavoured  to  raise  him  from  the 
ground.  But,  with  his  head  covered  up  as  it  was,  he 
exclaimed,  'Let  me  alone,  let  me  alone;  let  Fortune  still 
enjoy  the  trophy  she  has  erected/ 

€*  However,  I  prevailed  upon  him  to  accompany  me :  and 
at  the  same  time  pulling  off  one  of  my  own  two  garments, 
I  speedily — clothed,  or  covered  him,  shall  I  say?  imme 
diately  after  which,  I  took  him  to  a  bath,  and,  myself, 
applied  to  him  the  requisite  anointing  and  scrubbing 
processes,  and  laboriously  rubbed  off  the  coat  of  filth  with 
which  he  was  defiled.  Having  paid  every  attention  to 
him,  though  tired  myself,  I  supported  his  enfeebled  steps, 
and  with  great  difficulty  brought  him  to  my  inn;  where 
I  made  him  rest  on  a  couch,  gave  him  plenty  of  food, 
cheered  him  with  wine,  and  entertained  him  with  the 
news  of  the  day.  And  now  our  conversation  took  quite 
a  merry  turn,  we  cracked  jokes,  and  grew  noisy  in  our 
prattle;  when,  heaving  a  bitter  sigh  from  the  bottom  of 
his  breast,  and  violently  striking  his  forehead  with  his 
right  hand: 

"  'Miserable  man  that  I  am!5  said  he;  Ho  have  fallen 
into  these  misfortunes  while  intent  on  gratifying  myself 
with  a  famous  gladiatorial  spectacle.  For,  as  you  are 
very  well  aware,  I  went  to  Macedonia  on  an  affair  of 
business;  and  after  being  detained  there  for  the  space  of 


GREECE      &      ROME 249 

ten  months,  I  was  on  my  return  homewards,  having 
gained  a  very  pretty  sum  of  money.  I  had  nearly  reached 
Larissa,*  which  I  had  included  in  my  route  forthepurpose 
of  seeing  the  spectacle  I  mentioned,  when  I  was  attacked 
by  some  desperate  robbers,  in  a  lonely  and  rugged  valley, 
and  only  effected  my  escape,  after  being  plundered  by 
them  of  all  I  possessed.  Being  thus  reduced  to  extreme 
distress,  I  betook  myself  to  a  certain  woman  named 
Meroe,  who  kept  a  tavern,  and  who,  though  old,  was 
remarkably  engaging;  and  to  her  I  related  the  circum 
stances  of  my  lengthened  absence,  of  my  earnest  desire 
to  reach  home,  and  of  my  being  plundered  of  my  property 
on  that  day.  After  I,  unfortunate  wretch,  had  related 
such  particulars  as  I  remembered,  she  treated  me  with 
the  greatest  kindness,  supplied  me  with  a  good  supper, 
all  for  nothing.  But  from  the  very  moment  that  I,  un 
happy  man,  first  saw  her,  my  mind  contracted  a  lasting 
malady;  and  I  even  made  her  a  present  of  those  garments 
which  the  robbers,  in  their  humanity,  had  left  me  to 
cover  my  nakedness.  I  likewise  presented  her  with  the 
little  earnings  I  made  by  working  as  a  cloak-maker  while 
I  was  yet  in  good  condition  of  body;  until  at  length  this 
worthy  partner,  and  ill  fortune  together,  reduced  me  to 
that  state  in  which  you  just  saw  me.* 

"  *By  Pollux,  then,*  said  I,  'you  deserve  to  suffer 
extreme  misfortunes,  if  there  is  anything  still  more 
extreme  than  that  which  is  most  extreme,  for  having 
preferred  the  pleasures  of  dalliance  and  a  wrinkled  harlot, 
to  your  home  and  children/ 

"  'Hush!  hush!*  said  he,  raising  his  forefinger  to  his 
mouth,  and  looking  round  with  a  terror-stricken  counte 
nance  to  see  if  he  might  speak  with  safety;  *  Forbear  to 
revile  a  woman  skilled  in  celestial  matters,  lest  you  do 
yourself  an  injury  through  an  intemperate  tongue/ 

*Laris8a. — A  city  of  Thessaly,  situated  near  the  river  Feneus. 


250  THE      INNS      OF 

"  'Say  you  so?*  said  I.  'What  kind  of  a  woman  is 
this  tavern  keeper,  so  powerful  and  queenly?" 

"  'She  is  a  sorceress/  he  replied,  'and  endowed  with 
powers  divine;  she  is  able  to  draw  down  the  heavens,  to 
uplift  the  earth,  to  harden  the  running  water,  to  dissolve 
mountains,  to  raise  the  shades  of  the  dead,  to  dethrone 
the  Gods,  to  extinguish  the  stars,  and  to  illumine  the 
depths  of  Tartarus  itself/ 

"  'Come,  come/  said  I,  *do  draw  asunder  this  tragic 
curtain*  and  fold  up  the  theatric  drop-scene,  and  let's  hear 
your  story  in  ordinary  parlance/ 

**  ' Should  you  like/  said  he,  'to  hear  of  one  or  two,  ay, 
or  a  great  many  of  her  performances?  Why,  as  for 
making  not  only  her  fellow-countrymen  love  her  to  dis 
traction,  but  the  Indians  even,  or  the  inhabitants  of  both 
the  JEthiopias,f  and  even  the  AntichthonesJ  themselves; 
these  are  only  the  leaves,  as  it  were,  of  her  art,  and  mere 
trifles.  Listen,  then,  and  hear  what  she  has  performed 
in  the  presence  of  many  witnesses*  By  a  single  word 
only,  she  changed  a  lover  of  hers  into  a  beaver,  for  having 
been  connected  with  another  woman.  She  likewise 
changed  an  innkeeper,  who  was  her  neighbour  and  of 
whom  she  was  envious  on  that  account,  into  a  frog;  and 
now  the  old  fellow,  swimming  about  in  a  cask  of  his  own 

*Tragic  curtain. — The  "siparium"  was  a  piece  of  tapestry,  stretched  on  a 
frame,  and,  rising  before  the  stage,  answered  the  same  purpose  as  the  curtain  or 
drop-scene  with  us  in  concealing  the  stage  till  the  actors  appeared.  Instead  of 
drawing  up  this  curtain  to  discover  the  stage  and  actors,  according  to  our  present 
practice,  it  was  depressed  when  the  play  began,  and  fell  beneath  the  level  of  the 
stage;  whence  "  aukea  premuntur,"  meant  that  the  play  had  commenced.  "Aulsea " 
seems  here  to  mean  the  stage  curtain,  which  divided  in  the  middle  and  was  drawn 
aside:  while  the  "siparium"  would  more  nearly  correspond  with  our  drop-scene. 

jThe  JEthiopiag.—The  eastern  and  the  western,  separated  from  each  other  by 
the  river  Nile,  which  the  ancients  (as  we  are  informed  by  Strabo,  Geograph.  lib.  ii.) 
considered  as  the  boundary  of  Asia  and  Africa. 

tThe  Antichfhone*.—So  called  from  inhabiting  the  earth  contrary  to  that  on 
which  we  dwell.  Hence  they  are  either  the  same  with  the  Antipodes,  or,  at 
least,  are  those  who  dwell  in  the  inferior  hemisphere  which  is  contrary  to  ours. 


GREECE      &      ROME  _  251 

wine,  or  buried  in  the  dregs,  croaks  hoarsely  to  his  old 
customers,  quite  in  the  way  of  business.  She  likewise 
transformed  another  person,  an  advocate  of  the  Forum, 
into  a  ram,  because  he  had  conducted  a  cause  against  her; 
and  to  this  very  day  that  ram  is  always  at  loggerheads.* 
Then  there  was  the  wife  of  a  lover  of  hers,  whom  she  con 
demned  to  perpetual  pregnancy,  when  on  the  point  of 
increasing  her  family,  by  closing  her  womb  against  the 
egress  of  the  infant,  because  she  had  chattered  scandal 
against  the  witch. 

"  *  After  this  woman,  however,  and  many  other  persons, 
had  been  injured  by  her  arts,  the  public  indignation 
became  aroused  against  her;  and  it  was  determined  that 
on  the  following  day  a  most  dire  vengeance  should  be 
wreaked  upon  her,  by  stoning  her  to  death  But,  by  the 
power  of  her  enchantments,  she  frustrated  this  design: 
and  as  Medea,  having  obtained  by  entreaty  from  Creon 
the  truce  of  a  single  day,  prior  to  her  departure,  burned 
his  whole  palace,  his  daughter,  together  with  the  old  man 
himself,  with  flames  issuing  from  a  garland,  so,  likewise, 
did  this  sorceress,  having  performed  certain  deadly  incan 
tations  in  a  ditch,t  (as  she  herself  lately  told  me  in  a  fit 
of  drunkenness),  confine  all  the  inhabitants  of  the  town, 
each  in  his  own  house,  through  a  secret  spell  of  the 
daemons;  so  that  for  two  whole  days  together,  neither 
could  the  bars  be  wrenched  off,  nor  the  doors  be  taken  off 
the  hinges,  nor,  in  fine,  could  a  breach  be  made  in  the 
walls;  until,  by  mutual  consent,  the  people  unanimously 
cried  out,  and  swore  in  the  most  sacred  manner,  that  they 
would  not  lift  a  hand  against  her,  and  would,  in  case  any 
one  should  fhrnlc  of  so  doing,  afford  her  timely  assistance. 


*Is  always  at  ^ggerheads.--  "Causas  agit."  This  Sir  G.  Head  cleverly  renders, 
"and  gives  rebutters  and  surrebutters  as  lie  used  to  do.** 

^Incantations  in  a  <£&&.—  -Sacrifices  to  celestial  gods  were  offered  on  raised 
altars;  those  to  terrestial  gods,  on  the  ground;  those  to  infernal  gods,inapltorditcL 


252 


THE      INNS      OF 


Being  after  this  manner  appeased,  she  liberated  the  whole 

city. 

"'In  the  middle  of  the  night,  however,  she  conveyed 
the  author  of  this  conspiracy,  together  with  all  his  house, 
that  is  to  say,  with  the  walls,  the  very  ground,  and  all  the 
foundations,  close  shut  as  it  was,  into  another  city,  situate 
at  the  hundredth  milestone  hence,  and  on  the  summit 
of  a  craggy  mountain,  in  consequence  of  which  it  is  de 
prived  of  water.  And,  as  the  dwellings  of  the  inhabitants 
were  built  so  close  together,  that  they  did  not  afford  room 
to  this  new  comer,  she  threw  down  the  house  before  the 
gate  of  the  city,  and  took  her  departure/ 

"  'You  narrate/  said  I,  'marvellous  things,  my  good 
Socrates,  and  no  less  terrible  than  marvellous.  In  fine, 
you  have  excited  in  me  too,  no  small  anxiety,  indeed,  I 
may  say,  fear,  not  inoculating  me  with  a  mere  grain  of 
apprehension,  but  piercing  me  with  dread  as  with  a  spear, 
lest  this  old  hag,  employing  in  a  similar  manner  the 
assistance  of  some  daemon,  should  come  to  know  this  con 
versation  of  ours.  Let  us,  therefore,  with  all  speed, 
betake  ourselves  to  rest,  and  when  we  have  relieved  our 
weariness  by  a  night's  sleep,  let  us  fly  hence  as  far  as  we 
possibly  can,  before  daylight/ 

"While  I  was  yet  advising  him  thus,  the  worthy 
Socrates,  overcome  by  more  wine  than  he  had  been 
accustomed  to,  and  by  the  fatigue  of  the  day,  had  fallen 
asleep,  and  was  now  snoring  aloud.  Shutting  the  door, 
therefore,  securing  the  bolts,  and  placing  my  bed  close 
against  the  hinges,  I  tossed  it  up  well,  and  lay  down  upon 
it.  At  first,  indeed,  I  lay  awake  some  time  through  fear, 
but  closed  my  eyes  at  last  a  little  about  the  third  watch.* 

"I  had  just  fallen  asleep,  when  suddenly  the  door  was 
burst  open  with  too  great  violence  for  one  to  believe  that 
it  was  robbers;  nay,  the  hinges  being  entirely  broken  and 

*Tkird  Watch.— The  beginning  of  this  would  be  midnight. 


GREECE      &      ROME 253 

wrenched  off,  it  was  thrown  to  the  ground.  The  bed 
stead,  too,  which  was  but  small,  wanting  one  foot,  and 
rotten,  was  thrown  down  with  the  violence  of  the  shock, 
and  falling  upon  me,  who  had  been  rolled  out  and  pitched 
upon  the  ground,  completely  covered  and  concealed  me. 
Then  was  I  sensible  that  certain  emotions  of  the  mind  are 
naturally  excited  by  contrary  causes.  For  as  tears  very 
often  proceed  from  joy,  so,  amid  my  extreme  fear,  I  could 
not  refrain  from  laughing,  to  see  myself  turned,  from 
Aristomenes,  into  a  tortoise,*  And  so,  while  prostrate 
on  the  floor,  peeping  askance  to  see  what  was  the  matter, 
and  completely  covered  by  the  bed,  I  espied  two  women, 
of  advanced  age,  one  of  whom  carried  a  lighted  lamp, 
and  the  other  a  sponge  and  a  drawn  sword.  Thus 
equipped,  they  planted  themselves  on  either  side  of 
Socrates,  who  was  fast  asleep. 

"She  who  carried  the  sword  then  addressed  the  other, 
'This,  sister  Panthia,  is  my  dear  Endymion,f  my  Gany- 
mede,t  who  by  day  and  by  night,  hath  laughed  my 
youthful  age  to  scorn.  This  is  he  who,  despising  my 
passion,  not  only  defames  me  with  abusive  language,  but 
is  preparing  also  for  flight — and  I,  forsooth,  deserted 
through  the  craft  of  this  Ulysses,  just  like  another 
Calypso,  am  to  be  left  to  lament  in  eternal  loneliness/ 

"Then  extending  her  right  hand,  and  pointing  me  out 
to  her  friend  Panthia; '  And  there/  said  she,  'is  his  worthy 
counsellor  Aristomenes,  who  was  the  proposer  of  this 
flight,  and  who  now,  half  dead,  is  lying  flat  on  the  ground 
beneath  the  bedstead,  and  is  looking  at  all  that  is  going  on, 
while  he  fancies  that  he  is  to  relate  disgraceful  stories  of 
me  with  impunity.  I'll  take  care,  however,  that  some 

*Into  a  tortoise.— 'From  his  bed  and  bedstead  being  turned  over  him. 

\My  dear  Endymion.— Alluding  to  the  secret  of  Diana  and  the  shepherd 
Endymion,  on  Mount  Latmus. 

%My  Ganymede,— Called  "Catamitus"  in  the  text;  by  which  name  he  is  also 
called  in  the  Mensechini  of  Plautus. 


254 THE      INNS      OF 

day,  ay,  and  before  long  too,  this  very  instant  in  fact,  he 
shall  repent  of  Ms  recent  loquacity,  and  his  present 
inquisitiveness/ 

"On  hearing  this,  wretch  that  I  was,  I  felt  myself 
streaming  with  cold  perspiration,  and  my  vitals  began  to 
throb  with  agitation;  so  much  so,  that  even  the  bedstead, 
shaken  by  the  violence  of  my  palpitations,  moved  up  and 
down  upon  my  back. 

"  *  Well,  sister/  said  the  worthy  Panthia,  *  shall  we  hack 
him  to  pieces  at  once,  after  the  fashion  of  the  Bacchanals, 
or,  shall  we  bind  his  limbs  and  hold  him  prisoner?' 

"To  this,  Meroe  replied — for  I  perceived  from  the 
circumstances,  as  well  as  from  the  narrative  of  Socrates, 
how  well  that  name  fitted  her* — "Rather  let  him  live,  if 
only  that  he  may  cover  with  a  little  earth  the  body  of  this 
wretched  creature/  Then,  moving  the  head  of  Socrates 
to  one  side,  she  plunged  the  whole  sword  into  him  up  to 
the  hilt,  through  the  left  side  of  his  throat,  carefully 
receiving  the  flowing  blood  into  a  small  leathern  bottle, 
placed  under  it,  so  that  not  a  drop  of  it  was  anywhere 
to  be  seen.  All  this  did  I  witness  with  my  own  eyes; 
and,  what  is  more,  the  worthy  Meroe,  that  she  might  not, 
I  suppose,  omit  any  due  observance  in  the  sacrifice  of  the 
victim,  thrusting  her  right  hand  through  the  wound,  into 
the  very  entrails,  and  groping  among  them,  drew  forth 
the  heart  of  my  unhappy  companion;  while,  his  windpipe 
being  severed  by  the  thrust  of  the  weapon,  he  emitted 
through  the  wound  a  voice,  or  rather  I  should  say,  an 
indistinct  gurgling  noise,  and  poured  forth  his  spirit  with 
his  bubbling  blood.  Panthia  then  stopped  the  gaping 
wound  with  the  sponge,  exclaiming,  *  Beware,  O  sea-born 
sponge,  how  thou  dost  pass  through  a  river.5 

*How  weU  that  name  fitted  her. — Ausonius,  Epigram  xix.,  explains  this  allusion. 

You  are  named  Meroe,  not  because  you  are  of  a  swarthy  complexion  like  one 
born  in  Meroe,  the  island  of  the  Nile;  but  because  you  do  not  dilute  your  wine  with 
water  but  are  used  to  drink  it  unmixed  and  concentrated. — K. 


GREECE      &      ROME 255 

"Hardly  had  they  passed  over  the  threshold,  when 
the  door  resumed  its  former  state;  the  hinges  resettled 
on  the  pannels;  the  posts  returned  to  the  bars,  and  the 
bolts  flew  back  once  more  to  their  sockets.  But  I,  left  in 
such  a  plight,  prostrate  on  the  ground,  scared,  naked,  cold, 
indeed,  I  may  say,  half  dead,  but  still  surviving  myself, 
and  pursuing,  as  it  were,  a  posthumous  train  of  reflections, 
or,  to  say  the  least,  like  a  candidate  for  the  cross,  to  which 
I  was  surely  destined:  'What/  said  I,  'will  become  of 
me,  when  this  man  is  found  in  the  morning  with  his 
throat  cut?  Though  I  tell  the  truth,  who  will  think  my 
story  probable?  You  ought  at  least,  they  will  say,  to 
have  called  for  assistance,  if  you,  such  a  stout  man  as 
you  are,  could  not  resist  a  woman.  Is  a  man's  throat  to 
be  cut  before  your  eyes,  and  are  you  to  be  silent?  How 
was  it  you  were  not  likewise  assassinated?  TVhy  did  the 
barbarous  wretch  spare  you,  a  witness  of  the  murder, 
and  not  kill  you,  if  only  to  put  an  end  to  all  evidence  of 
the  crime?  Inasmuch,  then,  as  you  have  escaped  death, 
now  return  to  it/ 

"  These  remarks  I  repeated  to  myself,  over  and  over 
again,  while  the  night  was  fast  verging  towards  day. 

"It  appeared  to  me,  therefore,  most  advisable  to 
escape  by  stealth  before  daylight,  and  to  pursue  my 
journey,  though  with  trembling  steps.  I  took  up  my  bundle, 
and  putting  the  key  in  the  door,  drew  back  the  bolts. 
But  this  good  and  faithful  door,  which  during  the  night 
had  opened  of  its  own  accord,  was  now  to  be  opened  but 
with  the  greatest  difficulty,  after  putting  in  the  key  a 
multitude  of  times. 

"  *  Hallo!  porter/  said  I,  'where  are  you?  Open  the 
gates  of  the  inn ;  I  want  to  be  off  before  break  of  day/ 

"The  porter,  who  was  lying  on  the  ground  behind  the 
door  of  the  inn,  still  half  asleep,  replied,  'Who  are  you, 
who  would  begin  your  journey  at  this  time  of  night? 


256  _  THE      INNS      OF 

Don't  you  know  that  the  roads  are  infested  by  robbers? 
Ay,  ay,  though  you  may  have  a  mind  to  meet  your  death, 
stung  by  your  conscience,  belike  for  some  crime  you  have 
committed,  still,  I  haven't  a  head  like  a  pumpkin,  that 
I  should  die  for  your  sake/ 

"  "It  isn't  very  far  from  day-break,5  said  I;  'and 
besides,  what  can  robbers  take  from  a  traveller  in  the 
greatest  poverty?  Are  you  ignorant,  you  simpleton,  that 
he  who  is  naked  cannot  be  stripped  by  ten  athletes  even?' 

"The  drowsy  porter,  turning  himself  on  his  other  side, 
made  answer,  '  And  how  am  I  to  know  that  you  have  not 
murdered  that  fellow-traveler  of  yours,  with  whom  you 
came  hither  last  night,  and  are  now  consulting  your  safety 
in  flight?  And  now  I  recollect  that  just  at  that  hour  I 
saw  the  depths  of  Tartarus*  through  the  yawning  earth 
and  in  them  the  dog  Cerberus,  looking  ready  to  devour 
me.' 

"Then  truly  I  came  to  the  conclusion  that  the  worthy 
Meroe  had  not  spared  my  throat  through  any  compassion, 
but"  that  she  had  cruelly  reserved  me  for  the  cross,  f 
Accordingly,  on  returning  to  nay  chamber,  I  thought  about 
some  speedy  mode  of  putting  an  end  to  myself:  but  as 
Fortune  had  provided  me  with  no  weapon  with  which 
to  commit  self-destruction,  except  the  bedstead  alone  — 
'Now,  bedstead,'  said  I,  'most  dear  to  my  soul,  who  hast 
been  partner  with  me  in  enduring  so  many  sorrows,  who 
art  fully  conscious,  and  a  spectator  of  this  night's  events, 
and  whom  alone,  when  accused,  I  can  adduce  as  a  witness 
of  my  innocence,  do  thou  supply  me,  who  would  fain 

*Saw  the  depths  of  Tartarus.—  Of  course  in  a  dream.  Just  at  that  hour.—  He 
kncws  all  about  it,  even  to  the  precise  time.  The  promptitude  with  which  the  porter 
decides  from  the  evidence  of  his  dream  that  the  murder  had  been  actually  com 
mitted,  and  at  the  very  moment  when  the  dream  occurred,  is  a  fine  touch  of 
nature.—  K. 


crow.—  The  cross  was  the  instrument  of  punishment  for  slaves  and 
foreigners,  especially  in  cases  of  murder. 


GREECE      &      ROME 257 

hasten  to  the  shades  below,  with  a  welcome  instrument  of 
death/ 

"Thus  saying,  I  began  to  undo  the  rope  with  which 
the  bed  was  corded,  and  throwing  one  end  of  it  over  a 
small  beam  which  projected  above  the  window,  and  there 
fastening  it,  and  making  a  strong  slip-knot  at  the  other 
end,  I  mounted  upon  the  bed,  and  thus  elevated  for  my 
own  destruction,  I  put  my  head  into  the  noose.  But  while 
with  one  foot  I  was  kicking  away  the  support  on  which 
I  rested,  so  that  the  noose,  being  tightened  about  my 
throat  by  the  strain  of  my  weight,  might  stop  the  func 
tions  of  my  breath;  the  rope,  which  was  old  and  rotten, 
broke  asunder,  and  falling  from  aloft,  I  tumbled  with 
great  force  upon  Socrates  (for  he  was  lying  close  by),  and 
rolled  with  him  on  to  the  floor. 

"Lo  and  behold!  at  the  very  same  instant  the  porter 
burst  into  the  room,  bawling  out,  *  Where  are  you,  you 
uneasy  traveler  who  were  in  such  monstrous  haste  to  be 
off  at  midnight,  and  now  lie  snoring,  rolled  up  in  the 
bed-clothes?' 

"At  these  words,  whether  awakened  by  my  fall,  or  by 
the  discordant  notes  of  the  porter,  I  know  not,  Socrates 
was  the  first  to  start  up,  and  exclaim,  'Assuredly,  it  is  not 
without  good  reason  that  all  travellers  detest  these 
hostlers.  For  this  troublesome  fellow,  intruding  so  im 
pertinently,  with  the  intention,  no  doubt,  of  stealing 
something,  has  roused  me  out  of  a  sound  sleep,  by  his 
outrageous  bellowing/ 

"On  hearing  him  speak,  I  jumped  up  briskly,  in  an 
ecstasy  of  unhoped-for  joy:  'FaithfuHest  of  porters/ I 
exclaimed,  *my  friend,  my  own  father,  and  my  brother, 
behold  Trim  whom  you,  in  your  drunken  fit,  falsely  accused 
me  of  having  murdered/  So  saying,  I  embraced  Socrates, 
and  was  for  loading  him  with  kisses;  but  he,  being  assailed 
by  the  stench  of  the  most  filthy  liquor  with  which  those 


258        THE      INNS      OF 

hags*  had  drenched  me,  repulsed  me  with  considerable 
violence.  'Get  out  with  you/  he  cried,  'for  you  stink 
like  the  bottom  of  a  sewer/  and  then  began  jocularly  to 
enquire  the  cause  of  this  nasty  smell.  Sorely  confused,  I 
trumped  up  some  absurd  story  on  the  spur  of  the  moment, 
to  give  another  turn  to  the  conversation,  and,  taking  Vnm 
by  the  right  hand, '  Why  not  be  off/  said  I,  'and  enjoy  the 
freshness  of  the  morning  on  our  journey?*  So  I  took  my 
bundle,  and,  having  paid  the  innkeeper  for  our  night's 
lodging,  we  started  on  our  road. 

"We  had  proceeded  some  little  distance,  and  now 
every  thing  being  illumined  by  the  beams  of  the  rising 
sun,  I  keenly  and  attentively  examined  that  part  of  my 
companion's  neck,  into  which  I  had  seen  the  sword 
plunged.  'Foolish  man/  said  I  to  myself,  *  buried  in  your 
cups,  you  certainly  have  had  a  most  absurd  dream.  Why 
look,  here's  Socrates  safe,  sound  and  hearty.  Where  is 
the  wound?  where  is  the  sponge?  where,  in  fine,  is  the 
scar  of  a  wound,  so  deep,  and  so  recent?' 

" Addressing  myself  to  him,  'Decidedly/  said  I, 
'skilful  doctors  have  good  reason  to  be  of  opinion  that 
it  is  those  who  are  stuffed-out  with  food  and  fermented 
liquors  who  are  troubled  with  portentous  and  horrible 
dreams.  My  own  case  is  an  instance  of  this:  for  having 
in  my  evening  cups  exceeded  the  bounds  of  temperance, 
a  wretched  night  has  been  presenting  to  me  shocking  and 
dreadful  visions,  so  that  I  still  fancy  myself  besprinkled 
and  defiled  with  human  gore/ 

"  *  Tis  not  gore/  he  replied  with  a  smile,  'you  are 
sprinkled  with,  but  chamber-lye;  and  yet  I  too,  thought, 
in  my  sleep,  that  my  throat  was  cut:  some  pain,  too,  I  felt 
in  my  neck,  and  I  fancied  that  my  very  heart  was  being 

*Those  fto0*.— "Lamias"  wee  enchantresses,  who  were  said  to  prowl  about  at 
midnight  to  satisfy  their  lustful  propensities,  and  their  fondness  for  human  flesh. 
They  correspond  very  nearly  with  the  "Ghouls"  mentioned  in  the  Arabian  Nights' 


GREECE      &      ROME 259 

plucked  out:  and  even  now  I  am  quite  faint,  my  knees 
tremble,  I  stagger  as  I  go,  and  feel  in  want  of  some  food 
to  refresh  my  spirits/ 

"  "Look,5  cried  I,  'here's  breakfast  all  ready  for  you;' 
and  so  saying,  I  lifted  my  wallet  from  off  my  shoulders, 
and  at  once  handed  him  some  cheese  and  bread,  saying, 
*Let  us  sit  down  near  that  plane-tree/ 

"We  did  so,  and  I  also  helped  myself  to  some  refresh 
ment.  While  looking  at  him  somewhat  more  intently,  as 
he  was  eating  with  a  voracious  appetite,  I  saw  that  he  was 
faint,  and  of  a  hue  like  box-wood;  his  natural  colour  in 
fact  had  so  forsaken  him,  that  as  I  recalled  those  nocturnal 
furies  to  my  frightened  imagination,  the  very  first  piece  of 
bread  I  put  into  my  mouth,  though  a  very  tiny  bit,  stuck 
in  the  middle  of  my  throat,  so  that  it  could  neither  pass 
downward,  nor  yet  return  upward-  And  then  besides, 
the  number  of  people  passing  along  increased  my  appre 
hensions;  for  who  would  believe  that  one  of  two  com 
panions  could  meet  with  his  death  without  any  harm  done 
by  the  other? 

"  Meanwhile,  after  having  devoured  a  sufficient  quan 
tity  of  food,  he  began  to  be  impatient  for  some  drink; 
for  he  had  voraciously  eaten  a  good  part  of  a  most  excel 
lent  cheese;  and  not  very  far  from  the  roots  of  the  plane 
tree,  a  gentle  stream  flowed  slowly  along,  just  like  a  placid 
lake,  rivalling  silver  or  glass  in  its  lustre.  'Look/  said 
I,  *  drink  your  fill  of  the  water  of  this  stream,  bright  as  the 
Milky  Way/ 

"He  arose,  and,  wrapping  himself  in  his  cloak,*  with 
his  knees  doubled  under  him,  knelt  down  upon  the  shelv 
ing  bank,  and  bent  greedily  towards  the  water.  Scarcely 
had  he  touched  the  dewy  surface  of  the  water  with  the 
edge  of  his  lips,  when  the  wound  in  his  throat  burst  wide 
open,  the  sponge  suddenly  rolled  out,  a  few  drops  of  blood 

*In  his  dodk.— "PaHiolo"  seems  a  preferable  reading  to  "paulnlum." 


260 THE      INNS      OP 

accompanying  it;  and  then,  his  body,  bereft  of  life,  would 
have  fallen  into  the  river,  had  I  not  laid  hold  of  one  of  his 
feet,  and  dragged  it  with  the  utmost  difficulty  and  labour 
to  the  top  of  the  bank;  where,  having,  as  well  as  the  time 
permitted,  lamented  my  unfortunate  companion,  I  buried 
him  in  the  sandy  soil  that  eternally  begirt  the  stream. 
For  my  own  part,  trembling  and  terror-stricken,  I  fled 
through  various  and  unfrequented  places;  and,  as  though 
conscious  of  the  guilt  of  homicide,  abandoning  my 
country  and  my  home,  and  embracing  a  voluntary  exile, 
I  now  dwell  in  JStolia,  where  I  have  married  another 
wife." 

One  must  realize  that  in  accounts  such  as  these,  cir 
culated  in  the  conversation  wherever  people  met,  an 
author  such  as  Apuleius  would  revel,  and  his  fiction  is 
founded  upon  such  episodes,  tinctured  perhaps  by  lore 
from  the  Levant,  or  from  the  more  remote  hamlets  of 
his  native  Africa.  The  perseverance  with  which  such 
peoples  adhere  to  the  customs  of  primitive  hospitality 
has  much  to  commend  it,  and  the  bandits  and  beauties 
in  distress  whom  he  has  introduced  were  as  characteristic 
of  his  age  as  they  are  of  our  own. 


GREECE      &RO  ME  261 


EPILOGUE 

During  the  interminable  number  of  years  which  com 
prised  the  life  of  the  Roman  world  and  through  which  we 
have  conducted  our  readers,  we  have  met  always  the  same 
abuses;  whether  in  tavern,  inn,  or  cabaret,  always  have 
the  scandalous  contraventions  of  honesty  and  morality 
intruded  themselves  into  our  speculations  and  forced 
themselves  upon  our  notice. 

Lechery  in  silk,  lust  in  rags,  vice  generally  unpunished 
and  always  open,  and  unbridled  orgies  that  transcend 
belief,  infamy  and  robbery — all  these  things  taken  to 
gether  may  be  said  to  have  formed  an  integral  part  in  the 
calling  of  the  innkeeper. 

The  spread  of  Christianity,  the  invasion  by  savage 
barbarians,  whose  morals  were  at  first  purer  than  the 
effeminate  serfs  whom  they  subjugated,  the  slow  stran 
gulation  of  internal  commerce;  these  three  things  may,  in 
the  largest  sense  of  the  word,  be  said  to  have  caused  inn 
keepers  and  innkeeping  to  decline  to  a  degree  which 
would  have  scarcely  been  deemed  possible,  and  forced  the 
refectories  of  the  various  religious  orders  to  take  upon 
themselves  the  duties  of  a  hospitality  well-nigh  Grecian 
in  its  purity  and  its  freedom  from  self  interest. 

The  innkeepers  at  Rome  during  the  age  of  Alexander 
Severus  were  engaged  in  open  warfare  with  the  Christians 
and  sought  by  every  means  possible  to  give  the  death  blow 
to  the  new  religion  which  seemed  designed  to  destroy 
their  calling  by  its  austere  and  moral  precepts  of  sobriety. 
But  these  precepts  were  the  main  factors  in  the  destruc 
tion  of  the  ™r>g  and  innkeepers  of  the  early  Middle  Ages, 
and  it  is  scarcely  too  much  to  say  that  such  institutions 
during  that  period  were  to  be  found  in  numbers  only  in 


262 THE      INNS      OF 

the  great  sea-ports  and  centres  of  trade,  designed  upon 
the  one  hand  to  serve  the  interests  of  such  mariners  as 
were  lucky  enough  to  escape  the  pirates,  and  on  the  other 
to  cater  to  the  appetites  of  such  country  rustics  and  louts 
as  were  able  to  run  the  gauntlet  of  mediaeval  highwaymen 
and  assassins  on  market  days  and  occasions  of  f&tes  and 
fairs.*"- 

We  shall  bring  our  account  of  the  inns  of  Greece  and 
Rome  to  a  close  by  relating,  along  with  a  few  other 
incidents,  an  early  chapter  in  the  history  of  Augusto- 
dunum,  now  known  as  Augsburg,  and  the  martyrdom  of 
Affre,  its  patron  saint. 

The  Rhetians  as  a  people  remained  unconquered  for 
many  years,  but  we  cannot  escape  the  suspicion  that  that 
German  province  had  acquired  the  corruption  of  Rome 
before  it  was  subjected  by  her  arms.  Vice  marching  ahead 
had  undermined  the  barbarian  vigor  and  had  prepared  its 
votaries  for  the  sacrifice.  One  lone  tradition  has  come 
down  to  us  dealing  with  this  country  in  the  Roman  epoch, 
and  that,  alas,  is  a  scandalous  tradition  and  deals  with  the 
histories  of  infamous  taverns  even  as  we  have  already 
dealt;  nay  more:  it  shows  us  an  admirable  illustration  of 
the  power  and  example  exerted  by  those  same  precepts  of 
austere  and  moral  sobriety  which  were  the  cornerstones  of 
primitive  Christianity,  ere  it  had  come  to  purify  by  fire 
and  sanctify  by  blood. 

Let  us  then  suppose  ourselves  in  the  last  year  of  the 
reign  of  Galerius,  and  in  the  midst  of  the  last  persecution 
brought  about  to  subjugate  the  Christians.  Gaius  is 
vested  with  the  imperial  authority  of  Augsburg,  the 
tribunal  before  which  must  appear  all  those  confessing 
themselves  Christians  and  refusing  to  sacrifice  to  false 
gods.  Among  the  women  identified  with  the  cults  of 
shameless  divinities  which  were  anathema  in  the  nostrils 
of  the  new  faith  we  find  the  daughter  of  Hilaria,  born,  as 


GREECE      &      ROME 263 

was  her  mother,  in  Cypress.  Affre,  for  that  was  the  name 
of  the  future  martyr,  was,  we  regret  to  say,  a  prostitute. 
But  what  of  that;  what  was  one  to  expect  of  a  priestess  of 
Aphrodite? 

With  the  aid  of  three  young  women  who  came,  doubt 
less,  either  from  Cypress  or  Greece  itself,  Affre  and  her 
mother  opened  at  Augsburg  a  cabaret  on  the  order  of 
those  gay  establishments  conducted  by  Thracian  girls  in 
Athens,  or,  a  finer  comparison  still,  like  those  tasteful 
retreats  conducted  at  Rome  and  its  suburbs  by  Syrian 
harp-girls.  Hilaria  managed  the  house,  Affre  and  her 
companions  ministered  to  the  wants  of  the  patrons. 
" Affre/*  according  to  Tirardin,  who  has  been  instrumental 
in  preserving  this  legend  in  its  entirety,  "Affre  was,  I 
suppose,  the  Phryne  and  the  Aspasia  of  the  municipality 
of  Augsburg.  One  may  easily  conjure  up  a  picture  of  the 
opulent  young  Romans  who  came  to  Augsburg  in  their 
tour  of  duty;  whether  as  praetors  or  in  other  official  ca 
pacity,  sighing  for  the  flesh-pots  of  Italy,  and  looking 
forward  with  disgust  to  a  period  of  barbarous  and  horrid 
isolation  and  dreary  boredom.  What  must  have  been 
their  surprise  at  finding  in  this  forbidding  province  a 
retreat  which  would  have  charmed  Cypress  and  hostesses 
in  whose  company  Pericles  would  have  been  delighted?" 

One  day  there  arrived  at  the  door  of  this  abandoned 
retreat  two  men  of  forbidding  mein  and  grave  counte 
nance.  One  was  the  bishop,  Narcissus,  and  the  other  was 
his  deacon,  Felix.  They  found  here  a  refuge  from  the  per 
secutors  put  upon  their  track  by  the  minister  of  Galerius; 
they  had  seen  this  hostelry,  and  not  believing  it  as 
infamous  as  it  really  was,  they  had  entered,  Affre 
received  them,  "and  as  the  legend  had  it,  believing  them 
to  be  two  travellers  inflamed  with  impure  desires,  she 
invited  them  to  supper  and  prepared  everything  in  the 
manner  usual  and  convenient  to  such  occasions;  but  the 


264 THE      INNS      OF 

bishop,  when  he  approached  the  table,  began  to  pray  and 
sing  hymns  to  the  Lord.  Affre,  stupefied  by  these  words, 
the  like  of  which  she  had  never  heard  before,  demanded  of 
him  who  he  was,  and  he  apprised  her  that  he  was  a 
bishop  of  the  church.  Immediately  she  cast  herself  at  his 
feet  and  cried  out,  "Lord,  I  am  unworthy  to  receive  you, 
and  in  all  the  town  there  is  not  a  single  creature  more  vile 
than  I.  I  am  not  worthy  to  touch  even  the  hem  of  your 
garments/'  "Fear  nothing/'  the  bishop  responded,  "the 
Saviour  was  touched  by  impure  hands  and  remained  un 
stained.  Does  not  the  light  of  the  sun  shine  equally  upon 
sewers  and  immodest  places  and  is  it  contaminated 
thereby?  Therefore,  my  daughter,  receive  in  your  soul 
the  light  of  the  faith  that  you  may  be  purified  from  all 
your  sins,  that  you  may  rejoice  to  have  received  me  in  your 
house/'  "Alas/*  responded  Affre,  "I  have  committed 
more  sins  than  I  have  hairs  on  my  head.  How  shall  I  be 
able  to  wash  away  the  spots?"  "Believe,  receive 
baptism,  and  you  shall  be  saved/'  answered  Narcissus. 
At  these  words,  which  promised  hope  of  salvation  even  in 
this  house  of  shame,  Affre,  radiant  with  joy,  called  in  the 
young  women  who  lived  with  her,  her  companions  in 
luxury,  whom  she  wished  also  to  make  her  companions  in 
a  life  of  purity.  They  entered,  and  viewed  with  pious 
respect  the  holy  man  in  their  shrine.  "  This  man  who  has 
come  among  us,"  she  told  them,  "is  a  bishop  of  the 
Christians  and  he  has  said  to  me  if  you  will  believe  in 
Christ  and  receive  baptism,  all  your  sins  shall  be  forgiven 
you.  What  do  you  think?"  And  the  three  priestesses, 
Digna,  Eumenia,  and  Euprepia,  responded,  "you  are  our 
mistress;  we  have  followed  you  in  vice,  why  should  we  not 
follow  you  to  procure  pardon  for  our  sins?"  And  after 
these  words,  that  night,  which  as  all  the  others  would 
without  doubt  have  been  passed  in  an  orgy,  was  passed 
by  these  repentant  daughters  in  all  the  fervors  of  prayer, 


GREECE      &      ROME 265 

under  the  eyes  and  extended  hands  of  the  bishop*  The 
morning  came,  Affre  apprised  her  mother,  Hilaria,  of  the 
presence  of  the  holy  man,  she  experienced  the  charm  of 
his  conversation  and  the  old  courtesan  was  filled  with 
grace,  and  placed  all  her  hopes  of  heaven  in  the  blessings 
of  the  bishop.  Not  only  did  she  consent  to  give  him 
sanctuary  in  a  house  which  she  possessed  near  the  inn, 
but  when  Affre  said  to  her,  "It  is  well,  tonight  I  will  bring 
you  to  him,"  she  cried  out  full  of  joy,  "  bring  him  immedi 
ately  lest  he  refuse  what  thou  askest." 

Thus  it  was  that  day,  Narcissus,  conducted  by  Affre 
to  the  house  near  the  infamous  resort  which  his  presence 
had  so  miraculously  sanctified,  was  brought  into  the 
presence  of  Hilaria  to  whom  he  brought  an  equally 
poignant  gladness.  The  old  Cyprian  fell  at  his  knees  and 
during  three  hours,  so  says  the  tale,  she  made  the  curtain 
hoops  ring  with  her  cries,  "I  pray  you,  O  Lord,  vouchsafe 
that  I  shall  be  purified  of  my  sins." 

Here  the  legend,  as  is  customary  in  these  sorts  of 
tales,  introduces  the  devil,  who  is  to  strive  to  annul  all  that 
the  bishop  has  accomplished  and  "to  prevent  Narcissus 
from  obtaining  such  rich  prey  as  the  four  friends  whom  he 
had  uplifted  in  a  single  night  in  the  inn  of  Affre,  by  in 
sinuating  the  advisability  of  spending  another  night  alone 
with  the  four  friends  in  that  retreat  of  pleasure.  Narcissus 
refused,  fearing  lest  the  sinners,  with  difficulty  brought 
into  the  faith,  should  backslide  in  the  hours  of  darkness 
devoted  ordinarily  to  impurity,  and  the  demon,  van 
quished,  took  his  departure. 

On  the  following  day  Affre,  her  servants  and  her 
mother,  were  baptized. 

But  all  too  soon  the  soldiers  of  Gaius  surrounded  the 
inn  of  Affre,  seized  the  new  Christian,  brought  her  before 
the  Roman  commander,  who  threatened  to  have  her 
burned  to  death  unless  she  sacrificed  to  the  gods.  She 


266       THE      INNS      OF 

refused,  and  was  taken  to  an  island  in  the  LeK,  where, 
lashed  to  a  stake,  she  died,  praying  to  her  God. 

"During  all  this,  Digna,  Eumenia,  and  Euprepia,  who 
had  been  slaves,  sinners,  even  as  she,  and  baptized  with 
her  by  the  holy  bishop  Narcissus,  were  down  at  the  river. 
They  passed  over  to  the  island  and  found  the  corpse  of 
the  holy  Affre  unmutilated.  A  boy  who  was  with  them 
recrossed  the  river  by  swimming  and  carried  the  news  to 
Hilaria,  the  mother  of  the  martyr.  She  went  at  night  with 
the  priests  of  God,  took  up  the  body  and  interred  it  two 
miles  from  the  town  in  a  sepulchre  which  she  had  built  for 
herself  and  hers*  Gaius,  who  had  been  apprised  of  this, 
sent  her  a  messenger  with  orders  to  persuade  her  to 
sacrifice  if  it  should  be  possible;  if  not,  to  slay  her  in  the 
same  sepulchre.  The  soldiers,  after  having  employed  in 
vain  promises  and  threats,  and  finding  them  firm  in 
refusing  the  sacrifice,  filled  the  sepulchre  with  fagots  and 
dry  pine  cones,  set  them  afire,  and  departed.  Therefore 
the  same  day  which  saw  the  holy  Affre  canonized, 
witnessed  also  the  martyrdom  of  her  mother  and  her  three 
servants,"  as  Fleury  has  related. 

A  little  after  this  same  epoch  in  which  the  martyrdom 
of  the  holy  Affre,  hotel  hostess  and  courtesan,  prepared 
the  way  by  her  pious  example  for  the  conversion  of  the 
German  provinces,  there  was  born  and  grew  up  in  a  little 
inn  in  Sicily  a  holy  woman  who  was  able  more  than  any 
other  to  serve  the  cause  of  the  faith  and  to  open  the  road 
even  to  the  imperial  throne.  I  refer  to  the  holy  Helena, 
the  mother  of  Constantine  the  Great.  She  was  born  in 
the  third  century  in  the  village  of  Drepanum,  a  village 
which  Justinian  in  memory  of  her  so  richly  embellished 
and  which  he  called  Helenopolus.  Her  father  was  an  inn- 
keeper.  Some  historians,  by  no  means  satisfied  with  so 
humble  an  origin  for  the  mother  of  the  first  Christian 
emperor,  have  attempted  to  cloud  the  issue  and  to  secure 


GREECE      &      ROME 267 

for  Helena  a  more  noble  parentage,  but  the  birth  of 
Helena  in  the  little  inn  at  Drepanum  cannot  be  disputed, 
as  it  has  been  established  by  the  evidence  of  Orosius,  who 
wrote  in  good  faith,  and  thanks  also  to  Entropius,  who 
though  less  explicit,  has  remarked  that  Constantine  the 
Great  was  born  of  a  very  obscure  marriage  contracted  by 
Constantius  ex  obscuriore  matrimonio.  After  them 
Gibbon  has  confirmed  what  we  have  said  of  the  origin  of 
Helena:  "We  are  obliged  to  confess  that  Helena  was  the 
daughter  of  an  innkeeper,"  and  he  adds  in  a  note,  "It  is 
indeed  probable  enough  that  Helena's  father  kept  an  inn 
at  Drepanum  and  that  Constantius  might  lodge  there 
when  he  returned  from  a  Persian  embassy  in  the  reign  of 
Aurelius." 

In  discussing  the  decline  of  innkeeping,  and  the 
change  which  the  rites  of  hospitality  underwent,  as  a 
necessary  corollary,  we  must  give  some  consideration  to 
one  of  the  most  curious  social  conditions  with  which  the 
world  has  ever  been  confronted.  On  one  hand,  we  have 
the  movement  of  the  Christian  revolution,  operating  in 
favor  of  liberty,  enfranchising  poverty,  and  extending  the 
protection  of  the  laws  to  it;  on  the  otlrr,  the  political 
chaos  brought  about  by  barbarian  invasions,  operating  to 
install  new  authority,  the  parent,  as  it  were,  of  a  new 
slavery.  It  was  not  a  case  of  action  followed  by  the 
inevitable  reaction,  for  the  two  contrary  movements  were 
simultaneous,  and  the  singular  combination  born  of  that 
contradiction  has  never  been  thoroughly  studied  and 
understood  by  historians.  The  masters  of  Rome  became 
the  slaves  of  their  conquerors;  the  classes  who  had  known 
nothing  but  slavery  passed  under  the  authority  of  new 
masters,  and  the  ancient  slaves  of  the  Germans  and  the 
Goths  attached  themselves  to  the  destiny  of  their  latest 
owners.  Priests  of  the  church,  stationed  at  the  furthest 
borders  of  the  two  states,  conquering  and  conquered  alike, 


268  THE      INNS      OF 

slave  and  mistress,  owner  and  serf,  formed  an  im 
measurable  complication  which  did  much  to  bring  on  the 
era  which  we  call  that  of  the  Middle  Ages,  and  formed  the 
cornerstone  upon  which  feudalism  rested.  The  various 
degrees  of  servitude  produced  in  their  turn  divers  degrees 
of  vassalage.  So  difficult  was  it  to  annihilate  slavery,  an 
institution  having  its  deepest  roots  in  the  faith  and 
manners  of  the  conquering  nations  and  in  the  laws  of  the 
peoples  conquered,  that  the  very  monasteries  themselves 
were  slaves,  in  the  larger  meaning  of  the  term. 

The  classes  with  whom  we  are  especially  concerned  in 
our  researches,  the  innkeeping  and  tavern-keeping 
classes,  had,  notwithstanding  their  infamy,  come  to  play 
a  major  part  and  exert  a  powerful  influence  in  prolonging 
the  existence  of  pagan  rites,  and  in  aiding  in  their  celebra 
tion,  and  the  determined  opposition  which  Christianity 
encountered  amongst  the  slaves  and  the  vilest  of  the 
rabble,  may  be  accounted  for  by  this  fact.  The  tavern- 
keepers  acted  as  the  trusted  agents  for  pagan  cults  and 
their  establishments  became  the  refuge  of  believers  in  the 
older  religions.  In  fact,  these  Roman  hosts  were  the  born 
enemies  of  Christian  austerity,  they  were  the  priests  and 
ministers  of  the  gods  of  gluttony.  They  saw  themselves 
menaced  in  their  vital  interests  by  a  religion  which  en 
joined  abstinence  and  fasting  upon  their  best  customers. 
Paganism,  with  its  sensual  divinities,  its  orgies,  its 
sacrificial  feasts,  its  libations  in  temple  or  tomb,  was  the 
only  religion  which  they  could  embrace  to  their  advantage 
and,  in  defense  of  it,  they  were  prepared  to  devote  them 
selves,  soul  and  body.  Not  only  did  they  profit  from  the 
debaucheries  which  they  furthered,  but  the  sacrifices  were 
also  highly  advantageous  to  them.  The  popa,  as  we  have 
already  had  occasion  to  remark,  was  always  predaceous, 
and  generally  an  innkeeper.  We  ought  not,  therefore, 
manifest  surprise  when  we  find  a  man  of  such  keen 


GREECE      &      ROME 269 

intellect  and  convenient  principles,  for  the  interests 
involved  in  this  double  calling  required  both,  turning  a 
cold  shoulder  to  the  compliments  of  the  first  Christians. 
He  would  be  among  the  last  to  hold  friendly  intercourse 
with  a  sect  whose  purpose  was  to  crush  paganism,  and,  in 
crushing  it,  to  annul  his  usefulness  to  society. 

As  we  have  said  above,  open  warfare  between  the 
Christians  and  the  innkeepers  was  waged  under  Alex 
ander  Severus,  and  the  Christians  were  so  weak  in 
influence  at  court  and  in  the  means  of  defense  that  only 
with  difficulty  could  they  resist  the  vile  mob  of  roisterers 
gathered  against  them.  The  cause  of  this  crucial  diffi 
culty  was  a  piece  of  land  which  they  had  taken  possession 
of  for  the  purpose  of  building  a  church.  The  corporation 
of  innkeepers  laid  claim  to  this  land,  on  what  titles  we  do 
not  know.  The  affair  attracted  much  attention  on 
account  of  the  malignant  and  animated  clamors  of  the 
tavern-keepers,  to  which,  without  doubt,  the  Christians 
opposed  a  countenance  grave  but  firm.  The  case  came  at 
last  before  the  tribunal  of  the  emperor.  Luckily  for  the 
Christians  it  was  Alexander  Severus,  the  first  prince  whose 
heart  had  ever  opened  itself  to  the  sentiments  of  Chris 
tianity  other  than  to  malign  and  curse  them.  Lampridius, 
his  biographer,  has  reported  the  trial: 

"The  Christians  had  taken  possession  of  a  site  which* 
in  former  times,  had  been  public;  the  innkeepers  laid 
claim  to  it,  and  the  decision  of  Alexander  Severus  was 
that  it  would  be  better  in  every  way  to  consecrate  the  site 
to  the  cult  of  some  god  than  to  let  it  fall  into  the  hands  of 
the  tavern-keepers.'* 

Having  thus  gained  their  cause,  through  the  impartial 
judgment  of  the  emperor,  the  Christians  were  left  in 
possession  of  the  disputed  property  and  proceeded  to 
build  their  church.  Thus  was  the  first  church  built  in 
Rome.  It  was  erected  on  ground  which,  up  to  that  time, 


270    THE      INNS      OF 

had  been  used  by  tavern-keepers  and  claimed  by  them; 
a  tradition  little  in  keeping  with  a  foundation  so  pious. 

The  good  fathers  of  the  church  waxed  bitter  and 
eloquent  on  the  subjects  of  inns  and  taverns,  but  they 
still  would  have  us  believe  that  the  early  progress  of 
Christianity  brought  about  the  downfall  of  the  debauch 
ery,  of  the  divinities  dedicated  to  libertinage  and  orgy, 
and  that  chastity  and  the  symbol  of  the  Virgin  took  their 
place.  One  may  well  believe  that  primitive  Christianity 
was,  if  anything,  a  true  forerunner  of  socialism,  a  pre 
cursor  of  a  sort  of  communism  spreading  to  branches 
through  the  inferior  classes  of  the  Roman  world,  and 
coming  finally  to  dominate  them.  And  why  not?  Was 
not  its  chief  appeal  directed  at  the  social  strata  which 
have  from  the  beginning  of  organized  society  formed  the 
real  basis  of  power?  In  a  remarkable  passage  in  the 
" Destruction  of  Paganism"  the  learned  author  has  this  to 
say:  "One  may  repeat  habitually  that  Christianity  was 
the  religion  of  the  plebes,  the  poor,  the  sad.  In  fact,  it 
was  the  refuge  universal  in  its  scope  of  all  those  suffering 
from  the  imperfect  organization  of  Roman  society;  and 
that  which  was  true  of  that  epoch  was  not  less  so  in  the 
fourth  century,  for,  as  Jerome  remarks,  *The  church  of 
Christ  is  a  congregation  of  the  plebes/  " 

The  growth  of  the  new  sect  was  rapid,  but  its  members 
could  with  difficulty  reconcile  themselves  to  the  necessities 
of  military  life,  and  the  dissensions  with  which  the  Empire 
was  divided  reached  their  climax  under  Julian,  the 
Apostate.  The  social  cosmos,  distracted  with  class 
hatreds  and  religious  dogmas,  became  gradually  less  and 
less  able  to  contend  on  equal  terms  with  the  savage 
barbarian  hosts  of  the  north,  and  when  we  reach  the  age 
of  Arcadius  and  Honorius,  we  find  Italy  overrun  with  the 
hordes  of  Aleric,  and  a  great  official,  Rutilius  Numa- 
tianus,  to  visit  his  paternal  estates  in  Gaul,  was  forced  to 


GREECE      &      ROME 271 

make  the  trip  by  boat,  as  the  country  had  been  so  ravaged 
and  devastated  that  there  were  no  inns  left  in  the  north 
of  Italy.  Commerce  and  trade  languished  and  finally 
ceased  almost  altogether;  travel  was  dangerous  and  was 
only  undertaken  under  the  most  pressing  necessity;  and 
the  religious  monasteries  were  forced  to  take  upon  them 
selves  the  burden  of  hospitality,  a  burden  not  destined  to 
be  lifted  permanently  until  the  rise  of  guilds,  and  the 
necessity  of  marketing  their  products  had  revitalized  the 
inert  intelligence  of  baronial  and  municipal  authority. 
Then  mine  host  comes  again  into  his  own,  and  may  his 
just  reward  be  out  of  all  proportion  to  his  virtues. 


[THE  END] 


INDEX 


PAGE 

Adulteration  of  wines 74 

281 

on 82,228 

Alexander  the  Great 20,  51 

Alexandria 1 

Anarcharsis 91 

Annius  slays  Marcus  Antonius 200 

Aphrodite 14 

Apollo 33,54 

Appian  Way  and  its  lodging  houses. .  117 

Apuleius 192,  215 

Arcadian  merchant  and  his  fate,  an. .  126 

Aristophanes 50, 58,  61,  73, 84 

Aristotle 56,  92 

Assyrian  and  Babylonian  inns 18 

Assyrian  and  Chaldaean  wines 20 

Athenaeus's  specific  for  over-indul 
gence  10 

Athenaeus  on  vintages 12 

Athenian  debauch,  an 217 

Augustus 231 

Aurelian 237 

Aurelian  assassinated  in  a  pot-house . .  110 
Axilos 40 

Babylonians  against  women  selling 

wine 19 

Baths,  splendor  and  wickedness  of . . ,  165 

Beds  of  the  inns  and  taverns 121 

Beers,  perfumed ; 4 

Beers,  methods  of  making 6 

Beers  of  Egypt 4 

Bethlehem,  the  inn  at 24 

Bootleggers  in  Rome 230 

Brigandage  and  thievery  center  around 

inns  and  taverns 127 

Buchon 55,  56 

Byzantine's  love  for  wine 93 

Cabarets  and  low  dives  of  Athens  —  69 

Cabaret  dancer,  the 142 

Cabarets  and  resorts  of  Canopus. ...  11 
Caesar  Germanicus  drives  out  food 

hawkers 226 

Caligula  perfumes  his  body 166 

Canopus 11 

Cassius  Dio 211 

Cato  and  his  sumptuary  laws. . .  172,  229 

traffics  in  wine 238 

Chaucer 11 


PAGE 

Chick-pea  peddlers 207 

Chian  vintage  wines 90 

Cicero  and  Tres  Tabernae 156 

Claudius,  patron  of  the  vilest  inna . . .  104 

Clearchus 95 

Cleopatra 13 

Clodius  murdered  inaninn 15£ 

College  boys  of  the  dark  ages 10 

Commodus,  the  incarnation  of  evil.. .  181 

Constantine 159 

Cooks  and  caterers,  insolence  of 222 

Corinth,  city  of  new  pleasures 82 

Corn  pi  ills  and  millers 163 

Cnossis 4 

Crassus 228 

Croesus 27 

Cyrus 27 

Damsels  of  Tbrace,  the 64 

Dance,  graphically  described,  a 148 

Dancing-girl  gilds 138 

Darius 51 

Demetrius 189 

Demosthenes 67,  91 

Dice  gambling 151, 153 

Dining-rooms    connected    with    the 

baths 168 

Diodorus  Siculus 17 

Diogenes 56,  66 

Diomedes 40 

Dionyshis 54, 56, 83, 149 

Djotomus,  the  "funnel" 91 

Diphilus,  the  comic  poet 88 

Domitian  and  the  liquor  situation. .  .  135 

Drinking  invitations 6 

Drinking  cups 214 

Drunkards  of  Egypt 14 

Egyptian  drunkenness 14 

Etesius 11 

Epicurus 39 

Eustathius 32,  52 

Faleraian  wines 14 

Famous  drinkers 91 

Food  displays  in  restaurants 205 

Food  hawkers 80,  224 

Fruits  at  banquets 146 


PAGE 

Gallus  and  His  love  for  Blanche  the 

dancing  girl 150 

Gluttony,  age  of 222 

Gordian  and  the  baths 170 

Greece  establishes  military  roads  and 

hostelries 52 

Greek  inns  of  the  fifth  century  before 

Christ 53 

Greek  tavern-keepers  tricky 72 

Green  taverns  first  mentioned  by 

Homer 31 

Greek  restaurants 79 

wines  interdicted 238 

Guttlers  and  then*  orgies 133 

Hadrian 132 

Hadrian  and  Florus 182 

Hammurabi 18 

Hebrew  conception  of  hospitality 22 

Heliogabalus,  most  dissolute  of  all 

emperors. 181 

Hellene  hospitality 80 

Hermes 40 

Herodotus  credits  Lydians  with  first 

inna  and  taverns 27 

Heroic  Age,  the 3 

Hesiod 32 

Homer 3, 30,  32,  37,  40,  93 

Horace,  "To  Phidyle" 160 

Horace  derides  the  tavern-keeper 189 

Horace  and  his  nag 119 

Horace  and  his  rustic  Hebes 121 

Hospitalieres 46 

Hot  sausages 81 

Hot  water  drinks  popular 86 

Hyperides 75 

Ice  and  snow  for  drinks 215 

Imperial  travel  diplomas Ill 

Inn  life  in  ancient  Greece 63 

Inns  and  taverns  of  ancient  tunes — 127 

Innkeepers  of  the  better  class 118 

Inns,  terms  used  to  describe  various 
kinds  of 119,130 

Julius  Capitolinus 180 

Juvenal  describes  Roman  tavern 194 

Juvenal  describes  Egyptian  banquet  15 

Kitchens,  descriptions  of 208 

LeoXH 227 

Levantine  hospitality 24 

Lewd  taverns 191 

Love  philtres 139 

Lucan 13,  213 

Lucian 46 

Lucffius 140, 182 

Lucinian  food  laws 173 

Lucullus 229 


PJLGE 

Marcus  Antonius 200 

Martial  frequenter  of  the  taverns  184,  $26 

Martial  at  Ravenna J  22 

Maspero 5,  7,  20 

Menander 55,  73,  93 

Menelaus  entertains  Telemachus, 
earliest  and  finest  example  of  hos 
pitality 31,37 

Mithridates 51 

Murrhine  vase,  the 213 

Nero  compels  Roman  women  to  fre 
quent  and  solicit  in  the  public 


.133 

Nero  and  his  debaucheries 179 

Nero  sings  in  low  cabarets 189 

Nero,  a  night  brawler 106 

Nestor 37 

Nuptial  chambers 171 

Nympheae,  the 170 

Octavian 231 

Orgies  of  Memphis  and  Alesandreia. .  14 

Orestes 29 

Osiris,  inventor  of  beer 17 

Otho  noted  for  his  dissipations 104 

Ovid 231 

Ovid  advises  lovers  to  meet  at  baths.  167 

Pausanias  describes  two  famous  club 

rooms. 83 

Pelusium  wines 6 

Persian  system  of  inns 50 

Petronius 219 

Petronius  saves  Giton 181 

Philostratus  sings  praises  of  cabaret 

girl 186 

Philemon 41 

Philip  of  Macedon 56 

Philoxenos 79 

Plato 27,  34, 52,  77 

Plautus 42, 104, 130, 152, 196,  237 

Pliny 18,121 

Plutarch  on  Greek  inns 64,  85,  237 

Police  regulations 210 

Pollux 54,  62, 72 

Polybius  describes  inns  on  great  roads 

of  Italy 116 

Polygnotus,  famous  paintings  of 33 

Pompeii,  gardens  of 228 

Pompeian  wine-shop,  a 152 

Portable  ovens 80 

Post-houses  on  Roman  roads 108 

Pretty  ladies  of  Athens 76 

Propertius  abandons  himself  to  drunk 
enness 192 

Proxy  and  its  origin,  the 47 

Public  houses  subject  to  espionage. . .  109 
Pyrrhus 97 

Quevedo 219 


PAGE 

Rameses  n,  Egyptian  life  under 7 

Rameses  HI  and  royal  brewery.  . .    .11 

Refrigeration 215 

Religious  feasts  and  festivals £11 

Roman  funeral  feasts 223 

Roman  lawyer,  a 219 

Roman  lupinars 193 

Roman  plebe,  the 208 

Roman  hospice,  a 115 

Roman  circus  and  its  bloody  games. .  103 
Romans  of  better  class  and  taverns. .  99 
Rome  in  decay  and  low  pot-houses ...  11 1 

Romulus  and  Roman  wives 236 

Rutilius 4 

Saturnalia  celebrations 176 

Severus  and  serpent 118 

Severus  murdered  in  Tres  Tabernae. .  157 

Seneca 105,  151,  196,  215 

Signs  of  wine  merchants 201 

Snow,  methods  of  keeping 215 

Socrates  derides  public  houses 58 

Spartan  club-rooms 31 

Spiced  wines  and  sweetened  liquors. . 

211,213 

St.  Augustine 139 

St.  Paul  at  Tres  Tabernae 156 

Strabo  at  Canopus 11 

Stratonice,  the  flute  girl 45 

Suetonius 104 

Sumptuary  laws  of  Corinth 83 

Syrians,  their  vile  professions 137 

Tavern  signs 59, 157 

girls  absolved  from  penalties.  134 

Taverns  with  trap-doors 164 

frequented  by  literati 184 

and  wealthy  classes 125 

and  social  life  of  Italy 98 

of  Egypt 11 

Telemachus 30,  37,  39 

Temple  of  Bacchus 159 

Terence 97 

Tertulian 161 


PAGE 

Theophrastus 44,  57,  64,  70 

Thermopolia,  hot  water  drinks  em 
poriums 85 

Theodocius  purges  Rome  of  thieves 

and  harlots 164 

Thracians  as  tipplers 92 

Thucydides  describes  inns  of  Greece..  46 
Tiberius  squelches  tavern  brawls ....  178 

Titus 110 

Tokens  of  hospitality  in  use 42 

Tokens,  origin  of  the  checking  system  42 
Trimalchio  speculates  in  wine 199 

Ulysses 4 


.................  179 

Virgil  ............................  144 

Yitellius  dissipates  in  low  dives  ......  104 

Vitruvius  .........................  43 

Weights  and  measures  law  ..........  117 

Wine  ceflars  and  kitchens  ...........  107 

Wine  inspectors  ...................  77 

,  .............  11,235 


varieties  of 6, 234 

of  the  Plotemies,  source  of  great 

wealth 10 

vintages 235 

Wines  and  beers,  different  effects  of . .    7 
immense  quantities  consumed. 6, 234 

methods  of  preserving 5 

perfumed  and  spiced 234 

Ethiopia 6 

of  Libya  detestable 12 

of  Sorrentum 234 

Xenophon  encourages  hospitality  in 

Athens 49 

Xerxes's  edict  against  Babylonians. .  76 

Zeus 87,  40 

Zenobia 114 


Epilogue